30-Day Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices

ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1

email LT Ben Bauman, Seventeenth
Coast Guard District (dpi), by phone at
(907) 463–2809 or email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard published guidelines
on December 31, 1992 (57 FR 62600), to
assist groups seeking recertification
under the Oil Terminal and Oil Tanker
Environmental Oversight and
Monitoring Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2732)
(the Act). The Coast Guard issued a
policy statement on July 7, 1993 (58 FR
36504), to clarify the factors that the
Coast Guard would be considering in
making its determination as to whether
advisory groups should be certified in
accordance with the Act, and the
procedures which the Coast Guard
would follow in meeting its certification
responsibilities under the Act. Most
recently, on September 16, 2002 (67 FR
58440), the Coast Guard changed its
policy on recertification procedures for
regional citizen’s advisory council by
requiring applicants to provide
comprehensive information every three
years. For each of the two years between
the triennial application procedures,
applicants submit a letter requesting
recertification that includes a
description of any substantive changes
to the information provided at the
previous triennial recertification.
Further, public comment is only
solicited during the triennial
comprehensive review.
The Alyeska Pipeline Service
Company pays the PWSRCAC $3.7
million annually in the form of a longterm contract. In return for this funding,
the PWSRCAC must annually show that
it ‘‘fosters the goals and purposes’’ of
OPA 90 and is ‘‘broadly representative
of the communities and interests in the
vicinity of the terminal facilities and
Prince William Sound.’’ The PWSRCAC
is an independent, nonprofit
organization founded in 1989. Though it
receives federal oversight like many
independent, nonprofit organizations, it
is not a federal agency. The PWSRCAC
is a local organization that predates the
passage of OPA 90. The existence of the
PWSRCAC was specifically recognized
in OPA 90 where it is defined as an
‘‘alternative voluntary advisory group.’’
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
funds the PWSRCAC, and the Coast
Guard ensures the PWSRCAC operates
in a fashion that is broadly consistent
with OPA 90.
Discussion of Comments
On December 22, 2022, the Coast
Guard published a Notice; Request for
comments titled ‘‘Application for

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:20 Mar 28, 2023

Jkt 259001

Recertification of Prince William Sound
Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council’’ in
the Federal Register (87 FR 78701). We
received 76 comments, all in support of
the PWSRCAC recertification. No public
meeting was requested. The comments
consistently cited PWSRCAC’s
collaborative partnerships in furthering
the respective communities’ interest to
promote safety, to maintain effective
prevention and response efforts
regarding oil pollution, and to protect
the sensitive marine environment along
Alaska’s coastline.
Recertification
By letter dated February 25, 2023, the
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District, certified that the PWSRCAC
qualifies as an alternative voluntary
advisory group under 33 U.S.C. 2732(o).
This recertification terminates on
February 29, 2024.
Dated: March 6, 2023.
Nathan A. Moore,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventeenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2023–06473 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7070–N–15; OMB Control
No. 2528–0321]

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Evaluation of the
Supportive Services Demonstration
Office of Policy Development
and Research, Chief Data Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for an additional 30 days of
public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: April 28,
2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00058

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

18569

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, REE, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna
P. Guido at [email protected] or
telephone 202–402–5535. This is not a
toll-free number, HUD welcomes and is
prepared to receive calls from
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, as well as individuals with
speech or communication disabilities.
To learn more about how to make an
accessible telephone call, please visit:
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/
telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on January 4, 2023,
at 88 FR 365.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Evaluation of the Supportive Services
Demonstration.
OMB Approval Number: 2528–0321.
Type of Request: Revision.
Form Number: None.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) has contracted with
Abt Associates Inc. and L&M Policy
Research to continue conducting an
evaluation of HUD’s Supportive
Services Demonstration (demonstration,
or SSD), which was extended by
Congress for an additional two years in
the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2021. The demonstration tests the
Integrated Wellness in Supportive
Housing (IWISH) model and is designed
to learn whether structured health and
wellness support can help older adults
living in affordable housing successfully
age in place. The demonstration funds
a full-time Resident Wellness Director
and part-time Wellness Nurse to work in
HUD-assisted housing developments
that either predominantly or exclusively
serve households headed by people
aged 62 and over. The demonstration is
testing whether IWISH will affect
unplanned hospitalizations and the use
of other types of acute care with high
healthcare costs, the use of primary and
nonacute care, the length of stay in
housing, transitions to long-term care
facilities, and mortality. Eligible HUDassisted properties applied for the

E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM

29MRN1

18570

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices

demonstration and were randomly
assigned to one of three groups:
1. A ‘‘treatment group’’ that received
grant funding to hire a Resident
Wellness Director and Wellness Nurse
and implement the SSD model (40
properties).
2. An ‘‘active control’’ group that did
not receive grant funding but received a
stipend to participate in the evaluation
(40 properties).
3. A ‘‘passive control’’ group that
received neither grant funding nor a
stipend (44 properties).
The random assignment permits an
evaluation that quantifies the impact of
the SSD model by comparing outcomes
at the 40 treatment group properties to
outcomes at the 84 properties in the
active and passive control groups.
Under contract with HUD’s Office of
Policy Development and Research, Abt
Associates Inc. has been conducting a
two-part evaluation: a process study to
describe the implementation of the
demonstration, and an impact study to
measure the effect of the SSD model on
residents’ use of healthcare services and
housing stability. The first phase of the
demonstration ran from October 2017–
October 2020. The Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other
Extensions Act and the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2021 extended the
demonstration for an additional two

years. Abt will continue to evaluate the
demonstration through September 2026.
During the first phase of the
evaluation, Abt Associates Inc. received
OMB approval for the following primary
data collection activities:
• Questionnaires with staff from the
treatment and active control properties.
• Focus groups with residents of
treatment and active control properties
and caregivers of residents of the
treatment properties.
• Interviews with Resident Wellness
Directors and Wellness Nurses at the
treatment group properties.
• Interviews with Service
Coordinators at the active control group
properties
• Interviews with representatives of
organizations that own or manage the
active control or treatment properties.
This request is for an additional
round of data collection for the
activities listed below:
• Interviews with Resident Wellness
Directors and Wellness Nurses at each
of the 40 treatment properties.
• Interviews with property owners or
managers at the 40 treatment properties
and 40 active control properties.
• Interviews with up to 150 residents
of 10 of the treatment properties.
The purpose of these activities is to
collect data from demonstration staff,
property owners and managers, and
residents about the continued

implementation of the demonstration,
including the model’s strengths and
weakness, and how resident wellness
services and activities compare across
treatment and control properties. The
evaluation will culminate in a
comprehensive report that will be made
publicly available.
Respondents: Resident Wellness
Directors, Wellness Nurses, Property
owners and managers, and HUDassisted residents (aged 62 and over).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
Up to 54 Resident Wellness Directors,
44 Wellness Nurses, 40 property owners
and managers of treatment properties,
40 property owners and managers of
active control properties, and 150 HUDassisted residents aged 62 and older
living in treatment properties.
Frequency of Response: Once for all
interviews.
Average Hours per Response:
Interviews with Resident Wellness
Directors and Wellness Nurses will take
an estimated take 3 hours each,
interviews with property owners and
managers will take an estimated 2 hours
each, resident interviews conducted in
the resident’s preferred language an
estimated 1.5 hours each, and resident
interviews conducted via on-demand
interpretation will take an estimated 3
hours each.

EXHIBIT A–2—ESTIMATED HOUR AND COST BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
Information collection

Responses
per annum

Burden
hour per
response

Annual
burden
hour

Hourly
cost per
response

Number of
respondents

Frequency
of response

54
44

1
1

54
44

3
3

162
132

1 $40.00
2 63.99

$6,480.00
8,446.68

Annual cost

Interviews with Resident Wellness Directors ............................
Interviews with Wellness Nurses ..............................................
Interviews with Treatment Group Property Owners and Managers ......................................................................................
Interviews with Active Control Property Owners and Managers ......................................................................................
Resident Interviews conducted in core languages ...................
Resident Interviews conducted via on demand interpretation ..

40

1

40

2

80

3 51.23

4,098.40

40
120
30

1
1
1

40
120
30

2
1.5
3

80
180
90

3 51.23
4 9.63

4,098.40
1,733.40
866.70

Total ...................................................................................

328

....................

....................

....................

724

....................

25,723.58

4 9.63

1 Estimated

ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1

cost burden for Resident Wellness Directors participating in interviews is based on the average hourly wage for private industry workers by industry
sector. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2022, for the healthcare and social assistance industry ($40.00), accessed September 26, 2022 at Table 4. Private industry workers by occupational and industry group—2022 Q02 Results (bls.gov).
2 Estimated cost burden for property Wellness Nurses participating in interview is based on the average hourly wage for private industry workers by industry sector.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2022, for Registered Nurse Occupations ($63.99), accessed September 26, 2022 at Table 4. Private industry workers by occupational and industry group—2022 Q02 Results (bls.gov).
3 Estimated cost burden for property owners and managers is a blended rate based on average hourly and weekly earnings of all employees on private nonfarm
payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2022 for all private industry workers ($38.91) and the hourly cost for management, professional, and related workers ($63.55). Accessed September 26, 2022: Table 4. Private industry workers by occupational and industry group—2022 Q02
Results (bls.gov).
4 To estimate hourly cost for the residents, we used average Social Security benefit for retired works in June 2022, (accessed in September 26, 2022: https://
www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/basicfact-alt.pdf) which was $1,669 into an hourly rate of $9.63 per hour (by multiplying by 12 months and dividing by 2,080
hours).

B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:20 Mar 28, 2023

Jkt 259001

proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of

E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM

29MRN1

18571

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2023 / Notices
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
(5) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Office,
Office of Policy Development and Research,
Chief Data Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–06458 Filed 3–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7070–N–16; OMB Control
No. 2503–0034]

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Ginnie Mae Digital
Collateral Program
Office of Policy Development
and Research, Chief Data Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for an additional 30 days of
public comment.

SUMMARY:

DATES:

Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.

ADDRESSES:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, REE, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna
P. Guido at [email protected] or
telephone 202–402–5535. This is not a
toll-free number, HUD welcomes and is
prepared to receive calls from
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, as well as individuals with
speech or communication disabilities.
To learn more about how to make an
accessible telephone call, please visit:
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/
telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on January 26,
2023, at 88 FR 5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title of Information Collection: Ginnie
Mae Digital Collateral Program.
OMB Approval Number: 2503–0034.
Type of Request: Reinstatement.
Form Number: HUD–11701A; HUD–
11701B; HUD–11708–SI.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use:
Adapting to the needs of the industry,
Ginnie Mae is permitting the
securitization of mortgage loans where
the note is an eligible eNote. The forms
in this request are new forms that are
necessary due to the unique
requirements of managing eNotes and
eMortgages. This collection permits
Ginnie Mae to verify: (1) that eIssuers
and eMortgages have the specialized
knowledge and experience to
participate; (2) that eIssuers and
eCustodians have the technological
capability to service eMortgages and
safeguard eMortgage documents; (3) the
name and location of the entities
responsible for the various Ginnie Mae
accounts and eMortgage documents, and
(4) those entities that are responsible for
servicing the eMortgages that back the
Ginnie Mae pools. Ginnie Mae needs
this information to mitigate risk and
evaluate its business operations,
procedures and programs, and assist
lenders in processing borrower requests
more efficiently. Ginnie Mae also
requires the collection of information to
ensure that there are no deficiencies,
which could affect the pass through of
securities to its investors.
Based upon feedback received about
the eIssuer Application form (HUD–
11701A), we have revised the
instructions. The only revision is to the
form’s instructions which now address
subservicing by the eIssuer Applicant.
Burden
hour per
response

Annual
burden
hours

Hourly
cost per
response *

Frequency
of response

eIssuer Application (HUD11701–A) ..........................................
eCustodian Application (HUD 11701–B) ..................................
Request for Release of Secured Party (HUD 11708–SI) .........

20
5
300

1
1
1

20
5
300

.5
.5
.05

10
2.5
15

$38
38
38

$380
95
570

Total ...................................................................................

325

1

325

1.05

27.5

38

1,045

B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:20 Mar 28, 2023

Jkt 259001

Responses
per annum

A. Overview of Information Collection

Number of
respondents

Information collection

ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1

Comments Due Date: April 28,

2023.

(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.

PO 00000

Frm 00060

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Annual cost

(5) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.

E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM

29MRN1