Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection
No
Regular
Approved without change
06/17/1984
03/19/1984
EPA should explain succinctly how this requirement relates to the other information requirements of the pretreatment program. . The calculation of the number of respondents appears to be grossly incorrect. Assuming the total number of dischargers in compliance will increase each year (eventually reaching a stable plateau), the number of respondents should also incrementally increase each year. I should not be the simple average of 15,000/3.
table that charts list comparision
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
06/30/1987
06/30/1987
10,000
0
0
80,000
0
0
0
0
0
AN INDUSTRIAL USER (OF A PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (POTW) SUBJECT TO A CATEGORICAL PRETREATMENT STANDARD MUST REPORT SEMIANNUALLY TO THE CONTROL AUTHORITY ON CONTINUED COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARD. THE CONTROL AUTHORITY DETERMINES WHETHER ENFORCEMENT CACTIONS ARE NECESSAR
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.