60 Day FRN (88 FR 5041)

88 FR 5041_ January 26, 2023.pdf

Susan Harwood Training Grant Program Grantee Quarterly Progress Report

60 Day FRN (88 FR 5041)

OMB: 1218-0100

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2023 / Notices
OMB Control Number: 1210–0128.
Affected Public: Private Sector—
Businesses or other for-profits.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 11,000.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 11,110.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
264,110 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $110,000,000.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D))
Dated: January 20, 2023.
Mara Blumenthal,
Senior PRA Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2023–01525 Filed 1–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0021]

Susan Harwood Training Grant
Program; Revision of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:

OSHA solicits public
comments concerning the proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
specified in the Susan Harwood
Training Grant Program.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
March 27, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Documents in the
docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the website.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
through the OSHA Docket Office.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office at (202)
693–2350 (TTY (877) 889–5627) for

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:17 Jan 25, 2023

Jkt 259001

assistance in locating docket
submissions.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2010–0021) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). OSHA will place all comments,
including any personal information, in
the public docket, which may be made
available online. Therefore, OSHA
cautions interested parties about
submitting personal information such as
social security numbers and birthdates.
For further information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Seleda Perryman or Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor;
telephone (202) 693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of
the continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e.,
employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to
provide the public with an opportunity
to comment on proposed and
continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, the collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.)
authorizes information collection by
employers as necessary or appropriate
for enforcement of the OSH Act or for
developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29
U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires
that OSHA obtain such information
with minimum burden upon employers,
especially those operating small
businesses, and to reduce to the
maximum extent feasible unnecessary
duplication of effort in obtaining
information (29 U.S.C. 657).
Section 21 of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 (the ‘‘OSH Act’’)
(29 U.S.C. 670) authorizes the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) to conduct
directly, or through grants and
contracts, education, and training
courses. These courses must ensure an
adequate number of qualified personnel

PO 00000

Frm 00080

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

5041

to fulfill the purposes of the Act,
provide them with short-term training,
inform them of the importance and
proper use of safety and health
equipment, and train employers and
workers to recognize, avoid, and prevent
unsafe and unhealthful working
conditions.
Under Section 21, the agency awards
training grants to nonprofit
organizations to provide part of the
training. Organizations that receive
these grants must submit the Grantee
Quarterly Progress Report (GQPR;
OSHA 171, Revised 5/14) as required by
the Department of Labor under 29 CFR
95.51. This regulation states that grant
recipients (grantees) must submit
progress reports to the awarding agency
at least annually but no more than
quarterly. The reports must contain a
comparison of actual accomplishments
with goals and objectives established for
the reporting period and, if appropriate,
the program’s output.
Therefore, the GQPR allows OSHA to
monitor a grantee’s performance and to
determine if a recipient is using funds
as specified in its grant application.
After the grant recipient submits a
GQPR, the agency compares the
information provided by the grant
recipient in the report to the quarterly
milestones proposed by the grant
recipient in the work plan and budget
that accompanied its grant application.
This information includes: identifier
data (organization name, grant number,
and period covered by the report); the
date and location where the training
occurred; the number of workers and
employers attending training sessions
provided by the organization during the
quarter; the class length (in quarter
hours); the language used to deliver the
training; a description of the training
provided; a narrative account of grant
activities during the quarter (including
capacity building activities, needs
assessment activities, development of
training materials/curriculum,
evaluation activities, and other
educational activities); and an
evaluation of progress regarding
planned versus actual work
accomplished.
Using this information, OSHA can
determine if the grant recipient is
meeting the proposed program goals and
objectives, as described in the grant
proposal, and is spending funds
consistent with the proposed budget.
The lack of disaggregated
demographic data variables impedes
efforts to measure and advance equity.
Section 9 of the E.O. 13895 on
Advancing Racial Equity and Support
for Underserved Communities Through
the Federal Government requires each

