National Center on Early Childhood Quality Assurance Feedback Surveys for Technical Assistance Groups

Fast Track Generic Clearance for Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

4 - Instrument Form COP and Workgroup Evaluation - QIS COP

National Center on Early Childhood Quality Assurance Feedback Surveys for Technical Assistance Groups

OMB: 0970-0401

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OMB #: 0970-0401

Expiration Date: 6/30/2024


QIS Community of Practice Survey 2023

DATE

________________________________________

We want to learn about your experiences with the QIS Community of Practice that is part of the National Center on Early Childhood Quality Assurance. Your answers are private and will be used to improve our work. Thank you for taking the time to complete this brief survey.


Please use this survey to provide feedback by reflecting on your participation over the past year. The brief voluntary survey will only take a few minutes and all responses are private.



Please select your role:

  • QIS Administrator/Statewide

  • QIS Administrator/Local

  • QIS Manager/Statewide

  • QIS Manager/Local

  • QIS Support/Statewide

  • QIS Support/Local

  • Other


If other, please describe: ____________________________________

Content Relevance and Usefulness

Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Not applicable

The purposes of the CoP are clear.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

Resources are provided as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

The experience of being in the CoP is useful (i.e. provides you with practical information or a practical perspective to inform your work).

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

The experience of being in the CoP is relevant to my current work (i.e. pertinent to your current work).

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

The experience of being in the CoP is influential (i.e. influenced your thinking; gave you "a-ha" moments; enabled you to think in a different way about your system(s), your partnerships, or other critical aspects of your work; and/or helped you analyze, synthesize, or integrate information in a new way.)

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

If you marked disagree or strongly disagree above, please take a moment to give us a little more information.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________


Facilitators

Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Not applicable

The facilitator is well prepared.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

The facilitator helps the group

value the contributions of each member.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

The facilitator helps guide discussions and share activities about our shared interest.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA



If you marked disagree or strongly disagree above, please take a moment to give us a little more information.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________


Benefits


Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Not applicable

I am increasing my awareness and knowledge by participating in the CoP.


Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

I feel ready to apply new resources or ideas shared to my work.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA

Overall, the experience is relevant and fits my needs.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

NA



If you marked disagree or strongly disagree above, please take a moment to give us a little more information.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________



What barriers, if any, has your participation in the QIS Community of Practice helped you overcome?

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

Which aspect(s) of the QIS Community of Practice was most useful for you and why?

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

How could we improve this work to better meet your needs?

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________


Thank you!


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Public Law 104-13) STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BURDEN: The purpose of this information collection is to collect feedback from recipients participating in Training and Technical Assistance (T/TA) activities provided by the National Center on Early Childhood Quality Assurance (NCECQA). The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 minutes per respondent, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering, and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. This is a voluntary collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB # is 0970-0401 and the expiration date is 6/30/2024. If you have any comments on this collection of information, please contact Leatha Chun at [email protected].

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleDOCUMENTATION FOR THE GENERIC CLEARANCE
Author558022
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2024-07-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy