30-day FRN

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 165 / Thursday, August 28, 2025 / Notices
requiring them all, a related
programming update will enable trade
participants the ability to modify or
change a previous enrollment, including
updating or adding additional GBI
numbers, which may include a variety
of global identifier types (LEI, GLN,
DUNS). This programming change
would provide more flexibility and
utility to GBI participants by enabling
GBI numbers to be provided voluntarily
when they are known and encourages
participants to obtain other GBI
numbers as well as keep supply chain
information current because they can
easily add, delete, and modify GBI
numbers associated to an enrollment.
3. The GBI Test is also expanding the
available GBI supply chain entity party
types from the original six optional
parties (Manufacturer, Shipper, Seller,
Exporter, Distributor, Packager), to
include two new parties:
‘‘Intermediary’’ and ‘‘Source,’’ along
with optional free text fields for all the
parties that will allow filers to
voluntarily input additional
descriptions and information about the
specific party type or the underlying
entity. These party types and the free
text fields would be made available in
the GBI Enrollment database as well as
in ACE Cargo Release. Collectively, the
updates aim to enhance upstream
supply chain traceability and visibility
while addressing the increasing
complexity of global trade supply
chains. All participation and data is
voluntary.
4. As a demonstration of CBP’s intent
to expand the choices of identifiers
available to filers over the duration of
the Test, CBP is also working to add
new voluntary GBI identifiers,
beginning with the Altana ID (ALTA)
maintained by Altana Technologies
USG Inc. (Altana), as announced on
August 8, 2025 in the Federal Register
(See, 90 FR 38479). At no cost to the
government to access the underlying
entity and product specific supply chain
data associated with an ALTA, this
identifier offers comprehensive insights
across a product’s supply chain, thereby
enhancing traceability for CBP which
may translate to facilitation benefits and
reduced industry costs. CBP has
initiated programming requests to create
an ALTA GBI field in ACE and to
increase the current character limit in
ACE allowed for GBI identifiers. The
addition of the ALTA identifier
alongside the current GBI identifiers
will widen participants’ choices and
allow CBP to continue to evaluate the
breadth and veracity of entity and
supply chain information embedded
within different types of identifier
solutions already being leveraged by

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:23 Aug 27, 2025

Jkt 265001

trade industry traceability stewards. It
will also contribute to CBP’s ongoing
exploration of how traced supply chain
information may be ingested and
operationalized for risk management
and facilitation purposes. CBP proposes
adding more participants as the test
continues, and with approval from
OMB, will add these to the collection
through a non-substantive change to the
collection.
CBP encourages the trade to comment
specifically on whether there are other
comparable identifiers that the trade
already has, or that it would be
advantageous for CBP to include.
Section 484 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S. Code 1484) and
Part 141, Code of Federal Regulations,
Title 19 (19 CFR part 141), pertain to the
entry of merchandise and authorize CBP
to require information that is necessary
for CBP to determine whether
merchandise may be released from CBP
custody. Provisions of the U.S. Code
and CBP regulations, in various parts
and related to various types of
merchandise, specify information that is
required for entry. For reference, Part
163, Code of Federal Regulations, Title
19 (19 CFR part 163 Appendix A) refers
to a wide variety of regulatory
provisions for certain information that
may be required by CBP.
Type of Information Collection:
Global Business Identifier (GBI).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
100.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 100.
Estimated Time per Response: 10
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 17.
Dated: August 26, 2025.
Seth D. Renkema,
Branch Chief, Economic Impact Analysis
Branch, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2025–16547 Filed 8–27–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. CISA–2024–0012]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Infrastructure Visualization
Platform (IVP) Pre-Collection
Questionnaire
Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA),
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).

AGENCY:

PO 00000

Frm 00064

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

42029

30-Day notice and request for
comments; new information collection
request, 1670–NEW.

ACTION:

The Infrastructure Security
Division (ISD) within Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
will submit the following Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. CISA previously published this
information collection request (ICR) in
the Federal Register on May 21, 2024
for a 60-day public comment period. 0
comments were received by CISA. The
purpose of this notice is to allow an
additional 30 days for public comments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until September 29,
2025.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
pramain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
additional information is required
contact: Jonathan Moaikel; 202–251–
5276; jonathan.moaikel@
mail.cisa.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CISA’s
ISD supports the homeland security
mission of critical infrastructure
security. As part of this mission, CISA
Protective Security Advisors (PSAs)
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM

28AUN1

42030

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 165 / Thursday, August 28, 2025 / Notices

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

conduct various critical infrastructure
security assessments for various
stakeholders including facility owners
and operators; federal, state, and local
law enforcement officials; emergency
response personnel; and others.
One type of assessment PSAs can
perform is an Infrastructure
Visualization Platform (IVP). IVPs
integrate high-resolution, interactive
visual data as well as additional
assessment information. For a PSA to
conduct an assessment, each
stakeholder must complete an IVP PreCollection Questionnaire. The
questionnaire requests information such
as the purpose of the IVP assessment
being requested, the security point of
contact the team will be meeting with
when they arrive at the facility, who
will be escorting the team as they tour
the facility, special considerations the
collection team need to plan for prior to
arriving at the facility, and priority areas
know as Areas of Emphasis that the
team should be focused on while
conducting the IVP assessment
collection. When the form is completed
and submitted, the IVP team can better
plan for the assessment by reviewing
locations designated as Areas of
Emphasis (AOEs) to ensure those areas
receive an assessment, to know who
appropriate points of contact are
(stakeholder requesting and escort who
will be with the team during the
collect), and to address special
considerations prior to showing up for
the collect.
Analysis
Agency: Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA),
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
Title of Collection: Infrastructure
Visualization Platform (IVP) PreCollection Questionnaire.
OMB Control Number: 1670–NEW.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public: State, local, Tribal,
Territorial Governments and Private
Sector Individuals.
Number of Respondents: 120.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 30
minutes.
Total Burden Hours: 60 hours.
Annualized Respondent Cost:
$2,527.00.
Total Annualized Respondent Out-ofPocket Cost: $0.
Total Annualized Government Cost:
$2,576.00.
Robert J. Costello,
Chief Information Officer, Department of
Homeland Security, Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency.
[FR Doc. 2025–16489 Filed 8–27–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–LF–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:23 Aug 27, 2025

Jkt 265001

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
SAFECOM Membership Questionnaire
Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA),
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
ACTION: 30-Day notice of information
collection; request for comment;
reinstatement, with change, of a
previously approved collection for
which approval has expired.
AGENCY:

The Emergency
Communications Division (ECD) within
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure
Security Agency (CISA) submits the
following information collection request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and clearance.
CISA previously published this
information collection request (ICR) in
the Federal Register on May 26, 2025,
for a 60-day public comment period.
Zero comments were received by CISA.
The purpose of this notice is to allow an
additional 30 days for public comments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until September 29,
2025.
Submissions received after the
deadline for receiving comments may
not be considered.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number CISA–
2025–0005, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Please follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Instructions: All submissions
received must include the words
‘‘Department of Homeland Security’’
and the docket number for this action.
Comments received will be posted
without alteration at http://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice may be made available to the
public through relevant websites. For
this reason, please do not include in
your comments information of a
confidential nature, such as sensitive
personal information or proprietary
information. If you send an email
comment, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
internet. Please note that responses to
this public comment request containing
any routine notice about the
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

confidentiality of the communication
will be treated as public comments that
may be made available to the public
notwithstanding the inclusion of the
routine notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Ralph Barnett
III, at (703) 705–6130, or email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 16, 2018, Congress passed
Public Law 115–278, to amend the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6
U.S.C. 101 et seq.), enacted and
authorized the Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). CISA enhances public safety
interoperable communications at all
levels of government to help partners
across the country develop their
emergency communications
capabilities. Working with stakeholders
across the country, CISA conducts
extensive, nationwide outreach to
support and promote the ability of
emergency response providers and
relevant government officials to
continue to communicate in the event of
a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or
other man-made disaster. 6 U.S.C.
571(c)(2) mandates DHS through CISA
to administer and manage the
Department’s authorities and
responsibilities relating to the
SAFECOM program, a state, local, tribal,
and territorial stakeholder-driven public
safety communications program. In an
effort to resolve major communications
issues identified during the September
11, 2001 terrorist attacks, SAFECOM
was created as a Presidential E
Government Initiative to improve
interoperability, allowing emergency
responders to communicate more
effectively before, during, and after
emergencies and disasters.
Through collaboration with
emergency responders and elected
officials across all levels of government,
SAFECOM works to improve emergency
response providers’ inter-jurisdictional
and interdisciplinary emergency
communications interoperability across
local, regional, tribal, State, territorial,
international borders, and with Federal
government entities. SAFECOM works
with existing Federal communications
programs and key emergency response
stakeholders to address the need to
develop better technologies and
processes for the coordination of
existing communications systems and
future networks.
The SAFECOM Membership
Questionnaire is an internal SAFECOM
document disseminated only to active

E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM

28AUN1