PURPOSE: The Numbering Administration
Oversight Working Group (NAOWG) of the North American Numbering
Council (NANC) seeks aggregated input from your organization as
to the yearly performance of the North American Numbering Plan
Administrator (NANPA) services. Responses to the questions
contained in this survey are intended to provide information relative
to your satisfaction with the performance of the NANPA.
Please
note that while the NANPA, Pooling and Routing Number Administration
functions have been combined, the websites and systems were separate
until 4Q 2024. Therefore, this survey requests input on the
performance of the North American
Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA),
and not the Thousands-Block Pooling
Administrator (PA) or the Routing Number Administrator (RNA). If you
wish to comment on those services, please complete the PA survey
and/or the RNA survey.
EVALUATION PERIOD: January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024
SUBMISSION DEADLINE: 5 PM ET, March 31, 2025
QUALIFICATION:
Respondents are asked to submit only one (aggregated) survey per
functional entity, i.e., per service provider/other NANPA user or per
state or territorial regulatory agency. If multiple surveys for an
entity are received, the NAOWG will consolidate the responses to
ensure that one response per entity type is counted.
SURVEY
DESCRIPTION: Your satisfaction ratings will be combined with all
other survey responses for each of the questions. Your comments
recorded in the comment box at the end of the survey are strongly
encouraged, especially if a rating of "Not Met" has been
selected. Specific examples of your experiences with the NANPA will
provide valuable information concerning current processes that are
working well and in identifying areas where process improvements are
needed.
Please
complete all fields marked with an asterisk "*".
FURTHER INFORMATION: Direct all inquiries to the following NAOWG contacts:
Philip Linse
Karen Riepenkroger
Lara Walt
Lumen
T-Mobile
Public Service Commission of the
303-707-3844
913-315-8546
the District of Columbia
[email protected]
[email protected] 202-626-9191
[email protected]
SURVEY
RESULTS: Overall survey results will be incorporated into the
NANPA/PA/RNA 2024 Performance Evaluation Report and
will be posted at NANC
- North American Numbering Council (nanc-chair.org).
We have estimated
that your response to this collection of information will take an
average of 15 minutes. Our estimate includes the time to read
the instructions, look through existing records, gather and
maintain required data, and actually complete and review
the response. If you have any comments on this estimate, or on
how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it
causes you, please write the Federal Communications Commission,
Office of Managing Director, AMD-PPM, Washington, DC 20554, Paperwork
Reduction Act Project (3060-1307). We will also accept your PRA
comments via the Internet if you send an e-mail to
[email protected].
Please DO NOT SEND COMPLETED SURVEYS TO THIS
ADDRESS. You are not required to respond to a collection of
information sponsored by the Federal government, and the
government may not conduct or sponsor this collection, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number and/or we fail to
provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned
an OMB control number of 3060-1307. THIS NOTICE IS
REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995,
PUBLIC LAW
104-13, OCTOBER 1, 1995, 44 U.S.C. SECTION 3507.
Privacy Act Statement
Authority:
The Commission is authorized to pursue this collection pursuant to
the authority contained in 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154
(i)-(j) & (o), 155, 251(e)(1) & (3), 254, 257, 301, 303, 332,
402, 1302; and 5 U.S.C. §§ 602(c) and 609(a)(3).
Purpose:
The purpose of this performance satisfaction survey is to provide
input for the annual performance evaluation report of the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) vendor(s) acting as administrator for
telephone number management functions. These functions may be
performed by one or multiple vendors under one or multiple
contracts. The relevant vendor contract(s) require that the FCC
and/or its designee shall develop and conduct a performance survey
for the administrator. The results of this customer
satisfaction survey will provide FCC with indicators regarding how
well the vendor(s) are acting as administrator. At least a
portion of the survey results will be incorporated into the annual
performance evaluation report. The survey will collect
personally identifiable information (PII) in the form of the survey
respondents’ business contact information, including the name
of entity representative submitting the survey. This PII needs
to be collected to help monitor the accuracy of the survey,
facilitate sending the respondent a copy of the survey, and allow any
necessary follow-up communications with the respondent.
Routine
Uses: The
FCC may release information provided in this form to individuals and
entities when necessary and appropriate under 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)
of the Privacy Act to: the public in FCC releases of notices or
actions or when required to comply with federal laws or FCC
regulations requiring public disclosure of the information contained
in our records; to third parties, including individuals and
businesses in the communications industry and public safety, FCC
vendors and their contractors, and to other federal agencies or
state, local, U.S. territorial, and Tribal government entities to
administer, support, participate in, or receive information related
to, FCC programs and activities; or to ensure compliance with the
confidentiality and other rules regarding information sharing in the
FCC’s programs and activities; to other federal agencies or to
other administrative or adjudicative bodies before which the FCC is
authorized to appear; to federal, state, or local law enforcement
when FCC becomes aware of an indication of a violation or potential
violation of a civil or criminal statute, law, regulation, or order;
to Federal agencies, non-Federal entities, their employees, and
agents for the purpose of detecting and preventing fraud, waste, and
abuse in Federal programs; to non-federal personnel, including
contractors, grantees, and volunteers who have been engaged to assist
the FCC in the performance of a contract service, grant, cooperative
agreement, or other activity related to this system of records and
who need to have access to the records in order to perform their
activity; and, to appropriate agencies, entities, and persons
when the FCC suspects or has confirmed that there has been a breach
of information related to this system.
A
complete list of the routine uses can be found in the system of
records notice associated with this collection, FCC-2, Business
Contacts and Certifications, posted at
https://www.fcc.gov/managing-director/privacy-transparency/privacy-act-information.
Disclosure:
Responding to this survey is voluntary. However, if you do not
respond, it will harm the ability of the FCC to evaluate the
vendor(s) performance pursuant to their contracts and the FCC will
lack the necessary information to modify the vendor(s) policies and
procedures. This will, in turn, harm the FCC’s ability to
meet its policy goals related to numbering.
Full Name of Entity*:
First & Last Name of Contact*:
Street Address*:
City*:
State*:
Zip*:
Telephone Number*:
Email Address*:
Yes
No
( ) Service Provider or Other NANPA user that is not a State or Territorial Regulatory Agency
( ) State or Territorial Regulatory Agency
The following chart defines the Satisfaction Ratings that are to be used by you on the survey form to indicate your satisfaction with the NANPA’s performance for the evaluation period of January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024.
Satisfaction Rating |
Used when the NANPA... |
MET
|
|
NOT MET |
|
Not Applicable N/A |
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA provided timely, accurate, and courteous service in the assignment, reclamation, and administration of geographic central office codes. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA effectively managed the process of geographic central office code administration and reclamation, and coordinated with state regulators to address abandoned resources. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA demonstrated regional knowledge and effective facilitation skills in NPA relief planning activities, and kept the industry apprised of the status and changes related to NPA relief projects. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA initiated communications with state and territorial regulators and responded to their requests for assistance with and information about NPA relief planning and pending NPA relief activities. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA provided accurate and timely updates and assistance for completing and submitting utilization and forecast data via the NRUF Form 502 reporting process. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA assisted state and territorial regulators with access to and understanding of the NRUF utilization and forecast data available to them via NAS and/or the state NRUF database. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA provided direction in applying for other NANP resources, such as non-geographic 5XX and 9YY codes, Carrier Identification Codes and Vertical Service Codes, and provided assistance in understanding the purpose of these resources and associated reclamation processes. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
The NAS provided accurate numbering information and access to reports. The NAS-NANP Notification System (NAS-NNS) communicated planned NAS maintenance and availability, changes to system features and functions, and information pertaining to NANP administration (e.g., NPA relief planning, NRUF submissions, Planning Letters). |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
The existing NANPA website (www.nationalnanpa.com) and the new combined NANPA website (www.nanpa.com) were accessible and easy to navigate, and contained accurate and up-to-date information and reports. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA representative(s) provided customer service and assistance when needed (for example, Help Desk support), and responded to inquiries in a timely manner. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA representatives effectively participated in and contributed to discussion and/or resolution of numbering resource assignment and administration issues at industry forums (e.g., the Industry Numbering Committee (INC)). |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
NANPA provided sufficient testing and training for service providers and state and territorial regulators so that the transition from the NAS/PAS/RNAS systems to the new Combined NAS did not unreasonably delay the processing of requests for numbering resource applications by service providers or the processing of information requests by state and territorial regulators. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
The new combined NAS provided similar or better functionality. |
|
|
|
|
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
Based upon your experiences in the current performance year, how would you rate the NANPA's overall service? |
|
|
|
Provide comments to explain your assessment of the NANPA including any experiences you may have had, positive or negative, and describe the situation and the outcome. Your comments are encouraged and appreciated.
Your responses have been submitted.
Thank you for taking the 2024 NANPA Performance Survey.
Overall survey results will be incorporated into the NANPA/PA/RNA 2024 Performance Evaluation Report and will be posted at www.nanc-chair.org.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Riepenkroger, Karen |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-10-28 |