30-day notice (Published)

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 26, 2025 / Notices
4. Reports on Recent Oil Market and
Policy Developments in IEA and
Association member countries
5. IEA Oil Day 2025—Workshop
Summary
6. US Oil Landscape Under Second
Trump Administration
7. Global Energy Review 2024
8. Recent oil and gas market
development in Russia and nearterm risks
9. G7 Price Caps and the assessment of
Russian prices and freight rates
10. China recent developments and
medium-term oil outlook
11. Update on plans for Summit on the
Future of Energy Security
13. Any other business:
Date of next SOM/SEQ meetings:
—25–26 June 2025
—19–20 November 2025
A meeting of the Industry Advisory
Board (IAB) to the International Energy
Agency (IEA) will be held in person and
via webinar at the IEA Headquarters, 9
rue de la Fe´de´ration, 75015 Paris,
commencing at 9:30 a.m., Paris time, on
March 27, 2025. The purpose of this
notice is to permit attendance by
representatives of U.S. company
members of the IAB at a meeting of the
IEA’s Standing Group on Emergency
Questions (SEQ), which is scheduled to
be held at the same location in person
and via webinar at the same time. The
IAB will also hold an online preparatory
meeting among company
representatives at 2:00 p.m. Paris time
on March 20, 2025. The agenda for this
preparatory meeting is to review the
agendas for the SEQ meeting.
The agenda of the SEQ meeting is
under the control of the SEQ. It is
expected that the SEQ will adopt the
following agenda:
Closed SEQ Session—IEA Member
Countries Only
1. Adoption of the Agenda
2. Approval of the Summary Record of
the 179th SEQ meeting
3. Stockholding Levels of IEA Member
Countries
4. Update on Implementation of
Proposal for Changes to
Institutional Structure for Energy
Security
—Establishment of the Natural Gas
and Sustainable Gases Security
Working Party (GWP) Report on
Data Task Force (DTF)
Open SEQ Session—Open to
Association Countries
5. Questionnaire on Emergency
Exercises in Member Countries
6. ERE2024—Survey Results
7. Mid-Term Review update from
Australia
8. Emergency and Security Review
(ESR) of Korea

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:57 Mar 25, 2025

Jkt 265001

9. Mid-Term Review update from Italy
10. Emergency and Security Review
(ESR) of Netherlands
11. Mid-Term Review update from
Norway
12. Update on Emergency and Security
Work with Non-Member Countries
13. Industry Advisory Board Update
14. Update on Ongoing Work on Natural
Gas Security
15. Update on Ongoing Work on
Electricity Security
16. Any Other Business
Schedule of ESRs for 2025/26
Schedule of SEQ & SOM Meetings for
2025:
—25–26 June 2025
—19–20 November 2025
As provided in section 252(c)(1)(A)(ii)
of the Energy Policy and Conservation
Act (42 U.S.C. 6272(c)(1)(A)(ii)), the
meetings of the IAB are open to
representatives of members of the IAB
and their counsel; representatives of
members of the IEA’s Standing Group
on Emergency Questions and the IEA’s
Standing Group on the Oil Markets;
representatives of the Departments of
Energy, Justice, and State, the Federal
Trade Commission, the General
Accounting Office, Committees of
Congress, the IEA, and the European
Commission; and invitees of the IAB,
the SEQ, the SOM, or the IEA.
Signing Authority: This document of
the Department of Energy was signed on
March 20, 2025, by Joshua Volz, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Europe, Eurasia,
Africa and the Middle Eastm Office of
International Affairs, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, March 20,
2025.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2025–05047 Filed 3–25–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

PO 00000

Frm 00009

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

13735

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. IC25–2–000]

Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–517); Comment
Request; Extension
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of information collection
and request for comments.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) is soliciting
public comment on the currently
approved information collection, FERC–
517, Mandatory Reliability Standards:
COM Reliability Standards. There are no
changes to the reporting requirements
with this information collection. The
60-day notice comment period ended on
March 4, 2025, with no comments
received.

SUMMARY:

Comments on the collection of
information are due April 25, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments on
FERC–517 to OMB through
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. Please
identify the OMB Control Number
(1902–0319) in the subject line of your
comments. Comments should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
DATES:

Send written comments on
FERC–517 to OMB through
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. Please
identify the OMB Control Number
(1902–0319) in the subject line of your
comments. Comments should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
Please submit copies of your
comments to the Commission. You may
submit copies of your comments
(identified by Docket No. IC25–2–000)
by one of the following methods:
Electronic filing through https://
www.ferc.gov, is preferred.
• Electronic Filing: Documents must
be filed in acceptable native
applications and print-to-PDF, but not
in scanned or picture format.
• For those unable to file
electronically, comments may be filed
by USPS mail or by other delivery
methods:

ADDRESSES:

E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM

26MRN1

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

13736

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 26, 2025 / Notices

Æ Mail via U.S. Postal Service only:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
Æ All other delivery methods: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission,
Secretary of the Commission, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: OMB submissions must
be formatted and filed in accordance
with submission guidelines at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Using the search function under the
‘‘Currently Under Review’’ field, select
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
click ‘‘submit,’’ and select ‘‘comment’’
to the right of the subject collection.
FERC submissions must be formatted
and filed in accordance with submission
guidelines at: https://www.ferc.gov/ferconline/overview. For user assistance,
contact FERC Online Support by email
at [email protected], or by
phone at: (866) 208–3676 (toll-free).
Docket: Users interested in receiving
automatic notification of activity in this
docket or in viewing/downloading
comments and issuances in this docket
may do so at https://www.ferc.gov/ferconline/overview.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kayla Williams may be reached by
email at [email protected],
telephone at (202) 502–6468.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: FERC–517 (Safety of
Waterpower Projects and Project
Works).
OMB Control No.: 1902–0319.
Type of Request: Three-year extension
of the FERC–517 information collection
requirements with no changes to the
current reporting requirements.
Abstract: This information collection
will assist in the assessment of the
safety of waterpower projects and
project works licensed by the
Commission. The Commission will use
the information collection activities to
evaluate project-specific dam and public
safety assessments, determine whether
those assessments are sufficient for the
protection of life, health, and property,
and to ensure that project works are
being maintained in an adequate
condition of repair.
The information is necessary in order
to determine the urgency, priority, and
scope of potential safety improvements
or risk reduction measures that might be
needed for the protection of life, health,
and property.
The following reports are required
and are a part of FERC–517:

to report promptly to the Regional
Engineer 1 any incident resulting in
death or serious injury that occurs at the
relevant project. Section 12.10(a)
requires an oral report to the Regional
Engineer by telephone of any condition
affecting the safety of a project or
projects works, ‘‘as soon as practicable
after that condition is discovered.’’
Section 12.10(b) requires a written
report that includes a description of the
cause and location of the accident,
which must be submitted within the
time specified by the Regional Engineer.
The 18 CFR 12.10(b) requires a
written report of any death, serious
injury, or rescue. Such reports must
describe any remedial actions taken or
proposed to avoid or reduce the chance
of similar occurrences in the future and
must be verified in accordance with
section 12.13.2
Section 12.10(b)(3), section
12.10(b)(2)(ii) provides that deaths that
are not project-related may be reported
by providing a copy of a clipping from
a newspaper article, if available. Section
12.10(b)(2)(iii) provides that serious
injuries and rescues that are not projectrelated do not require a written report.
The initial report must be made by
email or telephone as soon as
practicable after the condition is
discovered, ‘‘preferably within 72
hours.’’

18 CFR Part 12, Subpart B (Reports and
Records)
The regulations at 18 CFR 12.10(a)
and (b) require applicants and licensees

1 The Regional Engineer is a member of the
Commission’s staff.
2 Section 12.13 specifies how to verify the
authenticity of a document submitted in accordance
with 18 CFR part 12.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:57 Mar 25, 2025

Jkt 265001

18 CFR Part 12, Subpart D (Review,
Inspection, and Assessment by
Independent Consultant)
Overview of Subpart D
Regulations at 18 CFR part 12 Subpart
D pertain to project safety inspections
by independent consultants. These
inspections sometimes are colloquially
called ‘‘Part 12D inspections.’’ These
inspections are licensee-facilitated and
are in addition to the project safety
inspections conducted regularly by
Commission staff.
Subpart D requires two tiers of
independent consultant inspections for
licensed project developments that meet
the criteria shown at section 12.30 that
includes two types of inspections: a
comprehensive assessment (CA) and a
periodic inspection (PI). Each
comprehensive assessment will be
performed at a ten-year interval, with
the periodic inspection occurring
midway between comprehensive
assessments. A periodic inspection will
focus on a project’s performance over
the previous five years, and will include

PO 00000

Frm 00010

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

a field inspection, a review of project
operations, an in-depth review of
monitoring data trends and behavior,
and an evaluation of whether any
potential failure modes are occurring. A
comprehensive assessment will build on
a periodic inspection with a deep dive
into every aspect of a project, including
a detailed review of the design basis,
analyses of record, and construction
history; an evaluation of spillway
adequacy; a Potential Failure Mode
Analysis; and a Risk Analysis.
Engineering Guidelines—Chapters 15 &
16
Chapter 15 of the Engineering
Guidelines provides guidance on a
Supporting Technical Information
Document (STID). A STID serves as a
compendium of knowledge and
information about a project and greatly
facilitates the review and evaluation of
the safety and performance of project
works by licensees, consultants, and
Commission staff. The STID consists of
a hard copy and a digital reference. It is
required for all projects subject to 18
CFR 12D and is used for assessing the
completeness and appropriateness of
technical information.
The STID summarizes the project
elements and details that, except in the
event of detailed studies or
construction, do not change
significantly over time. The digital
reference (e.g., a CD, DVD, or other form
of electronic media) includes a
compilation of all available source
material and additional supporting
information, formatted so that the
licensee, commission staff, or
consultants can identify and retrieve the
information they need. A searchable
electronic version of the hard copy
material must be included on the digital
reference. The licensee is responsible
for compiling the information for the
STID and for creating and maintaining
the document for use by themselves, the
Part 12D independent consultants, and
Commission staff.
Chapter 16 of the Engineering
Guidelines requires licensees to submit
a detailed Part 12D Inspection Plan
prior to conducting either type of
inspection (i.e., a periodic inspection or
comprehensive assessment) that
describes the scope of the inspection,
proposes an Independent Consultant
Team, and establishes the proposed
schedule. Section 16–3.3.1 of Chapter
16 of the Engineering Guidelines
provides that the Part 12D Inspection
Plan must include the following
information:
• Project name, FERC number, and
state(s) where the project is located;

E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM

26MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 26, 2025 / Notices

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

• Type of Part 12D Inspection
(Comprehensive Assessment or Periodic
Inspection), and a reminder that a Risk
Analysis must be completed for a
Comprehensive Assessment;
• A brief description of the project
features;
• A proposed team of Independent
Consultants, including the identification
and assessment of technical disciplines
to be represented on the team of
Independent Consultants; the names
and resumes for the Independent
Consultants; a list of supporting team
member roles and their intended areas
of expertise; and the names and resumes
of facilitators for any Potential Failure
Mode Analysis or Risk Analysis as
needed; and
• A schedule for Part 12D Inspectionrelated activities.
Under Chapter 16, members of the
Independent Consultant Team are
required to prepare a Pre-Inspection
Preparation Report to document their
initial findings from their review of
project documentation, instrumentation
data, and other information prior to the
field inspection. Chapter 16 provides an
outline for this PRA activity.
Chapter 16 also provides outlines for,
and describes the scope of, the periodic
inspections and comprehensive
assessments that are required in 18 CFR
part 12 Subpart D.
Chapters 17 and 18 provide additional
details and licensee guidance for
conducting a Potential Failure Mode
Analysis and a Level 2 Risk Analysis,
which are required components of a
comprehensive assessment.
Independent Consultant Team
Proposals and Reports
The regulations at 18 CFR 12.31(a)
and 12.31(b), respectively, list specific
qualifications that are required of
independent consultants and
independent consultant teams. The
regulation at 18 CFR 12.34(a) requires
that the licensee obtain written approval
of the independent consultant team
from the Director of the Division of Dam
Safety and Inspections (D2SI) prior to
performing a periodic inspection or
comprehensive assessment.
The regulation at 18 CFR 12.34(b)
requires that the licensee submit a
detailed independent consultant team
proposal to the Director of D2SI at least
180 days prior to performing a periodic
inspection or comprehensive
assessment. As part of this, the licensee
must submit documentation of the
experience and qualifications for all
members of the independent consultant
team, including one or more
independent consultants and additional
contributing members, as needed. This

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:57 Mar 25, 2025

Jkt 265001

enables the Commission staff to evaluate
the breadth and depth of the team’s
experience and ensure that it is
commensurate with the scale,
complexity, and technical disciplines of
the project and type of review being
performed. The Commission intends for
a comprehensive assessment to require
a higher level of experience and
expertise than a periodic inspection,
due to the broader scope of the
comprehensive assessment.
The regulation at 18 CFR 12.34(c)
authorizes the Director of D2SI to
disapprove an independent consultant
team member, regardless of
demonstrated experience and
qualifications, for good cause, such as
having a report rejected by the
Commission within the preceding five
years. This provision allows the
Commission to ensure that independent
consultants’ inspections are performed
by qualified parties.
18 CFR Part 12, Subpart F (Owner’s
Dam Safety Program)
Overview of Subpart F
The regulation at 18 CFR 12.60
provides that subpart F applies to all
licensees with dams or other project
works with a high or significant hazard
potential. The terms ‘‘High hazard
potential’’ and ‘‘Significant hazard
potential and ‘‘Low hazard potential’’
are defined at section 12.3(b)(13).
Owner’s Dam Safety Program (ODSP)
Document
Section 12.62 provides that any ODSP
Document that includes one or more
dams or project features with a high
hazard potential must designate a Chief
Dam Safety Engineer.3 Other ODSPs
may designate either a Chief Dam Safety
Engineer or Chief Dam Safety
Coordinator.4 Section 12.62 also
requires that the ODSP must be signed
by the Owner and, as applicable, the
Chief Dam Safety Engineer or the Chief
Dam Safety Coordinator.
The regulation at 18 CFR 12.63
requires the following additional
contents of an ODSP document:
(a) Dam safety policy, objectives, and
expectations;
(b) Responsibilities for dam safety;
(c) Dam safety training program;
(d) Communication, coordination,
reporting, and reports;
3 Section 12.61(a) provides that a Chief Dam
Safety Engineer is the designated individual, who
is a licensed engineer, who oversees the
implementation of the ODSP and has primary
responsibility for ensuring the safety of the
licensee’s dam(s) and other project features.
4 Section 12.61(b) provides that a Chief Dam
Safety Coordinator is not required to be a licensed
engineer but has the same responsibilities as a Chief
Dam Safety Engineer.

PO 00000

Frm 00011

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

13737

(e) Record keeping and databases; and
(f) Continuous improvement;
The regulation at 18 CFR 12.64
requires any ODSP to be reviewed by
the licensee’s dam safety staff and
discussed with senior management on
an annual basis. In addition, section
12.64 requires that any findings,
analysis, corrective measures, or
revisions be submitted to the D2SI
Regional Engineer for possible revision.
This requirement applies to any licensee
with a dam or other project feature with
a high or significant hazard potential.
ODSP Qualification Statement for
External Audit or Peer Review
The regulation at 18 CFR 12.65
applies to licensees of one or more dams
or other project features classified as
having a high hazard potential. Section
12.65(a) requires an independent
external audit or peer review of the
ODSP and its implementation. The
audit or peer review is required to be
performed at an interval not to exceed
five years.
Before the audit or peer review, 18
CFR 12.65(b) requires the licensee to
submit to the Regional Engineer a
statement of qualifications of the
prospective auditor(s) or peer review
team. The licensee must receive written
acceptance of the statement of
qualifications before performing the
audit or peer review.
ODSP External Audit or Peer Review
Report
The regulation at 18 CFR 12.65(c)
requires the auditor(s) or peer review
team to document their findings in a
report. The report must be reviewed by:
• The project’s owner,
• The Chief Dam Safety Engineer or
Chief Dam Safety Coordinator, and
• Management having responsibility
in the area(s) audited or reviewed.
Subsequently, the report on the audit
or peer review must be submitted to the
Regional Engineer.
ODSP Request for Extension of Time
Typically, the Commission’s letters to
licensees pertaining to ODSPs and
ODSP audits require submittal of a plan
and schedule or report within a set
period of time (e.g., provide a plan and
schedule within 30 days from the date
of this letter). Although neither the
ODSP regulations nor any of the existing
ODSP guidance documents expressly
contemplate extension of time requests,
there are times when a licensee cannot
meet that schedule and therefore files a
letter with Commission staff requesting
an extension of time to complete ODSPrelated tasks.

E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM

26MRN1

13738

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 26, 2025 / Notices

Estimate of Annual Burden: 5 The
Commission estimates the burden and
cost 6 for this information collection as
follows:
In the tables below, the burden
estimates for team proposals and reports

involving PIs and CAs define a single
response as the consolidated filings
during the typical ten-year cycle for
Independent Consultant’s Safety
Inspections (one PI and one CA each
during the ten-year period). Therefore,

the estimated average number of annual
responses for the consolidated filings is
averaged over the ten-year period and
represented as 0.1 responses on average
per year.

FERC–517—DIRECT AND INDIRECT ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST CHANGES
B.
Number of
respondents

A.
Type of response

Applicant’s or Licensee’s Report of Project-Related
Deaths, Serious Injuries, or Rescues.
Ind. Cons. Team Proposals and Reports on PIs and
CAs—Simple Facility 7.
Ind. Cons. Team Proposals and Reports on PIs and
CAs—Complex Facility 8.
Licensee’s Request for Exemption ............................
ODSP Document—Small Program 9 .........................
ODSP Document—Large Program 10 .......................
ODSP Document Revision ........................................
ODSP Qualification Statement for External Audit or
Peer Review.
ODSP External Audit or Peer Review Report—
Small Program 11.
ODSP External Audit or Peer Review Report—
Large Program 12.
ODSP Request for Extension of Time ......................
Total Hours and Costs .......................................

Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden and cost of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information collection;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: March 19, 2025.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025–05081 Filed 3–25–25; 8:45 am]

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

5 Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, refer to 5 CFR part 1320.
6 The Commission staff believes that industry is
similarly situated to the Commission in terms of
cost for wages and benefits. Based on FERC’s
current annual average cost of $207,786 (for salary
plus benefits) for a full-time equivalent, the average

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:57 Mar 25, 2025

Jkt 265001

C.
Avg. number
of annual
responses per
respondent

D.
Avg. annual burden hrs.
and cost per response

E.
Total number of
annual responses

F.
Total annual burden
hrs. and cost

(col. B × col. C)

(col. D × col. E)

65

2.14

2 hrs.; $200 ........................

139.10

278.20 hrs.; $27,820.

375

0.1

12 hrs.; $1,200 ...................

37.50

450 hrs.; $45,000.

375

0.1

32.6 hrs.; $3,260 ................

37.50

1,222.50 hrs.; $122,250.

10
180
45
225
225

1
0.2
0.2
1
0.2

2 hrs.; $200 ........................
60 hrs.; $6,000 ...................
120 hrs.; $12,000 ...............
6 hrs.; $600 ........................
8 hrs.; $800 ........................

10
36
9
225
45

20 hrs.; $2,000.
2160 hrs.; $216,000.
1080 hrs.; $108,000.
1350 hrs.; $135,000.
360 hrs.; $36,000.

180

0.2

62 hrs.; $6,200 ...................

36

2232 hrs.; $223,200.

45

0.2

242 hrs.; $24,200 ...............

9

2178 hrs.; $217,800.

5

1

4 hrs.; $400 ........................

5

1,730

........................

.............................................

589

20 hrs.; $2,000.
11,350.5 hrs.; $1,135,050.

Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC25–27–000.
Applicants: Alabama Power
Company, Tenaska Alabama Partners,
L.P.
Description: Tenaska Alabama
Partners, L.P. et al. submit response to
FERC’s 02/13/2025 Deficiency Letter.
Filed Date: 3/17/25.
Accession Number: 20250317–5229.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/7/25.
Docket Numbers: EC25–65–000.
Applicants: GenOn Energy
Management, LLC, Chalk Point Steam,
LLC, GenOn Power Midwest, LP,
Lanyard Power Holdings, LLC,
Morgantown Power, LLC, Ormond

Beach Power, LLC, Shawville Lessor
Genco LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of GenOn Energy
Management, LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 3/18/25.
Accession Number: 20250318–5202.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/25.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers: EG25–237–000.
Applicants: Star Light Energy Center,
LLC.
Description: Star Light Energy Center,
LLC submits Notice of Self-Certification
of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
Filed Date: 3/19/25.
Accession Number: 20250319–5142.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/9/25.
Docket Numbers: EG25–238–000.
Applicants: Panama Energy Center,
LLC.

hourly cost is $100/hour. Therefore, the hourly cost
used in the burden calculation is $100.
7 Includes direct and contracting burden and cost.
8 Includes direct and contracting burden and cost.
9 This information collection activity applies to
each licensee with dams or other project features
with a high or significant hazard potential, but with
fewer than three such dams or other project
features.
10 This information collection activity applies to
each licensee with three or more dams or project
features with a high or significant hazard potential.

11 This information collection activity applies to
each licensee with dams or other project features
with a high hazard potential, but with fewer than
three such dams or project features. The burden
estimates for this activity include direct and
contracting burdens and costs.
12 This information collection activity applies to
each licensee with three or more dams or project
features with a high hazard potential. The burden
estimates for this information collection activity
include direct and contracting burdens and costs.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1

PO 00000

Frm 00012

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM

26MRN1