Group Survey (Revised)

Evaluation and Monitoring for the National Science Foundation (NSF) Convergence Accelerator (CA) Program

Group Survey (Revised)

OMB: 3145-0276

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
NSF's	Convergence	Accelerator	Group	Entrance	Survey	(Revised)
Welcome!
Welcome	to	the	Convergence	Accelerator!
Participation	in	this	survey	helps	the	Convergence	Accelerator	adapt	to	your	team's	needs	and	evaluate	our	
progress	as	a	program.	This	will	help	us	improve,	and	in	turn	help	every	team	we	serve.	Your	participation	and	
responses	will	not	be	attributed	to	you	without	prior	consent,	and	will	not	influence	any	current	or	future	funding	
award	decisions	made	by	NSF.	Your	participation	is	also	entirely	voluntary.	We	are	still	very	grateful	for	your	help.
You	can	skip	a	question	if	you	don't	know	the	answer,	but	please	try	to	answer	everything	you	can!
Thank	you!	We	value	your	time	and	appreciate	your	participation!!
OMB	Control	No.	3145-XXXX

NSF's	Convergence	Accelerator	Group	Entrance	Survey	(Revised)
Team
1.	What	is	your	team's	number?	Ex:	A123,	X456	

2.	How	many	people	are	currently	working	on	your	Convergence	Accelerator	project,	at	least
half	time?	

3.	How	many	students	or	post-docs	are	currently	involved	with	the	project?	

4.	On	average,	how	long	have	the	team's	PIs	and	Co-PIs	been	working	together	closely?	
Ten	years	or	longer
Five	to	nine	years
One	to	five	years
Six	months	to	a	year
Less	than	six	months

5.	Does	the	team	currently	have	a	full-time	project	manager?	
Yes,	we	currently	have	one
No,	but	we're	actively	working	to	hire	one
No,	but	we'd	like	to	hire	one	soon
No,	and	we	don't	intend	to	hire	one	soon

6.	Is	your	team	primarily	in	one	place,	or	primarily	distributed?	
Entirely	in	one	place
Mostly	in	one	place
Mostly	in	different	places
Entirely	in	different	places

NSF's	Convergence	Accelerator	Group	Entrance	Survey	(Revised)
Project
7.	Approximately	how	many	years	old	is	your	project?	(We	know	this	can	be	a	difficult
question!	By	"project"	we	mean	the	solution	that	you	are	developing	now,	but	not	the	basic
research	that	came	before	the	idea	for	that	solution.)	

8.	Which	of	these	options	best	describes	the	current	state	of	your	project?	
1.	Basic	principles	considered
2.	Technology	concept	formulated
3.	Experimental	proof	of	concept
4.	Technology	validated	in	lab-like	environment
5.	Technology	validated	in	relevant	environment
6.	Technology	demonstrated	in	relevant	environment
7.	System	model	or	prototype	demonstration	in	operational	environment
8.	System	complete	and	qualified	for	use
9.	Actual	system	proven	in	operational	environment

9.	How	much	would	you	agree	that	you	have	a	fully	completed	business	plan	/	sustainability
plan?	We	have	no	expectation	that	you	do	have	such	a	thing	--	we	simply	want	to	know	your
current	situation.	
Completely	agree
Somewhat	agree
Neither	agree	nor	disagree
Somewhat	disagree
Completely	disagree

10.	How	much	would	you	agree	that	you	have	a	written	and	agreed	upon	contract,	licensing
materials,	or	other	documents,	specifying	who	controls	your	(possibly	future)	intellectual
property	(IP)	/	stock	/	organizational	ownership?	We	have	no	expectation	that	you	do	have
such	a	thing	--	we	simply	want	to	know	your	current	situation.	
Completely	agree
Somewhat	agree
Neither	agree	nor	disagree
Somewhat	disagree
Completely	disagree

NSF's	Convergence	Accelerator	Group	Entrance	Survey	(Revised)
Users	and	Stakeholders
11.	Please	describe	who	your	intended	users	are	(to	the	best	of	your	current	knowledge).
These	are	the	people	who	actually	use	the	solution	you're	developing,	not	those	are	only
affected	by	it.	

12.	Approximately	how	many	interviews	has	your	team	completed	with	people	who	will	use
the	solution	themselves?	For	example,	if	you	are	developing	a	curriculum,	these	are	the
teachers.	(We	do	not	expect	you	have	done	any,	but	want	to	know	if	you	have!)	

13.	In	your	current	thinking,	are	there	people	who	do	not	use	your	solution,	but	are
still	directly	affected	by	it?	For	example,	if	you	are	developing	a	curriculum,	these	are	the
students.	We	refer	to	them	as	stakeholders.	
Yes
No
Not	sure

14.	IF	YOU	ANSWERED	YES,	approximately	many	interviews	has	your	team	completed	with
stakeholders?	(For	example,	if	you	are	developing	a	curriculum,	these	are	the	students.)	If
you	answered	NO	or	NOT	SURE,	you	can	skip	this	question	

NSF's	Convergence	Accelerator	Group	Entrance	Survey	(Revised)
Partnerships
15.	What	are	your	goals	for	partnerships	during	Phase	1	(approximately	the	next	year)?	

16.	What	kinds	of	partners	does	your	team	currently	have?	You	can	choose	several,	if
applicable.	
Academic
Industry
Non-profit
Government
Community
Funders	/	Investors
Other	(please	specify)

17.	What	kinds	of	partners	does	your	team	currently	need	most?	You	can	choose	several,	if
applicable.	
Academic
Industry
Non-profit
Government
Community
Funders	/	Investors
Other	(please	specify)

18.	What	are	some	ways	you	hope	the	Convergence	Accelerator	will	support	you	in	your
partnership	goals?	Please	provide	all	the	details	you	think	would	be	helpful	for	us	to	support
you.	

NSF's	Convergence	Accelerator	Group	Entrance	Survey	(Revised)
Impact	and	Outcomes
19.	Three	years	from	now,	approximately	how	many	people	do	you	estimate	will	be
direct	users	of	your	solution?	
10s
100s
1,000s	(thousands)
10,000s
100,000s
1,000,000	(millions)
1,000,000,000	(billions)
I	have	no	idea

20.	Three	years	from	now,	approximately	how	many	people	do	you	estimate	will	be	directly
affected	by	your	solution?	
10s
100s
1,000s	(thousands)
10,000s
100,000s
1,000,000	(millions)
1,000,000,000	(billions)
I	have	no	idea

21.	If	any,	how	many	papers	have	you	submitted	for	a	publication	or	conference	that	are
directly	related	to	your	Convergence	Accelerator	project?	

22.	If	any,	how	many	patents,	invention	disclosures,	or	other	forms	of	IP	have	you	applied	for
that	are	directly	related	to	your	Convergence	Accelerator	project?	

23.	If	any,	how	many	partners	do	you	have	for	your	Convergence	Accelerator	project?	

24.	If	any,	how	many	investors	/	financial	contributors	do	you	have	for	your	Convergence
Accelerator	project	(that	are	not	the	Convergence	Accelerator	itself)?	

25.	If	any,	approximately	how	many	users	do	you	currently	have?	(We	do	not	expect	you	to
have	any,	but	want	to	know	if	you	do!)	

NSF's	Convergence	Accelerator	Group	Entrance	Survey	(Revised)
Ecosystem
26.	By	“convergence”,	we	mean	a	project	that	deeply	integrates	diverse	expertise,	sectors,
and	disciplines.	Using	this	definition,	where	would	you	say	you	are	right	now?	
Extremely	convergent
Very	convergent
Somewhat	convergent
Slightly	convergent
Not	at	all	convergent	(yet)

27.	As	part	of	a	new,	growing,	and	complex	space,	we	want	to	know	where	we	fit	into	the
innovation	ecosystem.	Were	you	considering	other	similar	programs,	when	applying	to	the
Convergence	Accelerator?	
Yes
No

28.	If	Yes,	which	ones?	

29.	How	good	of	a	"fit"	did	the	Convergence	Accelerator	seem	for	your	project,	relative	to
other	funding	opportunities,	and	why?	

30.	We	would	like	as	many	teams	as	possible	to	be	able	to	apply	to	the	Convergence
Accelerator;	did	you	encounter	any	particular	barriers	to	application,	or	a	lack	of	awareness
of	the	program,	that	we	could	improve?	

31.	What	is	your	team	most	excited	about,	in	the	Convergence	Accelerator	program?	

32.	What	is	your	team	most	worried,	or	concerned	about,	in	the	Convergence	Accelerator
program?	

33.	What	is	your	team	most	confused	about,	in	the	Convergence	Accelerator	program?	

34.	Do	you	have	any	additional	questions,	concerns,	or	comments	at	this	stage?	

That's	the	end	of	the	survey	--	thank	you	so	much	for	your	time	and	contribution!	


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2023-02-22
File Created2023-02-10

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy