Appendix F10 Second Concept Mapping Meeting Facilitator Guide

Appendix F10 Second Concept Mapping Meeting Facilitator Guide.docx

Food Security Status and Well-Being of Nutrition Assistance Program (NAP) Participants in Puerto Rico

Appendix F10 Second Concept Mapping Meeting Facilitator Guide

OMB: 0584-0674

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Shape2

OMB Number: 0584-XXXX

Expiration Date: XX/XX/XXXX


Appendix F.10. Second Concept Mapping Meeting Facilitator Guide

Overview

This guide provides instructions for the facilitators managing the two stakeholder meetings for the concept-mapping study conducted under the Puerto Rico Health and Well-Being Study project. It details the objectives, process, and questions the facilitators will use to gather feedback from the stakeholders.

Meeting 2

The objectives of the second meeting are to—

  1. Assess the results of the sorted and prioritized lists of recommendations.

  2. Gather detailed feedback on the recommendations for the final report.

Instructions and Agenda (10 minutes)

Welcome the stakeholders and thank them for their work.

Briefly review the agenda and the meeting process, explaining that the meeting will cover—

  1. Discussion of sorted and prioritized recommendations

  2. Additional feedback on recommendations

Discussion of Sorting and Prioritization Results (30 minutes)

Begin with the concept maps that illustrate how different groups of stakeholders have sorted and ranked the recommendations. Ask the stakeholders:

  1. What similarities and differences do you see in how different groups of stakeholders have sorted the policy and administrative recommendations?

  2. What similarities and differences do you see in how different groups of stakeholders have sorted the research recommendations?

  3. What similarities and differences do you see in how different groups of stakeholders have ranked the policy and administrative recommendations?

  4. What similarities and differences do you see in how different groups of stakeholders have ranked the research recommendations?

To conclude the above questions, ask:

  1. Do any of the similarities and differences raise any issues or concerns about the consensus on the recommendations?

Review the aggregate prioritized recommendations for policy and research. Ask the stakeholders:

  1. Do you agree with the list of the prioritized policy recommendations?

    1. Should any be moved up or down the list?

    2. Should any be removed from the list?

  2. Do you agree with the list of the prioritized research recommendations?

    1. Should any be moved up or down the list?

    2. Should any be removed from the list?

Feedback on the Recommendations (50 minutes)

Start at the top of the prioritized list of policy recommendations and work through as many as possible in approximately 30 minutes. Explain to the stakeholders that they will help provide additional context and details for each recommendation to include in the final report. Ask the stakeholders:

  1. Do you have any additional details that should be included to further develop this recommendation?

  2. Do you have any suggestions for how to implement it (e.g., funding sources, which stakeholders to involve)?

  3. Do you have any other considerations that should be included in the final report?

Take the final 20 minutes to work through as many research recommendations as possible. Ask the stakeholders:

  1. Do you have any additional details that should be included to further develop this recommendation?

  2. Do you have any suggestions for how to implement it (e.g., funding sources, which stakeholders to involve)?

  3. Do you have any other considerations that should be included in the final report?

At the end of the meeting, thank the stakeholders. Ask for one volunteer to coordinate comments on the final report. Explain that Insight will make the draft report available for review and comment, and the volunteer will help coordinate responses for the stakeholder group.





Public Burden Statement

This information is being collected to assist the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) in understanding food security status and economic well-being among Puerto Rico residents. This is a voluntary collection. FNS will use the information as a baseline for future assessments of food security and the Nutrition Assistance Program, particularly in the context of natural disasters. This collection does not request personally identifiable information under the Privacy Act of 1974. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0584-XXXX. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 90 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314. ATTN: PRA (0584-XXXX). Do not return the completed form to this address.

Shape1

Food Security Status and Well-Being of NAP Participants in Puerto Rico, Appendix F.10. Second Concept Mapping Meeting Facilitator Guide

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorAllyson Corbo
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2023-08-30

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy