0920-1355 Annual Technical Assistance Survey

Annual Technical Assistance Survey

Form Approved

OMB No. 0920-1355

Exp. Date: 11/30/2024

Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC/ATSDR Reports Clearance Officer; 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS D-74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; Attn: OMB-PRA (0920-1355)

Description and Administration 

Administered to a sample of individuals from each jurisdiction participating in TA. 10 participants from each jurisdiction will be randomly selected among those attending TA events throughout the year. Sample from each jurisdiction will include at least two of the following – Program Director, Manager, Principal Investigator, or CO-PI. 

Questions

Please indicate the DOP TAC state-recipient organization you are affiliated with: [drop-down list of all the state jurisdictions]

Please indicate the DOP TAC local-recipient organization you are affiliated with: [drop-down list of all the local jurisdictions]

Which of the following best describes your role on the DOP TAC team?

• Project manager

• Prevention staff

• Surveillance staff

• Evaluator

• Other (please specify)

Overall TA

Thinking about the TA you have accessed through TAC to date (e.g., webinars, one-on-one consultation, peer-to-peer, training, electronic resources, site visits), please rate your agreement with the following statements: Strongly disagree to Strongly agree.

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree	No opinion/not applicable
I understand the purpose of TA
I was aware of the TA options
Communications or announcements related to TA were clear
TA was provided in a timely manner
TA was effective in meeting my program needs
I felt actively engaged and encouraged to participate during the TA sessions
Examples from other jurisdictions were helpful

 

Types of TA

Please rate the following types of TA on their importance in helping achieve your work objectives and advancing your program: Not at all important to Very Important. 

	Not at all important	Slightly important	Moderately important	Very important	Extremely important	No opinion/not applicable
One-on-one TA through TAC
Webinars/virtual training
Peer-to-peer exchanges/communities of practice
Resource library
Peer forums
Strategy-specific contents (e.g., strategy pages, learning pathway)
Online TA Center website (e.g., member directory, calendar of events)

Resource Library

1. Did you access the learning pathway? (If no, skip Q2 and Q3) 

• No

• Yes

2. Did the learning pathways adequately address the needs within your professional domain?

• No

• Yes 

3. What improvement would you recommend to enhance the effectiveness of the learning pathways? 

4. How would you rate the quality of resources on the DOP TAC website?

• Poor

• Average

• Below average

• Good

• Excellent

5. Were there any challenges in accessing or navigating through the resource library?

• No

• Yes (if yes, specify)

6. Are there specific resources you found exceptionally valuable (you can list more than one)? If yes, please specify and briefly explain why. 

7. What topics or areas should be included or expanded in the resource library or learning pathway? If providing topics for the learning pathway, please include the title of the learning pathway 

TA Providers

Please rate the following TA Provider Groups on their impact in helping achieve your work objectives and advancing your program: No Impact to High Impact and N/A

	No Impact	Low Impact	Moderate Impact	High Impact	N/A
DOP Program Support received through the TAC
ASTHO
TAC experts external to CDC (e.g., Addiction Policy Forum, National Network for Public Health Institutes)

Think about all the TA you have received for each strategy and rate the TA's importance in helping you implement your work plan related to each strategy: Not important to Extremely important and N/A. [Dropdown of all the strategies] 

For those who are program directors, program managers, or principal investigators. 

1. How much has the TA your team received positively affected the implementation of your work plan?

• Not at all

• Slightly

• Moderately

• Very

• Extremely

2. What suggestions do you have for improving the variety and relevance of our technical assistance service? 

3. Are there specific topics or areas you would like to see covered in future technical assistance programs?