Crosswalk

CY2023 to CY2024 DV Crosswalk_20230727_508_Final.pdf

Medicare Part C and Part D Data Validation (42 CFR 422.516(g) and 423.514(g)) (CMS-10305)

Crosswalk

OMB: 0938-1115

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
CY 2023 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2023 DV FDCF (Appendix J)

CY 2024 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

Note:

All validation standards and sub-standards have been made
uniform across all Part C & D reporting sections.

N/A

Note:

Reporting section criterion (RSCs) were removed from both
the EES and DV Manual.

N/A

1

A review of source documents (e.g., programming code,
spreadsheet formulas, analysis plans, saved data queries,
file layouts, process flows) indicates that all source
documents accurately capture required data fields and are
properly documented.

1

Type of
Change

Reason for
Change

Burden
Change

N/A

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

N/A

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Database management and structure: A review of source
documents (for example, programming code, spreadsheet
formulas, analysis plans, saved data queries, file layouts,
process flows) shows that all source documents accurately
capture required data fields and the SO has properly
documented them.

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

CY 2024 DV EES (Appendix B)

1.a

Source documents are properly secured so that source
documents can be retrieved at any time to validate the
information submitted to CMS via HPMS.

1.a

SOs properly secured source documents and output, and have
referenced data file locations correctly so that DVCs can
retrieve source documents at any time to validate the
information submitted to CMS via CMS systems.

1.g

Source documents are clearly and adequately documented.

1.b

SOs clearly and adequately documented source documents.

Addition

Renumbering

None

1.c

SOs accurately captured required data fields including all data
fields for RR in source documents. All data fields have
meaningful, consistent labels (for example, label field for
patient ID as Patient ID, rather than Field1 and maintain the
same field name across data sets).

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

1.c

SOs accurately captured required data fields including all data
fields for RR in source documents. All data fields have
meaningful, consistent labels (for example, label field for
patient ID as Patient ID, rather than Field1 and maintain the
same field name across data sets).

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

1.b

Source documents create all required data fields for
reporting requirements.

1.d

All data fields have meaningful, consistent labels (e.g., label
field for patient ID as Patient ID, rather than Field1 and
maintain the same field name across data sets).

CY 2023 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2023 DV FDCF (Appendix J)

CY 2024 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2024 DV EES (Appendix B)

Type of
Change

Reason for
Change

Burden
Change

1.c

Source documents are error-free (e.g., programming code
and spreadsheet formulas have no messages or warnings
indicating errors, use correct fields, have appropriate data
selection, etc.).

1.d

Source documents are error-free (for example, programming
code and spreadsheet formulas have no messages or warnings
indicating errors).

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

1.i

Version control of source documents is appropriately
applied.

1.e

SOs appropriately applied version control of source documents.

Update

Renumbering

None

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

SOs captured the appropriate date range(s) for the reporting
period(s).

2.a

The appropriate date range(s) for the reporting period(s) is
captured.

1.f

1.f

If used, macros are properly documented.

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

2.b

Data are assigned at the applicable level (e.g., plan benefit
package or contract level).

1.g

SOs assigned data at the applicable level (for example, plan
benefit package (PBP) or contract level).

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

1.h

Titles and footnotes on reports and tables are accurate.

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

1.i

Version control of source documents is appropriately
applied.

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

SO reports data based on the required reporting period of 1/1 12/31.

CY 2023 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2024 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2024 DV EES (Appendix B)

Type of
Change

Reason for
Change

Burden
Change

2

A review of source documents (e.g., programming code,
spreadsheet formulas, analysis plans, saved data queries,
file layouts, process flows) and census or sample data,
whichever is applicable, indicates that data elements for
each reporting section are accurately identified, processed,
and calculated.

2

Database Extraction Function: Review of source data,
preliminary data sets, and interim data sets (for example,
programming code, spreadsheet formulas, analysis plans,
saved data queries, file layouts, process flows) indicates the
following: SOs accurately identify, process, and verify the
population for each reporting section (including calculations for
the number of members, claims, grievances, procedures, etc.).
They apply QA checks/thresholds to detect outlier or erroneous
data.

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

2.a

The appropriate date range(s) for the reporting period(s) is
captured.

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

2.b

Data are assigned at the applicable level (e.g., plan benefit
package or contract level).

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

2.c

Appropriate deadlines are met for reporting data (e.g.,
quarterly).

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

2.d

Terms used are properly defined per CMS regulations,
guidance, Reporting Requirements and Technical
Specifications.

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

CY 2023 DV FDCF (Appendix J)

CY 2023 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2023 DV FDCF (Appendix J)

CY 2024 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

2.e

The number of expected counts (e.g., number of members,
claims, grievances, procedures) are verified; ranges of data
fields are verified; all calculations (e.g., derived data fields)
are verified; missing data has been properly addressed;
reporting output matches corresponding source documents
(e.g., programming code, saved queries, analysis plans);
version control of reported data elements is appropriately
applied; QA checks/thresholds are applied to detect outlier
or erroneous data prior to data submission.

N/A

2.e

The number of expected counts (e.g., number of members,
claims, grievances, procedures) are verified; ranges of data
fields are verified; all calculations (e.g., derived data fields)
are verified; missing data has been properly addressed;
reporting output matches corresponding source documents
(e.g., programming code, saved queries, analysis plans);
version control of reported data elements is appropriately
applied; QA checks/thresholds are applied to detect outlier
or erroneous data prior to data submission.

2.a

Type of
Change

Reason for
Change

Burden
Change

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

SOs accurately identify, process, and verify the population for
each reporting section (including calculations for the number of
members, claims, grievances, procedures, etc.). They apply QA
checks/thresholds to detect outlier or erroneous data.

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

CY 2024 DV EES (Appendix B)

CY 2023 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2023 DV FDCF (Appendix J)

CY 2024 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2024 DV EES (Appendix B)

Type of
Change

Reason for
Change

Burden
Change

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Organization implements policies and procedures in their final
stage data sets for submission into HPMS, including the
following:

2.e

The number of expected counts (e.g., number of members,
claims, grievances, procedures) are verified; ranges of data
fields are verified; all calculations (e.g., derived data fields)
are verified; missing data has been properly addressed;
reporting output matches corresponding source documents
(e.g., programming code, saved queries, analysis plans);
version control of reported data elements is appropriately
applied; QA checks/thresholds are applied to detect outlier
or erroneous data prior to data submission.

3

a. Expected counts - Data elements are valid, complete, and
accurate according to the source document that SOs use to
upload/enter data into the HPMS; ranges of data fields are
verified; all calculations (for example, derived data fields) are
verified; they properly address missing data; reporting output
matches corresponding source documents (for example,
programming code, saved queries, analysis plans); they
appropriately apply version control of reported data elements.
b. Organization accurately captures data by applying data
integrity/logical checks; they apply QA checks/thresholds to
detect outlier or erroneous data.

Organization implements policies and procedures in their final
stage data sets for submission into HPMS, including the
following:

3.a

Data elements are accurately entered/uploaded into HPMS
and entries match corresponding source documents.

3

a. Expected counts - Data elements are valid, complete, and
accurate according to the source document that SOs use to
upload/enter data into the HPMS; ranges of data fields are
verified; all calculations (for example, derived data fields) are
verified; they properly address missing data; reporting output
matches corresponding source documents (for example,
programming code, saved queries, analysis plans); they
appropriately apply version control of reported data elements.
b. Organization accurately captures data by applying data
integrity/logical checks; they apply QA checks/thresholds to
detect outlier or erroneous data.

CY 2023 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2023 DV FDCF (Appendix J)

CY 2024 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2024 DV EES (Appendix B)

Type of
Change

Reason for
Change

Burden
Change

Organization implements policies and procedures for data
submission, including the following:

3

a. Data elements are accurately entered/uploaded into
HPMS and entries match corresponding source documents.
[Subsection #1, Data Elements A – G, Subsection #2, Data
Elements I – L, Subsection #3, Data Elements A – G,
Subsection #4, Data Elements I – L, Subsection #5, Data
Elements A – B, E – O]

N/A

N/A

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Update

Renumbering

None

b. All source, intermediate, and final stage data sets and
other outputs relied upon to enter data into HPMS are
archived.

3.a

Data elements are accurately entered/uploaded into HPMS
and entries match corresponding source documents.

3.a

Expected counts - Data elements are valid, complete, and
accurate according to the source document that SOs use to
upload/enter data into the HPMS; ranges of data fields are
verified; all calculations (for example, derived data fields) are
verified; they properly address missing data; reporting output
matches corresponding source documents (for example,
programming code, saved queries, analysis plans); they
appropriately apply version control of reported data elements.

2.e

The number of expected counts (e.g., number of members,
claims, grievances, procedures) are verified; ranges of data
fields are verified; all calculations (e.g., derived data fields)
are verified; missing data has been properly addressed;
reporting output matches corresponding source documents
(e.g., programming code, saved queries, analysis plans);
version control of reported data elements is appropriately
applied; QA checks/thresholds are applied to detect outlier
or erroneous data prior to data submission.

