Download:
pdf |
pdfCotton Ginnings
ISSN: 1948-9021
Released December 22, 2021, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
Running Bales Ginned by Crop – States and United States: December 15, 2018-2021
[Excluding linters]
Running bales ginned
Crop and State
2018 Crop
2019 Crop
2020 Crop
2021 Crop
December 15, 2018
December 15, 2019
December 15, 2020
December 15, 2021
(number)
(number)
(number)
(number)
Upland
Alabama ......................
Arizona ........................
Arkansas .....................
California .....................
Florida .........................
Georgia .......................
Kansas ........................
Louisiana .....................
Mississippi ...................
Missouri .......................
590,450
155,100
1,103,600
116,000
54,400
1,304,500
31,200
395,050
1,200,300
705,400
814,550
(D)
1,231,600
118,550
126,250
2,183,600
68,850
520,400
1,348,850
673,300
569,700
(D)
1,206,800
92,550
73,750
1,419,400
84,700
331,600
1,094,800
514,250
488,550
(D)
1,159,600
73,050
59,250
1,439,650
65,500
214,450
828,700
598,900
New Mexico .................
North Carolina .............
Oklahoma ....................
South Carolina .............
Tennessee ...................
Texas ..........................
Virginia ........................
18,550
629,250
197,600
262,250
731,250
4,216,000
157,800
(D)
920,950
285,800
354,800
856,450
5,355,600
183,600
(D)
421,500
264,000
162,900
568,650
4,162,000
76,150
(D)
685,500
304,650
227,450
517,750
5,285,750
142,050
United States ...............
11,868,700
15,224,750
11,247,400
12,253,400
American Pima
Arizona ........................
California .....................
New Mexico .................
Texas ..........................
14,450
372,900
7,500
11,800
(D)
345,650
(D)
13,100
(D)
254,400
(D)
21,350
(D)
187,350
(D)
9,350
United States ...............
406,650
372,900
291,050
215,800
All
Alabama ......................
Arizona ........................
Arkansas .....................
California .....................
Florida .........................
Georgia .......................
Kansas ........................
Louisiana .....................
Mississippi ...................
Missouri .......................
590,450
169,550
1,103,600
488,900
54,400
1,304,500
31,200
395,050
1,200,300
705,400
814,550
(D)
1,231,600
464,200
126,250
2,183,600
68,850
520,400
1,348,850
673,300
569,700
186,750
1,206,800
346,950
73,750
1,419,400
84,700
331,600
1,094,800
514,250
488,550
153,950
1,159,600
260,400
59,250
1,439,650
65,500
214,450
828,700
598,900
New Mexico .................
North Carolina .............
Oklahoma ....................
South Carolina .............
Tennessee ...................
Texas ..........................
Virginia ........................
26,050
629,250
197,600
262,250
731,250
4,227,800
157,800
(D)
920,950
285,800
354,800
856,450
5,368,700
183,600
33,200
421,500
264,000
162,900
568,650
4,183,350
76,150
27,750
685,500
304,650
227,450
517,750
5,295,100
142,050
United States ...............
12,275,350
15,597,650
11,538,450
12,469,200
(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned and to be Ginned – Counties, Districts, States, and United States:
2021 Crop Year
[Excluding linters]
State, county, and district
Running bales ginned
State, county, and district
(number)
(number)
Alabama
District 10
Colbert ...................................................
Lauderdale .............................................
Lawrence ...............................................
Limestone ..............................................
Madison .................................................
(D)
(D)
46,100
(D)
(D)
District 20
Blount ....................................................
Cherokee ...............................................
(D)
(D)
District 30
Chilton ...................................................
Tallapoosa .............................................
(D)
District 40
Autauga .................................................
Elmore ...................................................
Macon ....................................................
Marengo ................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 50
Escambia ...............................................
Mobile ....................................................
Monroe ..................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 60
Coffee ....................................................
Covington ..............................................
Geneva ..................................................
Henry .....................................................
Houston .................................................
Russell ...................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
Alabama total .........................................
488,550
Arizona
District 10
Mohave ..................................................
-
District 80
Cochise ..................................................
Graham ..................................................
Lapaz .....................................................
Maricopa ................................................
Pinal ......................................................
Yuma .....................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
92,900
(D)
Arizona total ...........................................
153,950
See footnote(s) at end of table.
2
Running bales ginned
Arkansas
District 30
Clay ......................................................
Craighead .............................................
Greene ..................................................
Mississippi ............................................
Poinsett .................................................
(D)
223,350
294,350
(D)
District 60
Crittenden .............................................
Lee .......................................................
Monroe .................................................
Phillips ..................................................
Saint Francis .........................................
(D)
(D)
86,750
67,350
District 90
Ashley ...................................................
Chicot ...................................................
Desha ...................................................
Drew .....................................................
Lincoln ..................................................
53,900
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
Arkansas total .......................................
1,159,600
California
District 50
Sutter ....................................................
(D)
District 51
Fresno ..................................................
Kern ......................................................
Kings .....................................................
Madera .................................................
Merced ..................................................
Tulare ...................................................
36,700
(D)
97,900
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 80
Riverside ...............................................
(D)
California total .......................................
260,400
Florida
District 10
Escambia ..............................................
Jackson ................................................
Santa Rosa ...........................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
Florida total ...........................................
59,250
--continued
Cotton Ginnings (December 2021)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned and to be Ginned – Counties, Districts, States, and United States:
2021 Crop Year (continued)
[Excluding linters]
State, county, and district
Running bales ginned
State, county, and district
(number)
Running bales ginned
(number)
Georgia
District 10
Bartow ...................................................
Louisiana
District 10
Caddo ...................................................
Red River .............................................
(D)
(D)
-
District 50
Bleckley .................................................
Dodge ....................................................
Laurens .................................................
Morgan ..................................................
Pulaski ...................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 30
East Carroll ...........................................
Franklin ................................................
Madison ................................................
Richland ...............................................
Tensas .................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 60
Bulloch ..................................................
Burke .....................................................
Candler ..................................................
Jefferson ................................................
Screven .................................................
(D)
39,050
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 50
Avoyelles ..............................................
Catahoula .............................................
Concordia .............................................
Pointe Coupee ......................................
Rapides ................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 70
Calhoun .................................................
Decatur ..................................................
Early ......................................................
Lee ........................................................
Miller ......................................................
Mitchell ..................................................
Randolph ...............................................
Seminole ...............................................
Sumter ...................................................
Terrell ....................................................
Thomas .................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
Louisiana total ......................................
214,450
Mississippi
District 10
Bolivar ..................................................
Coahoma ..............................................
Quitman ................................................
Tallahatchie ..........................................
Tunica ..................................................
186,750
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 20
Benton ..................................................
Calhoun ................................................
De Soto ................................................
Lafayette ...............................................
Panola ..................................................
Yalobusha ............................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 30
Lee .......................................................
Pontotoc ...............................................
(D)
(D)
District 40
Humphreys ...........................................
Leflore ..................................................
Sharkey ................................................
Sunflower .............................................
Washington ..........................................
Yazoo ...................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
95,800
(D)
(D)
(D)
-
District 80
Berrien ...................................................
Brooks ...................................................
Coffee ....................................................
Colquitt ..................................................
Cook ......................................................
Crisp ......................................................
Dooly .....................................................
Irwin .......................................................
Jeff Davis ...............................................
Tift .........................................................
Turner ....................................................
Wilcox ....................................................
Worth .....................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
178,700
(D)
(D)
142,550
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 90
Appling ..................................................
(D)
Georgia total ..........................................
1,439,650
Kansas
District 30
Stevens .................................................
(D)
District 50
Carroll ...................................................
Holmes .................................................
Montgomery .........................................
Webster ................................................
District 60
Harper ...................................................
Pratt .......................................................
(D)
(D)
District 60
Monroe .................................................
Noxubee ...............................................
(D)
(D)
District 90
Cowley ..................................................
(D)
District 70
Hinds ....................................................
(D)
Kansas total ...........................................
65,500
Mississippi total ....................................
828,700
See footnote(s) at end of table.
Cotton Ginnings (December 2021)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
--continued
3
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned and to be Ginned – Counties, Districts, States, and United States:
2021 Crop Year (continued)
[Excluding linters]
State, county, and district
Running bales ginned
State, county, and district
(number)
(number)
Missouri
District 90
Dunklin ...................................................
New Madrid ............................................
Pemiscot ................................................
Scott ......................................................
Stoddard ................................................
352,550
88,900
(D)
(D)
(D)
Missouri total ..........................................
598,900
New Mexico
District 90
Chaves ..................................................
Dona Ana ...............................................
Eddy ......................................................
(D)
(D)
New Mexico total ....................................
27,750
North Carolina
District 60
Anson ....................................................
Cleveland ...............................................
Stanly .....................................................
(D)
(D)
District 70
Bertie .....................................................
Chowan .................................................
Edgecombe ............................................
Gates .....................................................
Halifax ....................................................
Hertford ..................................................
Martin .....................................................
Nash ......................................................
Northampton ..........................................
Perquimans ............................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
113,300
(D)
(D)
(D)
54,750
(D)
District 80
Beaufort .................................................
Greene ...................................................
Hyde ......................................................
Jones .....................................................
Lenoir .....................................................
Pitt .........................................................
Wayne ...................................................
Wilson ....................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 90
Bladen ...................................................
Cumberland ...........................................
Duplin ....................................................
Hoke ......................................................
Robeson ................................................
Sampson ...............................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
North Carolina total ................................
685,500
Oklahoma
District 20
Custer ...................................................
Washita .................................................
(D)
(D)
District 30
Caddo ...................................................
Harmon .................................................
Jackson ................................................
Kiowa ....................................................
Tillman ..................................................
(D)
(D)
137,100
(D)
District 50
Grady ....................................................
(D)
Oklahoma total ......................................
304,650
South Carolina
District 30
Darlington .............................................
Dillon .....................................................
Florence ................................................
Marlboro ...............................................
Williamsburg .........................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 50
Calhoun ................................................
Clarendon .............................................
Lee .......................................................
Lexington ..............................................
Orangeburg ...........................................
Sumter ..................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 80
Hampton ...............................................
(D)
South Carolina total ..............................
227,450
Tennessee
District 10
Lake ......................................................
Lauderdale ............................................
Tipton ....................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 20
Carroll ...................................................
Crockett ................................................
Fayette ..................................................
Gibson ..................................................
Hardeman .............................................
Haywood ...............................................
Madison ................................................
(D)
126,000
(D)
(D)
(D)
107,600
(D)
District 40
Lincoln ..................................................
(D)
Tennessee total ....................................
See footnote(s) at end of table.
4
Running bales ginned
517,750
--continued
Cotton Ginnings (December 2021)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
All Cotton Running Bales Ginned and to be Ginned – Counties, Districts, States, and United States:
2021 Crop Year (continued)
[Excluding linters]
State, county, and district
Running bales ginned
State, county, and district
(number)
Texas
District 11
Briscoe ..................................................
Carson ...................................................
Castro ....................................................
Deaf Smith .............................................
Floyd .....................................................
Hale .......................................................
Hansford ................................................
Moore ....................................................
Parmer ..................................................
Swisher .................................................
Running bales ginned
(number)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
171,350
248,650
(D)
(D)
(D)
49,400
District 12
Bailey ....................................................
Cochran .................................................
Crosby ...................................................
Dawson .................................................
Gaines ...................................................
Glasscock ..............................................
Hockley .................................................
Howard ..................................................
Lamb .....................................................
Lubbock .................................................
Lynn ......................................................
Martin ....................................................
Midland ..................................................
Terry ......................................................
Yoakum .................................................
28,200
(D)
149,700
111,200
261,300
(D)
227,300
(D)
183,500
440,150
143,450
114,550
84,750
94,800
District 21
Childress ...............................................
Collingsworth .........................................
Cottle .....................................................
Dickens .................................................
Donley ...................................................
Hall ........................................................
Hardeman ..............................................
Kent .......................................................
Motley ....................................................
Wilbarger ...............................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 22
Fisher ....................................................
Haskell ..................................................
Jones .....................................................
Knox ......................................................
Mitchell ..................................................
Nolan .....................................................
Runnels .................................................
Scurry ....................................................
(D)
24,550
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 40
Ellis ........................................................
Falls .......................................................
Hill .........................................................
Hunt .......................................................
Lamar ....................................................
Navarro .................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
Williamson ............................................
24,000
Texas - continued
District 51
Houston ................................................
-
District 52
Brazos ..................................................
Robertson .............................................
Walker ..................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 60
El Paso .................................................
Pecos ...................................................
Reeves .................................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 70
Tom Green ...........................................
Upton ....................................................
(D)
(D)
District 81
Burleson ...............................................
Caldwell ................................................
(D)
(D)
District 82
Kleberg .................................................
Nueces .................................................
Refugio .................................................
San Patricio ..........................................
(D)
194,550
(D)
425,350
District 90
Brazoria ................................................
Calhoun ................................................
Fort Bend ..............................................
Jackson ................................................
Matagorda ............................................
Wharton ................................................
(D)
(D)
59,500
(D)
(D)
(D)
District 96
Zavala ..................................................
(D)
District 97
Cameron ...............................................
Hidalgo .................................................
Willacy ..................................................
72,200
(D)
(D)
Texas total ............................................
5,295,100
Virginia
District 90
Greensville ...........................................
Isle Of Wight .........................................
Southampton ........................................
Suffolk City ...........................................
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
Virginia total ..........................................
142,050
United States .......................................
12,469,200
- Represents zero.
(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.
Cotton Ginnings (December 2021)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
5
Statistical Methodology
Survey Procedure: The cotton ginnings survey is an enumeration of all active gins and every effort is made to obtain a
report from all ginners. Data are collected on the first and fifteenth of each month (September – January, February 1, and
March 1) for all estimating States while data collection begins with an August 1 survey in Texas. A final survey is
conducted after gins finish ginning for the season. Ginners are asked to report the number of Upland and American Pima
bales ginned prior to the data collection date. Data are collected by telephone, fax, and internet. If a completed report is
not received from an active gin, the bales ginned are estimated using administrative data or imputed using current survey
data for neighboring gins and the previously reported data for the imputed gin.
Estimating Procedures: Information obtained from the cotton ginnings survey is used to establish estimates of Upland
and American Pima bales ginned to date. These estimates are reviewed for errors, reasonableness, and consistency with
historical estimates.
Revision Policy: Cotton ginnings estimates are subject to revision in the annual report released in May and are based on a
thorough review of all available data.
Reliability: Cotton ginnings estimates are based on a census of all known ginners and therefore, have no sampling
variability. However, estimates are subject to errors such as omissions, duplication, and mistakes in reporting, recording,
and processing of the data. While these errors cannot be measured directly, they are minimized through strict quality
controls in the data collection process and a careful review of all reported data for consistency and reasonableness.
Information Contacts
Listed below are the commodity statisticians in the Crops Branch of the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact
for additional information. E-mail inquiries may be sent to [email protected]
Lance Honig, Chief, Crops Branch ....................................................................................................... (202) 720-2127
Chris Hawthorn, Head, Field Crops Section ......................................................................................... (202) 720-2127
Irwin Anolik – Crop Weather........................................................................................................... (202) 720-7621
Joshua Bates – Oats, Soybeans ........................................................................................................ (202) 690-3234
David Colwell – Current Agricultural Industrial Reports ................................................................ (202) 720-8800
Michelle Harder – Barley, County Estimates, Hay .......................................................................... (202) 690-8533
James Johanson – Rye, Wheat ......................................................................................................... (202) 720-8068
Greg Lemmons – Corn, Flaxseed, Proso Millet ............................................................................... (202) 720-9526
Becky Sommer – Cotton, Cotton Ginnings, Sorghum ..................................................................... (202) 720-5944
Travis Thorson – Sunflower, Other Oilseeds ................................................................................... (202) 720-7369
Lihan Wei – Peanuts, Rice ............................................................................................................... (202) 720-7688
6
Cotton Ginnings (December 2021)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Access to NASS Reports
For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways:
➢ All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: www.nass.usda.gov
➢ Both national and state specific reports are available via a free e-mail subscription. To set-up this free
subscription, visit www.nass.usda.gov and click on “National” or “State” in upper right corner above “search”
box to create an account and select the reports you would like to receive.
➢ Cornell’s Mann Library has launched a new website housing NASS’s and other agency’s archived reports. The
new website, https://usda.library.cornell.edu. All email subscriptions containing reports will be sent from the new
website, https://usda.library.cornell.edu. To continue receiving the reports via e-mail, you will have to go to the
new website, create a new account and re-subscribe to the reports. If you need instructions to set up an account or
subscribe, they are located at: https://usda.library.cornell.edu/help. You should whitelist [email protected] in your email client to avoid the emails going into spam/junk folders.
For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 727-9540,
7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: [email protected].
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for
employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where
applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's
income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program
or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or
employment activities.)
If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination
Complaint Form (PDF), found online at www.ascr.usda.gov/filing-program-discrimination-complaint-usda-customer, or
at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the
information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax
(202) 690-7442 or email at [email protected].
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | Cotton Ginnings 12/22/2021 |
| Author | USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service |
| File Modified | 2021-12-21 |
| File Created | 2021-12-21 |