Document
20261209.SCOOS.SpecialQuestions.Draft 4.0
ICR 202610-7100-005 · OMB 7100-0325 · Object 174107101.
Document Viewer [pdf]
Status: Original and derived artifacts are available for this document.
Download: pdf
Loading document viewer…
Document Metadata
| File Type | application/pdf |
|---|---|
| File Title | 20261209.SCOOS.SpecialQuestions.Draft 4.0 |
| Author | [email protected] |
| Last Modified By | Acrobat PDFMaker 26 for Word |
| File Modified | 2026-10-22 |
| File Created | 2026-10-13 |
| Conversion State | complete |
Extracted Text
PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL 2026: Q4 SCOOS Special Questions on Dealer Balance-Sheet Allocation to Treasury MarketMaking and Securities Financing Continued growth in outstanding Treasury securities and episodes of elevated Treasury yield volatility have underscored the importance of dealers’ balance sheet capacity available for Treasury market intermediation. In these special questions, we ask about your institutions’ allocation of balance-sheet capacity for Treasury market intermediation activities, including Treasury securities market-making and your provision of financing to clients collateralized by Treasury securities. Questions 1–5 ask about your capacity allocation for Treasury securities market-making and client demand. Questions 6–12 ask about your institution’s capacity to provide financing collateralized by Treasury securities and demand for such financing, including from your hedge fund clients. Treasury Securities Inventory and Market Making Activities 1. Since year-end 2025, how has your institution’s allocation of balance-sheet capacity to Treasury inventory and market-making activities changed? a) b) c) d) e) f) Increased considerably Increased somewhat Remained basically unchanged Decreased somewhat Decreased considerably Not applicable, my institution does not materially engage in Treasury market making 2a. To the extent your institution's allocation of balance sheet capacity dedicated to Treasury inventory and market-making activities has increased since year-end 2025, how important were each of the following factors? (Select up to three factors, ranked by importance) a) b) c) d) e) f) g) Increased profitability of Treasury market-making More favorable risk assessment of the Treasury market Lower cost of funding for Treasury inventory Less binding risk-based capital requirements Less binding leverage ratio requirements Less binding liquidity requirements Other 2b. To the extent your institution's allocation of balance sheet capacity dedicated to Treasury inventory and market-making activities has decreased since year-end 2025, how important were each of the following factors? (Select up to three factors, ranked by importance) a) b) c) d) e) f) g) 3. Reduced profitability of Treasury market-making Less favorable risk assessment of the Treasury market Higher cost of funding for Treasury inventory More binding risk-based capital requirements More binding leverage ratio requirements More binding liquidity requirements Other Since year-end 2025, how has demand from your institution’s clients and counterparties for Treasury marketmaking activities changed? 1 PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL a) b) c) d) e) 4. Increased considerably Increased somewhat Remained basically unchanged Decreased somewhat Decreased considerably Over the next year, how does your institution expect its allocation of balance-sheet capacity dedicated to Treasury inventory and market-making activities to change? a) b) c) d) e) 5. 2026: Q4 SCOOS Increase considerably Increase somewhat Remain basically unchanged Decrease somewhat Decrease considerably Over the next year, what do you expect to be the most important factors limiting your institution’s Treasury inventory and market-making activities? (Select up to three factors, ranked by importance.) a) b) c) d) e) f) Risk-based capital requirements Leverage ratio requirements Liquidity requirements Availability of funding to your institution Client demand levels Other Treasury Securities Financing Activities 6. Since year-end 2025, how has your institution’s allocation of balance-sheet capacity dedicated to Treasury securities financing (repo and reverse repo) for clients changed? a) b) c) d) e) f) Increased considerably Increased somewhat Remained basically unchanged Decreased somewhat Decreased considerably Not applicable, my institution does not materially engage in Treasury securities financing for clients 8a. To the extent your institution's allocation of balance sheet capacity dedicated to Treasury securities financing for clients has increased since year-end 2025, how important were each of the following factors? (Select up to three factors, ranked by importance) a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) Increased profitability of Treasury securities financing More favorable risk assessment of the Treasury market Lower cost of funding for your institution Less binding risk-based capital requirements Less binding leverage ratio requirements Less binding liquidity requirements Less binding counterparty credit or concentration limits Increased central clearing or balance sheet netting efficiency Other 8b. To the extent your institution's allocation of balance sheet capacity dedicated to Treasury securities financing for clients has decreased since year-end 2025, how important were each of the following factors? (Select up to three factors, ranked by importance) 2 PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) 8. Decreased profitability of Treasury securities financing Less favorable risk assessment of the Treasury market Increased cost of funding for your institution More binding risk-based capital requirements More binding leverage ratio requirements More binding liquidity requirements More binding counterparty credit or concentration limits Decreased central clearing or balance sheet netting efficiency Other Since year-end 2025, how has demand from your institution’s non-hedge fund clients and counterparties for Treasury securities financing changed? a) b) c) d) e) 9. 2026: Q4 SCOOS Increased considerably Increased somewhat Remained basically unchanged Decreased somewhat Decreased considerably Since year-end 2025, how has demand from hedge fund clients and counterparties for Treasury securities financing changed? a) b) c) d) e) Increased considerably Increased somewhat Remained basically unchanged Decreased somewhat Decreased considerably 10. Since year-end 2025, in which strategies have your hedge fund clients increased demand for Treasury securities financing? (Select up to three strategies, ranked by importance) a) b) c) d) e) Cash-futures basis trades Swap-spread trades Curve relative-value trades Other fixed-income relative-value strategies Other 11. Since year-end 2025, in which strategies have your hedge fund clients decreased their demand for Treasury securities financing? (Select up to three strategies, ranked by importance) a) b) c) d) e) Cash-futures basis trades Swap-spread trades Curve relative-value trades Other fixed-income relative-value strategies Other 12. Over the next year, how does your institution expect its allocation of balance-sheet capacity dedicated to Treasury securities financing for clients to change? a) b) c) d) e) Increase considerably Increase somewhat Remain basically unchanged Decrease somewhat Decrease considerably 3 PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL 2026: Q4 SCOOS 4