3.b

Organization accurately captures data by applying data
integrity/logical checks; they apply QA checks/thresholds to
detect outlier or erroneous data.

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

3.b

All source, intermediate, and final stage data sets and other
outputs relied upon to enter data into HPMS are archived.

4

All source, intermediate, and final stage data sets and other
outputs relied upon to enter data into CMS systems are
archived.

Update

Renumbering

None

CY 2023 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2023 DV FDCF (Appendix J)

CY 2024 DV
Validation
Standard /
Sub-Standard

CY 2024 DV EES (Appendix B)

Type of
Change

Reason for
Change

Burden
Change

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Update

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Organization implements policies and procedures for the
following:
4

Organization implements policies and procedures for
periodic data system updates (e.g., changes in enrollment,
provider/pharmacy status, and claims adjustments).

5

i. Periodic data system updates (for example, changes in
enrollment, provider/pharmacy status, and claims adjustments).
ii. Restoring data in each data system (for example, disaster
recovery plan).

Organization implements policies and procedures for the
following:
5

Organization implements policies and procedures for
archiving and restoring data in each data system (e.g.,
disaster recovery plan).

5

i. Periodic data system updates (for example, changes in
enrollment, provider/pharmacy status, and claims adjustments).
ii. Restoring data in each data system (for example, disaster
recovery plan).

6

If organization’s data systems underwent any changes
during the reporting period (e.g., because of a merger,
acquisition, or upgrade): Organization provided
documentation on the data system changes and, upon
review, there were no issues that adversely impacted data
reported.

6

If organization’s data systems underwent any changes during
the reporting period for example, because of a merger,
acquisition, vendor change or upgrade: Organization provided
documentation on the data system changes and, upon review,
changes were implemented correctly and did not adversely
impact the reported data.

CY 2023 DV Appendix E

CY 2024 DV Appendix E

Location: Table 1, Step 4, Timeline

Location: Table 1, Step 4, Timeline

Early April (allow for up to 1 week)

Early April

Location: Table 5
Coverage Determinations and Redeterminations

Type of
Change

Reason for Change

Burden
Change

Update

Consistent with current technical
guidance

None

Update

Consistent with current technical
guidance

None

Location: Table 5
Coverage Determinations, Redeterminations,
(including At-Risk Redeterminations Under a Drug
Management Program), and Reopenings

CY 2023 DV Manual

CY 2024 DV Manual

Type of
Change

2.1. Part C and Part D Reporting Sections Requiring
Data Validation in 2023

2.1. Parts C and D Reporting Sections Requiring DV

Update

2.2. Reporting Requirements Excluded from the
Validation Requirement

2.2. Reporting Sections Excluded from the DV Requirement

Update

3.2.2.1.

3.2.2.1. Process for Obtaining HPMS Access for SOs and
DVCs

Update

None

3.2.2.2. Process for SOs

Addition

None

3.2.2.3.1. HPMS PRDVM Access

Addition

None

3.2.2.3.2. Instructions for Requesting Plan Access via EFI

Addition

None

3.2.2.3.3. Existing CMS Enterprise User Administration (EUA)
User IDs and HPMS Access

Addition

None

3.2.2.3.4. Submission of Findings to CMS: Annual DV Review

Addition

3.4.1. Introduction to the Data Validation Standards

3.4.1. Introduction to the EES

Update

3.4.2. Data Validation Standards and Reporting
Section Criteria

3.4.2. EES (Appendix B)

Update

3.4.3. Reporting Section Criteria

Deleted

Deletion

4.4. Conduct On-Site or Virtual Visit

4.4. Conduct Site Visit

Update

4.4.4. Extract Census or Sample Data

Deleted

Deletion

Reason for Change
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Burden
Change
None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

CY 2023 DV Manual
4.4.5. Conduct Exit Conference
5.1 Determine Compliance with Data Validation
Standards and Record Findings in the Findings Data
Collection Form (FDCF) (Appendix J) to Upload into
the HPMS PRDVM

CY 2024 DV Manual
4.4.4. Conduct Exit Conference

5.1. Reporting DV Results: How to Determine Scoring

Type of
Change
Update

Update

5.1.1. Reporting Findings for Standards Using Binary
Scale

Deleted

Deletion

5.1.2. Reporting Findings for Standards Using Likert
Scale

Deleted

Deletion

5.1.3. Review of the Findings Data Collection Form

Deleted

Deletion

5.1.4. Guidance for Interpreting Standards and Making
a Findings Determination
Deleted

Deletion

5.2. Provide Draft Findings to Sponsoring Organization 5.2. The EES

Update

None

5.2.1. Reporting Findings for Standards Using Binary Scale

Addition

None

Addition

None

5.2.2. Reporting Findings for Standards Using Likert Scale
5.2.3. Guidance for Interpreting Standards and Making a
Findings Determination from Review of the EES

None

5.2.3.1. Standard 1

Addition

Addition

Reason for Change

Burden
Change

Renumbering due to
deletion

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Renumbering due to
deletion
Renumbering due to
deletion
Renumbering due to
deletion
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

5.2.3.2. Standard 2

Addition

None

5.2.3.3. Standard 3

Addition

Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Addition

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

5.2.3.4. Standards 4-7

None

None

None

None

None
None
None
None
None

None

None

None

CY 2023 DV Manual

CY 2024 DV Manual

Type of
Change

5.3. Review Draft Findings with Sponsoring
Organization and Obtain Additional Documentation
Necessary to Resolve Issues

5.3. Submit DV Review Findings via HPMS PRDVM

Update

None

5.3.1. Review Draft Findings with Sponsoring Organization

Addition

None

5.3.2. Submit DV Review Findings via HPMS PRSVM

Addition

5.4. Submit Data Validation Review Findings via
HPMS PRDVM

Deleted

Deletion

Reason for Change

Burden
Change

Renumbering due to
deletion

None

Renumbering due to
deletion
Renumbering due to
deletion
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

5.4.1. Data Validation Contractor’s Submission of
Findings

Deleted

Deletion

5.4.2. Sponsoring Organization Disagreement with
Findings

Deleted

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

6.2. Receive Pass or Not Pass Threshold Level and
Assess Pass or Not Pass Determination based on
Final Scores
6.3. Sponsoring Organization Appeal of Data
Validation

6.2. Review Final DV Results

Update

6.2.3. SO Appeal of DV Determination

Update

None

Glossary of Terms

Addition

None

EXHIBIT 4. PART C AND PART D REPORTING SECTIONS
EXCLUDED FROM DV

Addition

EXHIBIT 5. PART C AND PART D REPORTING
SECTIONS EXCLUDED FROM DATA VALIDATION

EXHIBIT 5. STANDARD 1: REQUIRED DATA FIELDS ARE
ACCURATELY CAPTURED AND PROPERLY
DOCUMENTED	

EXHIBIT 6. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR DATA
VALIDATION STANDARDS

EXHIBIT 6. EXAMPLES OF CALCULATIONS TO
DETERMINE MINIMUM THRESHOLD OF CORRECT
SAMPLE/CENSUS RECORDS FOR “YES” FINDING

EXHIBIT 7. STANDARD 1: REQUIRED DATA FIELDS EXHIBIT 7. EXAMPLE OF HOW TO DETERMINE MINIMUM
ARE ACCURATELY CAPTURED AND PROPERLY
THRESHOLD OF IMPLEMENTED POLICIES OR
DOCUMENTED
PROCEDURES FOR “YES” FINDING

Update

Addition

Addition

Renumbering due to
deletion
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None
None
None

None

None

None
None
None

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

CY 2023 DV Manual

CY 2024 DV Manual

EXHIBIT 8. STANDARD 2: DATA ELEMENTS ARE
ACCURATELY IDENTIFIED, PROCESSED, AND
CALCULATED

EXHIBIT 8. EXAMPLE OF HOW TO DETERMINE MINIMUM
THRESHOLD OF IMPLEMENTED POLICIES OR
PROCEDURES FOR FINDINGS USING BINARY AND
LIKERT SCORE.

EXHIBIT 9. STANDARD 3: DATA SUBMISSION

EXHIBIT 9. EXAMPLE ROWS FROM EES (APPENDIX B)
AND GUIDANCE FOR STANDARD 1

EXHIBIT 10. STANDARDS 4 AND 5: DATA SYSTEM
UPDATES AND ARCHIVE/RESTORATION

EXHIBIT 10. EXAMPLE OF THE EES (APPENDIX B) AND
GUIDANCE FOR STANDARD 2, SUB-STANDARDS 2.a.

EXHIBIT 11. STANDARDS 6 AND 7: DATA SYSTEM
CHANGES AND OVERSIGHT OF DELEGATED
ENTITY REPORTING

EXHIBIT 11. EXAMPLE ROWS FROM EES (APPENDIX B)
FOR STANDARD 3

EXHIBIT 12. REPORTING SECTION CRITERIA FOR
APPROPRIATE REPORTING PERIOD, REPORTING
LEVEL, AND REPORTING DEADLINE IN PART C
SPECIAL NEEDS PLANS (SNPs) CARE
EXHIBIT 12. EXAMPLE ROWS FROM EES (APPENDIX B)
MANAGEMENT
FOR STANDARDS 4 THROUGH 7
EXHIBIT 13. REPORTING SECTION CRITERION
FOR DEFINING KEY TERMS IN PART D
COVERRAGE DETERMINATIONS AND
REDETERMINATIONS SECTION

EXHIBIT 13. MINIMUM DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR
DV ARCHIVE

EXHIBIT 14. REPORTING SECTION CRITERIA FOR
SELECTED PART C GRIEVANCES DATA
ELEMENTS
Deleted
EXHIBIT 15. EXAMPLES OF CALCULATIONS TO
DETERMINE MINIMUM THRESHOLD OF CORRECT
SAMPLE/CENSUS RECORDS FOR “YES” FINDING Deleted
EXHIBIT 16. EXAMPLE OF HOW TO DETERMINE
MINIMUM THRESHOLD OF IMPLEMENTED
POLICIES OR PROCEDURES FOR “YES” FINDING

Deleted

Type of
Change

Addition

Addition

Addition

Addition

Reason for Change

Burden
Change

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

None

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Addition

Addition

Deletion

Deletion

Deletion

CY 2023 DV Manual
EXHIBIT 17. EXAMPLE OF HOW TO DETERMINE
MINIMUM THRESHOLD OF IMPLEMENTED
POLICIES OR PROCEDURES FOR FINDINGS
USING BINARY AND LIKERT SCORE.
EXHIBIT 18. EXAMPLE ROWS FROM FDCF
(APPENDIX J) FOR STANDARD 1

CY 2024 DV Manual

Deleted

Deleted

EXHIBIT 19. EXAMPLE OF THE FDCF (APPENDIX J)
FOR STANDARD 2, SUB-STANDARDS 2.A - 2.D.
FOR THE PART D GRIEVANCES REPORTING
Deleted
SECTION
EXHIBIT 20. EXAMPLE ROWS FROM FDCF
(APPENDIX J) FOR STANDARD 2, SUB-STANDARD
2.E RSC-5 FOR PART D GRIEVANCES REPORTING
SECTION
Deleted
EXHIBIT 21. EXAMPLE ROWS FROM FDCF
(APPENDIX J) FOR STANDARD 3 FOR PART D
GRIEVANCES REPORTING SECTION
EXHIBIT 22. EXAMPLE ROWS FROM FDCF
(APPENDIX J) FOR STANDARDS 4 THROUGH 7
EXHIBIT 23. GUIDANCE FOR DATA VALIDATION
STANDARD 1
EXHIBIT 24. GUIDANCE FOR DATA VALIDATION
STANDARD 2
EXHIBIT 25. GUIDANCE FOR DATA VALIDATION
STANDARD 3
EXHIBIT 26. GUIDANCE FOR DATA VALIDATION
STANDARD 4
EXHIBIT 27. GUIDANCE FOR DATA VALIDATION
STANDARD 5

Deleted

Deleted

Deleted

Deleted

Deleted

Deleted

Deleted

Type of
Change

Deletion

Deletion

Deletion

Deletion

Deletion

Reason for Change

Burden
Change

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Reduce
burden

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Deletion

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Deletion

Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Deletion

Reduce
burden
Reduce
burden
Reduce
burden
Reduce
burden
Reduce
burden
Reduce
burden

CY 2023 DV Manual
EXHIBIT 28. GUIDANCE FOR DATA VALIDATION
STANDARD 6
EXHIBIT 29. GUIDANCE FOR DATA VALIDATION
STANDARD 7

EXHIBIT 30. MINIMUM DOCUMENTATION
REQUIRED FOR DATA VALIDATION ARCHIVE

CY 2024 DV Manual

Deleted

Deleted

Deleted

Type of
Change

Deletion

Deletion

Deletion

Reason for Change
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance
Consistent with
current technical
guidance

Burden
Change
Reduce
burden
Reduce
burden
Reduce
burden


File Typeapplication/pdf
AuthorApoorva Srivastava
File Modified2023-07-26
File Created2023-07-26

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy