1122-0024 Supporting Statement A (052023)

1122-0024 Supporting Statement A (052023).docx

Semi-Annual Progress Report for the Tribal Sexual Assault Services Program

OMB: 1122-0024

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Semi-Annual Progress Report for the Tribal Sexual Assault Services Program

OMB Control Number 1122-0024

OMB Expiration Date: 05/31/2023




SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR

Semi-Annual Progress Report for the Tribal Sexual Assault Services Program


  1. JUSTIFICATION


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

Authorized by 34 U.S.C. § 12511(e), the Tribal Sexual Assault Services Program (TSASP) supports projects to create, maintain, and expand sustainable sexual assault services provided by Tribes, tribal organizations, and nonprofit tribal organizations within Indian country and Alaska Native villages. TSASP supported projects provide intervention, advocacy, accompaniment (e.g., accompanying victims to court, medical facilities, or police departments), support services, and related assistance for adult, youth, and child victims of sexual assault, non-offending family and household members of victims, and those collaterally affected by the sexual assault.

This information collection will enable the Office on Violence Against Women would require semi-annual progress reports on grant-funded activities from all Tribal Sexual Assault Services Program grantees in order to meet its Congressionally mandated reporting requirements as well as to monitor effectively the award of federal funds.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


OVW uses data from the information collection1 in different ways. OVW will use the information collected from SASP Tribal Program grantees to monitor their grant-funded activities and qualitatively assess those activities. In particular, OVW is seeking data that includes baseline information to review activities supported with SASP Tribal Program funds, including, for example, an increase in the number of trainings or an increase in the number of victims served. OVW will review semiannual progress report to monitor individual SASP Tribal Program grantee’s performance and ensure that the goals and objectives set forth in applications for funding and award documents are met. The SASP Tribal Program grantees collect information that addresses the following grant funded activities (different sections on the reporting form): staff, statutory purpose areas, informational materials, and victim services. Narrative questions at the end of these different sections enable grantees to give more detailed qualitative information about their grant-funded activities. In addition, SASP Tribal Program grantees must answer narrative questions on the most significant areas of remaining need with regard to improving services to victims/survivors of sexual assault, increasing victims/survivors safety, and enhancing community response (including offender accountability or sex offenders), what has SASP Tribal Program funding allowed the grantee to do that the grantee could not do prior to receiving funding, additional information about the SASP Tribal Program grant and/or the effectiveness of the grant and any additional information about the data submitted. In addition to the proposed information collection, OVW will continue to use a number of other techniques to assess the performance of SASP Tribal Program grantees. These may include OVW staff attendance at site visits, grant-funded training and technical assistance events, staff review of products prior to dissemination, and ongoing consultation with OVW staff. OVW will aggregate data from all SASP Tribal Program grantees’ progress reports to assess the performance of the SASP Tribal Program as a whole and to respond to Congressional, Department of Justice, and other inquiries about how SASP Tribal Program funds are being used. In addition, information collected from SASP Tribal Program grantees will support the following OVW GPRA measures: Number of victims receiving requested services; Percentage of victims requesting services who received them; Number of policies developed/revised; and Number of communities with improved CCR. Information collected from SASP Tribal Program grantees will enable OVW to respond to statutory requirements to report on the effectiveness of grant-funded activities. The 2016 Measuring Effectiveness Report to Congress, which includes information about how funds were expended and an assessment of the effectiveness of funded programs- see https://www.justice.gov/ovw/reports-congress. This report is based on data submitted by SASP Tribal Program grantees reflecting SASP Tribal Program awards made and SASP Tribal Program‐funded activities engaged in during calendar years July 1, 2013- June 30, 2015. OVW is in the process of submitting the 2018 Report to Congress. The data that OVW collects on the semiannual progress reporting forms is currently not used in connection with an evaluation of the SASP Tribal Program. OVW is currently exploring the development of a multi-layered evaluation agenda for its grant programs.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also, describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


The collection of information will involve the use of automated, electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. OVW grantees are required to submit semiannual progress reports through the Grants Management System (GMS).


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item A.2 above.


There is no other mechanism by which OVW collects information about grant funded activities including number of victims served, victims seeking services who could not be served, or persons trained.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


There is no significant impact on small business or other private entities.


6. Describe the consequence to federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


By statute, Congress has mandated that TA providers report to the Attorney General on the effectiveness of their activities funded under VAWA. If OVW was not able to collect the information necessary to complete these reports on behalf of the Attorney General, not only would it be failing to meet a statutorily required reporting mandate, but also the existence of this important and necessary funding could be jeopardized.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;


  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;


  • requiring the use of statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


  • that includes a pledge of confidentially that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentially to the extent permitted by law.


There are no special circumstances.


8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years -- even if the collection-of-information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.


The 60-Day Notice was published in the Federal Register on May 15, 2023 (88 FR 31034). The comment period ended on July 14, 2023. No comments were received.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payments or gifts to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No government funds will be used as payment or for gifts to respondents.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


Although this information is needed for a public report to Congress, it will not involve any personal information about victims that could identify them as specific individuals. However, anecdotal, non-identifying information about the effectiveness of individual programs may be included in the report. There is no assurance to confidentiality.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


The semiannual progress report will not contain any questions of a personal, sensitive 5 nature such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:


  • Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. General, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.


  • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form.


  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.



Estimated Annualized Respondent Cost and Hour Burden

Activity

Number of Respondents

Frequency

Total Annual Responses

Time Per Response

Total Annual Burden (Hours)

OVW Consolidated Progress Report Template

15

2

30

1 hr.

30hrs.







Unduplicated Totals

15


30


30hrs.


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).


  • The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital

and start up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a

total operation and maintenance and purchase of service component.

The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating,

maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of

methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.


  • If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.


  • Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.


OVW does not believe that there is any annual cost burden on respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of this information.


14. Provide estimates of the annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 into a single table.


The annualized costs to the Federal Government resulting from the OVW staff review of the progress reports submitted by grantees are estimated to be $1,680.


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.


There are no changes to this collection.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulations, and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


There will be no complex analytical techniques used in connection with the publication of information collected under the request. Information will be gathered once a year at the end of the reporting periods. OVW is statutorily required to submit a report on the effectiveness of all grant-funded activities on a biennial basis.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


We are requesting no exemption.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement.


This collection of information does not include any exceptions to the certificate statement.


B. COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATON EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS.

This collection does not contain statistical data.

6


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleMarch 6, 2007
AuthorTheda Kenney
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2023-07-29

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy