Document
View Survey
ICR 202607-1028-003 · OMB 1028-0140 · Object 171448500.
Document Viewer [pdf]
Status: Original and derived artifacts are available for this document.
Download: pdf
Loading document viewer…
Document Metadata
| File Type | application/pdf |
|---|---|
| File Title | View Survey |
| Last Modified By | wkhtmltopdf 0.12.5 |
| File Modified | 2023-10-23 |
| File Created | 2022-05-04 |
| Conversion State | complete |
Extracted Text
OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is collected to gather feedback from science community members who have a self-described interest in the use of terrestrial analogs for conducting scientific research into geologic processes that have been or are interpreted to be presently active on planetary (non-terrestrial) surfaces. The survey is intended to identify the obstacles that exist related to training, research, sample collections, and data archiving within analog projects, the need for coordination across the community, and what products and services might be needed to further terrestrial analog use and support exploration. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. OMB has approved this collection of information and assigned Control No. 1028-xxxx. Public Burden Statement: The public burden for the collection of information is estimated to be 1 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any aspect of this collection of information may be sent to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, USGS, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., Mil Stop 242, Reston, VA 20192. Please do not send your form to this address. OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 Terrestrial Analog Survey Respondent Details. * 1. Your organization? University or College Private industry Federal institution Other Non-teaching, non-governmental research institution * 2. Your stage of career? Undergraduate student Middle career professional Graduate student Late career professional Post-doc Other Early career professional * 3. Your discipline? [select up to three] Atmospheric science Geomorphology Biology/Astrobiology/Exobiology Geophysics Education Physics and Astronomy Engineering Other processing/archiving/dissemination Geochemistry/Cosmochemistry/Petrology Mission planning/operations Geographic Information Sciences Mission, instrument, or payload concept Geology * 4. Your type of work? [select up to three] Research Field Mapping Computer science GIS/Cartography Data Processing/Dissemination Public outreach Education (primary or secondary instruction) Programmatic and/or institutional management Education (university or college) Other 2 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 * 5. Your major funding source(s)? [select up to two] NASA programs College/University Non-NASA U.S. Federal Programs NSF ESA programs Other Non-ESA EU Programs * 6. Your office geographic location? Northeast West Southeast Hawaii/Alaska Midwest Outside the US Southwest * 7. Are you involved in active mission planning, mission operations, and/or specific mission-affiliated research? Yes No * 8. On a scale from 1 (not at all relevant) to 4 (extremely relevant), please rate how relevant each planetary bodies/systems are to your work. 1-Not at all relevant 2- Tangentially relevant 3- Somewhat relevant 4- Extremely relevant Mercury Venus Earth Moon Mars (including Deimos and Phobos) Main belt asteroids Jovian system Saturnian system Uranian/Neptunian systems Pluto (including Charon) Other Other (please specify) 3 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 * 9. On a scale of 1 (not at all relevant) to 4 (extremely relevant), please rate how relevant each of the following processes are to your work/teaching? 1- Not at all relevant 2- Tangentially relevant 3- Somewhat relevant 4- Extremely relevant Aeolian Fluvial Alluvial Deltaic Lacustrine Glacial Mass wasting Explosive volcanism Effusive volcanism Impact cratering Metamorphism 10. Please tell us about your field experience. Check all that apply. Undergraduate level field techniques class Professional (industry-related) field experience Graduate level field techniques class Professional (research-related) field experience Undergraduate level photogeologic mapping techniques class Professional (teaching-related) field experience Graduate level photogeologic mapping techniques class Other (please specify) 4 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 Terrestrial Analog Survey Field Analog Use 11. Do you conduct planetary analog field studies? Yes, analog field studies are a central part of my planetary science research No, but I am interested in such studies and would like to be involved in them Yes, I have done my own analog studies, but it has been secondary to my main research interests No, they are not an interest for my research Yes, but only as an assistant or student in a class 12. Frequency that you conduct analog fieldwork for your research: Weekly Once every few years Monthly Never Several times per year Not applicable Once per year 13. Frequency that you conduct analog fieldwork for your teaching: Weekly Once every few years Monthly Never Several times per year Not applicable Once per year 14. Frequency that you use data and/or results from others’ analog field studies: Weekly Once every few years Monthly Never Several times per year Not applicable Once per year 5 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 15. I do not do my own analog field studies because: (check all that apply) It is not relevant for my research/teaching I do not know where to find relevant field data Analog sites are too difficult to get to I do not know where relevant sites might be for my work I do not have funding for analog work Not applicable, I do analog field work Other (please specify) 16. What factors are most important to you in choosing a field location? Please rank the following from 1 to 5, where 1 is the most important factor and 5 is the least important factor. Each number can only be used once. (Skip if not relevant) 1 2 3 4 5 Relevant geologic processes Proximity to my location Logistics (including ease of getting permits and time to get to the location) Funding Interesting/cool location 17. When I conduct fieldwork for research and/or teaching, the primary audience is: (check all that apply) (Skip if not relevant) Undergraduate students Managers Graduate students Mission teams Engineers Myself and my peers 18. The field sites that I use are places that I visited before beginning a formalized project: (Skip if not relevant) Strongly disagree Somewhat disagree Somewhat agree Strongly agree 6 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 19. If the USGS Astrogeology Science Center produced easily accessible, topic specific field guides, I would use guides from the following analog locations (please rank them in order of importance, with 1 being most important and 7 being least important): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SP Crater, AZ San Francisco Volcanic Field, AZ Verde Valley, AZ Grand Canyon, AZ Sedona Area, AZ Hawaii Iceland 20. I would use USGS field guides for the following location(s): (write in response) 7 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 Terrestrial Analog Survey Data Portal Use 21. What kinds of field data do you collect? (check all that apply) Field notes/sketches in a notebook Field photos Rock samples Short range remote sensing (e.g., field spectrometers) Water samples Geomechanical measurements (e.g., shear strength) Biologic samples Weather/climate measurements (e.g., wind speed, rain fall) Air/gas samples Long term monitoring data (>1 field deployment) Geophysical measurements (e.g., gravity, magnetics, seismic) Drone or unoccupied aerial system data Topography Geochemistry/Petrology Other (please specify) 22. What have you done with the data and samples you have collected during analog field studies? (check all that apply) Placed them in a long-term publicly accessible archive that meets the standards mandated by Federal law or international organizations Have them sitting in your office/home Made them publicly available via personal or institutional web sites or portals. Not applicable Lost them Made them available to colleagues who request them Put all the important data in peer-reviewed publication Other (please specify) 23. How easy is it to locate data from field studies previously conducted by others? Very easy. My research has moved forward efficiently due to my ability to build upon previous studies. Very difficult. I have to collect everything myself because previous studies are not useful to me. Easy. While I do not have access to everything I want, I am generally able to get what I need from previous studies. I do not know how to locate existing field data. Not relevant Somewhat difficult. While I have access to some previous studies, I spend a lot of time trying to find what others have done. 8 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 24. Ideally, how would you prefer to search for data collected by previous planetary analog studies (Please rank, 1 is most preferred, 4 is least) 1 2 3 4 Data type specific databases (e.g., petrology, topography) Location specific database (e.g., geographic locations/field sites) Planetary body specific database (e.g., Moon) Planetary process specific database (e.g., aeolian) 25. What kinds of field data do you feel are important to archive digitally? (check all that apply) Field notes/sketches in a notebook Geophysical measurements (e.g., gravity, magnetics, seismic) Field photos Short range remote sensing data (e.g., field spectrometers) Rock sample data Geomechanical measurements (e.g., shear strength) Water sample data Geochemical measurements Biologic sample data Weather/climate measurements (e.g., wind speed, rain fall) Air/gas sample data Drone or unoccupied aerial system data Topography Long term monitoring data (>1 field deployment) Other (please specify) 26. What are the main limitations you encounter for archiving your data? (check all that apply) Lack of funding It would be a waste of my time Lack of technical capabilities Guidance is non-existent and/or unclear I don't have a clue where to start There are no appropriate locations to archive my data Other (please specify) 9 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 27. I would use an online repository to search for and access analog samples and data: Practically daily Every few weeks Every few months Less than annually 10 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 Terrestrial Analog Survey Geologic Materials Collection Use 28. In your opinion, how much value do analyses of planetary analog rock samples have for the field of planetary science? High. Analyses of analog samples provide essential ground truth for interpretations of remote sensing data, planetary geologic mapping, or other aspects of planetary science Moderate. Analog sample data provide some constraints on planetary geologic processes, but this is not essential to planetary science Low. Analog sample data is rarely relevant to interpretations of remote sensing data, planetary geologic mapping, or any other aspect of planetary science None. Analog sample data is not relevant to interpretations of remote sensing data, planetary geologic mapping, or any other aspect of planetary science Other (please specify) 29. How likely would you be to request rock samples and/or laboratory data from a USGS-based long-term publicly accessible archive, such as the USGS Meteor Crater Sample Collection? Very likely Likely Unlikely Very unlikely 30. What kinds of physical materials are important to archive? (check all that apply) Field notes/sketches in a notebook Water samples Field photos Biologic samples Rock samples Air/gas samples Soil samples Other (please specify) 11 OMB Control Number: 1028-XXXX Expiration date: 10/23/26 31. If planetary analog rock samples were available to researchers from a USGS-based publicly accessible archive, what rock types would be most useful to your work? (check all that apply) Volcanic (effusive) Hydrothermal metamorphic Volcanic (explosive) Other metamorphic Intrusive igneous Impactites (rocks from terrestrial impact craters) Sedimentary (clastic) Meteorites Sedimentary (chemical) Other (please specify) 32. How likely would you be to archive your physical samples in a USGS-based long-term publicly accessible archive, such as the USGS Meteor Crater Sample Collection? Very likely Likely Unlikely Very unlikely 33. Thank you for completing this survey! If you have any additional comments, please add in here. 12