FORM APPROVED OMB NO. 0920-1424 EXP DATE: 12/31/2026
Poliovirus Containment Sampling Points and Sanitation Assessment Form for Wastewater (WW) Systems Supporting a Poliovirus- Designated Facility (PVDF) in the United States
Public reporting burden: CDC estimates the average public reporting burden for this collection of information as 1.5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data/information sources, gathering and maintaining the data/information needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC/ATSDR Information Review Office; 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS D-74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; ATTN: PRA (0920-1424).
Purpose of Assessment
Describe and assess the PVDF WW system and the primary safeguards to reduce and control the release of poliovirus from the facility.
Describe and assess WW system(s) from PVDF WW source to environmental release of treated effluent, including the closed sewage system.
Describe and assess WW utilities that receive wastewater from the PVDF.
Poliovirus-Essential Facility
PEF name |
Address |
Phone |
Contact person and title |
Brief general description of WW treatment safeguards at facility |
WW produced annually (G/Y) |
Average WW daily flow (G/D) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describe the closed piped sewer system within the PVDF up to its entry into the closed sewage conveyance system. Maps or drawings preferred.
Description could include GIS mapping, imagery, or engineering drawings of the sewerage network within the PVDF to where it enters the closed sewage conveyance system.
Mapping should display gravity sewage flows between fixtures, sampling points (if applicable), and any other pertinent information before the sewage exits the facility and enters the closed sewage conveyance system.
Closed Sewage Conveyance System
Can multiple WW utilities receive effluent from the PVDF (e.g., via a diversion manhole/control structure)? Describe the wastewater conveyance system between PEF and wastewater utility (e.g., length and other attributes).
PEF name |
Is WW treated onsite? |
Associated WW treatment facility(ies) |
Type of conveyance system and description (number of connections on conveyance system, frequency of maintenance visits) |
Length of conveyance system between PVDF and WW treatment facility |
Number of access or sampling point(s) |
Description of sewage lift stations (number, locations, type, and general information such as pumps, control panel, security) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describe the closed piped sewer system from the PVDF to the associated WW treatment facility(ies). Maps or drawings preferred.
Description could include GIS mapping, imagery, or engineering drawings of the sewerage network from PVDF to WW treatment facility.
Mapping should display gravity sewage flows between manholes, lift stations, force mains, sampling points (if applicable), and any diversion/control structures that can divert flow to secondary WW treatment facility. If multiple WW treatment facilities serve the community, highlight the population area served by the WW treatment facility that also serve the PVDF.
Document historical issues with leaks or breaks, construction, and maintenance issues associated with the closed sewage conveyance system.
PVDF name |
Associated WW treatment facility(ies) |
Frequency and number of planned maintenance visits |
Document historical issues with the conveyance system sewage (backups, leaks, breaks, new construction or renovation, maintenance [jetting and cleaning], and sewer video or scoping recording logs |
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WW Treatment Facility
WW facility name |
Address |
Phone |
Contact person and title |
General description of community sewage treatment facility (e.g., conventional activated sludge treatment w/ anaerobic digestion) |
Primacy agency and contact information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WW facility name |
Year facility went into service |
WW facility design flow (MGD) |
Average WW daily flow (MGD) |
Catchment population size |
Emergency plan for facility exceeding capacity or not operational (provide detail) |
Dates and descriptions of renovations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describe the sewage flow within the WW treatment facility. Maps or drawings preferred.
Description could include GIS mapping, imagery, or engineering drawings of the sewerage network from the outlet of the closed sewage conveyance system to within the WW treatment facility.
Mapping should display gravity and pressurized sewage flows between mechanical or natural sewage treatment components, sampling points (if applicable), and any other pertinent information before the treated sewage exits the WW facility and enters the natural water body (stream, river, lake, etc.).
WW treatment facility – operational information
WW facility name |
Operational hours and days if facility does not operate 24/7/365 |
Dates facility has been nonoperational for longer durations (if applicable) |
Number of days facility has been nonoperational for longer durations (if applicable) |
Public or private WW system? |
Operating entity (government, local government, contractor) |
Describe sewage treatment steps for facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WW treatment facility – operator information
|
Are operators |
|
|
|
|
vaccinated for |
|
|
|
|
poliovirus? |
|
|
|
|
Indicate required |
|
|
|
|
vaccines for |
|
|
|
|
operators (e.g., |
|
|
|
|
polio, Hep A, |
|
Are operators |
|
|
DTaP); |
|
certified for their |
|
WW facility |
Indicate recommended vaccines for operators (e.g., |
Are operators enrolled in an occupational |
appropriate level and position as required by |
Does operator training include the following? Mark all that apply (sources: training attendance logs held by primacy |
name |
Influenza) |
health program? |
primacy agency? |
agency; OSHA compliance staff) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WW facility name |
Who performs maintenance (e.g., facility operators or private contractors) |
Describe the program for validation and certification process (sanitary survey) (e.g., frequency, agency conducting survey, timing of survey) |
What is included in the scope of the audit or sanitary survey? Check all that apply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document historical |
Is the treatment facility |
Time required |
Describe relevant environmental |
WW |
Describe key |
issues with the WW |
secured from |
to cycle WW |
factors in area receiving treated |
facility |
performance |
treatment system |
nonauthorized |
through the |
effluent from WW treatment |
name |
indicators* |
sewage |
personnel? |
system |
system (e.g., river, lakes, streams) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Examples include biological burden on different treatment steps, during rainy days, during drought, during different seasons, when sewage composition changes drastically, peak performance WW processing times.
Page
1
NAC.AUDIT.EXT.016.01
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| File Title | Poliovirus Containment Sampling Points and Sanitation Assessment Form for Wastewater (WW) Systems Supporting a Poliovirus-Essent |
| Author | Ottendorfer, Christy L. (CDC/DDPHSIS/CPR/OD) |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2025-11-25 |