18 CFR Part 11

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 1 of 87

ELECTRONIC CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
e-CFR data is current as of October 19, 2020
Title 18 → Chapter I → Subchapter B → Part 11
Title 18: Conservation of Power and Water Resources
PART 11—ANNUAL CHARGES UNDER PART I OF THE FEDERAL POWER ACT
Contents
Subpart A—Charges for Costs of Administration, Use of Tribal Lands and
Other Government Lands, and Use of Government Dams
§11.1
§11.2
§11.3
§11.4
lands.
§11.5
§11.6
§11.7
§11.8

Costs of administration.
Use of government lands.
Use of government dams, excluding pumped storage projects.
Use of government dams for pumped storage projects, and use of tribal
Exemption of minor projects.
Exemption of State and municipal licensees and exemptees.
Effective date.
Adjustment of annual charges.

Subpart B—Charges for Headwater Benefits
§11.10
§11.11
§11.12
§11.13
§11.14
§11.15
§11.16
§11.17

General provision; waiver and exemptions; definitions.
Energy gains method of determining headwater benefits charges.
Determination of section 10(f) costs.
Energy gains calculations.
Procedures for establishing charges without an energy gains investigation.
Procedures for determining charges by energy gains investigation.
Filing requirements.
Procedures for payment of charges and costs.

Subpart C—General Procedures
§11.20 Time for payment.
§11.21 Penalties.
Appendix A to Part 11—Fee Schedule for FY 2020
AUTHORITY: 16 U.S.C. 792-828c; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 2 of 87

Back to Top

Subpart A—Charges for Costs of Administration, Use of Tribal
Lands and Other Government Lands, and Use of Government
Dams
Back to Top
§11.1 Costs of administration.
(a) Authority. Pursuant to section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act and section
3401 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986, the Commission will assess
reasonable annual charges against licensees and exemptees to reimburse the
United States for the costs of administration of the Commission's hydropower
regulatory program.
(b) Scope. The annual charges under this section will be charged to and
allocated among:
(1) All licensees of projects of more than 1.5 megawatts of installed capacity;
and
(2) All holders of exemptions under either section 30 of the Federal Power Act
or sections 405 and 408 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as
amended by section 408 of the Energy Security Act of 1980, but only if the
exemption was issued subsequent to April 21, 1995 and is for a project of more than
1.5 megawatts of installed capacity.
(3) If the exemption for a project of more than 1.5 megawatts of installed
capacity was issued subsequent to April 21, 1995 but pursuant to an application
filed prior to that date, the exemptee may credit against its annual charge any filing
fee paid pursuant to §381.601 of this chapter, which was removed effective April 21,
1995, 18 CFR 381.601 (1994), until the total of all such credits equals the filing fee
that was paid.
(c) Licenses and exemptions other than State or municipal. For licensees and
exemptees, other than State or municipal:
(1) A determination shall be made for each fiscal year of the costs of
administration of Part I of the Federal Power Act chargeable to such licensees or
exemptees, from which shall be deducted any administrative costs that are stated in
the license or exemption or fixed by the Commission in determining headwater
benefit payments.
(2) For each fiscal year the costs of administration determined under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section will be assessed against such licenses or exemptee in the

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 3 of 87

proportion that the annual charge factor for each such project bears to the total of
the annual charge factors under all such outstanding licenses and exemptions.
(3) The annual charge factor for each such project shall be found as follows:
(i) For a conventional project the factor is its authorized installed capacity plus
112.5 times its annual energy output in millions of kilowatt-hours.
(ii) For a pure pumped storage project the factor is its authorized installed
capacity.
(iii) For a mixed conventional-pumped storage project the factor is its authorized
installed capacity plus 112.5 times its gross annual energy output in millions of
kilowatt-hours less 75 times the annual energy used for pumped storage pumping in
million of kilowatt-hours.
(iv) For purposes of determining their annual charges factor, projects that are
operated pursuant to an exemption will be deemed to have an annual energy output
of zero.
(4) To enable the Commission to determine such charges annually, each
licensee whose authorized installed capacity exceeds 1.5 megawatts must file with
the Commission, on or before November 1 of each year, a statement under oath
showing the gross amount of power generated (or produced by nonelectrical
equipment) and the amount of power used for pumped storage pumping by the
project during the preceding fiscal year, expressed in kilowatt hours. If any licensee
does not report the gross energy output of its project within the time specified above,
the Commission's staff will estimate the energy output and this estimate may be
used in lieu of the filings required by this section made by such licensee after
November 1.
(5) For unconstructed projects, the assessments begin on the date by which the
licensee or exemptee is required to commence project construction, or as that
deadline may be extended. For constructed projects, the assessments begin on the
effective date of the license or exemption, except for any new capacity authorized
therein. The assessments for new authorized capacity at licensed or exempted
projects begin on the date by which the licensee or exemptee is required to
commence construction of the new capacity. In the event that assessments begin
during a fiscal year, the charges will be prorated.
(d) State and municipal licensees and exemptees. For State or municipal
licensees and exemptees:
(1) A determination shall be made for each fiscal year of the cost of
administration under Part I of the Federal Power Act chargeable to such licensees
and exemptees, from which shall be deducted any administrative costs that are

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 4 of 87

stated in the license or exemption or that are fixed by the Commission in
determining headwater benefit payments.
(2) An exemption will be granted to a licensee or exemptee to the extent, if any,
to which it may be entitled under section 10(e) of the Act provided the data is
submitted as requested in paragraphs (d) (4) and (5) of this section.
(3) For each fiscal year the total actual cost of administration as determined
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section will be assessed against each such licensee
or exemptee (except to the extent of the exemptions granted pursuant to paragraph
(d)(2) of this section) in the proportion that the authorized installed capacity of each
such project bears to the total such capacity under all such outstanding licenses or
exemptions.
(4) To enable the Commission to compute on the bill for annual charges the
exemption to which State and municipal licensees and exemptees are entitled
because of the use of power by the licensee or exemptee for State or municipal
purposes, each such licensee or exemptee must file with the Commission, on or
before November 1 of each year, a statement under oath showing the following
information with respect to the power generated by the project and the disposition
thereof during the preceding fiscal year, expressed in kilowatt-hours:
(i) Gross amount of power generated by the project.
(ii) Amount of power used for station purposes and lost in transmission, etc.
(iii) Net amount of power available for sale or use by licensee or exemptee,
classified as follows:
(A) Used by licensee or exemptee.
(B) Sold by licensee or exemptee.
(5) When the power from a licensed or exempted project owned by a State or
municipality enters into its electric system, making it impracticable to meet the
requirements of this section with respect to the disposition of project power, such
licensee or exemptee may, in lieu thereof, furnish similar information with respect to
the disposition of the available power of the entire electric system of the licensee or
exemptee.
(6) The assessments commence on the date of commencement of project
operation. In the event that project operation commences during a fiscal year, the
charges will be prorated based on the date on which operation commenced.
(e) Transmission lines. For projects involving transmission lines only, the
administrative charge will be stated in the license.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 5 of 87

(f) Maximum charge. No licensed or exempted project's annual charge may
exceed a maximum charge established each year by the Commission to equal 2.0
percent of the adjusted Commission costs of administration of the hydropower
regulatory program. For every project with an annual charge determined to be above
the maximum charge, that project's annual charge will be set at the maximum
charge, and any amount above the maximum charge will be reapportioned to the
remaining projects. The reapportionment will be computed using the method
outlined in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section (but excluding any project whose
annual charge is already set at the maximum amount). This procedure will be
repeated until no project's annual charge exceeds the maximum charge.
(g) Commission's costs. (1) With respect to costs incurred by the Commission,
the assessment of annual charges will be based on an estimate of the costs of
administration of Part I of the Federal Power Act that will be incurred during the
fiscal year in which the annual charges are assessed. After the end of the fiscal
year, the assessment will be recalculated based on the costs of administration that
were actually incurred during that fiscal year; the actual costs will be compared to
the estimated costs; and the difference between the actual and estimated costs will
be carried over as an adjustment to the assessment for the subsequent fiscal year.
(2) The issuance of bills based on the administrative costs incurred by the
Commission during the year in which the bill is issued will commence in 1993. The
annual charge for the administrative costs that were incurred in fiscal year 1992 will
be billed in 1994. At the licensee's option, the charge may be paid in three equal
annual installments in fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 1996, plus any accrued interest.
If the licensee elects the three-year installment plan, the Commission will accrue
interest (at the most recent yield of two-year Treasury securities) on the unpaid
charges and add the accrued interest to the installments billed in fiscal years 1995
and 1996.
(h) In making their annual reports to the Commission on their costs in
administering Part I of the Federal Power Act, the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service are to deduct any amounts that
were deposited into their Treasury accounts during that year as reimbursements for
conducting studies and reviews pursuant to section 30(e) of the Federal Power Act.
(i) Definition. As used in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, authorized
installed capacity means the lesser of the ratings of the generator or turbine units.
The rating of a generator is the product of the continuous-load capacity rating of the
generator in kilovolt-amperes (kVA) and the system power factor in kW/kVA. If the
licensee or exemptee does not know its power factor, a factor of 1.0 kW/kVA will be
used. The rating of a turbine is the product of the turbine's capacity in horsepower
(hp) at best gate (maximum efficiency point) opening under the manufacturer's rated
head times a conversion factor of 0.75 kW/hp. If the generator or turbine installed
has a rating different from that authorized in the license or exemption, or the
installed generator is rewound or otherwise modified to change its rating, or the

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 6 of 87

turbine is modified to change its rating, the licensee or exemptee must apply to the
Commission to amend its authorized installed capacity to reflect the change.
(j) Transition. For a license having the capacity of the project for annual charge
purposes stated in horsepower, that capacity shall be deemed to be the capacity
stated in kilowatts elsewhere in the license, including any amendments thereto.
[60 FR 15047, Mar. 22, 1995, as amended by Order 584, 60 FR 57925, Nov. 24, 1995;
Order 815, 80 FR 63671, Oct. 21, 2015; Order 857, 84 FR 7991, Mar. 6, 2019]

Back to Top
§11.2 Use of government lands.
(a) Reasonable annual charges for recompensing the United States for the use,
occupancy, and enjoyment of its lands (other than lands adjoining or pertaining to
Government dams or other structures owned by the United States Government) or
its other property, will be fixed by the Commission.
(b) General rule. Annual charges for the use of government lands will be
payable in advance, and will be set on the basis of an annual schedule of per-acre
rental fees, as set forth in Appendix A of this part. The Executive Director will publish
the updated fee schedule in the FEDERAL REGISTER.
(c) The annual per-acre rental fee is the product of four factors: the adjusted
per-acre value multiplied by the encumbrance factor multiplied by the rate of return
multiplied by the annual adjustment factor.
(1) Adjusted per-acre value. (i) Counties (or other geographical areas) are
assigned a per-acre value based on their average per-acre land and building value
published in the Census of Agriculture (Census) by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS). The adjusted per-acre value is computed by reducing the
NASS Census land and building value by the sum of a state-specific modifier and
seven percent. A table of state-specific adjustments will be available on the
Commission's Web site.
(ii) The state-specific modifier is a percentage reduction applicable to all
counties or geographic areas in a state (except Puerto Rico), and represents the
ratio of the total value of irrigated farmland in the state to the total value of all
farmland in the state. The state-specific modifier will be recalculated every five years
beginning in payment year 2016.
(iii) The state-specific modifier for Puerto Rico is 13 percent.
(iv) For all geographic areas in Alaska except for the Aleutian Islands Area, the
Commission will calculate a statewide per-acre value based on the average per-acre
land and building values published in the NASS Census for the Kenai Peninsula

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 7 of 87

Area and the Fairbanks Area. This statewide per-acre value will be reduced by the
sum of the state-specific modifier and seven percent. The resulting adjusted
statewide per-acre value will be applied to all projects located in Alaska, except for
projects located in the Aleutian Island Area.
(2) Encumbrance factor. The encumbrance factor is 50 percent.
(3) Rate of return. The rate of return is 5.77 percent through payment year
2025. The rate of return will be adjusted every 10 years thereafter, and will be based
on the 10-year average of the 30-year Treasury bond yield rate immediately
preceding the applicable NASS Census. For example, for years 2026 through 2035,
the rate of return will be based on the 10-year average (2012-2021) of the 30-year
Treasury bond yield rate immediately preceding the 2022 NASS Census. If the 30year Treasury bond yield rate is not available, the next longest term Treasury bond
available should be used in its place.
(4) Annual adjustment factor. The annual adjustment factor is 1.9 percent
through payment year 2015. For years 2016 through 2025, the annual adjustment
factor is the annual change in the Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic
Product (IPD-GDP) for the ten years (2014-2023) preceding issuance (2024) of the
most recent NASS Census (2022). Each subsequent ten year adjustment will be
made in the same manner.
(d) The annual charge for the use of Government lands for 2013 will be reduced
by 25 percent for all licensees subject to this section.
(e) The minimum annual charge for the use of Government lands under any
license will be $25.
[Order 774, 78 FR 5265, Jan. 25, 2013, as amended by Order 838, 83 FR 7, Jan. 2, 2018]

Back to Top
§11.3 Use of government dams, excluding pumped storage projects.
(a) General rule. (1) Any licensee whose non-Federal project uses a
Government dam or other structure for electric power generation and whose annual
charges are not already specified in final form in the license must pay the United
States an annual charge for the use of that dam or other structure as determined in
accordance with this section. Payment of such annual charge is in addition to any
reimbursement paid by a licensee for costs incurred by the United States as a direct
result of the licensee's project development at such Government dam.
(2) Any licensee that is obligated under the terms of a license issued on or
before September 16, 1986 to pay specified annual charges for the use of a
Government dam must continue to pay the annual charges prescribed in the project

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 8 of 87

license pending any readjustment of the annual charge for the project made
pursuant to section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act.
(b) Graduated flat rates. Annual charges for the use of Government dams or
other structures owned by the United States are 1 mill per kilowatt-hour for the first
40 gigawatt-hours of energy a project produces, 11⁄2 mills per kilowatt-hour for over
40 up to and including 80 gigawatt-hours, and 2 mills per kilowatt-hour for any
energy the project produces over 80 gigawatt-hours.
(c) Information reporting. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, each licensee must file with the Commission, on or before November 1 of
each year, a sworn statement showing the gross amount of energy generated during
the preceding fiscal year and the amount of energy provided free of charge to the
Government. The determination of the annual charge will be based on the gross
energy production less the energy provided free of charge to the Government.
(2) A licensee who has filed these data under another section of part 11 or who
has submitted identical data with FERC or the Energy Information Administration for
the same fiscal year is not required to file the information described in paragraph (c)
(1) of this section. Referenced filings should be identified by company name, date
filed, docket or project number, and form, number.
(d) Credits. A licensee may file a request with the Director of the Office of
Energy Projects for a credit for contractual payments made for construction,
operation, and maintenance of a Government dam at any time before 30 days after
receiving a billing for annual charges determined under this section. The Director, or
his designee, will grant such a credit only when the licensee demonstrates that a
credit is reasonably justified. The Director, or his designee, shall consider, among
other factors, the contractual arrangements between the licensee and the Federal
agency which owns the dam and whether these arrangements reveal clearly that
substantial payments are being made for power purposes, relevant legislation, and
other equitable factors.
[Order 379, 49 FR 22778, June 1, 1984, as amended by Order 379-A, 49 FR 33862, Aug.
27, 1984. Redesignated at 51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986; Order 469, 52 FR 18209, May 14,
1987; 52 FR 33802, Sept. 8, 1987; 53 FR 44859, Nov. 7, 1988; Order 647, 69 FR 32438,
June 10, 2004]

Back to Top
§11.4 Use of government dams for pumped storage projects, and use of
tribal lands.
(a) General Rule. The Commission will determine on a case-by-case basis
under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act the annual charges for any pumped

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 9 of 87

storage project using a Government dam or other structure and for any project using
tribal lands within Indian reservations.
(b) Information reporting. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section a Licensee whose project includes pumped storage facilities must file with
the Commission, on or before November 1 of each year, a sworn statement showing
the gross amount of energy generated during the preceding fiscal year, and the
amount of energy provided free of charge to the Government, and the amount of
energy used for pumped storage pumping.
(2) A licensee who has filed these data under another section of part 11 or who
has submitted identical data with FERC or the Energy Information Administration for
the same fiscal year is not required to file the information required in paragraph (b)
(1) of this section. Referenced filings should be identified by company name, date
filed, docket or project number, and form number.
(c) Commencing in 1993, the annual charges for any project using tribal land
within Indian reservations will be billed during the fiscal year in which the land is
used, for the use of that land during that year.
[Order 379, 49 FR 22778, June 1, 1984. Redesignated at 51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986; Order
469, 52 FR 18209, May 14, 1987; 52 FR 33802, Sept. 8, 1987; Order 551, 58 FR 15770,
Mar. 24, 1993]

Back to Top
§11.5 Exemption of minor projects.
No exemption will be made from payment of annual charges for the use of
Government dams or tribal lands within Indian reservations but licenses may be
issued without charges other than for such use for the development, transmission,
or distribution of power for domestic, mining, or other beneficial use in minor
projects.
[Order 141, 12 FR 8492, Dec. 19, 1947. Redesignated by Order 379, 49 FR 22778, June 1,
1984. Redesignated at 51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986]

Back to Top
§11.6 Exemption of State and municipal licensees and exemptees.
(a) Bases for exemption. A State or municipal licensee or exemptee may claim
total or partial exemption from the assessment of annual charges upon one or more
of the following grounds:
(1) The project was primarily designed to provide or improve navigation;

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 10 of 87

(2) To the extent that power generated, transmitted, or distributed by the project
was sold directly or indirectly to the public (ultimate consumer) without profit;
(3) To the extent that power generated, transmitted, or distributed by the project
was used by the licensee for State or municipal purposes.
(b) Projects primarily for navigation. No State or municipal licensee shall be
entitled to exemption from the payment of annual charges on the ground that the
project was primarily designed to provide or improve navigation unless the licensee
establishes that fact from the actual conditions under which the project was
constructed and was operated during the calendar year for which the charge is
made.
(c) State or municipal use. A State or municipal licensee shall be entitled to
exemption from the payment of annual charges for the project to the extent that
power generated, transmitted, or distributed by the project is used by the licensee
itself for State or municipal purposes, such as lighting streets, highways, parks,
public buildings, etc., for operating licensee's water or sewerage system, or in
performing other public functions of the licensee.
(d) Sales to public. No State or municipal licensee shall be entitled to exemption
from the payment of annual charges on the ground that power generated,
transmitted, or distributed by the project is sold to the public without profit, unless
such licensee shall show:
(1) That it maintains an accounting system which segregates the operations of
the licensed project and reflects with reasonable accuracy the revenues and
expenses of the project;
(2) That an income statement, prepared in accordance with the Commission's
Uniform System of Accounts, shows that the revenues from the sale of project
power do not exceed the total amount of operating expenses, maintenance,
depreciation, amortization, taxes, and interest on indebtedness, applicable to the
project property. Periodic accruals or payments for redemption of the principal of
bonds or other indebtedness may not be deducted in determining the net profit of
the project.
(e) Sales for resale. Notwithstanding compliance by a State or municipal
licensee with the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, it shall be subject to
the payment of annual charges to the extent that electric power generated,
transmitted, or distributed by the project is sold to another State, municipality,
person, or corporation for resale, unless the licensee shall show that the power was
sold to the ultimate consumer without profit. The matter of whether or not a profit
was made is a question of fact to be established by the licensee.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 11 of 87

(f) Interchange of power. Notwithstanding compliance by a State or municipal
licensee with the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, it shall be subject to
the payment of annual charges to the extent that power generated, transmitted, or
distributed by the project was supplied under an interchange agreement to a State,
municipality, person, or corporation for sale at a profit (which power was not offset
by an equivalent amount of power received under such interchange agreement)
unless the licensee shall show that the power was sold to ultimate consumers
without profit.
(g) Construction period. During the period when the licensed project is under
construction and is not generating power, it will be considered as operating without
profit within the meaning of this section, and licensee will be entitled to total
exemption from the payment of annual charges, except as to those charges relating
to the use of a Government dam or tribal lands within Indian reservations.
(h) Optional showing. When the power from the licensed project enters into the
electric power system of the State or municipal licensee, making it impracticable to
meet the requirements set forth in this section with respect to the operations of the
project only, such licensee may, in lieu thereof, furnish the same information with
respect to the operations of said electric power system as a whole.
(i) Application for exemption. Applications for exemption from payment of
annual charges shall be signed by an authorized executive officer or chief
accounting officer of the licensee or exemptee and verified under oath. The
application must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with
filing procedures posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov within
the time allowed (by §11.20) for the payment of the annual charges. If the licensee
or exemptee, within the time allowed for the payment of the annual charges, files
notice that it intends to file an application for exemption, an additional period of 30
days is allowed within which to complete and file the application for exemption. The
filing of an application for exemption does not by itself alleviate the requirement to
pay the annual charges, nor does it exonerate the licensee or exemptee from the
assessment of penalties under §11.21. If a bill for annual charges becomes payable
after an application for an exemption has been filed and while the application is still
pending for decision, the bill may be paid under protest and subject to refund.
[Order 143, 13 FR 6681, Nov. 13, 1948. Redesignated and amended by Order 379, 49 FR
22778, June 1, 1984. Redesignated at 51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986; 60 FR 15048, Mar. 22,
1995; Order 737, 75 FR 43403, July 26, 2010]

Back to Top
§11.7 Effective date.
All annual charges imposed under this subpart will be computed beginning on
the effective date of the license unless some other date is fixed in the license.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 12 of 87

[51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986]

Back to Top
§11.8 Adjustment of annual charges.
All annual charges imposed under this subpart continue in effect as fixed unless
changed as authorized by law.
[51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986]

Back to Top

Subpart B—Charges for Headwater Benefits
SOURCE: Order 453, 51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986, unless otherwise noted.

Back to Top
§11.10 General provision; waiver and exemptions; definitions.
(a) Headwater benefits charges. (1) The Commission will assess or approve
charges under this subpart for direct benefits derived from headwater projects
constructed by the United States, a licensee, or a pre-1920 permittee. Charges
under this subpart will amount to an equitable part of the annual costs of interest,
maintenance, and depreciation expenses of such headwater projects and the costs
to the Commission of determining headwater benefits charges. Except as provided
in paragraph (b) of this section, the owner of any non-Federal downstream project
that receives headwater benefits must pay charges determined under this subpart.
(2) Headwater benefits are the additional electric generation at a downstream
project that results from regulation of the flow of the river by the headwater, or
upstream, project, usually by increasing or decreasing the release of water from a
storage reservoir.
(b) Waiver and exemptions. The owner of a downstream project with installed
generating capacity of 1.5 MW (2000 horsepower) or less or for which the
Commission has granted an exemption from section 10(f) is not required to pay
headwater benefits charges.
(c) Definitions. For purposes of this subpart:
(1) Energy gains means the difference between the number of kilowatt-hours of
energy produced at a downstream project with the headwater project and that which
would be produced without the headwater project.
(2) Generation means gross generation of electricity at a hydroelectric project,
including generation needed for station use or the equivalent for direct drive units,

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 13 of 87

measured in kilowatt-hours. It does not include energy used for or derived from
pumping in a pumped storage facility.
(3) Headwater project costs means the total costs of an upstream project
constructed by the United States, a licensee, or pre-1920 permittee.
(4) Separable cost means the difference between the cost of a multiple-function
headwater project with and without any particular function.
(5) Remaining benefits means the difference between the separable cost of a
specific function in a multiple-function project and the lesser of:
(i) The benefits of that function in the project, as determined by the responsible
Federal agency at the time the project or function was authorized; or
(ii) The cost of the most likely alternative single-function project providing the
same benefits.
(6) Joint-use cost means the difference between the total project cost and the
total separable costs. Joint-use costs are allocated among the project functions
according to each function's percentage of the total remaining benefits.
(7) Specific power cost means that portion of the headwater project costs that is
directly attributable to the function of power generation at the headwater project,
including, but not limited to, the cost of the electric generators, turbines, penstocks,
and substation.
(8) Joint-use power cost means the portion of the joint-use cost allocated to the
power function of the project.
(9) Section 10(f) costs means the annual interest, depreciation, and
maintenance expense portion of the joint-use power cost, including costs of nonpower functions required by statute to be paid by revenues from the power function.
(10) Party means:
(i) The owner of a non-Federal downstream hydroelectric project which is
directly benefited by a headwater project constructed by the United States, a
licensee, or a pre-1920 permittee;
(ii) The owner of a headwater project constructed by the United States, a
licensee, or a pre-1920 permittee;
(iii) An operating agency of, or an agency marketing power from, a headwater
project constructed by the United States; or
(iv) Any party, as defined in §385.102(c) of this chapter.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 14 of 87

(11) Final charge means a charge assessed on an annual basis to recover
section 10(f) costs and which represents the final determination of the charge for the
period for which headwater benefits are assessed. Final charges may be
established retroactively, to finalize an interim charge, or prospectively.
(12) Interim charge means a charge assessed to recover section 10(f) costs for
a specified period of headwater benefits pending determination of a final charge for
that period.
(13) Investment cost means the sum of:
(i) Project construction costs, including cost of land, labor and materials, cost of
pre- and post-authorization investigations, and cost of engineering, supervision, and
administration during construction of the project; and
(ii) Interest during construction.
[Order 453, 51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986, as amended by Order 699, 72 FR 45324, Aug. 14,
2007]

Back to Top
§11.11 Energy gains method of determining headwater benefits charges.
(a) Applicability. This section applies to any determination of headwater benefits
charges, unless:
(1) The Commission has approved headwater benefits charges pursuant to an
existing coordination agreement among the parties;
(2) The parties reach, and the Commission approves, a settlement with respect
to headwater benefits charges, pursuant to §11.14(a) of this subpart; or
(3) Charges may be assessed under §11.14(b).
(b) General rule—(1) Summary. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, a headwater benefits charge for a downstream project is determined under
this subpart by apportioning the section 10(f) costs of the headwater project among
the headwater project and all downstream projects that are not exempt from or
waived from headwater benefits charges under §11.10(b) of this chapter, according
to each project's share of the total energy benefits to those projects resulting from
the headwater project.
(2) Calculation; headwater benefits formula. The annual headwater benefits
charge for a downstream project is derived by multiplying the section 10(f) cost by
the ratio of the energy gains received by the downstream project to the sum of total
energy gains received by all downstream projects (except those projects specified in

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 15 of 87

§11.10(b) of this chapter) plus the energy generated at the headwater project that is
assigned to the joint-use power cost, as follows:

View or download PDF
In which:
P = annual payment to be made for headwater benefits received by a downstream project,
Cp = annual section 10(f) cost of the headwater project,
En = annual energy gains received at a downstream project, or group of projects if owned by one
entity,
Ed = annual energy gains received at all downstream projects (except those specified in §11.10(b)
of this chapter), and
Ej = portion of the annual energy generated at the headwater project assigned to the joint-use
power cost.

(3) If power generation is not a function of the headwater project, section 10(f)
costs will be apportioned only among the downstream projects.
(4) If the headwater project is constructed after the downstream project, liability
for headwater benefits charges will accrue beginning on the day on which any
energy losses at the downstream project due to filling the headwater reservoir have
been offset by subsequent energy gains. If the headwater project is constructed
prior to the downstream project, liability for headwater benefits charges will accrue
beginning on the day on which benefits are first realized by the downstream project.
(5) No final charge assessed by the Commission under this subpart may
exceed 85 percent of the value of the energy gains. If a party demonstrates, within
the time specified in §11.17(b)(3) for response to a preliminary assessment, that any
final charge assessed under this subpart, not including the cost of the investigation
assessed under §11.17(c), exceeds 85 percent of the value of the energy gains
provided to the downstream project for the period for which the charge is assessed,
the Commission will reduce the charge to not more than 85 percent of the value. For
purposes of this paragraph, the value of the energy gains is the cost of obtaining an
equivalent amount of electricity from the most likely alternative source during the
period for which the charge is assessed.
Back to Top
§11.12 Determination of section 10(f) costs.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 16 of 87

(a) for non-Federal headwater projects. If the headwater project was
constructed by a licensee or pre-1920 permittee and a party requests the
Commission to determine charges, the Commission will determine on a case-bycase basis what portion of the annual interest, maintenance, and depreciation costs
of the headwater project constitutes the section 10(f) costs, for purposes of this
subpart.
(b) For Federal headwater projects. (1) If the headwater project was
constructed or is operated by the United States, and the Commission has not
approved a settlement between the downstream project owner and the headwater
project owner, the section 10(f) cost will be determined by deriving, from information
provided by the headwater project owner pursuant to §11.16 of this subpart, the
joint-use power cost and the portion of the annual joint-use power cost that
represents the interest, maintenance, and depreciation costs of the project.
(2) If power is not an authorized function of the headwater project, the section
10(f) cost is the annual interest, maintenance, and depreciation portion of the
headwater project costs designated as the joint-use power cost, derived by deeming
a power function at the project. The value of the benefits assigned to the deemed
power function, for purposes of determining the value of remaining benefits of the
joint-use power cost, is the total value of downstream energy gains included in the
headwater benefits formula.
(3) For purposes of this paragraph, total value of downstream energy gains
means the lesser of:
(i) The cost of generating an equivalent amount of electricity at the most likely
alternative facility at the time the headwater project became operational; or
(ii) The incremental cost of installing electrical generation at the headwater
project at the time the project became operational.
Back to Top
§11.13 Energy gains calculations.
(a) Energy gains at a downstream project. (1) Energy gains at a downstream
project are determined by simulating operation of the downstream project with and
without the effects of the headwater project. Except for determinations which are not
complex or in which headwater benefits are expected to be small, calculations will
be made by application of the Headwater Benefits Energy Gains Model, as
presented in The Headwater Benefits Energy Gains (HWBEG) Model Description
and Users Manual, which is available for the National Technical Information Service,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 17 of 87

(2) If more than one headwater project provide energy gains to a downstream
project, the energy gains at the downstream project are attributed to the headwater
projects according to the time sequence of commencement of operation in which
each headwater project provided energy gains at the downstream project, by:
(i) Crediting the headwater project that is first in time with the amount of energy
gains that it provided to the downstream project prior to operation of the headwater
project that is next in time; and
(ii) Crediting any subsequent headwater project with the additional increment of
energy gains provided by it to the downstream project.
(3) Annual energy losses at a downstream project, or group of projects owned
by the same entity, that are attributable to the headwater project will be subtracted
from energy gains for the same annual period at the downstream project or group of
projects. A net loss in one calendar year will be subtracted from net gains in
subsequent years until no net loss remains.
(b) Energy generated at the headwater project. (1) Except as provided in
paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, the portion of the total annual energy
generation at the headwater project that is to be attributed to the joint-use power
cost is derived by multiplying the total annual generation at the headwater project
and the ratio of the project investment cost assigned to the joint-use power cost to
the sum of the investment cost assigned to both the specific power cost and the
joint-use power cost of the headwater project, as follows:

View or download PDF
In which:
Ej = annual energy generated at the headwater project to be attributed to the joint-use power cost,
E = total annual generation at the headwater project,
Cj = project investment costs assigned to the joint-use power cost, and
Cs = project investment costs assigned to specific power costs.

(2) If the headwater project contains a pumped storage facility, calculation of
the portion of the total annual energy generation at the headwater project that is
attributable to the joint-use power cost will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
(3) If no power is generated at the headwater project, the amount of energy
attributable to the joint-use power cost under this section is the total of all
downstream energy gains included in the headwater benefits formula.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 18 of 87

Back to Top
§11.14 Procedures for establishing charges without an energy gains
investigation.
(a) Settlements. (1) Owners of downstream and headwater projects subject to
this subpart may negotiate a settlement for headwater benefits charges. Settlements
must be filed with the Commission for its approval, according to the provisions of
§385.602.
(2) If the headwater project is a Federal project, any settlement under this
section must result in headwater benefits payments that approximate those that
would result under the energy gains method.
(b) Continuation of previous headwater benefits determinations. (1) For any
downstream project being assessed headwater benefit charges on or before
September 16, 1986, the Commission will continue to assess charges to that project
on the same basis until changes occur in the river basin, including hydrology or
project development, that affect headwater benefits.
(2) Any procedures that apply to §11.17(b)(5) of this subpart will apply to any
prospectively fixed charges that are continued under this paragraph.
Back to Top
§11.15 Procedures for determining charges by energy gains investigation.
(a) Purpose of investigations; limitation. Except as permitted under §11.14, the
Commission will conduct an investigation to obtain information for establishing
headwater benefits charges under this subpart. The Commission will investigate and
determine charges for a project downstream from a non-Federal headwater project
only if the parties are unable to agree to a settlement and one of the parties
requests the Commission to determine charges.
(b) Notification. The Commission will notify each downstream project owner and
each headwater project owner when it initiates an investigation under this section,
and the period of project operations to be studied will be specified. An investigation
will continue until a final charge has been established for all years studied in the
investigation.
(c) Jurisdictional objections. If any project owner wishes to object to the
assessment of a headwater benefits charge on jurisdictional grounds, such objection
must:
(1) Be raised within 30 days after the notice of the investigation is issued; and
(2) State in detail the grounds for its objection.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 19 of 87

(d) Investigations. (1) For any downstream project for which a final charge
pursuant to an investigation has never been established, the Commission will
conduct an initial investigation to determine a final charge.
(2) The Commission may, for good cause shown by a party or on its own
motion, initiate a new investigation of a river basin to determine whether, because of
any change in the hydrology, project development, or other characteristics of the
river basin that effects headwater benefits, it should:
(i) Establish a new final charge to replace a final charge previously established
under §11.17(b)(5); or
(ii) Revise any variable of the headwater benefits formula that has become a
constant in calculating a final charge.
(3) Scope of investigations. (i) The Commission will establish a final charge
pursuant to an investigation based on information available to the Commission
through the annual data submission requirements of §11.16, if such information is
adequate to establish a reasonably accurate final charge.
(ii) If the information available to the Commission is not sufficient to provide a
reasonably accurate calculation of the final charge, the Commission will request
additional data and conduct any studies, including studies of the hydrology of the
river basin and project operations, that it determines necessary to establish the
charge.
Back to Top
§11.16 Filing requirements.
(a) Applicability. (1) Any party subject to a headwater benefits determination
under this subpart must supply project-specific data, in accordance with this section,
by February 1 of each year for data from the preceding calendar year.
(2) Within 30 days of notice of initiation of an investigation under §11.15, a party
must supply project-specific data, in accordance with this section, for the years
specified in the notice.
(b) Data required from owner of the headwater project. The owner of any
headwater project constructed by the United States, a licensee, or a pre-1920
permittee that is upstream from a non-Federal hydroelectric project must submit the
following:
(1) Name and location of the headwater project, including the name of the
stream on which it is located.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 20 of 87

(2) The total nameplate rating of installed generating capacity of the project,
expressed in kilowatts, with the portion of total capacity that represents pumped
storage generating capacity separately designated.
(3) A description of the total storage capacity of the reservoir and allocation of
storage capacity to each of its functions, such as dead storage, power storage,
irrigation storage, and flood control storage. Identification, by reservoir elevation, of
the portion of the reservoir assigned to each of its respective storage functions.
(4) An elevation-capacity curve, or a tabulation of reservoir pool elevations with
corresponding reservoir storage capacities.
(5) A copy of rule curves, coordination contracts, agreements, or other relevant
data governing the release of water from the reservoir, including a separate
statement of their effective dates.
(6) A curve or tabulation showing actual reservoir pool elevations throughout
the immediately preceding calendar year and for each year included in an
investigation.
(7) The total annual gross generation of the hydroelectric plant in kilowatt-hours,
not including energy from pumped storage operation.
(8) The total number of kilowatt-hours of energy produced from pumped storage
operation.
(9) The investigation costs attributed to the power generation function of the
project as of the close of the calendar year or at a specified date during the year,
categorized according to that portion that is attributed to the specific power costs,
and that portion that is attributed to the joint-use power costs.
(10) The portion of the joint-use power cost, and other costs required by law to
be allocated to joint-use power cost, each item shown separately, that are
attributable to the annual costs of interest, maintenance, and depreciation,
identifying the annual interest rate and the method used to compute the depreciation
charge, or the interest rate and period used to compute amortization if used in lieu of
depreciation, including any differing interest rates used for major replacements or
rehabilitation.
(c) Data required from owners of downstream projects. The owner of any
hydroelectric project which is downstream from a headwater project constructed by
the United States, a licensee, or pre-1920 permittee must submit the following:
(1) Name and location of the downstream project, including the name of the
stream on which it is located.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 21 of 87

(2) Total nameplate rating of the installed generating capacity of the plant,
expressed in kilowatts, with the portion of total capacity that represents pumped
storage generating capacity separately designated.
(3) Record of daily gross generation, not including energy used for pumped
storage, and any unit outage which may have occurred.
(4) The total number of kilowatt-hours of energy produced from pumped storage
operation.
(d) Abbreviated data submissions. (1) For those items in paragraphs (b) and (c)
of this section in which data for the current period are the same as data furnished for
a prior period, the data need not be resubmitted if the owner identifies the last period
for which the data were reported.
(2) The Commission will notify the project owner that certain data items in
paragraphs (b) and (c) are no longer required to be submitted annually if:
(i) A variable in the headwater benefits formula has become a constant; or
(ii) A prospective final charge, as described in §11.17(b)(5), has been
established.
(e) Additional data. Owners of headwater projects or downstream projects must
furnish any additional data required by the Commission staff under paragraph (a) of
this section and may provide other data which they consider relevant.
Back to Top
§11.17 Procedures for payment of charges and costs.
(a) Payment for benefits from a non-Federal headwater project. Any billing
procedures and payments determined between a non-Federal headwater project
owner and a downstream project owner will occur according to the agreement of
those parties.
(b) Charges and payment for benefits from a Federal headwater project—(1)
Interim charges. (i) If the Commission has not established a final charge and an
investigation is pending, the Commission will issue a downstream project owner a
bill for the interim charge and costs and a staff report explaining the calculation of
the interim charge.
(ii) An interim charge will be a percentage of the estimate by the Commission
staff of what the final charge will be, as follows:
(A) 100 percent of the estimated final charge if the Commission previously has
completed an investigation of the project for which it is assessed; or

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 22 of 87

(B) 80 percent of the estimated final charge if the Commission has not
completed an investigation of the project for which it is assessed.
(iii) When a final charge is established for a period for which an interim charge
was paid, the Commission will apply the amount paid to the final charge.
(2) Preliminary assessment of a final charge. Unless the project owner was
assessed a final charge in the previous year, the Commission will issue to the
downstream project owner a preliminary assessment of any final charge when it is
determined. A staff technical report explaining the basis of the assessment will be
enclosed with the preliminary assessment. Copies of the preliminary assessment
will be mailed to all parties.
(3) Opportunity to respond. After issuance of a preliminary assessment of a final
charge, parties may respond in writing within 60 days after the preliminary
assessment.
(4) Order and bill. (i) After the opportunity for written response by the parties to
the preliminary assessment of a final charge, the Commission will issue to the
downstream project owner an order establishing the final charge. Copies of the
order will be mailed to all parties. A bill will be issued for the amount of the final
charge and costs.
(ii) If a final charge is not established prospectively under paragraph (b)(5) of
this section, the Commission will issue an order and a bill for the final charge and
costs each year until prospective final charges are established. After the
Commission issues an order establishing a prospective final charge, a bill will be
issued annually for the amount of the final charge and costs.
(5) Prospective final charges. When the Commission determines that historical
data, including the hydrology, development, and other characteristics of the river
basin, demonstrate sufficient stability to project average energy gains and section
10(f) costs, the Commission will issue to the downstream project owner an order
establishing the final charge from future years. Copies of the order will be mailed to
all parties. The prospective final charge will remain in effect until a new investigation
is initiated under §11.15(d)(2).
(6) Payment under protest. Any payment of a final charge required by this
section may be made under protest if a party is also appealing the final charge
pursuant to §385.1902, or requesting rehearing. If payment is made under protest,
that party will avoid any penalty for failure to pay under §11.21.
(7) Accounting for payments pending appeal or rehearing. The Commission will
retain any payment received for final charges from bills issued pursuant to this
section in a special account. No disbursements to the U.S. Treasury will be made
from the account until 31 days after the bill is issued. If an appeal under §385.1902

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 23 of 87

or a request for rehearing is filed by any party, no disbursements to the U.S.
Treasury will be made until final disposition of the appeal or request for rehearing.
(c) Charges for costs of determinations of headwater benefits charges. (1) Any
owner of a downstream project that benefits from a Federal headwater project must
pay to the United States the cost of making any investigation, study, or
determination relating to the assessment of the relevant headwater benefits charge
under this subpart.
(2) If any owner of a headwater or downstream project requests that the
Commission determine headwater benefits charges for benefits provided by nonFederal headwater projects, the headwater project owners must pay a pro rata
share of 50 percent of the cost of making the investigation and determination, in
proportion to the benefits provided by their projects, and the downstream project
owners must pay a pro rata share of the remaining 50 percent in proportion to the
energy gains received by their projects.
(3) Any charge assessed under this paragraph is separate from and will be
added to, any final or interim charge under this subpart.
Back to Top

Subpart C—General Procedures
Back to Top
§11.20 Time for payment.
Annual charges must be paid no later than 45 days after rendition of a bill by
the Commission. If the licensee or exemptee believes that the bill is incorrect, no
later than 45 days after its rendition the licensee or exemptee may file an appeal of
the bill with the Chief Financial Officer. No later than 30 days after the date of
issuance of the Chief Financial Officer's decision on the appeal, the licensee or
exemptee may file a request for rehearing of that decision pursuant to §385.713 of
this chapter. In the event that a timely appeal to the Chief Financial Officer or a
timely request to the Commission for rehearing is filed, the payment of the bill may
be made under protest, and subject to refund pending the outcome of the appeal or
rehearing.
[60 FR 15048, Mar. 22, 1995]

Back to Top
§11.21 Penalties.
If any person fails to pay annual charges within the periods specified in §11.20,
a penalty of 5 percent of the total delinquent amount will be assessed and added to

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Page 24 of 87

the total charges for the first month or part of month in which payment is delinquent.
An additional penalty of 3 percent for each full month thereafter will be assessed
until the charges and penalties are satisfied in accordance with law. The
Commission may, by order, waive any penalty imposed by this subsection, for good
cause shown.
[51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986]

Back to Top
Appendix A to Part 11—Fee Schedule for FY 2020
State
Alabama

County
Autauga
Baldwin
Barbour
Bibb
Blount
Bullock
Butler
Calhoun
Chambers
Cherokee
Chilton
Choctaw
Clarke
Clay
Cleburne
Coffee
Colbert
Conecuh
Coosa
Covington
Crenshaw
Cullman
Dale
Dallas
DeKalb
Elmore
Escambia
Etowah
Fayette
Franklin
Geneva
Greene
Hale
Henry
Houston
Jackson

Fee/acre/yr
$65.66
114.37
64.98
60.27
104.38
62.57
69.79
87.54
74.79
98.24
84.27
53.81
58.77
71.09
78.88
75.76
81.04
57.22
59.56
64.80
58.30
120.01
72.13
52.73
108.91
91.24
65.27
102.26
61.03
60.45
62.11
58.33
60.09
64.23
74.82
75.07

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Alaska
Arizona

Arkansas

Jefferson
Lamar
Lauderdale
Lawrence
Lee
Limestone
Lowndes
Macon
Madison
Marengo
Marion
Marshall
Mobile
Monroe
Montgomery
Morgan
Perry
Pickens
Pike
Randolph
Russell
Shelby
St. Clair
Sumter
Talladega
Tallapoosa
Tuscaloosa
Walker
Washington
Wilcox
Winston
Aleutian Islands
Statewide
Apache
Cochise
Coconino
Gila
Graham
Greenlee
La Paz
Maricopa
Mohave
Navajo
Pima
Pinal
Santa Cruz
Yavapai
Yuma
Arkansas

Page 25 of 87

129.53
42.46
85.35
87.90
108.48
116.88
49.61
70.62
106.75
51.22
63.83
108.95
116.74
56.54
75.40
107.26
50.43
59.41
65.45
80.75
64.98
120.66
110.31
40.88
83.59
69.36
85.20
74.07
48.53
48.35
74.75
1.08
38.87
3.24
23.60
3.52
5.52
9.73
26.29
21.64
95.37
8.13
4.36
8.78
40.06
25.73
26.55
121.60
60.66

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Ashley
Baxter
Benton
Boone
Bradley
Calhoun
Carroll
Chicot
Clark
Clay
Cleburne
Cleveland
Columbia
Conway
Craighead
Crawford
Crittenden
Cross
Dallas
Desha
Drew
Faulkner
Franklin
Fulton
Garland
Grant
Greene
Hempstead
Hot Spring
Howard
Independence
Izard
Jackson
Jefferson
Johnson
Lafayette
Lawrence
Lee
Lincoln
Little River
Logan
Lonoke
Madison
Marion
Miller
Mississippi
Monroe
Montgomery
Nevada

Page 26 of 87

66.44
61.01
101.43
58.83
79.87
56.23
58.15
60.95
42.25
73.13
62.61
89.08
49.34
59.18
73.36
68.64
63.52
58.15
36.59
63.78
57.63
74.99
52.09
36.62
84.33
51.52
78.16
46.83
58.72
53.92
47.88
40.39
57.55
66.32
55.00
46.26
61.12
63.95
63.92
38.45
51.37
63.61
62.15
46.06
45.43
65.15
54.97
57.32
43.40

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

California

Newton
Ouachita
Perry
Phillips
Pike
Poinsett
Polk
Pope
Prairie
Pulaski
Randolph
Saline
Scott
Searcy
Sebastian
Sevier
Sharp
St. Francis
Stone
Union
Van Buren
Washington
White
Woodruff
Yell
Alameda
Alpine
Amador
Butte
Calaveras
Colusa
Contra Costa
Del Norte
El Dorado
Fresno
Glenn
Humboldt
Imperial
Inyo
Kern
Kings
Lake
Lassen
Los Angeles
Madera
Marin
Mariposa
Mendocino
Merced

Page 27 of 87

50.46
50.94
55.75
59.69
48.77
70.18
60.64
62.78
57.20
78.62
46.08
80.48
50.26
38.14
60.89
53.40
41.57
54.12
44.63
57.95
56.75
94.03
58.81
57.06
51.94
47.60
37.00
33.94
65.56
28.15
46.86
72.69
75.20
70.98
71.49
39.62
22.29
60.42
6.72
38.26
52.04
52.53
16.63
107.49
65.69
53.74
18.15
34.62
66.76

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Colorado

Modoc
Mono
Monterey
Napa
Nevada
Orange
Placer
Plumas
Riverside
Sacramento
San Benito
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Francisco
San Joaquin
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
Shasta
Sierra
Siskiyou
Solano
Sonoma
Stanislaus
Sutter
Tehama
Trinity
Tulare
Tuolumne
Ventura
Yolo
Yuba
Adams
Alamosa
Arapahoe
Archuleta
Baca
Bent
Boulder
Broomfield
Chaffee
Cheyenne
Clear Creek
Conejos
Costilla
Crowley
Custer

Page 28 of 87

14.85
24.31
42.21
188.10
93.47
188.55
92.00
15.33
88.11
61.56
24.54
116.09
154.99
1,088.06
87.05
36.34
97.48
63.54
57.91
106.90
24.17
12.97
17.59
47.95
126.14
83.14
57.10
25.69
9.84
65.01
39.96
134.78
48.68
49.98
27.32
27.72
32.05
40.85
10.58
8.84
108.70
37.28
57.51
14.79
52.19
28.86
20.90
6.51
28.96

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Delta
Denver
Dolores
Douglas
Eagle
El Paso
Elbert
Fremont
Garfield
Gilpin
Grand
Gunnison
Hinsdale
Huerfano
Jackson
Jefferson
Kiowa
Kit Carson
La Plata
Lake
Larimer
Las Animas
Lincoln
Logan
Mesa
Mineral
Moffat
Montezuma
Montrose
Morgan
Otero
Ouray
Park
Phillips
Pitkin
Prowers
Pueblo
Rio Blanco
Rio Grande
Routt
Saguache
San Juan
San Miguel
Sedgwick
Summit
Teller
Washington
Weld
Yuma

Page 29 of 87

63.12
1,031.44
27.44
95.53
74.92
22.97
21.33
44.48
52.83
53.88
43.49
53.59
100.67
16.43
19.83
104.47
12.98
21.54
35.33
55.47
58.63
7.70
9.08
16.52
64.05
82.60
13.88
21.07
54.61
27.13
12.41
54.02
25.32
34.43
106.47
13.08
13.96
25.27
44.96
42.18
28.27
24.35
27.72
24.18
63.22
38.16
18.59
37.64
26.06

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Fairfield
Hartford
Litchfield
Middlesex
New Haven
New London
Tolland
Windham
Kent
New Castle
Sussex
Alachua
Baker
Bay
Bradford
Brevard
Broward
Calhoun
Charlotte
Citrus
Clay
Collier
Columbia
Dade
DeSoto
Dixie
Duval
Escambia
Flagler
Franklin
Gadsden
Gilchrist
Glades
Gulf
Hamilton
Hardee
Hendry
Hernando
Highlands
Hillsborough
Holmes
Indian River
Jackson
Jefferson
Lafayette
Lake
Lee
Leon
Levy

Page 30 of 87

333.62
347.35
313.12
386.60
345.05
283.80
272.67
209.52
228.60
283.94
224.42
109.21
131.53
105.36
84.84
109.85
464.98
43.09
102.82
134.35
71.42
90.95
92.04
515.83
95.29
79.99
140.71
99.02
86.01
39.41
89.89
67.62
62.01
84.89
58.56
83.70
82.33
170.31
59.60
183.68
57.27
78.24
68.33
85.47
83.67
152.96
192.45
111.62
121.18

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Georgia

Liberty
Madison
Manatee
Marion
Martin
Monroe
Nassau
Okaloosa
Okeechobee
Orange
Osceola
Palm Beach
Pasco
Pinellas
Polk
Putnam
Santa Rosa
Sarasota
Seminole
St. Johns
St. Lucie
Sumter
Suwannee
Taylor
Union
Volusia
Wakulla
Walton
Washington
Appling
Atkinson
Bacon
Baker
Baldwin
Banks
Barrow
Bartow
Ben Hill
Berrien
Bibb
Bleckley
Brantley
Brooks
Bryan
Bulloch
Burke
Butts
Calhoun
Camden

Page 31 of 87

54.89
68.33
113.42
189.76
133.54
385.06
97.11
73.60
93.18
169.73
80.10
143.86
137.21
611.60
111.19
112.18
159.73
133.03
96.53
71.80
97.67
108.55
81.44
77.20
72.51
124.53
71.07
58.36
58.31
64.39
73.39
79.65
75.49
67.31
151.08
151.05
121.83
69.75
72.95
89.86
64.01
79.55
90.82
80.65
66.59
61.95
95.81
60.26
59.95

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Candler
Carroll
Catoosa
Charlton
Chatham
Chattahoochee
Chattooga
Cherokee
Clarke
Clay
Clayton
Clinch
Cobb
Coffee
Colquitt
Columbia
Cook
Coweta
Crawford
Crisp
Dade
Dawson
Decatur
DeKalb
Dodge
Dooly
Dougherty
Douglas
Early
Echols
Effingham
Elbert
Emanuel
Evans
Fannin
Fayette
Floyd
Forsyth
Franklin
Fulton
Gilmer
Glascock
Glynn
Gordon
Grady
Greene
Gwinnett
Habersham
Hall

Page 32 of 87

65.52
121.97
155.90
56.10
141.97
57.20
84.67
260.88
155.31
45.48
153.25
74.53
336.47
72.40
80.78
135.03
75.66
135.92
84.81
57.48
86.97
214.03
78.58
76.45
60.57
64.49
90.13
181.27
59.06
72.57
76.42
97.28
58.65
71.16
178.89
168.03
107.18
302.37
148.85
186.46
168.89
50.81
107.87
131.94
84.63
88.72
284.22
158.03
225.85

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Hancock
Haralson
Harris
Hart
Heard
Henry
Houston
Irwin
Jackson
Jasper
Jeff Davis
Jefferson
Jenkins
Johnson
Jones
Lamar
Lanier
Laurens
Lee
Liberty
Lincoln
Long
Lowndes
Lumpkin
Macon
Madison
Marion
McDuffie
McIntosh
Meriwether
Miller
Mitchell
Monroe
Montgomery
Morgan
Murray
Muscogee
Newton
Oconee
Oglethorpe
Paulding
Peach
Pickens
Pierce
Pike
Polk
Pulaski
Putnam
Quitman

Page 33 of 87

94.16
115.85
132.07
142.49
95.50
157.72
85.18
69.92
152.32
95.22
91.34
54.93
51.67
49.40
87.35
105.53
93.71
56.41
79.13
58.10
76.25
67.72
97.28
247.34
61.77
78.82
70.99
70.47
154.45
87.21
67.79
78.65
93.78
47.51
120.21
117.91
141.29
116.16
198.63
89.07
179.96
109.97
184.67
65.49
100.38
99.18
71.98
104.57
58.65

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Hawaii

Idaho

Rabun
Randolph
Richmond
Rockdale
Schley
Screven
Seminole
Spalding
Stephens
Stewart
Sumter
Talbot
Taliaferro
Tattnall
Taylor
Telfair
Terrell
Thomas
Tift
Toombs
Towns
Treutlen
Troup
Turner
Twiggs
Union
Upson
Walker
Walton
Ware
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Webster
Wheeler
White
Whitfield
Wilcox
Wilkes
Wilkinson
Worth
Hawaii
Honolulu
Kauai
Maui
Ada
Adams
Bannock
Bear Lake

Page 34 of 87

194.64
53.21
72.88
192.03
62.50
58.68
74.32
143.80
145.00
53.97
62.26
57.31
60.57
76.38
55.69
52.32
65.01
91.96
87.35
65.21
162.60
49.33
109.49
65.56
68.79
165.42
86.90
107.46
147.61
67.86
55.52
56.86
75.52
48.75
41.05
188.83
133.28
67.07
76.38
58.68
71.06
176.86
446.78
168.34
217.87
65.60
18.91
22.47
17.67

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Illinois

Benewah
Bingham
Blaine
Boise
Bonner
Bonneville
Boundary
Butte
Camas
Canyon
Caribou
Cassia
Clark
Clearwater
Custer
Elmore
Franklin
Fremont
Gem
Gooding
Idaho
Jefferson
Jerome
Kootenai
Latah
Lemhi
Lewis
Lincoln
Madison
Minidoka
Nez Perce
Oneida
Owyhee
Payette
Power
Shoshone
Teton
Twin Falls
Valley
Washington
Adams
Alexander
Bond
Boone
Brown
Bureau
Calhoun
Carroll
Cass

Page 35 of 87

19.73
27.78
35.52
17.64
54.28
28.81
42.51
19.14
18.44
66.29
17.42
29.12
18.10
23.40
28.62
25.44
24.95
27.75
34.32
47.61
17.34
32.57
47.73
51.45
22.41
27.63
17.43
32.63
41.19
43.10
20.91
14.76
15.26
37.56
18.80
74.33
40.93
38.41
30.73
12.42
143.74
96.20
188.26
199.28
116.02
213.35
110.60
198.95
162.72

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Champaign
Christian
Clark
Clay
Clinton
Coles
Cook
Crawford
Cumberland
De Witt
DeKalb
Douglas
DuPage
Edgar
Edwards
Effingham
Fayette
Ford
Franklin
Fulton
Gallatin
Greene
Grundy
Hamilton
Hancock
Hardin
Henderson
Henry
Iroquois
Jackson
Jasper
Jefferson
Jersey
Jo Daviess
Johnson
Kane
Kankakee
Kendall
Knox
La Salle
Lake
Lawrence
Lee
Livingston
Logan
Macon
Macoupin
Madison
Marion

Page 36 of 87

231.65
220.44
142.94
138.61
170.14
205.13
304.68
145.41
158.29
209.13
228.48
221.39
202.15
191.09
117.08
168.65
129.66
220.59
107.91
152.72
127.84
164.03
221.64
105.33
166.61
102.89
180.11
198.77
197.89
114.57
147.41
104.86
171.56
141.26
87.94
258.20
192.40
252.63
199.82
229.57
302.50
142.50
220.19
209.13
208.99
227.90
180.91
185.67
122.24

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Indiana

Marshall
Mason
Massac
McDonough
McHenry
McLean
Menard
Mercer
Monroe
Montgomery
Morgan
Moultrie
Ogle
Peoria
Perry
Piatt
Pike
Pope
Pulaski
Putnam
Randolph
Richland
Rock Island
Saline
Sangamon
Schuyler
Scott
Shelby
St. Clair
Stark
Stephenson
Tazewell
Union
Vermilion
Wabash
Warren
Washington
Wayne
White
Whiteside
Will
Williamson
Winnebago
Woodford
Adams
Allen
Bartholomew
Benton
Blackford

Page 37 of 87

201.46
170.11
104.09
204.48
234.81
238.01
184.00
176.69
150.68
173.31
194.44
223.68
201.71
201.35
118.46
251.80
143.05
75.80
117.04
183.13
129.73
127.88
181.42
122.72
214.37
127.37
169.38
175.67
183.71
216.41
197.89
216.44
103.15
204.91
154.54
201.39
150.72
130.06
130.43
199.06
227.90
128.24
184.15
225.50
168.47
179.52
170.91
187.77
122.93

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Boone
Brown
Carroll
Cass
Clark
Clay
Clinton
Crawford
Daviess
Dearborn
Decatur
DeKalb
Delaware
Dubois
Elkhart
Fayette
Floyd
Fountain
Franklin
Fulton
Gibson
Grant
Greene
Hamilton
Hancock
Harrison
Hendricks
Henry
Howard
Huntington
Jackson
Jasper
Jay
Jefferson
Jennings
Johnson
Knox
Kosciusko
LaGrange
Lake
LaPorte
Lawrence
Madison
Marion
Marshall
Martin
Miami
Monroe
Montgomery

Page 38 of 87

179.45
116.38
198.49
157.38
122.93
126.71
194.02
74.48
188.39
118.38
154.73
128.78
154.11
130.05
234.59
135.14
155.02
139.50
133.10
146.08
154.95
162.22
114.64
186.90
166.25
107.04
169.63
144.01
184.72
158.55
133.25
178.32
190.90
102.94
113.29
177.12
164.18
170.58
216.56
164.94
176.90
92.25
175.27
186.75
151.28
117.40
147.39
140.48
162.40

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Iowa

Morgan
Newton
Noble
Ohio
Orange
Owen
Parke
Perry
Pike
Porter
Posey
Pulaski
Putnam
Randolph
Ripley
Rush
Scott
Shelby
Spencer
St. Joseph
Starke
Steuben
Sullivan
Switzerland
Tippecanoe
Tipton
Union
Vanderburgh
Vermillion
Vigo
Wabash
Warren
Warrick
Washington
Wayne
Wells
White
Whitley
Adair
Adams
Allamakee
Appanoose
Audubon
Benton
Black Hawk
Boone
Bremer
Buchanan
Buena Vista

Page 39 of 87

143.14
164.98
140.56
103.52
101.41
98.76
121.22
87.20
124.20
174.25
139.50
149.82
122.05
147.93
118.60
177.05
104.43
178.10
112.53
178.54
127.43
130.45
121.47
102.57
195.73
212.38
144.08
123.04
138.16
112.71
150.26
171.27
141.21
96.57
150.55
184.06
198.82
149.39
136.33
125.07
123.98
86.50
194.13
210.34
232.19
219.88
224.72
213.65
212.74

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Butler
Calhoun
Carroll
Cass
Cedar
Cerro Gordo
Cherokee
Chickasaw
Clarke
Clay
Clayton
Clinton
Crawford
Dallas
Davis
Decatur
Delaware
Des Moines
Dickinson
Dubuque
Emmet
Fayette
Floyd
Franklin
Fremont
Greene
Grundy
Guthrie
Hamilton
Hancock
Hardin
Harrison
Henry
Howard
Humboldt
Ida
Iowa
Jackson
Jasper
Jefferson
Johnson
Jones
Keokuk
Kossuth
Lee
Linn
Louisa
Lucas
Lyon

Page 40 of 87

198.97
223.92
219.22
159.20
208.95
193.22
216.27
208.55
98.41
215.18
139.46
206.95
201.56
196.02
85.74
87.05
209.97
162.40
205.75
177.52
212.12
200.43
186.52
193.65
178.94
202.87
234.01
168.92
236.63
202.72
215.18
169.69
143.61
192.09
222.25
197.73
176.35
155.34
181.16
133.78
200.10
195.18
145.21
221.66
124.34
195.88
167.32
83.73
240.24

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Kansas

Madison
Mahaska
Marion
Marshall
Mills
Mitchell
Monona
Monroe
Montgomery
Muscatine
O'Brien
Osceola
Page
Palo Alto
Plymouth
Pocahontas
Polk
Pottawattamie
Poweshiek
Ringgold
Sac
Scott
Shelby
Sioux
Story
Tama
Taylor
Union
Van Buren
Wapello
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Webster
Winnebago
Winneshiek
Woodbury
Worth
Wright
Allen
Anderson
Atchison
Barber
Barton
Bourbon
Brown
Butler
Chase
Chautauqua

Page 41 of 87

142.85
163.83
130.03
192.96
184.04
214.82
160.00
92.40
163.46
183.24
248.76
205.09
146.60
219.19
214.23
222.46
205.49
204.91
177.16
99.65
216.20
236.52
197.33
265.30
228.36
189.47
111.52
100.27
101.25
120.19
149.00
177.96
94.19
214.23
196.60
173.62
174.06
179.05
210.04
40.00
44.61
61.69
34.80
44.90
41.46
93.71
50.42
38.85
33.09

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Cherokee
Cheyenne
Clark
Clay
Cloud
Coffey
Comanche
Cowley
Crawford
Decatur
Dickinson
Doniphan
Douglas
Edwards
Elk
Ellis
Ellsworth
Finney
Ford
Franklin
Geary
Gove
Graham
Grant
Gray
Greeley
Greenwood
Hamilton
Harper
Harvey
Haskell
Hodgeman
Jackson
Jefferson
Jewell
Johnson
Kearny
Kingman
Kiowa
Labette
Lane
Leavenworth
Lincoln
Linn
Logan
Lyon
Marion
Marshall
McPherson

Page 42 of 87

53.35
45.37
26.07
60.48
57.04
43.72
26.39
41.03
47.98
43.68
57.79
103.09
81.75
61.12
36.34
38.17
37.99
41.21
34.88
66.49
55.54
36.84
37.78
38.17
38.24
42.61
40.35
28.97
43.47
73.62
39.46
30.79
50.42
64.09
55.29
124.32
37.17
40.93
35.31
42.57
36.84
92.67
42.79
50.42
33.80
44.69
60.41
77.13
64.67

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Kentucky

Meade
Miami
Mitchell
Montgomery
Morris
Morton
Nemaha
Neosho
Ness
Norton
Osage
Osborne
Ottawa
Pawnee
Phillips
Pottawatomie
Pratt
Rawlins
Reno
Republic
Rice
Riley
Rooks
Rush
Russell
Saline
Scott
Sedgwick
Seward
Shawnee
Sheridan
Sherman
Smith
Stafford
Stanton
Stevens
Sumner
Thomas
Trego
Wabaunsee
Wallace
Washington
Wichita
Wilson
Woodson
Wyandotte
Adair
Allen
Anderson

Page 43 of 87

34.95
89.70
64.17
44.33
42.07
24.24
80.85
42.90
29.83
37.95
46.58
39.24
53.92
52.21
35.84
54.64
45.83
49.95
51.45
75.95
45.76
52.38
37.60
37.17
32.73
56.61
43.47
68.07
32.98
71.29
54.96
48.91
46.48
50.63
31.72
39.28
51.35
61.09
37.60
42.11
36.13
66.85
38.89
41.18
39.42
137.75
74.21
85.66
90.33

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Ballard
Barren
Bath
Bell
Boone
Bourbon
Boyd
Boyle
Bracken
Breathitt
Breckinridge
Bullitt
Butler
Caldwell
Calloway
Campbell
Carlisle
Carroll
Carter
Casey
Christian
Clark
Clay
Clinton
Crittenden
Cumberland
Daviess
Edmonson
Elliott
Estill
Fayette
Fleming
Floyd
Franklin
Fulton
Gallatin
Garrard
Grant
Graves
Grayson
Green
Greenup
Hancock
Hardin
Harlan
Harrison
Hart
Henderson
Henry

Page 44 of 87

98.63
85.37
56.56
56.38
178.85
123.38
67.61
98.70
60.73
41.45
69.53
105.66
58.63
79.28
86.02
127.33
82.00
76.45
50.94
58.88
100.11
95.15
46.16
75.18
62.39
49.50
112.58
68.95
39.35
53.55
264.14
60.76
42.68
106.78
101.16
87.72
71.63
88.70
93.99
65.80
65.66
51.31
81.53
101.60
38.34
79.13
64.31
105.84
96.89

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Hickman
Hopkins
Jackson
Jefferson
Jessamine
Johnson
Kenton
Knott
Knox
Larue
Laurel
Lawrence
Lee
Leslie
Letcher
Lewis
Lincoln
Livingston
Logan
Lyon
Madison
Magoffin
Marion
Marshall
Martin
Mason
McCracken
McCreary
McLean
Meade
Menifee
Mercer
Metcalfe
Monroe
Montgomery
Morgan
Muhlenberg
Nelson
Nicholas
Ohio
Oldham
Owen
Owsley
Pendleton
Perry
Pike
Powell
Pulaski
Robertson

Page 45 of 87

100.87
84.13
52.68
250.23
158.63
50.73
126.38
39.20
50.69
99.21
99.97
41.05
55.15
125.98
67.03
42.57
72.14
61.67
97.07
58.70
87.47
42.97
78.05
88.63
145.91
74.71
89.21
51.89
108.99
94.03
51.81
97.94
65.40
68.37
79.50
36.99
67.36
97.47
62.58
70.95
181.10
66.85
39.10
68.63
34.97
38.66
46.09
83.95
52.39

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Louisiana

Rockcastle
Rowan
Russell
Scott
Shelby
Simpson
Spencer
Taylor
Todd
Trigg
Trimble
Union
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Webster
Whitley
Wolfe
Woodford
Acadia
Allen
Ascension
Assumption
Avoyelles
Beauregard
Bienville
Bossier
Caddo
Calcasieu
Caldwell
Cameron
Catahoula
Claiborne
Concordia
De Soto
East Baton Rouge
East Carroll
East Feliciana
Evangeline
Franklin
Grant
Iberia
Iberville
Jackson
Jefferson
Jefferson Davis
La Salle
Lafayette
Lafourche

Page 46 of 87

58.92
61.81
89.28
132.54
141.49
120.66
90.84
80.66
106.96
85.80
91.49
118.96
104.53
74.21
65.91
92.58
62.83
43.12
236.39
60.98
57.75
96.70
83.75
62.35
68.64
65.37
92.41
74.82
70.53
68.05
48.33
66.71
69.19
63.41
74.44
157.92
75.27
81.93
58.30
62.66
58.64
86.16
49.54
77.77
104.54
62.45
70.49
131.09
59.02

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Maine

Lincoln
Livingston
Madison
Morehouse
Natchitoches
Orleans
Ouachita
Plaquemines
Pointe Coupee
Rapides
Red River
Richland
Sabine
St. Bernard
St. Charles
St. Helena
St. James
St. John the Baptist
St. Landry
St. Martin
St. Mary
St. Tammany
Tangipahoa
Tensas
Terrebonne
Union
Vermilion
Vernon
Washington
Webster
West Baton Rouge
West Carroll
West Feliciana
Winn
Androscoggin
Aroostook
Cumberland
Franklin
Hancock
Kennebec
Knox
Lincoln
Oxford
Penobscot
Piscataquis
Sagadahoc
Somerset
Waldo
Washington

Page 47 of 87

91.45
157.95
67.81
65.06
66.71
425.66
80.14
34.70
75.40
69.87
53.69
63.11
87.39
45.69
59.53
91.96
96.74
79.97
66.09
67.95
68.91
201.03
113.16
60.39
61.63
79.94
71.42
86.84
97.42
95.71
103.06
58.67
72.52
66.44
70.37
39.18
134.70
59.63
92.46
78.67
104.23
95.76
69.79
55.31
47.07
103.72
58.15
51.19
42.92

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

York
Allegany
Anne Arundel
Baltimore
Calvert
Caroline
Carroll
Cecil
Charles
Dorchester
Frederick
Garrett
Harford
Howard
Kent
Montgomery
Prince George's
Queen Anne's
Somerset
St. Mary's
Talbot
Washington
Wicomico
Worcester
Barnstable
Berkshire
Bristol
Dukes
Essex
Franklin
Hampden
Hampshire
Middlesex
Nantucket
Norfolk
Plymouth
Suffolk
Worcester
Alcona
Alger
Allegan
Alpena
Antrim
Arenac
Baraga
Barry
Bay
Benzie
Berrien

Page 48 of 87

133.64
99.84
330.99
269.85
215.43
174.62
232.79
207.39
184.45
148.97
217.11
120.27
236.22
313.33
194.74
290.75
225.51
212.78
156.40
188.74
189.02
170.98
179.63
170.69
893.31
175.96
365.36
245.51
521.62
152.38
183.95
202.20
479.38
667.87
608.21
288.35
5,135.53
233.93
68.83
58.45
135.26
68.69
101.20
78.57
52.17
112.39
113.44
117.72
157.88

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Branch
Calhoun
Cass
Charlevoix
Cheboygan
Chippewa
Clare
Clinton
Crawford
Delta
Dickinson
Eaton
Emmet
Genesee
Gladwin
Gogebic
Grand Traverse
Gratiot
Hillsdale
Houghton
Huron
Ingham
Ionia
Iosco
Iron
Isabella
Jackson
Kalamazoo
Kalkaska
Kent
Keweenaw
Lake
Lapeer
Leelanau
Lenawee
Livingston
Luce
Mackinac
Macomb
Manistee
Marquette
Mason
Mecosta
Menominee
Midland
Missaukee
Monroe
Montcalm
Montmorency

Page 49 of 87

100.35
103.81
111.82
104.02
70.10
45.82
80.05
122.69
93.40
55.10
62.44
105.11
89.27
109.21
79.63
74.09
150.58
127.35
97.24
50.05
146.91
115.17
117.75
75.47
56.16
107.48
107.94
131.38
85.95
165.40
71.05
73.35
129.12
190.07
114.57
136.92
64.81
58.66
155.94
81.18
57.53
80.62
84.36
56.65
101.66
85.42
128.55
94.21
64.17

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Minnesota

Muskegon
Newaygo
Oakland
Oceana
Ogemaw
Ontonagon
Osceola
Oscoda
Otsego
Ottawa
Presque Isle
Roscommon
Saginaw
Sanilac
Schoolcraft
Shiawassee
St. Clair
St. Joseph
Tuscola
Van Buren
Washtenaw
Wayne
Wexford
Aitkin
Anoka
Becker
Beltrami
Benton
Big Stone
Blue Earth
Brown
Carlton
Carver
Cass
Chippewa
Chisago
Clay
Clearwater
Cook
Cottonwood
Crow Wing
Dakota
Dodge
Douglas
Faribault
Fillmore
Freeborn
Goodhue
Grant

Page 50 of 87

144.86
100.46
242.07
90.96
74.83
47.83
71.62
74.23
71.34
182.34
60.57
74.16
107.76
123.86
45.85
101.02
105.50
134.23
128.27
125.52
143.87
210.16
80.41
51.21
175.28
78.92
49.36
99.81
113.35
186.32
160.32
54.41
168.31
55.50
150.15
126.50
102.24
48.78
137.83
159.63
75.18
164.89
178.62
89.42
163.40
133.29
158.46
157.41
105.07

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Hennepin
Houston
Hubbard
Isanti
Itasca
Jackson
Kanabec
Kandiyohi
Kittson
Koochiching
Lac qui Parle
Lake
Lake of the Woods
Le Sueur
Lincoln
Lyon
Mahnomen
Marshall
Martin
McLeod
Meeker
Mille Lacs
Morrison
Mower
Murray
Nicollet
Nobles
Norman
Olmsted
Otter Tail
Pennington
Pine
Pipestone
Polk
Pope
Ramsey
Red Lake
Redwood
Renville
Rice
Rock
Roseau
Scott
Sherburne
Sibley
St. Louis
Stearns
Steele
Stevens

Page 51 of 87

239.28
100.32
65.48
108.20
54.73
177.53
66.68
139.65
50.96
34.18
127.45
95.45
43.29
161.19
112.66
151.02
59.13
61.27
178.22
156.47
120.87
79.98
80.59
173.97
163.98
188.54
171.94
86.95
159.01
72.79
52.77
58.62
152.54
84.33
106.53
266.59
50.85
183.78
175.93
166.53
204.26
34.50
180.95
124.98
174.15
54.63
113.35
174.30
129.81

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Mississippi

Swift
Todd
Traverse
Wabasha
Wadena
Waseca
Washington
Watonwan
Wilkin
Winona
Wright
Yellow Medicine
Adams
Alcorn
Amite
Attala
Benton
Bolivar
Calhoun
Carroll
Chickasaw
Choctaw
Claiborne
Clarke
Clay
Coahoma
Copiah
Covington
DeSoto
Forrest
Franklin
George
Greene
Grenada
Hancock
Harrison
Hinds
Holmes
Humphreys
Issaquena
Itawamba
Jackson
Jasper
Jefferson
Jefferson Davis
Jones
Kemper
Lafayette
Lamar

Page 52 of 87

148.66
68.68
129.23
136.49
51.83
170.89
239.35
177.57
113.39
136.16
155.78
133.00
61.02
52.48
94.63
50.65
44.89
68.02
51.85
52.83
51.95
55.47
56.56
66.30
46.08
70.94
64.29
82.71
74.28
96.07
72.06
94.52
61.16
51.39
111.47
174.32
64.47
58.99
62.11
53.92
56.45
106.23
56.17
59.58
55.82
89.67
48.86
63.06
101.31

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Missouri

Lauderdale
Lawrence
Leake
Lee
Leflore
Lincoln
Lowndes
Madison
Marion
Marshall
Monroe
Montgomery
Neshoba
Newton
Noxubee
Oktibbeha
Panola
Pearl River
Perry
Pike
Pontotoc
Prentiss
Quitman
Rankin
Scott
Sharkey
Simpson
Smith
Stone
Sunflower
Tallahatchie
Tate
Tippah
Tishomingo
Tunica
Union
Walthall
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Webster
Wilkinson
Winston
Yalobusha
Yazoo
Adair
Andrew
Atchison
Audrain

Page 53 of 87

67.14
75.61
75.30
53.78
56.74
84.29
59.69
73.64
83.42
55.47
49.18
50.02
86.65
58.56
60.78
61.94
54.10
89.99
80.50
99.90
51.15
44.12
56.63
84.08
71.08
64.47
77.02
83.13
102.78
54.87
63.24
56.45
45.77
52.10
75.96
58.28
84.15
52.80
59.79
81.94
50.79
63.20
61.09
51.18
59.06
70.17
101.78
139.12
109.36

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Barry
Barton
Bates
Benton
Bollinger
Boone
Buchanan
Butler
Caldwell
Callaway
Camden
Cape Girardeau
Carroll
Carter
Cass
Cedar
Chariton
Christian
Clark
Clay
Clinton
Cole
Cooper
Crawford
Dade
Dallas
Daviess
DeKalb
Dent
Douglas
Dunklin
Franklin
Gasconade
Gentry
Greene
Grundy
Harrison
Henry
Hickory
Holt
Howard
Howell
Iron
Jackson
Jasper
Jefferson
Johnson
Knox
Laclede

Page 54 of 87

72.60
60.23
64.87
59.80
57.61
104.25
98.74
91.09
65.09
93.49
62.26
89.62
89.66
47.57
94.92
52.14
85.05
89.37
75.93
122.53
98.06
83.33
81.29
59.51
62.73
66.56
79.65
80.61
45.85
46.46
107.86
106.50
70.13
75.43
105.36
65.88
71.35
60.76
55.54
108.69
72.60
53.86
46.06
115.52
66.88
97.49
75.68
85.30
62.94

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Lafayette
Lawrence
Lewis
Lincoln
Linn
Livingston
Macon
Madison
Maries
Marion
McDonald
Mercer
Miller
Mississippi
Moniteau
Monroe
Montgomery
Morgan
New Madrid
Newton
Nodaway
Oregon
Osage
Ozark
Pemiscot
Perry
Pettis
Phelps
Pike
Platte
Polk
Pulaski
Putnam
Ralls
Randolph
Ray
Reynolds
Ripley
Saline
Schuyler
Scotland
Scott
Shannon
Shelby
St. Louis
St. Charles
St. Clair
St. Francois
Ste. Genevieve

Page 55 of 87

120.88
73.32
82.79
111.58
69.13
83.44
70.88
52.64
55.83
101.89
66.20
63.48
63.55
118.81
77.18
89.41
98.78
75.71
126.89
73.74
93.02
44.53
58.58
46.46
103.50
76.46
78.29
65.84
99.03
111.22
59.12
55.72
59.01
91.84
75.25
78.11
41.84
51.32
115.09
63.69
84.01
116.66
47.78
101.64
118.09
121.31
47.39
71.88
65.95

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Montana

Stoddard
Stone
Sullivan
Taney
Texas
Vernon
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Webster
Worth
Wright
Beaverhead
Big Horn
Blaine
Broadwater
Carbon
Carter
Cascade
Chouteau
Custer
Daniels
Dawson
Deer Lodge
Fallon
Fergus
Flathead
Gallatin
Garfield
Glacier
Golden Valley
Granite
Hill
Jefferson
Judith Basin
Lake
Lewis and Clark
Liberty
Lincoln
Madison
McCone
Meagher
Mineral
Missoula
Musselshell
Park
Petroleum
Phillips
Pondera

Page 56 of 87

125.67
67.77
53.14
56.11
46.96
61.69
111.01
54.90
43.70
74.75
64.48
51.43
25.52
10.10
13.68
26.18
26.95
12.30
24.15
18.37
9.21
11.82
10.24
36.91
10.04
19.80
114.30
60.48
11.30
15.62
12.90
29.21
14.82
25.95
20.43
36.57
34.68
13.91
85.89
28.67
10.99
22.00
101.80
63.37
11.30
58.42
10.04
13.16
18.57

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Nebraska

Powder River
Powell
Prairie
Ravalli
Richland
Roosevelt
Rosebud
Sanders
Sheridan
Silver Bow
Stillwater
Sweet Grass
Teton
Toole
Treasure
Valley
Wheatland
Wibaux
Yellowstone
Adams
Antelope
Arthur
Banner
Blaine
Boone
Box Butte
Boyd
Brown
Buffalo
Burt
Butler
Cass
Cedar
Chase
Cherry
Cheyenne
Clay
Colfax
Cuming
Custer
Dakota
Dawes
Dawson
Deuel
Dixon
Dodge
Douglas
Dundy
Fillmore

Page 57 of 87

12.62
21.66
12.90
111.16
13.68
14.48
9.44
27.18
13.56
35.91
31.96
24.61
24.06
16.42
11.50
11.36
11.73
10.70
17.48
140.11
112.93
11.22
20.44
13.61
117.01
28.34
36.50
19.01
99.22
138.48
131.35
153.78
117.01
52.20
14.10
23.69
136.26
140.47
142.40
50.37
127.40
19.74
82.46
26.51
110.11
148.97
165.06
36.07
146.35

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Franklin
Frontier
Furnas
Gage
Garden
Garfield
Gosper
Grant
Greeley
Hall
Hamilton
Harlan
Hayes
Hitchcock
Holt
Hooker
Howard
Jefferson
Johnson
Kearney
Keith
Keya Paha
Kimball
Knox
Lancaster
Lincoln
Logan
Loup
Madison
McPherson
Merrick
Morrill
Nance
Nemaha
Nuckolls
Otoe
Pawnee
Perkins
Phelps
Pierce
Platte
Polk
Red Willow
Richardson
Rock
Saline
Sarpy
Saunders
Scotts Bluff

Page 58 of 87

78.81
38.96
62.16
92.69
16.23
26.32
84.02
14.67
85.72
118.67
171.13
81.83
34.35
34.25
55.55
11.75
78.28
104.27
67.56
140.24
49.35
20.57
23.03
73.64
121.59
38.13
30.17
19.68
127.89
11.88
101.88
24.49
90.73
107.98
100.15
114.02
68.69
60.30
119.56
114.79
135.06
157.76
42.31
101.21
28.61
127.89
158.19
139.84
49.58

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

Seward
Sheridan
Sherman
Sioux
Stanton
Thayer
Thomas
Thurston
Valley
Washington
Wayne
Webster
Wheeler
York
Carson City
Churchill
Clark
Douglas
Elko
Esmeralda
Eureka
Humboldt
Lander
Lincoln
Lyon
Mineral
Nye
Pershing
Storey
Washoe
White Pine
Belknap
Carroll
Cheshire
Coos
Grafton
Hillsborough
Merrimack
Rockingham
Strafford
Sullivan
Atlantic
Bergen
Burlington
Camden
Cape May
Cumberland
Essex
Gloucester

Page 59 of 87

133.57
18.38
62.89
15.20
116.15
109.44
13.34
134.03
58.64
159.92
116.08
75.13
32.52
149.50
56.13
20.34
46.95
24.13
4.14
14.99
5.41
8.29
6.21
24.32
18.36
3.59
17.90
7.80
321.14
6.81
6.84
149.38
129.93
80.06
65.26
81.32
177.62
108.67
203.12
134.10
107.68
320.54
1,096.60
252.02
327.37
300.09
209.05
1,651.40
309.84

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

New Mexico

New York

Hudson
Hunterdon
Mercer
Middlesex
Monmouth
Morris
Ocean
Passaic
Salem
Somerset
Sussex
Union
Warren
Bernalillo
Catron
Chaves
Cibola
Colfax
Curry
De Baca
Dona Ana
Eddy
Grant
Guadalupe
Harding
Hidalgo
Lea
Lincoln
Los Alamos
Luna
McKinley
Mora
Otero
Quay
Rio Arriba
Roosevelt
San Juan
San Miguel
Sandoval
Santa Fe
Sierra
Socorro
Taos
Torrance
Union
Valencia
Albany
Allegany
Bronx

Page 60 of 87

332.84
426.73
528.43
512.20
561.50
602.25
401.88
811.83
205.41
533.30
277.68
3,280.55
266.16
23.01
8.68
7.31
6.34
8.04
11.75
5.02
36.34
9.08
7.61
5.40
5.73
5.02
6.88
7.18
309.92
8.60
6.39
11.27
8.53
6.80
14.69
9.90
7.05
7.66
10.61
17.18
5.81
10.00
23.80
7.38
7.46
19.13
87.70
49.53
73.58

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Broome
Cattaraugus
Cayuga
Chautauqua
Chemung
Chenango
Clinton
Columbia
Cortland
Delaware
Dutchess
Erie
Essex
Franklin
Fulton
Genesee
Greene
Hamilton
Herkimer
Jefferson
Kings
Lewis
Livingston
Madison
Monroe
Montgomery
Nassau
New York
Niagara
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Orange
Orleans
Oswego
Otsego
Putnam
Queens
Rensselaer
Richmond
Rockland
Saratoga
Schenectady
Schoharie
Schuyler
Seneca
St. Lawrence
Steuben
Suffolk

Page 61 of 87

74.22
53.52
90.99
58.44
68.13
51.93
57.31
147.80
53.95
70.54
146.81
83.73
59.71
47.54
60.78
74.50
105.74
51.58
54.55
46.41
22,428.05
47.26
82.00
57.80
100.50
65.06
518.82
73.58
64.88
56.35
89.29
91.20
156.71
73.51
57.24
63.53
154.73
145.11
97.25
4,989.67
2,451.27
135.59
97.74
64.49
80.87
83.34
40.12
51.90
331.04

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

North Carolina

Sullivan
Tioga
Tompkins
Ulster
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westchester
Wyoming
Yates
Alamance
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Catawba
Chatham
Cherokee
Chowan
Clay
Cleveland
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Granville

Page 62 of 87

104.22
55.68
78.04
142.70
113.13
68.66
70.15
455.71
74.08
111.96
133.61
168.58
136.09
105.56
161.17
197.45
86.61
76.58
93.27
121.92
243.74
150.69
207.58
156.46
80.52
93.16
81.54
153.03
140.59
162.84
89.80
141.41
116.65
85.93
87.67
88.45
115.83
109.31
173.92
175.06
115.51
243.07
74.64
235.45
121.04
171.80
98.62
170.77
116.40

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Henderson
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison
Martin
McDowell
Mecklenburg
Mitchell
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Scotland
Stanly
Stokes
Surry
Swain
Transylvania

Page 63 of 87

110.52
175.27
67.20
151.57
179.49
221.25
67.80
90.79
69.71
170.42
273.64
138.36
75.59
118.45
95.64
157.88
216.25
153.41
79.88
163.47
583.51
149.38
116.15
150.90
108.04
403.29
74.17
108.22
189.65
81.54
89.51
119.83
91.96
107.61
90.15
207.79
135.81
116.72
83.24
114.63
160.32
114.34
112.64
102.02
145.69
109.03
130.00
178.28
250.44

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

North Dakota

Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
Adams
Barnes
Benson
Billings
Bottineau
Bowman
Burke
Burleigh
Cass
Cavalier
Dickey
Divide
Dunn
Eddy
Emmons
Foster
Golden Valley
Grand Forks
Grant
Griggs
Hettinger
Kidder
LaMoure
Logan
McHenry
McIntosh
McKenzie
McLean
Mercer
Morton
Mountrail
Nelson
Oliver
Pembina
Pierce
Ramsey
Ransom

Page 64 of 87

72.12
160.04
98.05
271.34
72.62
85.51
211.79
116.86
137.23
108.18
149.27
183.70
23.44
64.98
37.58
22.90
39.29
21.88
24.39
40.92
83.30
55.31
65.53
18.79
26.53
38.89
34.24
54.30
24.50
61.09
26.82
53.03
32.60
26.89
62.87
29.73
26.13
34.20
21.44
38.16
27.69
29.73
26.46
34.16
29.69
74.94
29.87
40.49
53.13

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Ohio

Renville
Richland
Rolette
Sargent
Sheridan
Sioux
Slope
Stark
Steele
Stutsman
Towner
Traill
Walsh
Ward
Wells
Williams
Adams
Allen
Ashland
Ashtabula
Athens
Auglaize
Belmont
Brown
Butler
Carroll
Champaign
Clark
Clermont
Clinton
Columbiana
Coshocton
Crawford
Cuyahoga
Darke
Defiance
Delaware
Erie
Fairfield
Fayette
Franklin
Fulton
Gallia
Geauga
Greene
Guernsey
Hamilton
Hancock
Hardin

Page 65 of 87

47.03
86.35
32.67
68.98
27.18
25.99
24.79
39.47
53.79
50.77
37.29
84.35
69.13
44.70
47.03
21.66
83.08
153.36
132.86
95.06
80.72
175.42
97.05
104.56
169.65
107.90
155.54
149.11
148.21
144.03
141.10
99.55
135.87
496.68
206.00
130.10
172.33
136.63
138.52
158.84
178.54
161.27
94.44
205.89
174.51
83.34
211.37
137.32
141.86

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Harrison
Henry
Highland
Hocking
Holmes
Huron
Jackson
Jefferson
Knox
Lake
Lawrence
Licking
Logan
Lorain
Lucas
Madison
Mahoning
Marion
Medina
Meigs
Mercer
Miami
Monroe
Montgomery
Morgan
Morrow
Muskingum
Noble
Ottawa
Paulding
Perry
Pickaway
Pike
Portage
Preble
Putnam
Richland
Ross
Sandusky
Scioto
Seneca
Shelby
Stark
Summit
Trumbull
Tuscarawas
Union
Van Wert
Vinton

Page 66 of 87

87.29
163.84
105.03
104.05
169.00
130.18
68.57
79.96
138.70
219.14
70.86
142.04
144.51
136.34
167.69
147.81
144.18
138.52
184.67
70.46
227.95
165.51
66.97
170.01
69.73
135.91
94.69
73.94
137.94
140.70
105.21
139.10
92.19
150.78
152.56
145.96
144.03
104.71
136.67
81.63
141.42
172.77
160.03
245.29
116.32
111.20
149.08
182.17
70.46

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Oklahoma

Warren
Washington
Wayne
Williams
Wood
Wyandot
Adair
Alfalfa
Atoka
Beaver
Beckham
Blaine
Bryan
Caddo
Canadian
Carter
Cherokee
Choctaw
Cimarron
Cleveland
Coal
Comanche
Cotton
Craig
Creek
Custer
Delaware
Dewey
Ellis
Garfield
Garvin
Grady
Grant
Greer
Harmon
Harper
Haskell
Hughes
Jackson
Jefferson
Johnston
Kay
Kingfisher
Kiowa
Latimer
Le Flore
Lincoln
Logan
Love

Page 67 of 87

207.53
77.68
181.04
111.09
168.96
145.96
56.90
40.87
40.15
19.19
31.77
34.22
50.93
38.46
55.39
45.40
68.15
42.31
14.52
89.86
36.23
39.72
32.39
45.79
51.40
38.53
66.68
29.11
22.93
41.23
45.43
46.30
39.25
24.62
27.39
21.89
43.53
35.87
28.79
29.08
38.64
38.89
39.18
27.64
38.32
57.08
49.57
54.17
49.75

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Oregon

Major
Marshall
Mayes
McClain
McCurtain
McIntosh
Murray
Muskogee
Noble
Nowata
Okfuskee
Oklahoma
Okmulgee
Osage
Ottawa
Pawnee
Payne
Pittsburg
Pontotoc
Pottawatomie
Pushmataha
Roger Mills
Rogers
Seminole
Sequoyah
Stephens
Texas
Tillman
Tulsa
Wagoner
Washington
Washita
Woods
Woodward
Baker
Benton
Clackamas
Clatsop
Columbia
Coos
Crook
Curry
Deschutes
Douglas
Gilliam
Grant
Harney
Hood River
Jackson

Page 68 of 87

32.28
48.09
60.74
58.73
50.11
44.32
39.86
50.75
40.98
47.66
36.70
89.10
51.79
30.34
66.32
38.28
54.38
39.14
50.57
50.50
32.71
29.65
70.85
40.58
57.58
36.45
23.00
28.86
104.52
69.80
48.09
34.47
31.20
31.85
20.75
121.45
276.09
113.57
112.44
66.02
18.60
69.76
143.61
63.13
10.18
16.48
11.21
388.97
95.86

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Pennsylvania

Jefferson
Josephine
Klamath
Lake
Lane
Lincoln
Linn
Malheur
Marion
Morrow
Multnomah
Polk
Sherman
Tillamook
Umatilla
Union
Wallowa
Wasco
Washington
Wheeler
Yamhill
Adams
Allegheny
Armstrong
Beaver
Bedford
Berks
Blair
Bradford
Bucks
Butler
Cambria
Cameron
Carbon
Centre
Chester
Clarion
Clearfield
Clinton
Columbia
Crawford
Cumberland
Dauphin
Delaware
Elk
Erie
Fayette
Forest
Franklin

Page 69 of 87

13.13
205.80
30.20
20.83
139.70
98.16
99.08
24.03
162.60
19.47
244.18
125.72
12.21
128.13
33.42
31.68
25.85
15.41
191.85
13.26
187.58
178.38
150.79
82.28
137.63
105.68
253.54
130.65
106.00
351.46
135.87
93.80
55.95
187.39
155.01
374.07
84.47
75.81
154.94
134.30
80.78
223.02
129.97
394.89
97.88
98.38
95.05
68.90
190.22

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Puerto Rico
Rhode Island

South Carolina

Fulton
Greene
Huntingdon
Indiana
Jefferson
Juniata
Lackawanna
Lancaster
Lawrence
Lebanon
Lehigh
Luzerne
Lycoming
McKean
Mercer
Mifflin
Monroe
Montgomery
Montour
Northampton
Northumberland
Perry
Philadelphia
Pike
Potter
Schuylkill
Snyder
Somerset
Sullivan
Susquehanna
Tioga
Union
Venango
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Westmoreland
Wyoming
York
All Areas
Bristol
Kent
Newport
Providence
Washington
Abbeville
Aiken
Allendale
Anderson

Page 70 of 87

104.14
86.08
109.69
80.10
74.31
144.21
140.06
358.57
117.49
302.30
238.37
128.47
122.06
59.03
97.88
140.45
224.95
402.15
156.91
235.19
140.17
144.57
1,297.57
52.52
78.67
184.21
166.57
75.31
88.26
116.73
98.38
154.30
88.51
67.15
130.44
106.75
136.16
114.80
216.01
185.31
630.91
212.86
548.98
358.30
292.91
78.52
107.53
62.57
123.59

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

South Dakota

Bamberg
Barnwell
Beaufort
Berkeley
Calhoun
Charleston
Cherokee
Chester
Chesterfield
Clarendon
Colleton
Darlington
Dillon
Dorchester
Edgefield
Fairfield
Florence
Georgetown
Greenville
Greenwood
Hampton
Horry
Jasper
Kershaw
Lancaster
Laurens
Lee
Lexington
Marion
Marlboro
McCormick
Newberry
Oconee
Orangeburg
Pickens
Richland
Saluda
Spartanburg
Sumter
Union
Williamsburg
York
Aurora
Beadle
Bennett
Bon Homme
Brookings
Brown
Brule

Page 71 of 87

62.68
68.97
95.72
100.95
79.06
176.40
85.81
79.80
77.50
52.07
76.33
69.75
73.64
97.34
83.65
78.98
62.68
66.60
183.86
68.13
67.84
85.35
76.90
86.52
111.39
95.89
64.09
112.73
65.86
61.37
50.02
76.72
150.19
71.52
157.76
99.36
80.72
140.46
65.65
62.32
59.04
142.37
68.50
83.07
16.39
84.71
123.61
84.63
66.07

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Buffalo
Butte
Campbell
Charles Mix
Clark
Clay
Codington
Corson
Custer
Davison
Day
Deuel
Dewey
Douglas
Edmunds
Fall River
Faulk
Grant
Gregory
Haakon
Hamlin
Hand
Hanson
Harding
Hughes
Hutchinson
Hyde
Jackson
Jerauld
Jones
Kingsbury
Lake
Lawrence
Lincoln
Lyman
Marshall
McCook
McPherson
Meade
Mellette
Miner
Minnehaha
Moody
Pennington
Perkins
Potter
Roberts
Sanborn
Shannon

Page 72 of 87

34.30
17.95
36.99
68.24
73.50
128.29
77.85
18.96
33.25
98.41
55.44
85.61
16.61
82.78
63.60
14.94
56.42
86.81
35.43
17.44
103.63
55.33
108.64
12.18
56.93
95.37
40.32
23.06
57.08
21.10
96.27
118.39
41.16
157.81
29.08
64.83
123.22
44.38
19.54
20.74
93.19
149.29
147.76
20.27
15.59
57.98
73.43
68.97
13.34

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Tennessee

Spink
Stanley
Sully
Todd
Tripp
Turner
Union
Walworth
Yankton
Ziebach
Anderson
Bedford
Benton
Bledsoe
Blount
Bradley
Campbell
Cannon
Carroll
Carter
Cheatham
Chester
Claiborne
Clay
Cocke
Coffee
Crockett
Cumberland
Davidson
Decatur
DeKalb
Dickson
Dyer
Fayette
Fentress
Franklin
Gibson
Giles
Grainger
Greene
Grundy
Hamblen
Hamilton
Hancock
Hardeman
Hardin
Hawkins
Haywood
Henderson

Page 73 of 87

86.34
26.62
45.25
14.83
32.42
125.21
145.41
42.97
120.17
13.78
169.66
110.71
64.93
101.58
197.33
157.57
108.24
89.74
70.98
151.74
123.71
55.84
88.83
80.50
106.25
102.56
82.17
110.31
180.24
62.29
92.96
96.44
72.65
91.01
92.93
112.92
89.52
85.10
110.16
117.41
82.97
135.66
163.80
66.56
73.99
73.33
102.05
104.51
63.95

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Henry
Hickman
Houston
Humphreys
Jackson
Jefferson
Johnson
Knox
Lake
Lauderdale
Lawrence
Lewis
Lincoln
Loudon
Macon
Madison
Marion
Marshall
Maury
McMinn
McNairy
Meigs
Monroe
Montgomery
Moore
Morgan
Obion
Overton
Perry
Pickett
Polk
Putnam
Rhea
Roane
Robertson
Rutherford
Scott
Sequatchie
Sevier
Shelby
Smith
Stewart
Sullivan
Sumner
Tipton
Trousdale
Unicoi
Union
Van Buren

Page 74 of 87

80.50
69.35
65.73
82.39
83.84
156.44
138.01
222.21
95.35
90.61
76.74
75.40
97.67
157.10
99.19
73.01
85.25
87.42
105.71
118.71
62.51
101.98
130.59
124.87
102.20
99.30
92.31
94.16
57.40
84.16
129.50
125.41
101.36
147.32
141.05
141.31
81.81
93.76
171.69
132.87
76.99
76.16
160.10
140.91
85.97
111.65
159.67
83.65
107.81

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Texas

Warren
Washington
Wayne
Weakley
White
Williamson
Wilson
Anderson
Andrews
Angelina
Aransas
Archer
Armstrong
Atascosa
Austin
Bailey
Bandera
Bastrop
Baylor
Bee
Bell
Bexar
Blanco
Borden
Bosque
Bowie
Brazoria
Brazos
Brewster
Briscoe
Brooks
Brown
Burleson
Burnet
Caldwell
Calhoun
Callahan
Cameron
Camp
Carson
Cass
Castro
Chambers
Cherokee
Childress
Clay
Cochran
Coke
Coleman

Page 75 of 87

103.39
185.92
58.34
86.23
109.11
213.70
128.42
67.55
9.04
87.19
47.05
27.17
29.03
54.09
112.84
22.23
74.38
103.21
28.68
51.53
84.57
118.22
130.54
16.15
66.83
62.65
83.84
104.14
12.94
23.02
29.34
56.50
79.32
91.78
91.30
48.46
41.70
81.12
71.86
25.40
56.88
30.31
55.12
68.21
21.23
43.56
18.57
28.86
41.77

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Collin
Collingsworth
Colorado
Comal
Comanche
Concho
Cooke
Coryell
Cottle
Crane
Crockett
Crosby
Culberson
Dallam
Dallas
Dawson
Deaf Smith
Delta
Denton
DeWitt
Dickens
Dimmit
Donley
Duval
Eastland
Ector
Edwards
El Paso
Ellis
Erath
Falls
Fannin
Fayette
Fisher
Floyd
Foard
Fort Bend
Franklin
Freestone
Frio
Gaines
Galveston
Garza
Gillespie
Glasscock
Goliad
Gonzales
Gray
Grayson

Page 76 of 87

146.42
22.99
91.37
144.90
66.31
43.70
90.23
67.17
17.09
16.29
17.40
23.61
9.46
26.03
127.33
21.78
27.30
50.43
168.75
72.14
20.23
43.04
29.75
36.04
54.88
13.36
34.69
53.50
87.85
88.78
53.78
70.73
116.94
29.89
31.62
20.40
113.08
79.22
57.99
56.40
26.79
99.51
19.16
117.63
24.71
57.09
89.23
24.51
103.76

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Gregg
Grimes
Guadalupe
Hale
Hall
Hamilton
Hansford
Hardeman
Hardin
Harris
Harrison
Hartley
Haskell
Hays
Hemphill
Henderson
Hidalgo
Hill
Hockley
Hood
Hopkins
Houston
Howard
Hudspeth
Hunt
Hutchinson
Irion
Jack
Jackson
Jasper
Jeff Davis
Jefferson
Jim Hogg
Jim Wells
Johnson
Jones
Karnes
Kaufman
Kendall
Kenedy
Kent
Kerr
Kimble
King
Kinney
Kleberg
Knox
La Salle
Lamar

Page 77 of 87

107.18
106.73
99.27
32.72
21.30
68.55
25.54
24.16
85.40
147.53
78.56
27.75
20.43
171.21
20.43
82.25
83.88
62.20
28.65
112.80
61.13
61.96
20.95
15.53
84.39
21.06
25.92
54.02
58.37
86.95
13.25
45.77
36.86
50.46
112.60
30.72
71.73
93.85
132.20
18.16
23.58
72.73
48.95
16.78
33.21
52.02
21.33
53.92
59.71

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Lamb
Lampasas
Lavaca
Lee
Leon
Liberty
Limestone
Lipscomb
Live Oak
Llano
Loving
Lubbock
Lynn
Madison
Marion
Martin
Mason
Matagorda
Maverick
McCulloch
McLennan
McMullen
Medina
Menard
Midland
Milam
Mills
Mitchell
Montague
Montgomery
Moore
Morris
Motley
Nacogdoches
Navarro
Newton
Nolan
Nueces
Ochiltree
Oldham
Orange
Palo Pinto
Panola
Parker
Parmer
Pecos
Polk
Potter
Presidio

Page 78 of 87

31.96
69.35
80.94
88.33
69.21
69.17
52.22
22.30
52.91
74.70
5.49
51.15
24.85
77.28
61.41
28.51
65.38
54.74
32.55
51.15
71.55
38.80
71.73
40.28
39.56
98.89
61.37
21.78
69.03
163.06
25.92
57.99
20.37
69.62
56.68
55.33
31.03
42.77
27.65
16.29
91.75
66.48
58.02
138.41
28.72
14.01
75.45
15.12
12.74

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Rains
Randall
Reagan
Real
Red River
Reeves
Refugio
Roberts
Robertson
Rockwall
Runnels
Rusk
Sabine
San Augustine
San Jacinto
San Patricio
San Saba
Schleicher
Scurry
Shackelford
Shelby
Sherman
Smith
Somervell
Starr
Stephens
Sterling
Stonewall
Sutton
Swisher
Tarrant
Taylor
Terrell
Terry
Throckmorton
Titus
Tom Green
Travis
Trinity
Tyler
Upshur
Upton
Uvalde
Val Verde
Van Zandt
Victoria
Walker
Waller
Ward

Page 79 of 87

69.66
27.72
13.43
40.80
45.91
7.42
25.20
18.16
66.10
161.16
35.73
60.37
75.04
63.79
78.29
44.11
67.31
25.58
23.47
30.17
80.84
29.75
104.55
107.52
48.88
38.62
14.57
19.85
26.06
25.44
175.04
31.27
10.73
31.45
33.10
71.11
31.48
105.97
63.99
80.74
79.04
16.22
55.19
15.74
88.12
63.30
91.92
172.45
10.22

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Utah

Vermont

Washington
Webb
Wharton
Wheeler
Wichita
Wilbarger
Willacy
Williamson
Wilson
Winkler
Wise
Wood
Yoakum
Young
Zapata
Zavala
Beaver
Box Elder
Cache
Carbon
Daggett
Davis
Duchesne
Emery
Garfield
Grand
Iron
Juab
Kane
Millard
Morgan
Piute
Rich
Salt Lake
San Juan
Sanpete
Sevier
Summit
Tooele
Uintah
Utah
Wasatch
Washington
Wayne
Weber
Addison
Bennington
Caledonia
Chittenden

Page 80 of 87

153.22
29.89
70.17
22.68
32.93
27.61
50.46
107.28
82.50
10.01
105.35
78.77
22.33
38.21
32.27
42.39
22.60
13.61
39.93
13.78
24.17
73.36
9.42
19.23
25.73
6.55
21.34
13.58
15.95
15.90
17.82
33.17
11.39
53.53
4.23
24.35
34.16
25.81
13.51
7.16
60.32
43.19
41.37
45.68
65.88
86.83
119.13
90.78
122.59

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Virginia

Essex
Franklin
Grand Isle
Lamoille
Orange
Orleans
Rutland
Washington
Windham
Windsor
Accomack
Albemarle
Alleghany
Amelia
Amherst
Appomattox
Arlington
Augusta
Bath
Bedford
Bland
Botetourt
Brunswick
Buchanan
Buckingham
Campbell
Caroline
Carroll
Charles City
Charlotte
Chesapeake City
Chesterfield
Clarke
Craig
Culpeper
Cumberland
Dickenson
Dinwiddie
Essex
Fairfax
Fauquier
Floyd
Fluvanna
Franklin
Frederick
Giles
Gloucester
Goochland
Grayson

Page 81 of 87

53.13
79.91
108.58
103.98
88.36
69.39
77.52
114.46
114.03
108.26
105.46
251.95
89.41
88.19
104.92
81.93
1,546.99
180.02
119.88
127.47
92.80
125.74
60.07
76.03
88.55
85.89
118.76
98.01
108.08
65.35
125.31
153.33
226.74
91.21
185.59
103.23
85.39
86.39
87.62
436.10
228.32
104.23
146.67
101.97
169.84
76.03
144.66
157.03
120.71

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Greene
Greensville
Halifax
Hanover
Henrico
Henry
Highland
Isle of Wight
James City
King and Queen
King George
King William
Lancaster
Lee
Loudoun
Louisa
Lunenburg
Madison
Mathews
Mecklenburg
Middlesex
Montgomery
Nelson
New Kent
Northampton
Northumberland
Nottoway
Orange
Page
Patrick
Pittsylvania
Powhatan
Prince Edward
Prince George
Prince William
Pulaski
Rappahannock
Richmond
Roanoke
Rockbridge
Rockingham
Russell
Scott
Shenandoah
Smyth
Southampton
Spotsylvania
Stafford
Suffolk

Page 82 of 87

197.96
58.37
66.11
160.16
189.26
77.69
97.26
102.33
252.24
88.87
144.80
107.43
131.75
63.37
344.64
164.66
68.48
181.74
178.18
74.09
110.92
140.34
131.82
158.98
124.27
86.36
89.77
194.12
169.23
96.00
69.92
164.84
92.15
120.92
254.00
88.44
242.92
82.94
123.01
123.62
203.00
62.48
59.74
160.56
80.24
76.75
176.38
263.78
130.09

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Washington

Surry
Sussex
Tazewell
Virginia Beach City
Warren
Washington
Westmoreland
Wise
Wythe
York
Adams
Asotin
Benton
Chelan
Clallam
Clark
Columbia
Cowlitz
Douglas
Ferry
Franklin
Garfield
Grant
Grays Harbor
Island
Jefferson
King
Kitsap
Kittitas
Klickitat
Lewis
Lincoln
Mason
Okanogan
Pacific
Pend Oreille
Pierce
San Juan
Skagit
Skamania
Snohomish
Spokane
Stevens
Thurston
Wahkiakum
Walla Walla
Whatcom
Whitman
Yakima

Page 83 of 87

103.05
65.53
63.73
153.00
205.37
113.26
102.90
79.31
97.44
143.62
21.75
15.04
48.35
154.73
220.15
223.48
19.01
153.54
17.99
7.51
51.71
16.74
60.54
37.14
251.46
161.37
378.56
467.12
78.09
25.17
111.17
19.65
146.51
23.43
61.05
53.94
251.21
233.64
133.97
179.57
283.56
50.23
27.78
153.47
82.88
36.85
204.07
24.68
31.84

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

West Virginia

Barbour
Berkeley
Boone
Braxton
Brooke
Cabell
Calhoun
Clay
Doddridge
Fayette
Gilmer
Grant
Greenbrier
Hampshire
Hancock
Hardy
Harrison
Jackson
Jefferson
Kanawha
Lewis
Lincoln
Logan
Marion
Marshall
Mason
McDowell
Mercer
Mineral
Mingo
Monongalia
Monroe
Morgan
Nicholas
Ohio
Pendleton
Pleasants
Pocahontas
Preston
Putnam
Raleigh
Randolph
Ritchie
Roane
Summers
Taylor
Tucker
Tyler
Upshur

Page 84 of 87

56.65
166.84
50.31
47.38
56.43
86.86
44.08
54.26
54.55
71.21
42.67
68.89
82.22
104.36
84.98
82.22
61.40
63.97
199.15
62.74
57.05
58.57
56.47
62.45
63.71
61.25
69.51
64.40
87.11
41.08
89.54
66.14
129.53
73.97
67.01
67.41
56.00
63.79
71.50
74.07
72.08
52.59
46.33
49.73
63.68
71.90
88.64
53.21
67.23

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Wisconsin

Wayne
Webster
Wetzel
Wirt
Wood
Wyoming
Adams
Ashland
Barron
Bayfield
Brown
Buffalo
Burnett
Calumet
Chippewa
Clark
Columbia
Crawford
Dane
Dodge
Door
Douglas
Dunn
Eau Claire
Florence
Fond du Lac
Forest
Grant
Green
Green Lake
Iowa
Iron
Jackson
Jefferson
Juneau
Kenosha
Kewaunee
La Crosse
Lafayette
Langlade
Lincoln
Manitowoc
Marathon
Marinette
Marquette
Menominee
Milwaukee
Monroe
Oconto

Page 85 of 87

54.48
63.57
52.92
47.60
67.59
60.06
110.38
52.40
79.64
57.80
154.38
95.76
69.97
157.08
77.62
88.96
143.50
77.01
172.38
152.39
115.82
49.44
94.37
85.44
88.64
142.32
58.59
118.45
124.50
129.30
113.58
65.66
88.00
147.51
87.61
143.35
123.82
95.19
139.30
78.79
70.32
150.22
82.99
86.37
97.57
36.57
269.17
91.24
93.13

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Wyoming

Oneida
Outagamie
Ozaukee
Pepin
Pierce
Polk
Portage
Price
Racine
Richland
Rock
Rusk
Sauk
Sawyer
Shawano
Sheboygan
St. Croix
Taylor
Trempealeau
Vernon
Vilas
Walworth
Washburn
Washington
Waukesha
Waupaca
Waushara
Winnebago
Wood
Albany
Big Horn
Campbell
Carbon
Converse
Crook
Fremont
Goshen
Hot Springs
Johnson
Laramie
Lincoln
Natrona
Niobrara
Park
Platte
Sheridan
Sublette
Sweetwater
Teton

Page 86 of 87

119.24
150.00
159.57
93.52
112.62
81.14
93.70
54.10
155.09
85.69
157.15
57.95
110.45
65.24
102.23
149.19
119.59
62.29
90.99
93.94
152.32
174.55
70.64
165.98
185.75
109.31
98.43
119.63
89.57
10.23
27.79
10.53
10.23
6.87
16.15
15.83
14.14
12.71
11.05
13.08
32.75
11.35
9.76
25.49
13.08
14.99
24.47
3.68
57.88

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)

Uinta
Washakie
Weston

Page 87 of 87

13.37
16.15
8.51

[85 FR 6760, Feb. 6, 2020]

Back to Top
Need assistance?

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=06c0f1f4220211a563c990edf25bc183&mc=tr... 10/21/2020