60-day notice (published)

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices
35.13(a)(2)(iii): AEP submits one
Facilities Agreement re: ILDSA, SA No.
1336 to be effective 8/16/2022.
Filed Date: 6/16/22.
Accession Number: 20220616–5115.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/7/22.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system (https://
elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/
fercgensearch.asp) by querying the
docket number. Any person desiring to
intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance
with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR
385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is
necessary to become a party to the
proceeding. eFiling is encouraged. More
detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: June 16, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–13468 Filed 6–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RD22–3–000]

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1

Before Commissioners: Richard Glick,
Chairman; James P. Danly, Allison
Clements, Mark C. Christie, and Willie
L. Phillips; North American Electric
Reliability Corporation; Order
Approving Modifications to the
Compliance Section of Reliability
Standard CIP–014
1. On February 16, 2022, the North
American Electric Reliability
Corporation (NERC), the Commissioncertified Electric Reliability
Organization (ERO), submitted a
petition seeking approval of Reliability
Standard CIP–014–3, which would
modify the compliance section of
Reliability Standard CIP–014–2
(Physical Security). The proposed
modification would eliminate a
provision requiring that all evidence
demonstrating compliance with this
Reliability Standard should be retained
at the transmission owner’s or
transmission operator’s facility. As
discussed in this order, we approve
NERC’s petition.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:26 Jun 23, 2022

Jkt 256001

I. Background
A. Section 215 and Mandatory
Reliability Standards
2. Section 215 of the Federal Power
Act (FPA) requires a Commissioncertified ERO to develop mandatory and
enforceable Reliability Standards,
subject to Commission review and
approval. The ERO is obligated to file
each Reliability Standard or
modification to a Reliability Standard
that it proposes to be made effective
with the Commission.1 Reliability
Standards may be enforced by the ERO,
subject to Commission oversight, or by
the Commission independently.2
Pursuant to section 215 of the FPA, the
Commission established a process to
select and certify an ERO,3 and
subsequently certified NERC.4
B. Currently Effective Reliability
Standard CIP–014–2
3. Reliability Standard CIP–014–2,
which applies to transmission owners
and transmission operators, is designed
to ‘‘identify and protect Transmission
stations and Transmission substations,
and their associated primary control
centers, that if rendered inoperable or
damaged as a result of a physical attack
could result in widespread instability,
uncontrolled separation, or Cascading
within an Interconnection.’’ 5 Pursuant
to the Reliability Standard, transmission
owners must perform an initial and
subsequent risk assessments to identify
the transmission stations and
substations that, if rendered inoperable
or damaged could result in instability,
uncontrolled separation, or cascading
within an Interconnection, and is
subject to a third party verification.
Transmission owners that control
identified facilities must conduct an
evaluation of the potential threats and
vulnerabilities of a physical attack to
transmission stations and substation, as
well as primary control centers, develop
and implement a documented physical
security plan and have a third-party
review of the evaluation.
1 16

U.S.C. 824o(d)(1).
824o(e).
3 Rules Concerning Certification of the Elec.
Reliability Org.; & Procedures for the Establishment,
Approval, & Enforcement of Elec. Reliability
Standards, Order No. 672, 114 FERC ¶ 61,104, order
on reh’g, Order No. 672–A, 71 FR 19814 (April 18,
2006),114 FERC ¶ 61,328 (2006).
4 N. Am. Elec. Reliability Corp., 116 FERC
¶ 61,062, order on reh’g and compliance, 117 FERC
¶ 61,126 (2006), aff’d sub nom. Alcoa, Inc. v. FERC,
564 F.3d 1342 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
5 NERC Reliability Standard CIP–014–2 (Physical
Security), Purpose.
2 Id.

PO 00000

Frm 00040

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

37847

C. NERC Petition for Modifications to
the Compliance Section of Reliability
Standard CIP–014
4. NERC proposes to remove section
C.1.1.4., Additional Compliance
Information, from the compliance
section of the currently effective
Reliability Standard CIP–014–2
(Physical Security) that requires all
evidence demonstrating compliance
with this Reliability Standard to be
retained at the transmission owner’s or
transmission operator’s facility in order
to protect the entity’s confidential
information.6 NERC states that the
proposed change applies only to the
compliance section of Reliability
Standard CIP–014–2, and proposes no
changes in the mandatory and
enforceable Requirements of Reliability
Standard CIP–014–2. According to
NERC, the provision presents challenges
to effective and efficient compliance
monitoring and is not necessary to
protect the confidentiality of Reliability
Standard CIP–014–2 compliance
evidence.7
5. NERC states that the ‘‘Additional
Compliance Information’’ provision in
the compliance section of CIP–014 was
added to address heightened concerns
regarding the protection of CIP–014
evidence. However, NERC has
determined that it should no longer treat
CIP–014 evidence any differently than
other sensitive evidence it collects
during its Compliance Monitoring and
Enforcement Program (CMEP)
activities.8 With the advent of the ERO
Secure Evidence Locker (SEL), NERC
asserts that it has a secure means of
collecting and analyzing CIP–014
evidence in the same manner as any
other sensitive evidence collected as
part of CMEP activities.14
6. NERC explains that if the change is
approved, it will no longer treat
Reliability Standard CIP–014 evidence
any differently than other sensitive
evidence it collects during its
compliance activities.9 NERC plans to
use its SEL to support data and
information handling, and it explains
that it has developed the SEL for
temporary storage of all registered entity
compliance evidence.10 According to
NERC, the SEL enables a registered
entity to securely submit evidence
6 NERC Petition at 1. Section C.1.1.4., Additional
Compliance Information states:
Confidentiality: To protect the confidentiality and
sensitive nature of the evidence for demonstrating
compliance with this standard, all evidence will be
retained at the Transmission Owner’s and
Transmission Operator’s facilities.
7 NERC Petition at 1.
8 Id. at 5–6.
9 Id.
10 Id. at 6.

E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM

24JNN1

37848

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1

through an encrypted session; the
evidence is encrypted immediately
upon submission, securely isolated per
registered entity, never extracted, never
backed up, and subject to proactive and
disciplined destruction policies. NERC
submits that the SEL provides security
advantages to ensure proper protection
and chain-of-custody management of
the submitted evidence for CIP–014
compliance.
7. NERC requests that the
modification to the Reliability Standard
become effective on the date of
Commission approval.
II. Notice of Filing and Responsive
Pleadings
8. Notice of NERC’s February 16, 2022
Petition was published in the Federal
Register, 87 FR 11061 (Feb. 28, 2022),
with interventions and protests due on
or before March 15, 2022. The Edison
Electric Institute (EEI) filed a timely
motion to intervene and comments. On
March 21, 2022, NERC submitted a
request to submit reply comments and
reply comments (NERC Answer). On
March 30, 2022, EEI filed a motion for
leave to answer and answer (EEI
Answer).
9. EEI opposes NERC’s petition and
maintains that Reliability Standard CIP–
014 requires data collection for
industry’s most sensitive assets and,
therefore, the compliance provision
should be retained so that NERC
continues to review compliance
evidence for this Reliability Standard
only on-site at the registered entities for
the most sensitive data.11 EEI explains
that the information retained under this
compliance requirement is of a critical
and highly sensitive nature, and some
information provided for Reliability
Standard CIP–014 compliance is only
available to a small set of personnel on
a need-to-know basis within EEI
member companies.12 According to EEI,
its members go to great lengths to
protect the identity of the assets and
other sensitive information by using
alternative anonymous names both in
internal and external discussions.
Further, EEI expresses security concerns
related to the use of SEL, arguing that
the SEL increases the risk of aggregated
industry information falling into the
hands of a nation state or bad actor.13
EEI argues that ease of access cannot
take precedence over the safety,
security, and reliability of the electric
grid.
10. NERC asserts in its answer that the
proposed modification would not
11 EEI
12 Id.

Comments at 1.
at 5.

13 Id.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:26 Jun 23, 2022

Jkt 256001

decrease the protection of any highly
sensitive compliance evidence, but it is
needed to ensure compliance
monitoring with Reliability Standard
CIP–014.14 Among other arguments,
NERC explains that there will be limited
CIP–014 evidence aggregated in the SEL
at any given time.15 Further, NERC
elaborates that a registered entity may
choose to develop its own SEL rather
than use NERC’s SEL, or use NERC’s
exceptions process, which allows
registered entities to collaborate with
the compliance authority on alternative
submittal methods.
11. Finally, NERC states that over the
last two years, due to pandemic
restrictions, in some instances registered
entities refused on-site access for
compliance monitoring.16 In addition,
certain entities also refused to allow a
review of evidence using a secure
videoconferencing platform. NERC
believes that ‘‘[t]he end result was
increased risk, in certain instances,
because [NERC and the Regional
Entities] had no mechanism with which
to monitor compliance with CIP–014
until the entity, at its own discretion,
lifted its pandemic-related
restriction.’’ 17
12. In its answer, EEI argues that more
flexibility should be given to registered
entities to select the most secure
methods for providing CIP–014
compliance data. In particular, EEI
states that, if agreed to by a registered
entity’s Compliance Enforcement
Authority, ‘‘secure videoconferencing is
an attractive and equally effective and
efficient alternative to using the ERO
SEL and one that EEI members would
welcome.’’ 18 EEI notes, however, that
certain entities may prefer to use their
own videoconferencing tools, as
opposed to an ERO-based tool, ‘‘because
in doing so they have an understanding
of, and confidence in, the security
measures that have been
implemented.’’ 19 Further, because
many registered entities’ corporate
security access management programs
require training, background checks,
and monitoring of third-party access,
EEI believes that some registered
entities may be unable to use their own
SEL to submit compliance information
if NERC or Regional Entity compliance
personnel are unable or unwilling to
meet their SEL security access
requirements.20 EEI also expresses
14 NERC

Answer at 1.
at 2–3.
16 Id. at 3–4.
17 Id. at 4.
18 EEI Answer at 2.
19 Id.
20 Id. at 2–3.
15 Id.

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4703

concern with the length of time NERC
will keep compliance information in the
SEL, as entities have no way of verifying
whether it has been deleted.
III. Determination
A. Procedural Matters
13. Pursuant to Rule 214 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2021), EEI’s
timely, unopposed motion to intervene
serve to make it a party to this
proceeding.
14. Rule 213(a)(2) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.213(a)(2) (2021),
prohibits an answer to a protest or
answer unless otherwise ordered by the
decisional authority. We accept NERC’s
and EEI’s answers because they have
provided information that assisted us in
our decision-making process.
B. Substantive Matters
15. As discussed below, we find that
the proposed removal of the evidence
retention provision in section C.1.1.4 of
the compliance section of Reliability
Standard CIP–014–2 is just, reasonable,
not unduly discriminatory or
preferential, and in the public interest.
The modification will allow NERC to
monitor compliance more effectively
without compromising the
confidentiality of sensitive information.
Accordingly, we approve NERC’s
petition.
16. Reliability Standard CIP–014–2,
compliance section C.1.1.4., Additional
Compliance Information, currently
requires compliance personnel and
auditors (and enforcement staff if a
potential noncompliance is identified)
to be physically present at an entity’s
facility to review evidence of
compliance. As NERC’s petition
explains, this requirement presented
challenges during the pandemic, when
auditors could not access certain
entities’ facilities in person and in some
instances were prevented from
reviewing the evidence remotely.21
17. We recognize that Reliability
Standard CIP–014–2 requires data
collection for industry’s sensitive assets
and that therefore the data should be
handled in a secure manner. However,
while section C.1.1.4 may have
provided necessary protection in the
past, we are persuaded by NERC’s
explanation that its SEL now offers a
secure and more flexible alternative for
compliance evidence collection and
review for Reliability Standard CIP–
014–2.
18. Moreover, we are not persuaded
by EEI’s comments seeking to retain the
21 NERC

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM

Petition at 7; NERC Answer at 3.

24JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices
on-site viewing requirement. First,
contrary to EEI’s suggestion in its
comments, the use of the SEL is not
novel and untested. In NERC’s petition
requesting funding for the SEL, which
was filed in June 2020, NERC explained
that the use of an evidence locker was
a practice already in place for at least
two Regional Entities to collect evidence
associated with Critical Infrastructure
Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards.22
Before deciding to implement the SEL,
NERC consulted with industry and
discussed security concerns related to
evidence collection.23 Also, NERC has
been using the SEL to access
compliance evidence for the other CIP
Reliability Standards, which indicates
that it is a well-established and secure
method of evidence review. Restricting
auditor review to on-site only when
there is a secure alternative impairs the
auditor’s ability to perform in-depth
review of the evidence and could result
in increased risk due to lack of adequate
or timely compliance monitoring.
19. Further, we are not persuaded by
EEI’s argument that the SEL increases
the risk of aggregated industry
information falling into the hands of a
nation-state or bad actor. Once evidence
is submitted through an SEL encrypted
session, it is immediately encrypted and
cannot be extracted, is not backed up,
and is subject to proactive and
disciplined destruction policies, as well
as being separated by registered entity.24
NERC explained that it will remove the
information from the SEL when the
CMEP engagement concludes.25
20. Finally, as stated by NERC,
entities can structure their own SELs
that adhere to their security measure
requirements. EEI argues that some
registered entities may be unable to use
their own SELs to submit compliance
information if NERC or Regional Entity
compliance personnel are unable or

unwilling to meet the SEL security
access requirements.26 However, EEI
provides no specific evidence of such
situations for other CIP compliance
monitoring engagements or whether
they have led to increased risk of
evidence being compromised. We find
unpersuasive EEI’s objections to NERC’s
offering of a flexible approach to
accommodate entities.
21. Therefore, we find that the
removal of the evidence retention
provision in section C.1.1.4 of the
compliance section of Reliability
Standard CIP–014–2 will allow NERC to
monitor compliance more effectively
without compromising the
confidentiality of sensitive information.
Accordingly, we approve NERC’s
petition and accept the proposed
Reliability Standard CIP–014–3, to
become effective on the date of issuance
of this order.
IV. Information Collection Statement
22. In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A), the Commission is
soliciting public comment on revisions
to the information collection FERC–
725U, Mandatory Reliability Standards
for the Bulk Power System; CIP
Reliability Standards; which will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for a review of the
information collection requirements.
Comments on the collection of
information are due within 60 days of
the date this order is published in the
Federal Register. Respondents subject
to the filing requirements of this order
will not be penalized for failing to
respond to these collections of
information unless the collections of
information display a valid OMB
control number.

37849

23. The information collection
requirements are subject to review by
the OMB under section 3507(d) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.27
OMB’s regulations require approval of
certain information collection
requirements imposed by agency
rules.28 The Commission solicits
comments on the Commission’s need for
this information, whether the
information will have practical utility,
the accuracy of the burden estimates,
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected
or retained, and any suggested methods
for minimizing respondents’ burden,
including the use of automated
information techniques.
24. The number of respondents below
is based on an estimate of the NERC
compliance registry for transmission
owners and transmission operator. The
Commission based its paperwork
burden estimates on the NERC
compliance registry as of May 6, 2022.
According to the registry, there are 326
transmission owners and 18
transmission operators not also
registered as transmission owners. The
estimate is based on a zero change in
burden from the current standard to the
standard approved in this Order. The
Commission based the burden estimate
on staff experience, knowledge, and
expertise.
25. For the new Reliability Standard
CIP–014–3, the burden for entities
remains the same as they will still need
to provide the same evidence to
demonstrate compliance whether it is
kept on-site or loaded electronically into
the SEL. No comments were received
that expressed a change in the manhour
burden associated with the use of SEL.
26. Burden Estimates: The
Commission estimates the changes in
the annual public reporting burden and
cost 29 as indicated below:

FERC–725U—(MANDATORY RELIABILITY STANDARDS: RELIABILITY STANDARD CIP–014) CHANGE IN BURDEN
Number of
respondents 30

Number of
responses per
respondent

Total
number of
responses

Average burden hours
& cost per response

Total burden hours
& total cost

Average
cost per
respondent

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1

Change Annual Reporting and
Recordkeeping.
Total FERC–725U ........................

344

1

344

32.71 hrs.; $2,845.77 .....

11,252.24 hrs.; $978,944.88 .....

$2,845.77

344

1

344

32.71 hrs.; $2,845.77 .....

11,254.24 hrs.; $978,944.88 .....

2,845.77

22 NERC, Request of the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation to expend funds to develop
the ERO Enterprise Secure Evidence Locker, Docket
No. RR19–8–001, at 4 (filed June 8, 2020) (NERC
2020 Filing); N. Am. Elec. Reliability Corp., Docket
No. RR19–8–001 (June 22, 2020) (delegated order).
23 NERC 2020 Filing at 5.
24 NERC Answer at 2.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:26 Jun 23, 2022

Jkt 256001

25 Id.

at 2–3.

26 Id.
27 44

U.S.C. 3507(d).
CFR 1320 (2021).
29 FERC staff estimates that industry costs for
salary plus benefits are similar to Commission
costs. The FERC 2021 average salary plus benefits
for one FERC full-time equivalent (FTE) is
28 5

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

$180,703/year (or $87.00/hour) posted by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Utilities sector
(available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
naics3_221000.htm).
30 The total number (344) of transmission owners
(326) plus transmission operators (18) not also
registered as owners, this represents the unique US
entities (taken from data as of May 6, 2022).

E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM

24JNN1

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1

37850

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices

Titles: FERC–725U, Mandatory
Reliability Standards for the Bulk Power
System; CIP Reliability Standards.
Action: Compliance update with no
changes to Existing Collections of
Information, FERC–725U.
OMB Control Nos.: 1902–0274(FERC–
725U).
Respondents: Business or other for
profit, and not for profit institutions.
Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
Necessity of the Information:
Reliability Standard CIP–014–3
(Physical Security) is part of the
implementation of the Congressional
mandate of the Energy Policy Act of
2005 to develop mandatory and
enforceable Reliability Standards to
better ensure the reliability of the
nation’s Bulk Power system.
Specifically, the revised standard only
changes the how the evidence is stored.
Internal Review: The Commission has
reviewed NERC’s proposal and
determined that its action is necessary
to implement section 215 of the FPA.
27. Interested persons may obtain
information on the reporting
requirements by contacting the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Office
of the Executive Director, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426
[Attention: Ellen Brown, email:
[email protected], phone: (202)
502–8663].
28. All submissions must be formatted
and filed in accordance with submission
guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov. For
user assistance, contact FERC Online
Support by email at ferconlinesupport@
ferc.gov, or by phone at (866) 208–3676
(toll-free).
29. Comments concerning the
information collections and
requirements approved and associated
burden estimates, should be sent to the
Commission in this docket and may also
be sent to the Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs [Attention: Desk
Officer for the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission]. OMB
submissions must be formatted and filed
in accordance with submission
guidelines at www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Using the search function
under the ‘‘Currently Under Review’’
field, select Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission; click ‘‘submit,’’ and select
‘‘comment’’ to the right of the subject
collection.
30. Please refer to the appropriate
OMB Control Number(s) 1902–
0274(FERC–725U) in your submission.
V. Document Availability
31. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:26 Jun 23, 2022

Jkt 256001

interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the internet through the
Commission’s Home Page (http://
www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s
Public Reference Room during normal
business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
32. From the Commission’s Home
Page on the internet, this information is
available on eLibrary. The full text of
this document is available on eLibrary
in PDF and Microsoft Word format for
viewing, printing, and/or downloading.
To access this document in eLibrary,
type the docket number excluding the
last three digits of this document in the
docket number field.
33. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the Commission’s website
during normal business hours from the
Commission’s Online Support at (202)
502–6652 (toll free at 1–866–208–3676)
or email at [email protected],
or the Public Reference Room at (202)
502–8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email
the Public Reference Room at
[email protected].
The Commission orders:
Reliability Standard CIP–014–3 is
hereby approved, as discussed in the
body of this order.
Issued: June 16, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–13464 Filed 6–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC22–77–000.
Applicants: Wisconsin River Power
Company, Wisconsin Power and Light
Company, Wisconsin Public Service
Corporation.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Wisconsin River
Power Company, et al.
Filed Date: 6/16/22.
Accession Number: 20220616–5185.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/7/22.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers: EG22–146–000.
Applicants: Invenergy Nelson
Expansion LLC.

PO 00000

Frm 00043

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Description: Invenergy Nelson
Expansion LLC submits Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status.
Filed Date: 6/17/22.
Accession Number: 20220617–5043.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22.
Docket Numbers: EG22–147–000.
Applicants: Invenergy Nelson LLC.
Description: Invenergy Nelson LLC
submits Notice of Self-Certification of
Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
Filed Date: 6/17/22.
Accession Number: 20220617–5049.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22.
Docket Numbers: EG22–148–000.
Applicants: West Texas Solar Project
II LLC.
Description: Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of West Texas Solar
Project II LLC.
Filed Date: 6/17/22.
Accession Number: 20220617–5075.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER11–2366–001.
Applicants: Lincoln Generating
Facility, LLC.
Description: Compliance filing:
Informational Filing Pursuant to
Schedule 2 of the PJM OATT & Request
for Waiver to be effective N/A.
Filed Date: 6/17/22.
Accession Number: 20220617–5048.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22.
Docket Numbers: ER11–3110–001.
Applicants: Crete Energy Venture,
LLC.
Description: Compliance filing:
Informational Filing Pursuant to
Schedule 2 of the PJM OATT & Request
for Waiver to be effective N/A.
Filed Date: 6/17/22.
Accession Number: 20220617–5046.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22.
Docket Numbers: ER21–55–000.
Applicants: Mesquite Power, LLC.
Description: Refund Report: Refund
Report—Mesquite Power, LLC (ER21–
55–et al.) to be effective N/A.
Filed Date: 6/17/22.
Accession Number: 20220617–5154.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22.
Docket Numbers: ER21–60–000.
Applicants: PacifiCorp.
Description: Refund Report: April 18
Order Refund Report for ER21–60 to be
effective N/A.
Filed Date: 6/17/22.
Accession Number: 20220617–5098.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–983–001.
Applicants: ISO New England Inc.,
New England Power Pool Participants
Committee.

E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM

24JNN1