Document

Public Comments

ICR 202610-3206-002 · OMB 3206-0284 · Object 174333302.

Document Viewer [pdf]

Status: Original and derived artifacts are available for this document.

Download: pdf

Primary: pdfSource: application/pdf
Loading document viewer…

Document Metadata

Record metadata
application/pdf
Public Comments
JasperReports Library version 6.16.0-48579d909b7943b64690c65c71e
2026-10-20
2026-10-20
complete

Extracted Text

Public Comments for ICR 202609-3206-001

October 19, 2026

Author Full Name :

Anonymous Anonymous

Page 1 of 1

Received Date : 10/19/2026 08:13 PM

Comments Received :
The Annual Employee Survey is not merely an internal management exercise. Congress required annual employee surveys
covering leadership, management practices, and employee experience, and directed OPM to prescribe questions permitting
comparisons across agencies. Pub. L. 108-136, § 1128, 5 U.S.C. § 7101 note.
OPM now proposes to reduce the common questions from 16 to 10 and transfer survey administration from OPM to
individual agencies, while continuing to collect agency results for governmentwide comparison. This is a material change in
how the government generates information about its own management. The resulting data will be shaped by organizations
whose leadership and practices the survey is intended to evaluate.
The central concern is institutional independence and public accountability. Decentralized administration can fragment a
governmentwide measurement system, weaken comparisons over time, and make employee experience harder to assess
consistently across agencies. These consequences matter particularly when the stated value of the collection rests on its
usefulness for governmentwide workforce analysis.
The Paperwork Reduction Act requires a meaningful assessment of practical utility, effective management and use, and
applicable statistical methodology. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(A), (H)–(I). OMB should not treat the collection as a ministerial
consequence of an already announced policy change. It must independently examine whether the proposed collection, in its
actual institutional context, satisfies those requirements.
I object to approval on the present record. OMB should not approve the collection merely because agencies will submit
common-question results to central offices. The submission must stand on its demonstrated statutory utility, not on the
assumption that decentralization preserves the value of the system it replaces. If that showing has not been made, OMB
should return or disapprove the request.