Document

Public Comments

ICR 202602-1205-002 · OMB 1205-0508 · Object 169960500.

Document Viewer [pdf]

Status: Original and derived artifacts are available for this document.

Download: pdf

Primary: pdfSource: application/pdf
Loading document viewer…

Document Metadata

Record metadata
application/pdf
Public Comments
Acrobat PDFMaker 26 for Microsoft Outlook
2026-05-28
2026-05-28
complete

Extracted Text

From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:

Clement Chang
ETA, OFLC Forms - ETA
Agency Information Collection Activities for Application for Prevailing Wage Determination (OMB control number
1205-0508)
Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:04:56 AM
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Labor. Do
not click (select) links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
and know the content is safe. Report suspicious emails through the "Report"
button on your email toolbar.
Dear Administrator Pasternak,
I am writing to comment on the published Agency Information Collection Activities for
Application for Prevailing Wage Determination (OMB 1205-0508).
While I understand the Department of Labor’s goal to protect U.S. workers from being
unfairly discriminated against by bad acting employers who may be underpaying foreign
workers, I don’t think your proposed rule would fix the issue. I think your approach is
overly broad and it would unnecessarily hurt a lot of U.S. employees and U.S. employers
who are on the whole, following the rules as best as they can.
Instead, I would request the DOL to consider a more practical approach that is to
enforce existing laws and use AI data to go after those bad actor/employers who have no
qualms undercutting employee pay, no matter if they are U.S. worker or not.
I also think DOL has been using misleading information and wrong assumptions about
how employers generally hire their workers – they are also trying to find the most
qualified workers too. They know they have to set their wage at reasonable level in order
to attract interested workers. We are in a market economy after all, where employers
have to search for employees, and employees can decide whom they want to work for.
If you do proceed with this program, I also believe it will unnecessarily burden many U.S.
employers (particularly small and medium size companies) who will bear the economic
brunt of having to adapt to the new rules. They have to worry how this wage level change

will impact their business practices moving forward.   
Instead of these drastic changes, perhaps DOL would consider modifying existing rules
that are more in tune to the labor market conditions.
If DOL does decide to proceed, then I would request DOL to institute a reasonable
period of transition for the U.S. employers, so that they can experience minimum
negative impacts that this will new rule will surely bring to them and the local economy
where they are based.
I thank your for your consideration and understanding in this matter.

Regards,
Clement Chang
張鑑明律師
Senior Associate

Edison: 1794 Oak Tree Road, Edison, NJ 08820
Pasricha & Patel LLC | T: (732) 593-6200 | F: (732) 593-6201 |
[email protected] | www.pasricha.com | [www.lawimm.com]www.lawimm.com

Book Time with Clement

The foregoing communication and any accompanying attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee, and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please
know that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, fax, or telephone (we will accept collect
calls) and permanently delete the original transmission from us, including any attachments, without making a copy.

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.