Form 1 Evaluation

Application and Impact of Online Clinical Research Training Programs on Healthcare Professionals in Industry, Academia, and Clinical Research, Office of Clinical Research, OD, NIH

IPPCR Lecture Evaluation

IPPCR Lecture Evaluation (Students)

OMB: 0925-0764

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OMB # 0925-0764

Expiration Date: XX/XXXX



INTRODUCTION TO THE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH LECTURE EVALUATION FORM (ONLINE)

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: NIH, Project Clearance Branch, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7974, Bethesda, MD 20892-7974, ATTN: PRA (0925-0764). Do not return the completed form to this address.

  1. Lecture objectives were achieved.

    1. Completely

    2. Considerably

    3. Moderately

    4. Minimally

    5. None or not at all

  1. The lecture material was well organized.

  1. Completely

  2. Considerably

  3. Moderately

  4. Minimally

  5. None or not at all

  1. The material covered in the lecture was useful to me.

  1. Completely

  2. Considerably

  3. Moderately

  4. Minimally

  5. None or not at all

  1. The speaker communicated effectively.

  1. Completely

  2. Considerably

  3. Moderately

  4. Minimally

  5. None or not at all

  1. I will be able to apply this information to my current/future work or area of study.

  1. Completely

  2. Considerably

  3. Moderately

  4. Minimally

  5. None or not at all

  1. The technical level of the lecture was:

  1. Appropriate

  2. Too high

  3. Too low

  1. The length of the lecture was:

  1. Appropriate

  2. Too short

  3. Too long

  1. OPTIONAL: What were the major strengths of the lecture (50 words max)?

­________________________________________________________________________

  1. OPTIONAL: Which aspects of the lecture could be improved (50 words max)?

________________________________________________________________________



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Authorcurriem
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2024-07-20

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy