FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION
Positive Train Control and Other Signal Systems
(Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 235 and 236)
SUPPORTING JUSTIFICATION
OMB Control No. 2130-0553
Summary
This submission is a request for a revision of the last three-year approval granted by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on July 25, 2022, which expires October 31, 2025.
The Federal Railroad Administration (hereafter “FRA” or “the Agency”) published
the required 60-day Federal Register notice on November 14, 2022. See 87 FR 68226. FRA received one comment in response to this Notice. See question number 8 for response to comment.
Overall, the adjustments decreased the burden by 63 hours and responses remained the same at 4,567,826, after a thorough review of the data.
The answer to question number 12 itemizes all information collection requirements.
The answer to question number 15 itemizes adjustments.
Circumstances that make collection of the information necessary.
Section 20157 of title 49 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) mandates that each Class I railroad, and each entity providing regularly scheduled intercity or commuter rail passenger transportation implement an FRA-certified positive train control (PTC) system on: (1) its main lines over which poison- or toxic-by-inhalation hazardous materials are transported, if the line carries five million or more gross tons of any annual traffic; (2) its main lines over which intercity or commuter rail passenger transportation is regularly provided; and (3) any other tracks the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) prescribes by regulation or order.1 By law, PTC systems must be designed to prevent certain accidents or incidents, including train-to-train collisions, over-speed derailments, incursions into established work zones, and movements of trains through switches left in the wrong position.2
On November 15, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden signed into law the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). Section 22414 of the IIJA establishes the same reporting requirement as FRA's existing regulations, using the same FRA form number (Form FRA F 6180.152) and content requirements, but modifies the statutory reporting cadence to quarterly rather than biannual. On July 25, 2022, OMB approved FRA’s extension request in which FRA modified Form FRA F 6180.152 to align with the statutory quarterly framework. FRA now requires each subject railroad to submit Form FRA F 6180.152 on a quarterly basis.
As part of this ICR revision request, FRA will continue to collect this information on a quarterly basis using Form FRA F 6180.152. Additionally, FRA is hereby proposing to standardize the reporting process required by 49 CFR 236.1023(e)(1), (h), and (f) by creating the Errors and Malfunctions Notification Form (Form FRA F 6180.179). This proposed Form, FRA F 6180.179, will be in an Excel format and will make it easier for the entities to notify FRA of each applicable failure, malfunction, or defective condition, and for FRA to synthesize and act on the reported failure. The Errors and Malfunctions Notification Form would not change the requirements that each railroad or PTC supplier and vendor currently must follow to notify FRA of each reportable failure, malfunction, or defective condition.3 The proposed Form FRA F 6180.179 would be submitted to [email protected] within the same 15-day deadline required under 49 CFR 236.1023(f)(1).
How, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used.
FRA’s regulations require that railroads or PTC vendors and suppliers notify FRA of certain PTC system errors and malfunctions.4 For example, railroads must maintain a database of all safety-relevant hazards identified in their PTC Safety Plans (PTCSP) and those that had not previously been identified in their PTCSPs.5 If the frequency of a safety-relevant hazard exceeds the thresholds in a railroad’s PTCSP, or such hazard has not been previously identified in a railroad’s risk analysis, then the railroad must notify FRA of the failure, malfunction, or defective condition that decreased or eliminated the safety functionality of the railroad’s PTC system.6 In addition, FRA’s regulations require PTC vendors and suppliers to notify FRA of any safety-relevant failure, defective condition, or previously unidentified hazard discovered by the vendor or supplier and the identify of each affected and notified railroad.7
Currently, each railroad or PTC vendor and supplier that must submit notifications of such a failure, malfunction, or defective condition does so by emailing the information to an FRA inbox ([email protected]). The information is currently sent in different formats by each railroad or PTC supplier and vendor because there is currently no standardized form. The new standardized form, Form FRA F 6180.179, Errors, and Malfunctions Notification Form, offers drop-down menus that would allow railroads or PTC suppliers and vendors to select an answer from an established list, instead of creating each answer from scratch. The proposed Errors and Malfunctions Notification Form would not change the requirements that each railroad or PTC supplier and vendor currently must follow to notify FRA of each reportable failure, malfunction, or defective condition.8
As noted in response to question 1, FRA continues to require each subject railroad to submit Form FRA F 6180.152 on a quarterly basis. The information collected is used by FRA to ensure new or novel signal and train control technologies meet proposed performance standards and work as intended in the US rail environment.
3. Extent of automated information collection.
In keeping with past agency practice and the requirements of the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, FRA highly encourages and strongly supports the use of advanced information technology, wherever possible, to reduce paperwork burdens.
FRA developed a standardized, Excel-based Errors and Malfunctions Notification Form FRA F 6180.179, that railroads and PTC vendors and suppliers will utilize to satisfy the reporting requirements. Form FRA F 6180.152 is also an Excel-based form.
To date, FRA’s PTC expert estimates that 100 percent of required documents have been submitted electronically to the agency.
4. Efforts to identify duplication.
The information collection requirements to our knowledge are not duplicated elsewhere. Similar data are not available from any other source.
5. Efforts to minimize the burden on small businesses.
The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA)
has authority to regulate
issues related to small businesses and stipulates
in its size standards that a “small entity” in the
railroad industry is a for-profit “line-haul railroad”
that has fewer than 1,500 employees, a “short line railroad”
with fewer than 500 employees, or a “commuter rail system”
with annual receipts of less than seven million dollars. See
“Size Eligibility Provisions and Standards,” 13 CFR part
121, subpart A. Respondents of this information collection
request are individual railroads mandated to provide this information
under 49 U.S.C. § 20157. While some of those railroads are
smaller, short-line railroads that may qualify as small businesses,
most are larger freight or passenger railroads that do not qualify as
small businesses. Therefore, the burden on small businesses affected
by the proposed Errors and Malfunctions Notification Form (Form FRA F
6180.179) should be negligible.
6. Impact of less frequent collection of information.
This information collection activity is essential to effectuate FRA oversight of railroads’ operation of PTC technology under 49 U.S.C. § 20157. By statute, railroads have the burden of collecting, cataloging, and presenting this information in Form FRA F 6180.152.9 By regulation, each railroad or PTC supplier or vendor must notify FRA of each applicable failure, malfunction, or defective condition and proposed form FRA F 6180.179 does not change this regulatory requirement, but rather standardizes the reporting. This data enables FRA to actively oversee the performance and reliability of PTC systems. The collection of information serves to meet the congressional mandate in 49 U.S.C. § 20157 and advance the goal of enhancing rail safety nationwide.
7. Special circumstances.
There are no special circumstances.
8. Compliance with 5 CFR 1320.8.
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and 5 CFR § 1320, FRA published a notice in the Federal Register on November 14, 2022, soliciting comments.10 FRA received one comment in response to this notice.
On January 13, 2023, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) submitted a spreadsheet containing suggestions for changes to the proposed collection. AAR’s suggestions fell into three categories: (1) changes to the data validation and listed options, (2) options to fill in a cell with a blank, “N/A,” or “Other” if there was not a valid option in the proposed list, and (3) general changes to the form’s instructions to improve clarity.
For data validation and listed options, AAR asked that the software version numbers allow for free text, so versions such as “6.3.24.2” be allowed rather than just numbers with a single decimal point, such as 6.3. The restrictions on the cell were removed to allow for free text entry. AAR additionally asked that, for “Type of Reportable Issue,” a listed option be changed to “Previously Unidentified Hazard” from the incorrectly listed prior two options that stated “Previously” and “Unidentified Hazard.” In the dropdown list, the two original line items were combined into “Previously Unidentified Hazard” to correct for the typographical error.
AAR asked for the option to fill in many cells with “N/A,” a blank, or provide an “Other” option to record additional entries outside of the original list. Doing so would allow for cases where an entity might not know the information requested but could provide an answer to the form rather than leaving it blank. For example, Suppliers or Vendors do not often know confidential information about the railroad, such as mile posts or track segment designations, and this option would allow them to submit without knowing milepost or track segment associated with the failure. The following sections now allow for “N/A” or “Other” options: “Affected Railroad, Supplier or Vendor,” “Track Segment,” and “Nature of Failure.”
Several of the form instructions were clarified or elaborated on as requested by AAR. The revisions did not require changing the context of a cell, but rather allowed for multiple cases and a better understanding of what FRA is asking for within the form. The following sections were updated: “Submission Instructions,” “Additional Affected Railroad(s), Supplier(s), or Vendor(s).” As the “Submission Instructions” were updated, FRA elected not to revise the instructions next to the cells themselves as the revisions that were made were sufficient.
Finally, AAR made two suggestions that FRA did not act on. First, AAR recommended removing the “Estimated Date to Correct Failure” field. FRA believes this is required per regulatory compliance, so this field has not been removed. Second, AAR noted that the proposed form cells need to “grow” as text is entered. FRA conducted testing on several noted cells, such as the “Synopsis” field, and confirmed that the field did expand as the user entered more text.
Consultations with representatives of the affected population:
As a part of FRA’s oversight and enforcement, individuals from the railroad industry are generally in direct contact with FRA’s inspectors at the time of site inspections and can provide any comments or concerns to them.
9. Payments or gifts to respondents.
There are no monetary payments provided or gifts made to respondents associated with the information collection requirements contained in this regulation.
10. Assurance of confidentiality.
FRA fully complies with all laws pertaining to confidentiality, including the Privacy Act of 1974.
11. Justification for any questions of a sensitive nature.
There are no questions, information, or data of a sensitive nature that would normally be considered private contained in this information collection.
12. Estimate of burden hours for information collected.
The estimates for the respondent universe, annual responses, and average time per responses are based on the experience and expertise of FRA’s Signal and Train Control Division.
CFR Section/Subject |
Respondent Universe |
Total annual responses (A) |
Average time per response (B) |
Total annual burden hours (C = A * B) |
Total
cost equivalent in USD |
PRA Analyses and Estimates |
235.6(c)—Expedited application for approval of certain changes described in this section |
42 |
10 |
5.00 |
50.00 |
$3,850.00 |
Modification
of a signal system consisting of the installation, relocation, or
removal of one or more signals, interlocked switches, derails,
movable-point frogs, or electric locks in an existing system
directly associated with the implementation of PTC pursuant to
Subpart I of Part 236, if the modification does not include the
discontinuance or decrease of limits of a signal or train control
system. |
—Copy of expedited application to labor union |
42 |
10 |
30.00 |
5.00 |
$385.00 |
FRA
estimates that one (1) copy of each of the 10 expedited
application requests (with the necessary notice and profile plan)
will be provided to the Headquarters of the Railroad Signalmen’s
Union or BRS (Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen). |
—Railroad letter rescinding its request for expedited application of certain signal system changes |
42 |
1 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
$462.00 |
FRA
estimates that approximately 1 letter rescinding a request for
expedited application of certain signal system changes will be
made by railroads and sent to FRA. |
—Revised application for certain signal system changes |
42 |
1 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
$385.00 |
FRA estimates that approximately 1 revised application for approval of certain signal system changes that include the required notice, profile plan, and statement will be sent to FRA under §§ 235.5 and 235.9–235.20. |
—Copy of railroad revised application to labor union |
42 |
1 |
30.00 |
0.50 |
$38.50 |
FRA
estimates that 1 copy of the revised application request (with the
necessary notice and profile plan) will be provided to the
Headquarters of the Railroad Signalmen’s Union or
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen. |
236.1—Railroad maintained signal plans at all interlockings, automatic signal locations, and controlled points, and updates to ensure accuracy |
700 |
25 |
15.00 |
6.25 |
$481.25 |
As
required for maintenance, plans shall be kept at all
interlockings, automatic signals and controlled points. Plans
shall be legible and correct. |
236.15—Designation of automatic block, traffic control, train stop, train control, cab signal, and PTC territory in timetable instructions |
700 |
10 |
30.00 |
5.00 |
$385.00 |
Automatic
block, traffic control, train stop, train control, cab signal, and
PTC territory shall be designated in timetable instructions. |
236.18—Software management control plan – New railroads |
2 |
2 |
160.00 |
320.00 |
$24,640.00 |
FRA
estimates that the Class II railroads and Class III railroads have
prepared and adopted a software management control plan.
Therefore, only new or existing Class II and Class III railroads
that become subject to this requirement would be affected. |
236.23(e)—The names, indications, and aspects of roadway and cab signals shall be defined in the carrier’s Operating Rule Book or Special Instructions. Modifications shall be filed with FRA within 30 days after such modifications become effective |
700 |
2 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
$154.00 |
The
names, indications, and aspects of roadway and cab signals shall
be defined in the carrier's Operating Rule Book or Special
Instructions. Modifications shall be filed with the FRA within
thirty days after such modifications become effective. |
236.587(d)—Certification and departure test results |
742 |
4,562,500 |
5.00 |
6,336.81 |
$487,934.00 |
Whoever
performs the departure test shall certify in writing that such
test was properly performed. The certification and the test
results shall be posted in the cab of the locomotive and a copy of
the certification and test results left at the test location for
filing in the office of the supervisory official having
jurisdiction. |
236.905(a)—Railroad Safety Program Plan (RSPP)—New railroads |
2 |
2 |
40.00 |
80.00 |
$6,160.00 |
The
RSPP must establish the minimum Product Safety Plan (PSP)
requirements that will govern the development and implementation
of all products subject to this subpart, consistent with the
provisions contained in § 236.907. |
236.913(a)—Filing and approval of a joint Product Safety Plan (PSP) |
742 |
1 |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
$240,000.00 |
A PSP
must be prepared for each product covered by this subpart. A
joint PSP must be prepared when: |
—(c)(1) Informational filing/petition for special approval |
742 |
0.5 |
50.00 |
25.00 |
$1,925.00 |
Not
less than 180 days prior to planned use of the product in revenue
service as described in the PSP or PSP amendment, the railroad
shall submit an informational filing to the Associate
Administrator for Safety, FRA. |
—(c)(2) Response to FRA’s request for further data after informational filing |
742 |
0.25 |
5.00 |
1.25 |
$96.00 |
FRA
estimates that it will request further information in
approximately 0.25 instances under the above requirement. |
—(d)(1)(ii) Response to FRA’s request for further information within 15 days after receipt of the Notice of Product Development (NOPD) |
742 |
0.25 |
1.00 |
0.25 |
$19.25 |
Within
15 days of receipt of the Notice of Product Development, the
Associate Administrator for Safety either acknowledges receipt, or
acknowledges and requests more information. |
—(d)(1)(iii) Technical consultation by FRA with the railroad on the design and planned development of the product |
742 |
0.25 |
5.00 |
1.25 |
$96.25 |
If
FRA concludes the Notice of Product Development contains
sufficient information, the Associate Administrator for Safety
determines the extent and nature of the assessment and review
necessary for final product approval. FRA may convene a technical
consultation as necessary to discuss issues related to the design
and planned development of the product. |
—(d)(1)(v) Railroad petition to FRA for final approval of NOPD |
742 |
0.25 |
1.00 |
0.25 |
$19.25 |
Within
30 days of receipt of the petition for final approval, the
Associate Administrator for Safety either acknowledges receipt or
acknowledges receipt and requests more information. FRA estimates, after careful review, that it will take approximately 1 hour for each petition. |
—(d)(2)(ii) Response to FRA’s request for additional information associated with a petition for approval of PSP or PSP amendment |
742 |
1 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
$3,850.00 |
Within
60 days of receipt of the petition for approval, FRA either
acknowledges receipt, or acknowledges receipt and requests more
information. |
—(e) Comments to FRA on railroad informational filing or special approval petition |
742 |
0.5 |
10.00 |
5.00 |
$385.00 |
Interested
parties may submit to FRA information and views pertinent to FRA’s
consideration of an informational filing or petition for approval.
|
—(h)(3)(i) Railroad amendment to PSP |
742 |
2 |
20.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
A
railroad may submit an amendment to a PSP at any time in the same
manner as the initial PSP. |
—(j) Railroad field testing/information filing document |
742 |
1 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
$7,700.00 |
Field
testing of a product may be conducted prior to approval of a PSP
by the submission of an informational filing by a railroad. The
FRA will arrange to monitor the tests based on the information
provided in the filing. |
236.917(a)—Railroad retention of records: results of tests and inspections specified in the PSP |
13 |
13 |
160.00 |
2,080.00 |
$160,160.00 |
A
railroad must maintain at a designated office on the railroad: (i)
For the life cycle of the product, adequate documentation to
demonstrate that the PSP meets the safety requirements of the
railroad’s RSPP and applicable standards in this subpart,
including the risk assessment; (ii) An Operations and Maintenance
Manual, pursuant to § 236.919; and (iii) Training records
pursuant to § 236.923(b). Results of inspections and tests
specified in the PSP must be recorded as prescribed in §
236.110. Contractors of the railroad must maintain at a
designated office training records pursuant to § 236.923(b). |
—(b) Railroad report that frequency of safety-relevant hazards exceeds threshold set forth in PSP |
13 |
1 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
After
the product is placed in service, the railroad must maintain a
database of all safety-relevant hazards as set forth in the PSP
and those that had not been previously identified in the PSP.
|
—(b)(3) Railroad final report to FRA on the results of the analysis and countermeasures taken to reduce the frequency of safety-relevant hazards |
13 |
1 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
$770.00 |
A
railroad must provide a final report to the FRA Director, Office
of Safety Assurance and Compliance, on the results of the analysis
and countermeasures taken to reduce the frequency of the
safety-relevant hazard(s) below the threshold set forth in the PSP
when the problem is resolved. |
236.919(a)—Railroad Operations and Maintenance Manual (OMM) |
13 |
1 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
A
railroad must catalog and maintain all documents as specified in
the PSP for the installation, maintenance, repair, modification,
inspection, and testing of the product and have them in one
Operations and Maintenance Manual, readily available to persons
required to perform such tasks and for inspection by FRA and FRA
certified state inspectors. |
—(b) Plans for proper maintenance, repair, inspection, and testing of safety-critical products |
13 |
1 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
Plans
required for proper maintenance, repair, inspection, and testing
of safety-critical products must be adequate in detail and must be
made available for inspection by FRA and FRA certified state
inspectors where such products are deployed or maintained. They
must identify all software versions, revisions, and revision
dates. Plans must be legible and correct. |
—(c) Documented hardware, software, and firmware revisions in OMM |
13 |
1 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
Hardware,
software, and firmware revisions must be documented in the
Operations and Maintenance Manual according to the railroad’s
configuration management control plan and any additional
configuration/revision control measures specified in the PSP. |
236.921 and 923(a)—Railroad Training and Qualification Program |
13 |
1 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
Employers
must establish and implement training and qualification programs
for products subject to this subpart. These programs must meet
the minimum requirements set forth in the PSP and in §§
236.923 through 236.929 as appropriate, for the following
personnel: (1) through (4) of this section. |
236.923(b)—Training records retained in a designated location and available to FRA upon request |
13 |
350 |
10.00 |
58.33 |
$4,491.00 |
Employers
shall retain records which designate persons who are qualified
under this section until new designations are recorded or for at
least one year after such persons leave applicable service. These
records shall be kept in a designated location and be available
for inspection and replication by FRA and FRA-certified State
inspectors. |
236.1001(b)—A railroad’s additional or more stringent rules than prescribed under 49 CFR part 236, subpart I |
38 |
1 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
$4,800.00 |
Each
railroad may prescribe additional or more stringent rules, and
other special instructions, that are not inconsistent with this
subpart. |
236.1005(b)(4)(i)–(ii)—A railroad’s submission of estimated traffic projections for the next 5 years, to support a request, in a PTCIP or an RFA, not to implement a PTC system based on reductions in rail traffic |
The
estimated paperwork burden for this requirement is included under
§ 236.1009(a) and § 236.1021.
|
|||||
236.1005(b)(4)(iii)—A railroad’s request for a de minimis exception, in a PTCIP or an RFA, based on a minimal quantity of PIH materials traffic |
7 |
1 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
A
railroad may request review of the requirement to install a PTC
system on a track segment where a PTC system is otherwise required
by this section, but has not yet been installed, based upon the
presence of a minimal quantity of PIH materials traffic. |
—(b)(5) A railroad’s request to remove a line from its PTCIP based on the sale of the line to another railroad and any related request for FRA review from the acquiring railroad |
The
burden for this requirement is included under §236.1009(a)
and §236.1021.
|
|||||
—(g)(1)(i) A railroad’s request to temporarily reroute trains not equipped with a PTC system onto PTC-equipped tracks and vice versa during certain emergencies |
38 |
45 |
8.00 |
360.00 |
$27,720.00 |
A
train equipped with a PTC system as required by this subpart may
be temporarily rerouted onto a track not equipped with a PTC
system and a train not equipped with a PTC system may be
temporarily rerouted onto a track equipped with a PTC system as
required by this subpart. |
—(g)(1)(ii) A railroad’s written or telephonic notice to the applicable FRA Regional Administrator of the conditions necessitating emergency rerouting and other required information under 236.1005(i) |
38 |
45 |
2.00 |
90.00 |
$6,930.00 |
The
railroad provides written or telephonic notification to the
applicable SMT of the information listed in paragraph (i) within
one business day of the beginning of the rerouting made in
accordance with this paragraph; and (iii) the conditions under
paragraph (j) of this section are followed. |
—(g)(2) A railroad’s temporary rerouting request due to planned maintenance not exceeding 30 days |
38 |
720 |
8.00 |
5,760.00 |
$443,520.00 |
A
railroad my submit a temporary rerouting request in the event
planned maintenance that would prevent usage of the regularly used
track if: (i) the maintenance period does not to exceed 30 days;
(ii) a request is filed with the applicable Regional Administrator
in accordance with paragraph (i) of this section no less than 10
days prior to the planned rerouting; and (iii) the conditions
contained in paragraph (j) of this section are followed. |
—(h)(1) A response to any request for additional information from the FRA Regional Administrator or Associate Administrator, prior to commencing rerouting due to planned maintenance |
38 |
10 |
2.00 |
20.00 |
$1,540.00 |
For
the purposes of paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the rerouting
request shall be self-executing unless the applicable SMT responds
with a notice disapproving of the rerouting or providing
instructions to allow rerouting. Such instructions may include
providing additional information to the SMT or Associate
Administrator prior to the commencement of rerouting. Once the
SMT responds with a notice under this paragraph, no rerouting may
occur until the SMT or Associate Administrator provides his or her
approval. |
—(h)(2) A railroad’s request to temporarily reroute trains due to planned maintenance exceeding 30 days |
38 |
160 |
8.00 |
1,280.00 |
$98,560.00 |
In
the event the temporary rerouting described in paragraph (g)(2) of
this section is to exceed 30 consecutive calendar days: (i) The
railroad shall provide a request in accordance with paragraphs (i)
and (j) of this section with the Associate Administrator no less
than 10 business days prior to the planned rerouting; and (ii) The
rerouting shall not commence until receipt of approval from the
Associate Administrator. |
236.1006(b)(4)(iii)(B)—A progress report due by December 31, 2020, and by December 31, 2022, from any Class II or III railroad utilizing a temporary exception under this section |
38 |
5 |
16.00 |
80.00 |
$6,160.00 |
To
the extent any movement exceeds 20 miles in length, such movement
is not permitted without the controlling locomotive being equipped
with an onboard PTC system after December 31, 2023, and each
applicable Class II or III railroad shall report to FRA its
progress in equipping each necessary locomotive with an onboard
PTC apparatus to facilitate continuation of the movement. The
progress reports shall be filed not later than December 31, 2020,
and, if all necessary locomotives are not yet equipped, on
December 31, 2022. |
—(b)(5)(vii) A railroad’s request to utilize different yard movement procedures, as part of a freight yard movements exception— |
The burden for this requirement is included under §236.1015 and §236.1021. |
|||||
236.1007(b)(1)—For any high-speed service over 90 miles per hour (mph), a railroad’s PTC Safety Plan (PTCSP) must additionally establish that the PTC system was designed and will be operated to meet the fail-safe operation criteria in Appendix C |
The burden for this requirement is included under §236.1015 and §236.1021. |
|||||
—(c) An HSR-125 document accompanying a host railroad’s PTCSP, for operations over 125 mph |
38 |
1 |
3,200.00 |
3,200.00 |
$384,000.00 |
In
addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section, a host railroad that conducts a freight or passenger
operation at more than 125 miles per hour shall have an approved
PTCSP accompanied by a document (“HSR-125”)
establishing that the system complies with (1) through (2) of this
section. |
—(c)(1) A railroad’s request for approval to use foreign service data, prior to submission of a PTCSP |
38 |
0.33 |
8,000.00 |
2,640.00 |
$203,280.00 |
FRA
estimates that approximately one request every three years to use
foreign service data before submittal of the PTCSP will be made
under the above requirement. |
—(d) A railroad’s request in a PTCSP that FRA excuse compliance with one or more of this section’s requirements |
38 |
1 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
$120,000.00 |
In
addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
section, a host railroad that conducts a freight or passenger
operation at more than 150 miles per hour, which is governed by a
Rule of Particular Applicability, shall have an approved PTCSP
accompanied by an HSR-125 developed as part of an overall system
safety plan approved by the Associate Administrator. |
236.1009(a)(2)—A PTCIP if a railroad becomes a host railroad of a main line requiring the implementation of a PTC system, including the information under 49 U.S.C. 20157(a)(2) and 49 CFR 236.1011 |
264 |
1 |
535.00 |
535.00 |
$64,200.00 |
After
April 16, 2010, a host railroad shall file: (i) a PTCIP if it
becomes a host railroad of a main line track segment for which it
required to implement and operate a PTC system in accordance with
§ 236.1005(b); or (ii) a request for amendment (“RFA”)
of its current and approved PTCIP in accordance with §
236.1021 if it intends to: (A) initiate a new category of service
(i.e., passenger or freight); or (B) add, subtract, or otherwise
materially modify one or more lines of railroad for which
installation of a PTC system is required. |
—(a)(3) Any new PTCIPs jointly filed by a host railroad and a tenant railroad |
264 |
1 |
267.00 |
267.00 |
$32,040.00 |
The
host and tenant railroad(s) shall jointly file PTCIP that
addresses shared track: (i) if the host railroad is required to
install and operate a PTC system on a segment of its track; and
(ii) if the tenant railroad that shares the same track segment
would have been required to install a PTC system if the host
railroad had not otherwise been required to do so. |
—(b)(1) A host railroad’s submission, individually or jointly with a tenant railroad or PTC system supplier, of an unmodified Type Approval |
264 |
1 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
$616.00 |
An unmodified Type Approval previously issued by the Associate Administrator in accordance with § 236.1013 or § 236.1031(b) with its associated docket number. |
—(b)(2) A host railroad’s submission of a PTCDP with the information required under 49 CFR 236.1013, requesting a Type Approval for a PTC system that either does not have a Type Approval or has a Type Approval that requires one or more variances |
264 |
1 |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
$154,000.00 |
A
PTCDP requesting a Type Approval for: (i) a PTC system that does
not have a Type Approval; or (ii) a PTC system with a previously
issued Type Approval that requires one or more variances. |
—(d) A host railroad’s submission of a PTCSP |
The burden for this requirement is included under §236.1015. |
|||||
—(e)(3) Any request for full or partial confidentiality of a PTCIP, Notice of Product Intent (NPI), PTCDP, or PTCSP |
38 |
10 |
8.00 |
80.00 |
$6,160.00 |
Each
filing referenced in this section may include a request for full
or partial confidentiality in accordance with § 209.11 of
this chapter. If confidentiality is requested as to a portion of
any applicable document, then in addition to the filing
requirements under § 209.11 of this chapter, the person
filing the document shall also file a copy of the original
un-redacted document, marked to indicate which portions are
redacted in the document’s confidential version without
obscuring the original document’s contents. |
—(h) Any responses or documents submitted in connection with FRA’s use of its authority to monitor, test, and inspect processes, procedures, facilities, documents, records, design and testing materials, artifacts, training materials and programs, and any other information used in the design, development, manufacture, test, implementation, and operation of the PTC system, including interviews with railroad personnel |
38 |
36 |
4.00 |
144.00 |
$11,088.00 |
The
Associate Administrator, or that person’s designated
representatives, shall be afforded reasonable access to monitor,
test, and inspect processes, procedures, facilities, documents,
records, design and testing materials, artifacts, training
materials and programs, and any other information used in the
design, development, manufacture, test, implementation, and
operation of the system, as well as interview any personnel: (1)
through (2) of this section. |
—(j)(2)(iii) Any additional information provided in response to FRA’s consultations or inquiries about a PTCDP or PTCSP |
38 |
1 |
400.00 |
400.00 |
$30,800.00 |
If
FRA has not approved, approved with conditions, or denied the
PTCDP or PTCSP within the 60-day or 180-day window, as applicable,
FRA will provide the submitting party with a statement of reasons
as to why the submission has not yet been acted upon and a
projected deadline by which an approval or denial will be issued,
and any further consultations or inquiries will be resolved.
|
236.1011(a)–(b)—PTCIP content requirements |
The
burden for this requirement is included under §236.1009(a)
and (e) and §236.1021.
|
|||||
—(e) Any public comment on PTCIPs, NPIs, PTCDPs, and PTCSPs |
38 |
2 |
8.00 |
16.00 |
$1,232.00 |
Upon
receipt of a PTCIP, NPI, PTCDP, or PTCSP, FRA posts on its public
website notice of receipt and reference to the public docket in
which a copy of the filing has been placed. FRA may consider any
public comment on each document to the extent practicable within
the time allowed by the law and without delaying implementation of
PTC systems. |
236.1013—PTCDP and NPI content requirements |
The estimated paperwork burden for this requirement is included under § 236.1009(b), (c), and (e) and § 236.1021. |
|||||
236.1015—Any new host railroad’s PTCSP meeting all content requirements under 49 CFR 236.1015 |
264 |
1 |
8,000.00 |
8,000.00 |
$616,000 |
This
section sets forth PTC Safety Plan (PTCSP) content requirements
and what each railroad must do to receive a PTC System
Certification. Each PTCSP must address railroad-specific
implementation issues associated with the PTC system identified by
the submitted Type Approval. Each PTCSP must include a risk
assessment. FRA uses this information as a basis to confirm
compliance with the appropriate performance standard. |
—(g) A PTCSP for a PTC system replacing an existing certified PTC system |
38 |
0.33 |
3,200.00 |
1,056.00 |
$81,312.00 |
If a
PTCSP applies to a system designed to replace an existing
certified PTC system, the PTCSP will be approved provided that the
PTCSP establishes with a high degree of confidence that the new
system will provide a level of safety not less than the level of
safety provided by the system to be replaced. |
—(h) A quantitative risk assessment, if FRA requires one to be submitted |
38 |
0.33 |
800.00 |
264.00 |
$20,328.00 |
When
reviewing the issue of the potential data errors, the PTCSP must
include a careful identification of each of the risks and a
discussion of each applicable mitigation. |
236.1017(a)—An independent third-party assessment, if FRA requires one to be conducted and submitted |
38 |
0.33 |
1,600.00 |
528.00 |
$63,360.00 |
The
PTCSP must be supported by an independent third-party assessment
when the Associate Administrator concludes that it is necessary
based upon the criteria set forth in § 236.913, with the
exception that consideration of the methodology used in the risk
assessment (§ 236.913(g)(2)(vii)) shall apply only to the
extent that a comparative risk assessment was required. |
—(b) A railroad’s written request to confirm whether a specific entity qualifies as an independent third party |
38 |
0.33 |
8.00 |
2.64 |
$203.00 |
If a
PTC system is to undergo an independent assessment in accordance
with this section, the host railroad may submit to the Associate
Administrator a written request that FRA confirm whether a
particular entity would be considered an independent third party
pursuant to this section. |
—Further information provided to FRA upon request |
38 |
0.33 |
20.00 |
6.60 |
$508.00 |
The
request should include supporting information identified in
paragraph (c) of this section. FRA may request further information
to make a determination or provide its determination in writing. |
—(d) A request not to provide certain documents otherwise required under Appendix F for an independent, third-party assessment |
38 |
0.33 |
20.00 |
6.60 |
$508.00 |
The
independent third-party assessment must, at a minimum, consist of
the activities and result in the production of documentation
meeting the requirements of Appendix F to this part, unless
excepted by this part or by FRA order or waiver. |
—(e) A request for FRA to accept information certified by a foreign regulatory entity for purposes of 49 CFR 236.1017 and/or 236.1009(i) |
38 |
0.33 |
32.00 |
10.56 |
$813.00 |
Information
provided that has been certified under the auspices of a foreign
railroad regulatory entity recognized by the Associate
Administrator may, at the Associate Administrator’s
discretion, be accepted as having been independently verified. |
236.1019(b)—A request for a passenger terminal main line track exception (MTEA) |
38 |
1 |
160.00 |
160.00 |
$12,320.00 |
FRA
will consider an exception in the case of trackage used
exclusively as yard or terminal tracks by or in support of
regularly scheduled intercity or commuter passenger service where
the MTEA describes in detail the physical boundaries of the
trackage in question and its use and characteristics (including
track and signal charts) as descripted by this section. |
—(c)(1) A request for a limited operations exception (based on restricted speed, temporal separation, or a risk mitigation plan) |
38 |
1 |
160.00 |
160.00 |
$12,320.00 |
FRA
will consider an exception in the case of a track segment used for
limited operations (at speeds not exceeding those permitted under
236.0 of this part) and described by this section. |
—(c)(2) A request for a limited operations exception for a non-Class I, freight railroad's track |
10 |
1 |
160.00 |
160.00 |
$12,320.00 |
Passenger
service is operated on a segment of track of a freight railroad
that is not a Class I railroad on which less than 15 million gross
tons of freight traffic is transported annually (and follows the
conditions described in this section). |
—(c)(3) A request for a limited operations exception for a Class I railroad’s track |
7 |
1 |
160.00 |
160.00 |
$12,320.00 |
Not
more than four passenger trains per day are operated on a segment
of track of a Class I freight railroad on which less than 15
million gross tons of freight traffic is transported annually. |
—(d) A railroad’s collision hazard analysis in support of an MTEA, if FRA requires one to be conducted and submitted |
38 |
0.33 |
50.00 |
16.50 |
$1,271.00 |
A
limited operations exception under paragraph (c) is subject to FRA
review and approval. FRA may require a collision hazard analysis
to identify hazards and may require that specific mitigations be
undertaken. Operations under any such exception shall be
conducted subject to the terms and conditions of the approval.
Any main line track exclusion is subject to periodic review.
|
—(e) Any temporal separation procedures utilized under the 49 CFR 236.1019(c)(1)(ii) exception |
The
burden for this requirement is included under §
236.1019(c)(1).
|
|||||
236.1021(a)–(d)—Request for RFA to a railroad’s PTCIP or PTCDP |
38 |
10 |
160.00 |
1,600.00 |
$123,200.00 |
(a)
No changes, as defined by this section, may be made to a PTCIP or
PTCDP unless: |
—(e) Any public comments, if an RFA includes a request for approval of a discontinuance or material modification of a signal or train control system and a Federal Register notice is published |
5 |
10 |
16.00 |
160.00 |
$12,320.00 |
If
the RFA includes a request for approval of a discontinuance or
material modification of a signal or train control system, FRA
will publish a notice in the Federal Register of the application
and will invite public comment in accordance with part 211 of this
chapter. |
—(l) Any jointly filed RFA to a PTCDP or PTCSP |
The burden for this requirement is included under §236.1021(a)―(d) and (m). |
|||||
—(m)
Any RFA to a railroad’s PTCSP |
38 |
15 |
80.00 |
1,200.00 |
$92,400.00 |
No
changes, as specified under paragraphs (h)(3) or (4) of this
section, may be made to an FRA-certified PTC system or an
FRA-approved PTCSP unless the host railroad first complies with
the process outlined in (1) through (2) of this section. |
236.1023(a)—A railroad’s PTC Product Vendor List, which must be continually updated |
38 |
2 |
8.00 |
16.00 |
$1,232.00 |
Each
railroad implementing a PTC system on its property shall establish
and continually update a PTC Product Vendor List (PTCPVL) that
includes all vendors and suppliers of each PTC system, subsystem,
component, and associated product, and process in use system wide.
The PTCPVL shall be made readily available to FRA upon request. |
—(b)(1) The railroad shall specify within its PTCSP all contractual arrangements between a railroad and its hardware and software suppliers or vendors for certain immediate notifications |
The burden for this requirement is included under § 236.1015 and § 236.1021. |
|||||
—(b)(2)–(3) A vendor’s or supplier’s notification, upon receipt of a report of any safety-critical failure of its product, to any railroads using the product |
10 |
10 |
8.00 |
80.00 |
$6,160.00 |
The
notification from a supplier to any railroad shall include
explanation from the supplier of the reasons for such
notification, the circumstances associated with the failure, and
any recommended mitigation actions to be taken pending
determination of the root cause and final corrective actions. |
—(c)(1)–(2) A railroad’s process and procedures for taking action upon being notified of a safety-critical failure or a safety-critical upgrade, patch, revision, repair, replacement, or modification, and a railroad's configuration/revision control measures, set forth in its PTCSP |
The
burden for this requirement is included under § 236.1015 and
§ 236.1021.
|
|||||
—(d) A railroad’s submission, to the applicable vendor or supplier, of the railroad’s procedures for action upon notification of a safety-critical failure, upgrade, patch, or revision to the PTC system and actions to be taken until it is adjusted, repaired, or replaced |
38 |
2.50 |
16.00 |
40.00 |
$3,080.00 |
The
railroad shall provide to the applicable vendor or supplier the
railroad’s procedures for action upon notification of a
safety critical failure, upgrade, patch, or revision for the PTC
system, subsystem, component, product, or process, and actions to
be taken until the faulty system, subsystem, or component has been
adjusted, repaired, or replaced. |
—(e) A railroad’s database of all safety-relevant hazards, which must be maintained after the PTC system is placed in service |
38 |
38 |
16.00 |
608.00 |
$46,816.00 |
After
the product is placed in service, the railroad shall maintain a
database of all safety-relevant hazards as set forth in the PTCSP
and those that had not previously been identified in the PTCSP.
|
—(e)(1) A railroad’s notification to the vendor or supplier and FRA if the frequency of a safety-relevant hazard exceeds the threshold set forth in the PTCDP and PTCSP, and about the failure, malfunction, or defective condition that decreased or eliminated the safety functionality—Form FRA F 6180.179—Errors and Malfunctions Notification (Revised requirement) |
38 |
8 |
7.50 |
60.00 |
$4,620.00 |
If
the frequency of the safety-relevant hazard exceeds the thresholds
set forth in the PTCSP, or has not been previously identified in
the appropriate risk analysis, the railroad must: |
—(e)(2) Continual updates about any and all subsequent failures |
38 |
1 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
$616.00 |
The
railroad must keep the applicable vendor or supplier and FRA
apprised on a continual basis of the status of any and all
subsequent failures. |
—(f) Any notifications that must be submitted to FRA under 49 CFR 236.1023 |
The
burden for this requirement is included under §
236.1023(e)(1), (g), and (h)(1)(2).
|
|||||
—(g) A railroads and vendor’s or supplier’s report, upon FRA request, about an investigation of an accident or service difficulty due to a manufacturing or design defect and their corrective actions |
38 |
0.50 |
40.00 |
20.00 |
$1,540.00 |
Whenever
any investigation of an accident or service difficulty report
shows that a PTC system or product is unsafe because of a
manufacturing or design defect, the railroad and its vendor shall,
upon request of the Associate Administrator, report to the
Associate Administrator the results of its investigation and any
action taken or proposed to correct that defect. |
—(h) A PTC system vendor’s or supplier’s reports of any safety-relevant failures, defective conditions, previously unidentified hazards, recommended mitigation actions, and any affected railroads—Form FRA F 6180.179—Errors and Malfunctions Notification (Revised requirement) |
10 |
20 |
7.50 |
150.00 |
$11,550 |
PTC
system and product suppliers and vendors shall promptly report any
safety relevant failures or defective conditions, previously
unidentified hazards, and recommended mitigation actions in their
PTC system, subsystem, or component to each railroad using the
product. |
—(k) A report of a failure of a PTC system resulting in a more favorable aspect than intended or other condition hazardous to the movement of a train, including the reports required under part 233 |
The burden for this requirement is included under § 236.1023 (e)(1), (g), and (h)(1)(2) and 49 CFR § 233.7 |
|||||
236.1029(b)(4)—A report of an en route failure, other failure, or cut out to a designated railroad officer of the host railroad |
150 |
1,000 |
30.00 |
500.00 |
$38,500 |
Except
as provided in paragraphs (c) and (g) of this section, where a
controlling locomotive that is operating in, or is to be operated
within, a PTC-equipped track segment experiences PTC system
failure or the PTC system is otherwise cut out while en route
(i.e., after the train has departed its initial terminal), the
train may only continue in accordance as described under
paragraphs (1) through (6) of this section. |
—(h) Form FRA F 6180.152—Biannual Report of PTC System Performance |
38 |
146 |
32.00 |
4,672.00 |
$359,744.00 |
Each
railroad shall provide FRA with a report of the number of PTC
failures that occurred during the reporting period. The report
shall identify failures by category, including but not limited to
locomotive, wayside, communications, and back-office system
failures. The report shall also include positive
performance-related information, including about the technology’s
positive impact on rail safety. |
236.1031(a)–(d) — A railroad's Request for Expedited Certification |
FRA
anticipates that there will be zero requests for expedited
certification during this 3-year ICR.
|
|||||
236.1033—Communications and security requirements |
The
burden for this requirement is included under § 236.1009 and
§ 236.1015.
|
|||||
236.1035(a)–(b)—A railroad’s request for authorization to field test an uncertified PTC system and any responses to FRA’s testing conditions |
38 |
10 |
40.00 |
400.00 |
$30,800.00 |
Before
any field testing of an uncertified PTC system, or a product of an
uncertified PTC system, or any regression testing of a certified
PTC system is conducted on the general rail system, the railroad
requesting the testing must provide a complete description of the
PTC system as described under paragraphs (1) through (7) of this
section. Furthermore, FRA may impose additional testing
conditions for the safety of train operations. |
236.1037(a)(1)–(2)—Records retention |
The
burden for this requirement is included under § 236.1009 and
§ 236.1015.
|
|||||
—(a)(3)–(4) Records retention |
The
burden for this requirement is included under § 236.1039 and
§ 236.1043(b).
|
|||||
—(b) Results of inspections and tests specified in a railroad’s PTCSP and PTCDP |
38 |
800 |
1.00 |
800.00 |
$61,600.00 |
Results
of inspections and tests specified in the PTCSP and PTCDP must be
recorded pursuant to § 236.110. |
—(c) A contractor’s records related to the testing, maintenance, or operation of a PTC system maintained at a designated office |
20 |
1,600 |
10.00 |
266.67 |
$20,534.00 |
Each
contractor providing services relating to the testing,
maintenance, or operation of a PTC system required to be installed
under this subpart shall maintain at a designated office training
records required under §236.1039(b). |
—(d)(3) A railroad’s final report of the results of the analysis and countermeasures taken to reduce the frequency of safety-related hazards below the threshold set forth in the PTCSP |
38 |
8 |
160.00 |
1,280.00 |
$98,560.00 |
The
railroad shall provide a final report when the inconsistency is
resolved to FRA, on the results of the analysis and
countermeasures taken to reduce the frequency of the
safety-relevant hazard(s) below the threshold set forth in the
PTCSP and PTCDP. |
236.1039(a)–(c), (e)—A railroad’s PTC Operations and Maintenance Manual (OMM), which must be maintained and available to FRA upon request |
38 |
2 |
10.00 |
20.00 |
$1,540.00 |
The
railroad shall catalog and maintain all documents as specified in
the PTCDP and PTCSP for the installation, maintenance, repair,
modification, inspection, and testing of the PTC system and have
them in one Operations and Maintenance Manual, readily available
to persons required to perform such tasks and for inspection by
FRA and FRA-certified State inspectors as described under
paragraphs (b), (c), and (e) of this section. |
—(d) A railroad’s identification of a PTC system’s safety-critical components, including spare equipment |
38 |
1 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
$77.00 |
Safety-critical
components, including spare equipment, must be positively
identified, handled, replaced, and repaired in accordance with the
procedures specified in the PTCDP and PTCSP. |
236.1041(a)–(b) and 236.1043(a)—A railroad’s PTC Training and Qualification Program (i.e., a written plan) |
38 |
2 |
10.00 |
20.00 |
$1,540.00 |
Employers
shall establish and implement training and qualification programs
for PTC systems subject to this subpart. These programs must meet
the minimum requirements set forth in the PTCDP and PTCSP in §§
236.1039 through 236.1045, as appropriate. |
236.1043(b)—Training records retained in a designated location and available to FRA upon request |
150 |
150 |
1.00 |
150.00 |
$1 1,550.00 |
Employers
must retain records which designate persons who are qualified
under this section until new designations are recorded or for at
least one year after such persons leave applicable service. These
records shall be kept in a designated location and be available
for inspection and replication by FRA and FRA-certified State
inspectors. |
Total |
742 railroads and 10 vendors |
4,567,826 |
N/A |
51,930 |
$4,324,155 |
|
13. Estimate of total annual costs to respondents.
There will be no additional cost burden to respondents beyond the burden listed in FRA’s answer to question number 12 and those customary and usual expenses associated with normal daily business operations.
14. Estimate of Cost to Federal Government.
In terms of governmental costs associated with the expanded reporting requirement, including the increase from biannual to quarterly reporting, FRA expects it will cost approximately $10,000, over the ten-year period, to review the additional data railroads will submit in their Quarterly Reports of PTC System Performance (Form FRA F 6180.152). Regarding Form FRA F 6180.179, there are no new costs associated with the use of this form to fulfill this reporting requirements in 49 CFR 236.1023(e)(1), (h), and (f). The new Form FRA F 6180.179 will make the reporting requirement much easier to process and will take less time to complete.
To calculate the government administrative cost, the 2023 Office of Personnel Management wage rates were used. The average wage, step 5, was used as a midpoint. Wages were considered at the burdened wage rate by multiplying the actual wage rate by an overhead cost of 75 percent. The following table shows the estimated average annual cost to the Federal government to review all the required documents and conduct the external audits associated with this rule.
Resources |
Pay Grade |
Annual-Average Wage Rate |
Number of Employees |
Percent Share of Time Use |
Total Wages (Wages * 1.75 of Overhead Cost) |
Division Staff Director |
GS-15 |
176,458.00 |
1 |
25 |
77,200.00 |
Deputy Staff Director |
GS-14 |
150,015.00 |
1 |
10 |
26,253.00 |
PTC Senior Test and Plan Monitors |
GS-14 |
150,015.00 |
1 |
85 |
223,147.00 |
PTC Regional Specialists |
GS-13 |
121,473.00 |
7 |
85 |
1,264,838.00 |
PTC Safety Specialist at Headquarter |
GS-12 |
106,759.00 |
1 |
25 |
46,707.00 |
Electronic Engineer |
GS-14 |
150,015.00 |
2 |
25 |
131,263.00 |
Estimated Average Annual Cost to Government |
|
|
1,769,408.00 |
Total annual government cost = $1,769,408.00 + $1,000 (shift from biannual to quarterly on Form FRA F 610.152) = $1,770,408.
15. Explanation of program changes and adjustments.
This is a revision to a current information collection (ICR). Currently, the OMB inventory for this collection of information shows a total burden of 51,993 hours and 4,567,826 responses, while the requesting inventory reflects an estimate of a total burden of 51,931 hours and 4,567,826 responses. Overall, the adjustments for this submission have decreased the burden by 62 hours.
The tables below provide specific information on the review of any of the estimates that have changed.
CFR Section/Subject |
Total Annual Responses |
Total Annual Burden Hours |
PRA Analyses and Estimates |
||||
Previous Submission |
Current Submission |
Difference |
Previous Submission |
Current Submission |
Difference |
|
|
236.587(d)—Certification and departure test results |
4,562,500.00
train departures |
4,562,500.00
train departures |
0.00
train departures |
6,337.00 hours |
6,336.81 hours |
-0.19 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(c)(2) Response to FRA’s request for further data after informational filing |
0.25
data calls/documents |
0.25
data calls/documents |
0.00
data calls/documents |
1.00 hour |
1.25 hour |
0.25 hour |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
236.923(b)—Training records retained in a designated location and available to FRA upon request |
350.00
records |
350.00
records |
0.00
records |
58.00 hours |
58.33 hours |
0.33 hours |
|
—(c)(1) A railroad’s request for approval to use foreign service data, prior to submission of a PTCSP |
0.33
request |
0.33
request |
0.00
request |
2,667.00 hours |
2,640.00 hours |
-27.00 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(g) A PTCSP for a PTC system replacing an existing certified PTC system |
0.33
PTCSP |
0.33
PTCSP |
0.00
PTCSP |
1,067.00 hours |
1,056.00 hours |
-11.00 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(h) A quantitative risk assessment, if FRA requires one to be submitted |
0.33
assessment |
0.33
assessment |
0.00
assessment |
267.00 hours |
264.00 hours |
-3.00 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
236.1017(a)—An independent third-party assessment, if FRA requires one to be conducted and submitted |
0.33
assessment |
0.33
assessment |
0.00
assessment |
533.00 hours |
528.00 hours |
-5.00 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(b) A railroad’s written request to confirm whether a specific entity qualifies as an independent third party |
0.33
written request |
0.33
written request |
0.00
written request |
3.00 hours |
2.64 hours |
-0.36 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—Further information provided to FRA upon request |
0.33
set of additional information |
0.33
set of additional information |
0.00
set of additional information |
7.00 hours |
6.60 hours |
-0.40 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(d) A request not to provide certain documents otherwise required under Appendix F for an independent, third-party assessment |
0.33
request |
0.33
request |
0.00
request |
7.00 hours |
6.60 hours |
-0.40 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(e) A request for FRA to accept information certified by a foreign regulatory entity for purposes of 49 CFR 236.1017 and/or 236.1009(i) |
0.33
request |
0.33
request |
0.00
request |
11.00 hours |
10.56 hours |
-0.44 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(d) A railroad’s collision hazard analysis in support of an MTEA, if FRA requires one to be conducted and submitted |
0.33
collision hazard analysis |
0.33
collision hazard analysis |
0.00
collision hazard analysis |
17.00 hours |
16.50 hours |
-0.50 hours |
Adjustment due to rounding. |
—(e)(1) A railroad’s notification to the vendor or supplier and FRA if the frequency of a safety-relevant hazard exceeds the threshold set forth in the PTCDP and PTCSP, and about the failure, malfunction, or defective condition that decreased or eliminated the safety functionality—Form FRA F 6180.179—Errors and Malfunctions Notification (Revised requirement) |
8.00
notifications |
8.00
notifications |
0.00
notifications |
64.00 hours |
60.00 hours |
-4.00 hours |
The reduction in burden hours is a result of the use of the new standardized Form 6180.179. The use of the standardized form reduces the burden hours for this notification from 8 hours to 7.50 hours. |
—(h) A PTC system vendor’s or supplier’s reports of any safety-relevant failures, defective conditions, previously unidentified hazards, recommended mitigation actions, and any affected railroads—Form FRA F 6180.179—Errors and Malfunctions Notification (Revised requirement) |
20.00
reports |
20.00
reports |
0.00
reports |
160.00 hours |
150.00 hours |
-10.00 hours |
The reduction in burden hours is a result of the use of the new standardized Form 6180.179. The use of the standardized form reduces the burden hours for this notification from 8 hours to 7.50 hours. |
Total |
4,567,826 responses |
4,567,826 |
-0.00
responses |
51,993 hours |
51,931 hours |
-62.00 hours |
|
16. Publication of results of data collection.
FRA does not plan to tabulate or publish the responses.
17. Approval for not displaying the expiration date for OMB approval.
FRA is not seeking approval to not display the expiration date.
18. Exception to certification statement.
No exceptions are taken at this time.
1 Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-432, 104(a), 122 Stat. 4848 (Oct. 16, 2008), as amended by the Positive Train Control Enforcement and Implementation Act of 2015 (PTCEI Act), Pub. L. No. 114-73, 129 Stat. 568, 576–82 (Oct. 29, 2015), and the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, Pub. L. No. 114-94, section 11315(d), 129 Stat. 1312, 1675 (Dec. 4, 2015), codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. 20157. See also Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 236, subpart I.
2 49 U.S.C. 20157(g)(1), (i)(5); 49 CFR 236.1005 (setting forth the technical specifications).
3 See, e.g., 49 CFR 236.1023(e), (h), and (f).
4 See 49 CFR 236.1023.
5 49 CFR 236.1023(e).
6 49 CFR 236.1023(e)(1).
7 49 CFR 236.1023(h)(2).
8 See, e.g., 49 CFR 236.1023(e), (h), and (f).
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | 2130-0553_PTC-SuppJustification_Renewal |
Author | frauser1 |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-07-27 |