Food and
Nutrition
Service
1320
Braddock
Place
Alexandria,
VA
22314
T O: Laurel Havas
OMB Desk Officer
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
THROUGH: Ruth Brown
Department Clearance Officer
United States Department of Agriculture
Office of Chief Information Office (OCIO)
Jamia Franklin
Information Collection Clearance Officer
OPS/Planning and Regulatory Affairs Office
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
FROM: Anna Vaudin
SNAP Evaluation Branch
OPS/SNAP Research and Analysis Division
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
DATE: August 2, 2023
SUBJECT: Justification for changes to sample size for Minnesota-Rural site in OMB Control No: 0584-0680 “Rapid Cycle Evaluation of Operational Improvements in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment & Training (E&T) Programs”.
The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) is requesting a non-substantive change to the study of Rapid Cycle Evaluation of Operational Improvements in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment & Training (E&T) Programs, approved under OMB Control No. 0584-0680; expiration date of March 31, 2026. FNS has the opportunity to significantly increase the sample of participants for a Rural site, which will contribute valuable information to the study.
The originally approved sample size was 500, but this has increased to 4,223. This changes the minimum detectible impact (MDI) from 8.6 percentage points to 3.0 percentage points, meaning that the new sample size will better allow for the detection of a treatment effect, if it is present. This will also allow for subgroup analyses, which can provide important insight into how treatment effects may differ based on economic and sociodemographic factors. This size of sample is not typically accessible in rural areas, and this increase provides an important opportunity to learn more about SNAP E&T in an understudied population.
The following table shows the changes in sample size and burden for the Minnesota-Rural site and, as a result, for the project overall. Additionally, the full Burden Table is attached showing changes to the calculation.
|
Minnesota-Rural |
Total for ICR |
||
Original |
Change Request |
Original |
Change Request |
|
Sample Size (n) |
500 |
4,223 |
61,782 |
65,505 |
Number of Respondents |
400 |
3,378 |
49,476 |
52,454 |
Number of Non- Respondents |
100 |
845 |
12,306 |
13,051 |
Responsive Annual Burden Hours |
20 |
169.3 |
14,986.5 |
15,135.7 |
Non-Responsive Annual Burden Hours |
5 |
42.3 |
1,229.3 |
1,266.6 |
Grand Total Annual Burden Estimate |
25.1 |
211.6 |
16,215.74 |
16,402.26 |
Total Annualized Cost of Respondent Burden ($) |
352.82 |
2,979.93 |
323,742.81 |
326,369.92 |
Note: numbers in table are copied exactly from ICR Burden Table and may not be exact due to rounding in the spreadsheet
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Jamia Franklin, FNS Information Collection Clearance Officer for the Food and Nutrition Service, Planning & Regulatory Affairs Office at (703) 305-2403.
Attachments:
Appendix T – Burden Table
Shows changes to sample size and resulting changes to burden for the Minnesote-Rural site. A clean version as well as a version with the changed cells highlighted are included.
USDA is an Equal Opportunity Provider, Employer and Lender
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Yoast, Katey - FNS |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-07-21 |