United States Food and Drug Administration
Foreign
Supplier Verification Programs (FSVP) for
Importers of Food for
Humans and Animals
OMB Control No. 0910-0752
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Part A: Justification:
Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary
This information collection helps support implementation of section 805 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 384a), requiring persons who import food into the United States to perform risk-based foreign supplier verification activities. The requirements are intended to ensure (1) that food is produced in compliance with section 418 (concerning hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls) or 419 (concerning standards for the safe production and harvesting of certain fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities (RACs)) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350g and 350h), as appropriate; (2) that food is not adulterated under section 402 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 342); and (3) that food is not misbranded under section 403(w) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 343(w)) (concerning food allergen labeling).
The regulations in 21 CFR part 1; subpart L (Foreign Supplier Verification Programs for Food Importers) established requirements FDA deemed necessary and appropriate to verify that food imported into the United States is as safe as food produced and sold within the United States. Specifically, regulations in 21 CFR 1.501 set forth the applicability of requirements for FSVP, while regulations in sections 1.502 through 1.508, prescribe specific activities for developing, maintaining, and following an FSVP; as well as for evaluating compliance and for identifying and correcting hazards. Finally, regulations in section 1.509 identify required data elements applicable to food products offered for importation into the United States, while regulations in 1.510 govern required records, providing that records be made available to FDA upon request and that records be maintained electronically.
FDA launched the FSVP Importer Portal for FSVP Records Submission as a means for importers to upload and submit records electronically, after receiving a written request from FDA. The portal may be found https://www.access.fda.gov/, and a user guide is available at https://www.fda.gov/media/148312/download. We have also established and maintain a webpage regarding the FSVP program at FSVP, including relevant resources.
Respondents to the information collection are persons who import food into the United States.
We therefore request OMB approval for the information collection provisions found in in 21 CFR part 1; subpart L (1.500-1.514) regarding FDA’s FSVPs for food importers, and discussed in this supporting statement.
2. Purpose and Use of the Information Collection
The information collection requires that respondents establish and maintain records on FSVP activities, including the hazard controls set forth in the regulations. The regulations also include requirements pertaining to reporting to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) (for subsequent transfer to FDA). Specifically, persons who wish to import food for research or evaluation purposes must submit a declaration that the food will be used for that purpose. Submission of these declarations enables us to effectively monitor whether the requirements for the FSVP exemption for food for research or evaluation are being met.
3. Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction
Although the recordkeeping requirements for FSVPs do not require the use of electronic recordkeeping, we encourage this approach. As discussed above, we have established a records submission portal to facilitate record submissions under the information collection. We expect that most of the importers will maintain their records in electronic format. Likewise, the reporting requirements to CBP specify that the information must be provided electronically. This is necessary to ensure the efficient collection of information by CBP and the subsequent transfer of the information to FDA for FSVP monitoring and enforcement purposes. We estimate 100% of respondents will use electronic means to satisfy the information collection provisions.
4. Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information
We are unaware of duplicative information collection.
5. Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities
To assist small business respondents with the FSVP requirements we have developed a small entity compliance guide available at:https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/small-entity-compliance-guide-foreign-supplier-verification-programs-importers-food-humans-and. We also provide a Small Business Guide on our website at:
http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/SmallBusinessAssistance/default.htm along with draft guidance regarding FSVP implementation.
6. Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently
The information collection includes recordkeeping undertaken at the discretion of respondents. Information may be reported or retained on a daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly basis depending on which types of documents are being transmitted and which regulations are applicable. Some information from respondents will be needed every time a food is imported into the United States while other information may not be needed every time. For example, a DUNS number will be provided to CBP with every entry line; shipments could occur regularly (e.g., on a weekly basis) between the same importer and foreign supplier, or they could happen once a year, or sporadically. As another example, audit results of a supplying facility could be transmitted to the importer once annually for a relationship between a specific supplier supplying the same product to the same importer over the course of the year. We believe that the reporting and record collection schedules provided for in the regulations are minimal and collecting the information less frequently would undermine our public protection mandate.
7. Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5
The reporting requirements concerning (1) declarations of food for research or evaluation (in §1.501(c)) and (2) identification of the importer when a food is offered for importation into the United States (in § 1.509(c)) must be made when filing entry for the food with CBP. Consequently, this reporting must occur as frequently as the food is offered for importation, which could be as often as multiple times in a single day. There are no other special circumstances relating to the information collection request.
8. Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside the Agency
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d), we published a 60-day notice for public comment in the Federal Register of May 1, 2025 (90 FR 18682). No comments were received.
9. Explanation of Any Payment or Gift to Respondents
This information collection does not provide for payment or gifts to respondents.
10. Assurance of Confidentiality Provided to Respondents
The information collection does not specify confidentiality. However, records that may be reviewed during FDA inspections of food importers are subject to FDA regulations on the release of information in 21 CFR Part 20. Confidential commercial information is protected from disclosure under FOIA in accordance with section 552(a) and (b) (5 U.S.C. 552(a) and (b)) and by part 20. To the extent that § 20.64 applies, we will honor the confidentiality of any data in investigation records compiled for law enforcement purposes.
11. Justification for Sensitive Questions
This information collection does not contain questions of a sensitive nature.
12. Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
12a. Annualized Hour Burden Estimate
Description of Respondents: Generally, respondents include all persons who import food into the United States.
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden1, 2
21 CFR Section |
No. of Respondents |
No. of Responses per Respondent |
Total Annual Responses |
Average Burden Per Response |
Total Hours |
Exemption for Food for research; § 1.501(c) |
36,360 |
40 |
1,454,400 |
0.083 (5 minutes) |
120,715 |
DUNS number for filing with CBP; §§ 1.509(c), 1.511(c), 1.512(b)(2) |
56,800 |
157 |
8,917,600 |
0.02 (1.2 minutes) |
178,352 |
Total |
299,067 |
1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
2 Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Table 2.-Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden1
Activity; 21 CFR Section |
No. of Recordkeepers |
No. of Records per Recordkeeper |
Total Annual Records |
Average Burden per Recordkeeping |
Total Hours |
Controls for Low Acid Canned Food; § 1.502(b) |
2,443 |
4 |
9,772 |
1 |
9,772 |
FSVP Recordkeeping including hazard determination, written procedures, reevaluation; audits; and corrective actions: |
|||||
Determine and document hazards; § 1.504(a) |
11,701 |
1 |
11,701 |
3.5 |
40,954 |
Review hazard analysis; § 1.504(d) |
11,701 |
7 |
81,907 |
0.33 (20 minutes) |
27,029 |
Evaluation of food and foreign supplier; §§ 1.505(a)(2), 1.511(c)(1) |
11,701 |
1 |
11,701 |
4 |
46,804 |
Approval of suppliers; §§ 1.505(b), 1.512(c)(1)(iii) |
8,191 |
1 |
8,191 |
12 |
98,292 |
Reevaluation of food and foreign supplier; §§ 1.505(c), 1.512(c)(1)(ii)(A) |
11,701 |
365 |
4,270,865 |
0.25 (15 minutes) |
1,067,716 |
Confirm or change requirements of foreign supplier verification activity; §§ 1.505(c), 1.512(c)(1)(ii)(A) |
2,340 |
1 |
2,340 |
2 |
4,680 |
Review of other entities assessments; §§ 1.505(d), 1.512(c)(1)(iii) |
3,510 |
1 |
3,510 |
1.2 |
4,212 |
Written procedures for use of approved foreign suppliers; §§1.506(a)(1), 1.511(c)(2), 1.512(c)(3)(i) |
11,701 |
1 |
11,701 |
8 |
93,608 |
Review of written procedures; §§ 1.506(a)(2), 1.511(c)(2)(ii), 1.512(c)(3)(ii) |
11,701 |
1 |
11,701 |
1 |
11,701 |
Written procedures for conducting verification activities; §§ 1.506(b), 1.511(c)(3) |
11,701 |
1 |
11,701 |
2 |
23,402 |
Determination and documentation of appropriate supplier verification activities; §§ 1.506(d)(1)-(2) 1.511(c)(5)(i) |
11,701 |
4 |
46,804 |
3.25 |
152,113 |
Review of appropriate supplier verification activities determined by another entity; §§ 1.506(d)(3) 1.511(c)(5)(iii) |
11,701 |
2 |
23,402 |
0.33 (20 minutes) |
7,723 |
Conduct/review audits; § 1.506(e)(1)(i), 1.511(c)(6)(i)(A) |
11,701 |
2 |
23,402 |
3 |
70,206 |
Conduct periodic sampling/testing; §§ 1.506(e)(1)(ii), 1.511(c)(6)(i)(B) |
11,701 |
2 |
23,402 |
1 |
23,402 |
Review records; §§ 1.506(e)(1)(iii), 1.511(c)(6)(i)(C) |
11,701 |
2 |
23,402 |
1.6 |
37,443 |
Document your review of supplier verification activity records; §§ 1.506(e)(3), 1.511(c)(6)(iii) |
11,701 |
6 |
70,206 |
0.25 (15 minutes) |
17,552 |
§ 1.507(a)(1) |
11,701 |
3.17 |
37,092 |
1.25 |
46,365 |
Written assurances; §§ 1.507(a)(2), 1.507(a)(3), and 1.507(a)(4) |
11,701 |
8.72 |
102,033 |
0.5 (30 minutes) |
51,017 |
Disclosures that accompany assurances; §§ 1.507(a)(2), 1.507(a)(3), and 1.507(a)(4) |
102,038 |
1 |
102,038 |
0.5 (30 minutes) |
51,019 |
Document assurances from customers; § 1.507(c) |
36,522 |
2.8 |
102,262 |
0.25 (15 minutes) |
25,566 |
Document corrective actions; §§ 1.508(a) and 1.512(b)(4) |
2,340 |
1 |
2,340 |
2 |
4,680 |
Investigate and determine FSVP adequacy; §§ 1.508(b), 1.511(c)(1) |
2,340 |
1 |
2,340 |
5 |
11,700 |
Subtotal for FSVP Recordkeeping Itemized Above: |
1,917,184 |
||||
Written assurances for food produced under dietary supplement CGMPs; § 1.511(b) |
11,701 |
2.88 |
33,699 |
2.25 |
75,823 |
Document very small importer/certain small foreign supplier status; § 1.512(b)(1) |
50,450 |
1 |
50,450 |
1 |
50,450 |
Written assurances associated with very small importer/certain small foreign supplier; § 1.512(b)(3) |
50,450 |
2.8 |
141,260 |
2.25 |
317,835 |
Overall Total |
|
2,371,064 |
12b. Annualized Cost Burden Estimate
We estimate that the annualized reporting cost burden under the regulations would be $25,408.732.32 (see Table 3 below) We assume the reporting burden on food importers seeking an exemption for food imported for research under §1.501(c) and food importers submitting a DUNS number for filing with CBP under §§1.509(c), 1.511(c), and 1.512(b)(2) to be conducted by importer personnel at the level of a Food Scientist and Technologist as reported in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2023 National Occupational Survey under occupation code 19-1012 at the fully loaded hourly wage of $84.96.
We estimate that the annualized recordkeeping cost burden under the regulations would be $143,520,504 (see Table 4 below) We estimate that records will be kept by the employee performing the corresponding activity. In most cases, this employee will be, or will be similar to, a production manager in the food manufacturing industry as reported in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2023 National Occupational Survey under occupation code 11-3051at the fully loaded hourly wage of $60.53.
Table 3--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden Cost |
|||
Type of Respondent |
Total Burden Hours |
Fully Loaded Hourly Wage |
Total Respondent Costs |
Food Scientist and Technologist |
299,067 |
$84.96 |
$25,408.732.32 |
Total |
$25,408.732.32 |
Table 4--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden Cost |
|||
Type of Respondent |
Total Burden Hours |
Hourly Wage Rate |
Total Respondent Costs |
Production Manager |
2,371,064 |
$ 60.53 |
$143,520,504 |
Total |
$143,520,504 |
13. Estimates of Other Total Annual Costs to Respondents and/or Recordkeepers/Capital Costs
Table 5- Estimated Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs |
|
21 CFR Part 1 |
Operating and Maintenance Costs |
Conduct/Review audits; 1.506(g)(1)(i), 1.506(h), 1.511(c)(5)(i) |
$3,085,000 |
Conduct periodic sampling/testing; 1.506(g)(1)(ii), 1.506(h), 1.511(c)(5)(ii) |
$158,240,430 |
Investigate adulteration or misbranding; 1.507(b), 1.511(c)(1) |
$6,661,250 |
Total Annual Costs |
$167,986,680 |
14. Annualized Cost to the Federal Government
We estimate a “per-inspection” cost for the review of records of $1,992.45 per review ($53.85/hour x 37 hours). We assume an average of 1,900 inspections per year. Thus, our estimated annual cost to the Federal Government for reviewing records during inspections would be $3,785,655 ($1,9992.45 x 1,900 inspections).
15. Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments
Based on a review of the information collection since our last request for OMB approval, we have made no adjustments to the currently approved burden estimate. However, a miscalculation in the burden estimate was identified during a review of the prior renewal and has been corrected.
16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule
FDA updates and publishes quarterly list of data that is obtained from FSVP importer entry data provided in accordance with § 1.509 and in furtherance of the requirement of section 805(g) of the FD&C Act, to “publish and maintain on [our] Internet Web site . . . a current list that includes the name and location of, and other important information deemed necessary by [FDA] about, importers participating under this section [i.e., section 805].”. This list of FSVP participants can be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/food/importing-food-products-united-states/foreign-suppliers-verification-programs-fsvp-list-participants.
17. Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date Is Inappropriate
Display of the OMB expiration date is appropriate.
18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
There are no exceptions to the certification.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2025-07-30 |