SUP STAT (1545-1138)-(Clean)

SUP STAT (1545-1138)-(Clean).docx

TD 8350 -- Requirements For Investments To Qualify Under Section 936(d)(4) As Investments in Qualified Caribbean Basin Countries

OMB: 1545-1138

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Internal Revenue Service

TD 8350, Requirements for Investments to Qualify under Section 936(d)(4)

as Investments in Qualified Caribbean Basin Countries

OMB # 1545-1138



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 936(d)(4) expands the definition of "qualified possession source investment income" by providing that an investment in a qualified financial institution will, subject to such conditions as the Secretary of the Treasury prescribes pursuant to regulations, be treated as used in Puerto Rico to the extent used by such financial institution for investment in accordance with the goals and purposes of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (P.L. 98‑67 (Aug. 5, 1983)), in active business assets or development projects in a qualified Caribbean Basin country. Income that is qualified possession source investment income is entitled to a quasi‑tax exemption by reason of the U.S. possessions tax credit under section 936(a) and substantial tax exemptions in Puerto Rico. Section 936(d)(4)(C) places certification requirements on the recipient of the investment and the qualified financial institution; and recordkeeping requirements on the financial institution and the recipient of the investment funds to enable the Secretary to ensure that the requirements of section 936(d)(4) are being fulfilled. Sections 1.936‑10(c)(12) and (13) enumerate these certifications and continuing due diligence requirements.


While Section 936 was repealed in 2018, IRS is renewing the OMB approval while the collection requirements phase out.

  1. USE OF DATA


The certification and recordkeeping requirements that sections 1.936‑10(c)(12) and (13) place on the recipients of investments and the qualified financial institutions are used by the IRS to verify that the investment funds are being used properly and in accordance with the purposes of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.

  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS has no plans to offer electronic filing due to no reporting requirements associated with this collection.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.




5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


This information collection will not have a significant economic impact on small businesses or other small entities.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


A less frequent collection will not enable the IRS to verify that the investment funds are being used properly and in accordance with the purposes of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


In response to the Federal Register notice dated May 22, 2023 (88 FR 32821), IRS

received no comments during the comment period regarding TD 8350.

  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No personally identifiable information (PII) is collected.






  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.936‑10(c)(12) provides that the certification responsibility placed on the recipient of the investment and the financial institution is satisfied if the financial institution submits a certificate to both the Assistant Commissioner (International) and to the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico upon authorization of the investment by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions and, in any event, prior to the first disbursement of the loan proceeds to the qualified recipient or to the financial intermediary (if any). Section l.936‑10(c)(13)(i) requires the recipient of the investment to submit annually to the qualified financial institution certain information concerning use of the loan proceeds. Section 1.936‑10(c)(13)(ii) specifies the documents and information that the financial institution must maintain and have available for inspection by the Secretary or the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico. The total burden for these requirements is estimated to be 1,500 hours.


CFR Citation

Respondents

# Recordkeepers Per Respondent

Annual Recordkeepers

Recordkeeping Hours Per Respondent

Total Annual Burden

1.936-10(C)(12), -(13)

50

1

50

30.00

1,500

The following regulation imposes no additional burden. Please continue to assign OMB number 1545-1138 to this regulation.

1.936-10


  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There is no annualized cost to the federal government.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. IRS is making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


IRS believes that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the IRS intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement for this collection.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorDepartment of Treasury
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2023-08-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy