Document
D1 Action Memo APRIL 2019
ICR 202607-0648-010 · OMB 0648-0678 · Object 171113600.
Document Viewer [pdf]
Status: Original and derived artifacts are available for this document.
Download: pdf
Loading document viewer…
Document Metadata
| File Type | application/pdf |
|---|---|
| File Title | D1 Action Memo APRIL 2019 |
| Author | Jon McCracken |
| Last Modified By | Acrobat PDFMaker 17 for Word |
| File Modified | 2019-12-05 |
| File Created | 2019-03-28 |
| Conversion State | complete |
Extracted Text
D1 Cooperative Reports April 2019 Council Meeting Action Memo Staff: Jon McCracken and Sarah Marrinan Other presenters: Representatives of the Cooperatives Action Required: Annual review of Cooperative Reports BACKGROUND The Council has developed several cooperative programs as components of larger catch share programs. Under these programs, cooperatives have been required or requested to provide an annual report. These reports are intended as a resource for the Council to track the effectiveness of the cooperative and their ability to meet the Council’s goal for the programs. Additionally, they are a tool for the cooperatives to provide feedback on the programs to the Council. In general, these reports are presented by cooperative managers during the April meeting. An infographic summarizing the cooperative reports is provided below and will be posted on the cooperative reports webpage. In addition, a table that provides a more expanded overview of mandatory and voluntary elements of the different cooperative reports is included in this action memo, as well as a list of active cooperatives and the status of their 2018 fishing year annual report (2018/19 for the crab fisheries). As a reminder, for any requests, deletions, and/or clarifications of information provided in the cooperative reports (voluntary or otherwise), the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requires Federal agencies (1) to seek public comment on proposed collections and (2) to submit proposed collections for review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). OMB reviews agency information collection requests for approval and disapproval. The PRA should not discourage the Council from making requests for voluntary cooperative information to be included in future cooperative reports. Rather, this guidance advises the Council to pursue voluntary information requests in a deliberative manner, providing clear explanation of the objective of the new information. Council and NMFS staff will track these Council information requests and submit the necessary PRA paperwork to OMB, so a clear explanation for requests is helpful. (a) AFA Co-op reports In 1998, Congress established the American Fisheries Act specifically for the pollock fishery in the BSAI management area. Among other things, the AFA encouraged domestic enterprise in Alaskan fisheries and established provisions for the creation of fishery cooperatives in three sectors: at sea catcher processors, motherships, and inshore vessels. Cooperatives are given exclusive allocation of pollock based on their members’ historical catch. See below for a list of AFA cooperative reports and Council presentations at this meeting. (b) Amendment 80 Co-op reports Implemented in 2008, the Amendment 80 Program is a limited access privilege program (LAPP) that allocates a portion of total allowable catch (TAC) for Atka mackerel, Pacific ocean perch, and 3 flatfish D1 Cooperative Reports APRIL 2019 species (yellowfin sole, rock sole, and flathead sole), along with an allocation of prohibited species catch (PSC) quota for halibut and crab, in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands (BSAI), to the Amendment 80 sector. See below for a list of Amendment 80 cooperative reports and Council presentations at this meeting. The Amendment 80 cooperatives also provide halibut bycatch management plans to the Council at the December meeting. That request originated from the Council during the June 2015 meeting. In addition, as part of the BSAI flatfish flexibility action (Amendment 105), the Council asked for information on flatfish exchanges, cooperative transfers, and actual harvest. NMFS provides this information as part of their December inseason management report. (c) CGOA Rockfish Co-op reports In 2007, the Central GOA Pilot Rockfish Program was implemented. The program was intended to enhance resource conservation and improve economic efficiency for harvesters and processors who participated in the program. Allocations of the primary rockfish species (Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, and pelagic rockfish) and important incidental catch species (i.e., sablefish, Pacific cod, shortraker and rougheye rockfish, and thornyhead rockfish) are divided between the catcher vessel sector and the catcher processor sector. In addition, each sector is allocated halibut PSC limits based on historic catch of halibut in the target rockfish fisheries. As part of reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act in 2007, the Pilot Program was extended until December 31, 2011. During that time, the Council completed action on Amendment 88 to the GOA Fishery Management Plan that revised the Rockfish Program and the amendment was implemented in 2012. See below for a list of CGOA Rockfish Program cooperative reports and Council presentations at this meeting. (d) BSAI Crab Co-op reports The BSAI Crab Rationalization program is a limited access privilege management program, which was implemented in 2005. The program issued harvest quota shares to vessel owners (License Limitation Program license holders) and captains, as well as issuing processor quota shares to processors based on their associated history. The crab rationalization program allows for the voluntary formation of harvesting cooperatives to coordinate crab harvest. If a quota share holder is associated with a cooperative, the annual pounds of IFQ that are derived from the quota share holder’s quota is issued to their cooperative and able to be internally managed and harvested among its members. More than 99 percent of the crab rationalization harvesting quota share is harvested through cooperatives. The BSAI Crab rationalization program as implemented in 2005 did not include a pre-established reporting requirement for cooperatives. In 2013, the Council reviewed an analysis evaluating the Council’s management options for promoting active participation among lease holders, as well as lease rates, crew compensation, and active participation through flexible cooperative management. While the Council opted against a regulatory solution at that time, it requested that the industry use non-regulatory methods to address the Council’s concerns. The Council requested an annual cooperative report for industry to report on the effectiveness of non-regulatory measures, noting that these reports would help the Council determine whether to take regulatory action in the future. The Council letter sent to each of the cooperatives requested that they voluntarily report on: • QS transfers to active participant and crew members • Lease rates • Crew compensation rates The letter also requests any additional information or data the cooperatives wish to provide demonstrating the effectiveness of existing measures and the level of participation in cooperative-established measures. The Council also recommended using the seven question/response format, as has been employed by many of the groups in the past, as their preferred reporting structure. See below for a list of BSAI Crab cooperative reports and Council presentations at this meeting. The Council has developed catch share programs including four that allow or require the formation of cooperatives. As part of these programs, cooperatives submit annual reports detailing the use of the cooperative quota or other aspects of the program. AFA BSAI Crab Amendment 80 Implemented in 1998 Key species – pollock Cooperatives - 9 Active vessels – 100 Program first wholesale value - $1.2 billion • Pounds landed – 2.6 billion • Implemented in 2005 • Key species – King and tanner crab • Cooperatives - 9 • Active vessels – 72 • Program first wholesale value - $220.8 million • Pounds landed – 31.6 million • Implemented in 2008 • Key species – Flatfish, other groundfish • Cooperatives -1 • Active vessels – 19 • Program first wholesale value - $352 million • Pounds landed – 648.2 million • Implemented in 2012 • Key species – rockfish, cod, and sablefish • Cooperatives - 7 • Active vessels – 29 • Program first wholesale value - $34 million • Pounds landed – 48.1 million Cooperative Report Includes: Cooperative Report Includes: Cooperative Report Includes: • Measures to increase availability of QS for transfer to active participants and crew members • Measures to address high QS lease rates • Measures to address low crew compensation • Retained and discarded catch • Directed and bycatch species transfers • Cooperative monitoring methods • Percent of groundfish retained • Cooperative’s quota and sideboard limit • Retained and discarded catch • Cooperative monitoring methods • Monthly Chinook bycatch numbers • • • • • Cooperative Report Includes: • Allocation and suballocation of pollock and sideboards • Retained and discarded catch • Cooperative monitoring methods • Salmon bycatch numbers Current as of: April 2019 Incentive Plan Agreement Report Includes: • Incentive in effect to reduce salmon bycatch • Salmon bycatch numbers • Transfers of Chinook salmon and pollock • Suballocations of Chinook salmon GOA Rockfish D1 Cooperative Reports APRIL 2019 Summary of the cooperative reporting requirements and voluntary requests for information Cooperative program Required information Established in 50 CFR §679.61(f) as well as Section 210(a)(1)(B) of the AFA: Allocation of pollock and sideboard species to cooperative Sub-allocations of pollock and sideboard species on a vessel-by-vessel basis Retained and discarded catch on an area-by-area and vessel-by-vessel basis Method used to monitor fisheries AFA Cooperative Report Actions taken by cooperative against members that exceed catch or bycatch The total weight of pollock landed outside the State of Alaska on a vessel-byvessel basis Number of salmon taken, by species and season Each vessel’s number of appearances on the weekly “dirty 20” lists for nonChinook salmon Established in 50 CFR 679.21(f)(13) • Incentive measures in effect in the previous year • How incentive measures affected individual vessels • How incentive measures affected salmon savings beyond current levels • IPA amendments approved by NMFS since the last annual report and the reasons for amendments Chinook Salmon Incentive • Sub-allocation to each participating vessel Plan Agreement (IPA) • Number of Chinook PSC and amount of pollock (mt) at the start of each Annual Report fishing season • Number of Chinook PSC and amount of pollock (mt) caught at the end of each season • Inseason transfers among entities of Chinook salmon PSC or pollock among AFA cooperatives • Transfers among IPA vessels • Amount of pollock (mt) transferred Established in 50 CFR 679.5(r)(6)(i): Cooperative’s quota and sideboard limit Actual retained and discarded catch of Cooperative’s retained and discarded Central GOA Rockfish catch of CQ and sideboard limit by statistical area and vessel-by-vessel basis Cooperative Report Method used by cooperative to monitor fisheries Actions taken by cooperative in response to members that exceeded their catch allowance Voluntary information AFA exempt vessel activity in the GOA Inter-temporal harvest information Voluntary presentation at April Council meeting Voluntary presentation at April Council meeting Inter-temporal harvest information Monthly Chinook bycatch numbers by stock of origin (pull from NMFS in-season management reports) Use consistent terminology Voluntary presentation at April Council meeting Deadline Recipient April 1st NPFMC April 1st NPFMC December 15st NMFS 4 D1 Cooperative Reports APRIL 2019 Cooperative program Amendment 80 Cooperative Report Amendment 80 Halibut Bycatch Avoidance Progress Report and Management Plan Crab Rationalization Cooperative Report Required information Voluntary information Deadline Recipient Established in 50 CFR 679.5(s)(6)(i): Actual retained and discarded catch of CQ and GOA sideboard limit by area and by vessel Information on the directed and bycatch species transfers by species, amount, and date Method used to monitor fisheries Actions taken by co-ops against members that exceed assigned CQ The percent of groundfish retained by the cooperative relative to aggregate groundfish retained by all Amendment 80 co-ops Results from a third-party audit on cooperatives annual groundfish retention Catch information from the Northern Bristol Bay Trawl Area A retrospective indication of Amendment 80 catch capacity Inter-temporal harvest information Voluntary presentation at April Council meeting March 1st NMFS December Council meeting NPFMC Development of effective and verifiable measures for halibut avoidance Performance measurement and assessment at the boat and company level Voluntary presentation at December Council meeting Increase availability of QS for transfer to active participants and crew members Decrease high QS lease rates Improve low crew compensation Voluntary presentation at April Council meeting April Council meeting NPFMC 5 D1 Cooperative Reports APRIL 2019 List of cooperative reports Cooperative Name AFA Cooperatives Catcher Vessel Intercooperative Peter Pan Fleet Cooperative Unisea Fleet Cooperative Westward Fleet Cooperative Unalaska Fleet Cooperative Akutan Catcher Vessel Cooperative Northern Victor Fleet Cooperative Mothership Fleet Cooperative Pollock Conservation Cooperative & High Seas Catchers’ Cooperative Submitted Annual Report Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Council Presentation Yes Stephanie Madsen Submitted Annual Report Yes Council Presentation Beth Concepcion Submitted Annual Report Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Council Presentation John Gruver Current as of 3/27/19 Cooperative Name Amendment 80 Cooperatives Alaska Seafood Cooperative Current as of 3/27/19 Cooperative Name CGOA Rockfish Cooperatives ISA Rockfish Cooperative North Pacific Rockfish Cooperative OBSI Rockfish Cooperative Star of Kodiak Rockfish Cooperative Western Alaska Fisheries Rockfish Cooperative Pacific Rockfish Cooperative Best Use Cooperative Julie Bonney Yes Yes Christopher Oliver Submitted Annual Report Council Presentation Current as of 3/27/19 Cooperative Name Alaska King Crab Harvesters Cooperative Aleutian Island Cooperative Alternative Crab Exchange (ACE) BSAI Crab Cooperatives Coastal Villages Crabbing Cooperative Crab Producers and Harvesters Association Dog Boat Cooperative Inter-cooperative Exchange (ICE) R & B Cooperative Trident Affiliated Crab Harvesting Cooperative Yes Yes Gretar Gudmundsson Yes Yes Yes Yes Caitlin Yeager Joe Sullivan and Jake Jacobsen Yes Current as of 3/26/19, subject to updates 6