E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM

26JAN1

5042

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2023 / Notices

agency to evaluate whether their
policies produce racially inequitable
results when implemented and make
necessary changes to ensure
underserved communities are
adequately supported. Our first step is
to collect disaggregated age, race,
ethnicity, gender, and language datasets
to make informed program decisions
and strategies.
Requiring these reports on a quarterly
basis enables the agency to identify
training and expenditure discrepancies
in a timely fashion so that it can
implement appropriate action. In
addition, this information permits
OSHA to assess a grant recipient’s
ability to meet projected milestones and
expenditures.
This ICR requests a revision to add
race, ethnicity, and language to a
currently approved data collection. By
conducting an equity assessment to
meet the requirements of Executive
Order (E.O.) 13895 on Advancing Racial
Equity and Support for Underserved
Communities Through the Federal
Government and the DOL Evidence
Building Act Evaluation Plan, Project 38
(See Section 15).

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
agency’s functions to protect workers,
including whether the information is
useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection,
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB revise
the approval of the information
collection requirements contained in
Susan Harwood Training Grant
Program. The agency is requesting a
program change from 6,160 hours to
6,324 hours, a difference of 164 hours.
This increase is due to the addition of
the processing of the additional
demographic data required for the data
collection.
OSHA will summarize the comments
submitted in response to this notice and
will include this summary in the
request to OMB to extend the approval

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:17 Jan 25, 2023

Jkt 259001

of the information collection
requirements.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Susan Harwood Training Grant
Program.
OMB Control Number: 1218–0100.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits.
Number of Respondents: 93.
Number of Responses: 372.
Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
Average Time per Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 6,324.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); if your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at 202–693–1648.
or (3) by hard copy. Please note: While
OSHA’s Docket Office is continuing to
accept and process submissions by
regular mail due to the COVID–19
pandemic, the Docket Office is closed to
the public and not able to receive
submissions to the docket by hand,
express mail, messenger, and courier
service. All comments, attachments, and
other material must identify the agency
name and the OSHA docket number for
the ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2010–0021).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or a facsimile submission,
you must submit them to the OSHA
Docket Office (see the section of this
notice titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so that the
agency can attach them to your
comments.
Due to security procedures, the use of
regular mail may cause a significant
delay in the receipt of comments.
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and dates of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from this website. All
submissions, including copyrighted

PO 00000

Frm 00081

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov website to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the website’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office at
(202) 693–2350, (TTY (877) 889–5627)
for information about materials not
available from the website, and for
assistance in using the internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
James S. Frederick, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 8–2020 (85 FR 58393).
Signed at Washington, DC.
James S. Frederick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2023–01561 Filed 1–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–255–LT–2, 50–155–LT–2,
72–007–LT, 72–043–LT–2, ASLBP No. 22–
974–01–LT–BD01]

Order; Notice of Hearing
Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board, Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
In December 2020, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Entergy Nuclear
Palisades, LLC, Holtec International,
and Holtec Decommissioning
International, LLC (collectively
Applicants) sought the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission’s (NRC)
approval for the indirect transfer of
control of the Palisades Nuclear Plant
and Big Rock Point Site, including the
general licenses for each facility’s
Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation Entergy’s licenses, to Holtec
International.1 They further sought the
transfer of operating authority of the
facilities from Entergy to Holtec so that
Holtec can conduct licensed activities at
AGENCY:

1 Palisades Nuclear Plant and Big Rock Point
Plant Consideration of Approval of Transfer of
Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments,
86 FR 8225 (Feb. 4, 2021) [Hereinafter Hearing
Opportunity Notice]; Application for Order
Consenting to Transfers of Control of Licenses and
Approving Conforming License Amendments, at 1
[Hereinafter Application], attached (Encl. 1) to
Letter from A. Christopher Bakken III, President and
Chief Executive Officer, Entergy, to NRC Document
Control Desk (Dec. 23, 2020) (ADAMS Accession
No. ML20358A075).

E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM

26JAN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2023-01-26
File Created2023-01-26

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy