Web Meetings of Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) Implementation Research and Evaluation Grant Teams - Participant Feedback

Plans for Poll:

NOTE: Participant feedback will be collected at the end of selected grantee web meeting through either a Zoom poll, or a link to an online survey. ACF will administer the poll up to four times over the course of 12 months.

This document includes a universe of questions. We may ask 1, 2 or all 3 questions each time that feedback is requested. We may repeat question 2, to ask about multiple topics. The information in brackets will be identified based on Community of Practice discussions and feedback.

1. Help us select and prioritize topics for future Community of Practice discussions. Please rank topic[s] from the following list of potential topics for our meetings over the next [two/three/four/five] months. (We will provide 5-10 response options per administration of this question.)

1. [Building strength of agency-researcher partnerships]

2. [Grant recipient peer sharing on progress, lessons learned, and findings]

3. [Analyzing COVID-era administrative data]

4. [Other issues related to research in a time of COVID-19]

5. [Decline in family child care]

6. [Other CCDF Policy topics]

7. [Sampling/recruitment of participants]

8. [data dashboards]

9. [new topic to be identified]

10. [new topic to be identified]

2. How helpful would a [presentation/discussion] about [CCDF policy or research topic] be for your team? Please select one of the following:

1. Very helpful

2. Somewhat helpful

3. A little bit helpful

4. Not helpful, at least not at this time

3. We would like your feedback on recent sessions held during our Community of Practice. Please pick the rating that best reflects your perspective on each of the sessions listed below.

1. [IT Staff and Other Agency Stakeholders: A Peer Sharing Discussion-November 2021]

1. Very helpful

2. Somewhat helpful

3. A little bit helpful

4. Not helpful

5. Did not attend

2. [Analyzing and interpreting COVID-era data: A peer sharing discussion- December 2021]

1. Very helpful

2. Somewhat helpful

3. A little bit helpful

4. Not helpful

5. Did not attend

3. [Planning for a two-part national webinar series – January 2022]

1. Very helpful

2. Somewhat helpful

3. A little bit helpful

4. Not helpful

5. Did not attend or can’t remember

4. [Subsidy policy and practice and structural racism, with Gina Adams and Eleanor Pratt – February 2022]

1. Very helpful

2. Somewhat helpful

3. A little bit helpful

4. Not helpful

5. Did not attend

5. [Building data dictionaries as part of a researcher-agency partnership, with Missy Coffey]– March 2022]

1. Very helpful

2. Somewhat helpful

3. A little bit helpful

4. Not helpful

5. Did not attend or can’t remember

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BURDEN: The purpose of this information collection is to help ACF understand grantee preferences for future meetings. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per respondent, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. This is a voluntary collection of information. agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB # is 0970-0401 and the expiration date is 06/30/2024. If you have any comments on this collection of information, please contact Teresa Derrick-Mills at [email protected].