Agency
Needs
Assessment
Survey:
Summary
of
Survey
Results
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2125-0655
EXPIRATION DATE: mm/dd/yyyy
Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2125-0655. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 90 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering, and maintaining the data needed, completing, and reviewing the collection of information.
All responses to this collection of information are voluntary. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE, Washington, D.C. 20590.
Which of the following documents/studies is your agency responsible for producing? Please select all that apply.
What is the status of tolling within your agency’s jurisdiction?
What fixed route transit services are available within (all or a portion of) your planning jurisdiction? Please select all that apply.
Which of the following data/analysis products does your agency produce in the course of its mission? Please select all that apply.
Population/Employment Growth Projections (state/regional/county control totals)
Future Land Use Patterns (TAZ or parcel level)
Transit Ridership Forecasts for FTA
Traffic and Toll Revenue Forecasts
Freight or Truck Forecasts
Economic Impact Analyses of Transportation Projects
Environmental Justice Analyses of Transportation Projects
Pedestrian/Cyclist Activity Forecast
Other (please specify):
How important are quantitative analysis/performance measures to your agency’s decision makers (e.g. Policy Board, Commissioner, etc.)?
Extremely Important
Very important
Somewhat Important
Not very important
Not at all important
If you could improve your agency’s analysis capabilities for only one planning issue, what would it be? Please provide as much detail as you can.
Issue
Extremely Important
Very Important
Important
Not very Important
Not at all Important
Transportation
Road/Corridor
Pricing
Mobility/Congestion
Reduction
Transit
Travel Demand/Congestion
Management
Long Distance
Travel
Traffic Operations/Systems
Management
Travel Time
Reliability
Asset/Infrastructure
Conditions
Economics
Economic Impacts/
Cost Effectiveness
Freight
Visitors/Seasonal
Residents
Economic
Development
Environmental
Environmental
Impacts
Air Quality/Climate
Change
Environmental
Justice/Equity
Quality of
Life
Sustainability/Livability
Walking/Biking/Active
Transportation
Safety
School Transportation
Issue |
Extremely Important |
Very Important |
Important |
Not very Important |
Not at all Important |
Transportation for Seniors |
|
|
|
|
|
Growth |
|||||
Smart Growth/Transit- Oriented Design/Built Environment |
|
|
|
|
|
Demographics/Evolution |
|
|
|
|
|
Migration |
|
|
|
|
|
Optional: Please provide a short description of any other issues not listed on the previous pages that are important to your agency.
Does your agency have or have access to a GIS database of all land parcels within your planning jurisdiction?
Yes
No
I don’t know
When was the last time your agency conducted (or participated in) the following types of surveys?
Survey Type |
In the last 1-2 years |
3-5 years ago |
6-10 years ago |
More than 10 years ago |
Never or not that I know of |
Household travel survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Establishment travel survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Transit on-board survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor survey |
|
|
|
|
|
External cordon line origin- destination survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Corridor or other special origin-destination survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Freight survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated preference survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Parking survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Longitudinal panel survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer satisfaction/public opinion survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Please describe your agency’s use or interest in using the following data sources. Randomize list of answer choices
Data Source |
Already Use/Have used |
Very Interested in Using |
Somewhat Interested in Using |
Not Interested |
Archived operational traffic data |
|
|
|
|
Commercial travel time data (INRIX, NavTeq, TomTom, AirSage, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
Web-based routing/travel time data (Google, MapQuest, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
Transit operational data on actual vehicle headways |
|
|
|
|
Electronic transit fare and toll collection data |
|
|
|
|
Tablet-based on-board surveys |
|
|
|
|
Smart phone surveys |
|
|
|
|
GPS-equipped household surveys |
|
|
|
|
Passively collected origin-destination data (ATRI, AirSage, TomTom, Bluetooth, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
[If already used passive origin-destination data] Which passive origin-destination data collection technology have you used? Please select all that apply.
GPS based
Cell phone based
Bluetooth based
If your agency purchases propriety data when a free alternative is available, (e.g., InfoGroup employment data rather than Census LEHD, IHS Global Insight Transearch Data rather than FHWA FAF, etc.) what motivates this decision? Please provide as much detail as you can.
Also show checkbox for: My agency doesn’t purchase proprietary data when a free alternative is available
Data Source
Major Impact
Minor Impact
No Impact
Don’t Know
Census
Bureau’s
Longitudinal
Employer-Household
Dynamics
(LEHD)
Census Bureau’s
American Communities
Survey (ACS) Journey to Work Data
Census Transportation
Planning Package
(CTPP)
Census Bureau’s
County Business
Patterns
Data Source |
Major Impact |
Minor Impact |
No Impact |
Don’t Know |
Bureau of Economic Analysis’s Regional Economic Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Federal Highway Administration’s National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) |
|
|
|
|
Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ Commodity Flow Survey (CFS)/Federal Highway Administration’s Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) |
|
|
|
|
Does your agency document its decision process to develop or acquire analysis tools/methods?
Yes
No
Does your agency document its decision process to use an analysis tool/method for a particular project or program?
Yes
No
[If agency produces Future Land Use Patterns (6b)] You responded that your agency develops future land use allocations. How does your agency allocate growth in population and employment to traffic analysis zones (parcels or other detailed unit of geography)? Please select all that play a major role in your process.
Based on Current Distribution
Based on Recent Growth
According to Master Plan/Zoning
Delphi Panel/Expert Process/Negotiation
Public Visioning Process
Land Use Planning Tool (CommunityViz, i-PLACE3S, EnvisionTomorrow, etc.)
Land Use Forecasting Model (UrbanSim, PECAS, DRAM/EMPAL, CubeLand, etc.)
Home-grown land use allocation tool
Other (please specify)
[If Yes to Land Use Planning Tool and/or Land Use Forecasting Model (18f and/or g)] How long has your agency been using this tool?
Still under development
1 year or less
2 years
3-5 years
5-10 years
More than 10 years
I don’t know
[If NO to Land Use Planning Tool and/or Land Use Forecasting Model (18f and/or g)] Is your agency considering use of a land use model/visioning tool?
No, we are content with our current methods
Yes, we are considering such tools but have no definite plans
Yes, we plan to purchase/develop a land use tool/model within the next three years
What role do travel demand models play in your agency in developing traffic/transit/freight forecasts?
We do not have a travel demand model. We rely entirely on other methods (sketch planning models, growth factoring, diversion curves, etc.).
We have a travel demand model but use it in conjunction with other independent methods (sketch planning models, growth factoring, diversion curves, etc.).
We have a travel demand model and generally rely exclusively on its direct outputs.
We have a travel demand model, but typically post-process or otherwise adjust its outputs to produce forecasts.
[If agency has a travel model (21b,c,d)]Please rank the following uses of your agency’s travel demand model in order of importance where 1 is most important and 10 is least important to your agency. Note that you can only use each number once.
Long Range Plan Development
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Development
Air Quality Conformity Demonstrations
NEPA Alternatives Analysis
Design Forecasts
Traffic Operational Planning/Travel Demand Management
Transit Studies
Freight Studies
Traffic Impact Studies
Traffic Operational Studies
[If agency has a travel model (21b,c,d)] Which of the following modes does your travel model forecast? Please select all that apply.
Transit
Walk/bike
Trucks
Other freight mode(s) (e.g., rail, barge, etc.) (please specify)
[If agency has a travel model (21b,c,d)] Which framework is your current travel model?
Trip-based
Tour-based (trips linked into tours)
Activity-based (trips and tours linked into daily patterns)
Other (e.g. Tour for work trips only)
[If agency has trip-based travel model (24a)] Is your agency moving towards a tour or activity- based model?
No
Undecided
Yes, but no concrete plans/timeframe uncertain
Yes, next model update, not underway
Yes, efforts currently underway
[If agency has a travel model (21b,c,d)] Do you know the precision of your agency’s travel model? For example, can you specify a confidence interval around your model’s forecasts (e.g., plus or minus X)?
Yes
No
[If agency has a travel model (21b,c,d)] Do your travel model’s forecasts reflect the following?
Randomize list of answer choices
Variable |
Yes, adequately reflects |
Yes, but maybe not adequately |
No, it does not consider |
I Don’t Know |
Age of Travelers |
|
|
|
|
Different built environments (e.g., Mixed Use Developments) |
|
|
|
|
Walk/bike suitability of neighborhoods |
|
|
|
|
Roadway tolls |
|
|
|
|
Parking costs |
|
|
|
|
Fuel prices |
|
|
|
|
Accessibility [to jobs, to shopping, etc.] |
|
|
|
|
Service characteristics other than time/cost, such as reliability, real-time information, comfort, safety, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Employer policies such as flex- time, free parking for carpooling, subsidized transit passes, etc. |
|
|
|
|
ITS policies such as ramp metering, speed harmonization, incident management, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Besides land use/travel demand models, which of the following tools has your agency used (directly or through consultant assistance) within the past three years? Please select all that apply for tools that your agency uses regardless of whether they were developed in-house or by outside consultants.
Sketch planning tools (IDAS, SPASM, SMITE, etc.)
Strategic models (SmartGAP, GreenSTEP, EERPAT, etc.)
Dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) (CUBE Avenue, TransModeler, TRANSIMS, VISTA, DynaSmart, DynusT, DynaMIT, etc.)
Traffic microsimulation model (VISSIM, TransModeler, Paramics, CORSIM, etc.)
Analytic/deterministic/optimization traffic tool (McTrans HCS/HCM, Synchro, TEAPAC, TRAFFIX, etc.)
General decision support tools (Decision Lens, Expert Choice, etc.)
Economic impact/Benefit-cost tool (TREDIS, REMI, STEAM, T-PICS, HERS, Cal-B/C, NET- BC, MicroBENCOST, HDM4, etc.)
Crash forecasting tool (HSM/IHSDM, SafetyAnalyst, etc.)
Project (lifecycle) costing tool (RealCost, etc.)
Vehicle emissions models (MOVES, EMFAC, MOBILE)
Air dispersion model (AERMOD, CAL3QHC or similar)
Noise impact model (FHWA’s TNM or similar)
Data visualization/visual analytics (ESRI, CADD, Adobe, etc.)
Other (please specify)
[If Sketch Planning Tools or Strategic Models (28 a or b)] Has your agency developed any in- house strategic models or sketch planning tools in the past three years? Please select all that apply.
Yes, custom scripts (please describe)
Yes, custom software (please describe)
Yes, other tool(s) (please describe)
No
[Did NOT select dynamic traffic assignment (NOT 28c)] Is your agency moving towards a dynamic traffic assignment?
No
Undecided
Yes, but no concrete plans/timeframe uncertain
Yes, next model update or planning cycle, not underway
Yes, efforts currently underway
Does your agency summarize and present uncertainty in your analyses and forecasts to senior decision-makers (e.g. Executive Director, Policy Board, etc.)?
Yes
No
[If agency summarizes/presents uncertainty (31a)] How does your agency summarize and present uncertainty in your analyses and forecasts to senior decision-makers (e.g. Executive Director, Policy Board, etc.)? Please provide any detail around the format or structure used to present uncertainty and risk.
Does your agency conduct “before and after” comparisons of forecasts and other analyses?
Yes, on a regular/planned basis
Yes, at least once, but irregularly
No
Does your agency have a formal risk management process/program?
Yes
No
I don’t know
Does your agency have a formal quality control or quality assurance process/program?
Yes, and it is applied effectively to planning analyses
Yes, but the process may not adequately ensure the quality of planning analyses
No
I don’t know
What is the greatest threat to your agency’s credibility with senior decision-makers or the public?
What is the greatest threat to your agency’s ability to provide accurate information to support transportation decision-making?
What is the greatest opportunity to improve your agency’s credibility or ability to provide accurate information to support transportation decision-making?
What technical issue has caused the greatest difficulty for your planning analyses? If able, please describe an example of the problem encountered.
Please rank the importance of the following general challenges according to how they affect your agency’s ability to conduct analyses to further its planning mission, where 1 is most important and 9 is least important to your agency. Note that you can only use each number once: Randomize list of answer choices
Limited budgets for planning analysis/high costs of planning analysis
Limited staff/staff time for planning analysis
Limited staff training/training opportunities
Planning cycles/deadlines
Lack of data or poor data quality
Limited ability of existing/available analysis tools/methods to provide needed information
Cost/time required by existing/available analysis tools/methods
Inherent uncertainties about the future
Limited computing resources/runtime considerations
Please allocate 150 points among the following 15 technical challenges according to how important addressing them is to improving your agency’s ability to conduct analyses to further its planning mission. (More points = More important) Your thoughtful response is appreciated as your allocations will help FHWA prioritize its efforts.
Note: randomize statements within each category (fundamental tool limitations, etc.)
Note: if easy, randomize categories of statements, but always keeping “Other” anchored at the bottom
Note: If reasonable, still show the tally/total at the bottom of the page, but don’t require exactly 50 points. Also if reasonable, don’t allow to put negative numbers or more than 150 points in a given box.
Fundamental Tool Limitations
Slow models/tools with long run times that limit their usefulness
Inability of available tools/methods to produce accurate estimates of travel times, travel time reliability and/or delay
Inability of available tools/methods to produce accurate estimates of passenger travel/volumes by origin/destination location, mode, and socioeconomic characteristics of the traveler
Inability of available tools/methods to produce accurate estimates of freight demand, truck movements/volumes, etc.
Poor or limited understanding of the uncertainty/precision associated with tools/methods
Poor or Uncertain Quality of Inputs
Inaccurate or uncertain land use forecasts or problems with forecasts of socioeconomic variables such as income and automobile ownership
Poor representation of transportation supply including free flow travel times and capacities (for intersections as well as road segments)
Poor Model Resolution
Poor spatial resolution: Inability of available tools/methods to deal with small scale projects and phenomenon (e.g., walking, biking)
Poor temporal resolution: Inability of available tools/methods to produce results with enough temporal detail (e.g., need for hourly or peak 15 minute traffic, poor handling or peak spreading, etc.)
Poor demographic/market resolution: Inability to identify who benefits or is impacted or to conduct equity or environmental justice analyses
Poor representation of special, high value or high impact travel (e.g., long distance travel, business-related travel, tourism/visitor travel)
Lack of Sensitivity to Policies or Other Factors Affecting Transportation
Lack of sensitivity to built environment, walkability, etc., in available tools/methods
Lack of sensitivity to supply characteristics in available tools/methods (e.g., parking costs, comfort, traveler information, etc.)
Inability of available tools/methods to evaluate employer policies such as flex- time, free parking for carpooling, subsidized transit passes, etc.
Inability of available tools/methods to evaluate ITS policies such as ramp metering, speed harmonization, incident management, etc.
Other
Other (please specify)
On the previous question you assigned points to an “other” category. Please provide any detail around what you had in mind for “other”.
If
your agency
could acquire
one type
of data
it currently
does not
have, what
would it
be?
If you could do one thing to improve your agency’s existing analysis tools/methods, what would it be?
If you could acquire one new tool for your agency, what would it be? You can name an actual existing tool or describe a tool that may not exist but you would like to see.
How
could FHWA
best help
your agency
improve its
travel modeling
and related
analyses?
Do you have any novel ideas (or new tools/methods your agency has developed) for advancing the state of the practice that you would like to share with FHWA?
How interested would you be in seeing FHWA present information on post-processing tools/methods for the following variables? Randomize list of answer choices
Variable |
Very Interested |
Somewhat Interested |
Not Interested |
Accessibility (To jobs, etc., by various modes) |
|
|
|
Travel Time Reliability |
|
|
|
User Benefits (Time & cost savings, etc.) |
|
|
|
Economic Impacts (Jobs, Income, etc.) |
|
|
|
Emissions (for criteria pollutants: PM, ozone, etc.) |
|
|
|
Greenhouse gases |
|
|
|
Health - Physical Activity |
|
|
|
Environmental Justice/Equity |
|
|
|
Safety (crashes, crash rates) |
|
|
|
Please allocate 100 points among the following 20 tools/information that FHWA might provide according to how helpful they would be for your agency. (More points = more helpful) Your thoughtful response is appreciated as your allocations will help FHWA prioritize its efforts.
Note: randomize statements within each category (fundamental tool limitations, etc.)
Note: if easy, randomize categories of statements, but always keeping “Other” anchored at the bottom
Note: If reasonable, still show the tally/total at the bottom of the page, but don’t require exactly 100 points. Also if reasonable, don’t allow to put negative numbers or more than 100 points in a given box.
Data
Data (TAZ data, counts, etc.) consistency checking tools
Summary of uncertainty in regional socioeconomic growth forecasts
New methods to incorporate observed speed/travel time data in models
Examples of how to expand samples of passively collected origin-destination data
Simplified Modeling Tools/Techniques
Managed lane feasibility spreadsheet based tool for estimating hourly volumes on managed lanes based on regional travel model data, time-of-day distributions and toll rates
Peak-spreading spreadsheet based tool for estimating the effects of pricing or congestion on the time-of-day of highway traffic
Modeling Fundamentals & Basic Structural Improvements
How-to Guides for developing standard practice model components (How-to Guide to Trip Generation, etc.)
Helpful insights on the “nuts & bolts” of models (options for balancing, single vs. double constraints, etc.)
Examples of data driven approaches to modeling travel demand (data-based trip tables)
Examples of methods to improve the handling of non-home-based trips in trip- based models
Comparisons of Alternative Methods
Comparisons of various methods of representing intersection delays in static assignments
Comparisons of activity-based and four-step models
Comparisons of gravity and destination choice models
Comparison of various methods and criteria for feedback convergence
Accuracy, Sensitivity and Uncertainty in Forecasting
Review/illustrations of techniques for quantifying uncertainty in forecasts and communicating it to decision-makers
Retrospective (predicted vs. actual) studies of traffic forecasting accuracy
Documenting standard sensitivity/dynamic validation tests and ranges of reasonable results
Examples of Good Practice in Communicating Results
Sharing methods for calculating accessibility measures to report the impacts of transportation projects/plans
Examples of new methods for estimating public health impacts of physically active modes of transportation
Examples of best practices in visualization of travel analysis results
Other
Other (please specify)
On the previous question you assigned points to an “other” category. Please provide any detail around what you had in mind for “other”.
Person responsible for providing this information
Name
Position
Phone Number
Would you be willing to be contacted for follow-up interviews?
Yes
No
Thank you for your participation. Your answers will help FHWA focus its resources on areas of greatest need to the agencies it serves.
April
2024
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | Report Purpose |
Author | Michelle Lee |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-07-24 |