ASSESSMENT OF THE PERCEPTIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF THE CITIZENS OF NEW YORK STATE TOWARD THE MANDATORY SEAT BELT USE LAW

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
142248	ASSESSMENT OF THE PERCEPTIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF THE CITIZENS OF NEW YORK STATE TOWARD THE MANDATORY SEAT BELT USE LAW		Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2127-0530	ICR Reference No: 198409-2127-002
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: DOT/NHTSA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: ASSESSMENT OF THE PERCEPTIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF THE CITIZENS OF NEW YORK STATE TOWARD THE MANDATORY SEAT BELT USE LAW
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 09/25/1984
	Date Received in OIRA: 09/21/1984
Terms of Clearance: This proposed survey is approved for use subject to the following conditions: (1) Your proposed questions 3, 3A, and 3B must be moved to the end of the attitude and reported usage section, i.e., just before question 12 on the 1984 survey and just before question 11 on the 1985 survey, and (2) In the 1985 survey, your proposed question 10 must be moved to the front to become the new question 3. It must also be rewritten to read "Since last year, would you say you wear your seat belt more often, less often, or about the same?" The first change is necessary to minimize the likelihood that early questions (such as the proposed 3, 3A, and 3B on accidents) would bias later responses (on seat belts). In the 1985 survey, the new question 3 (your proposed question 10) required rewording because people are more likely to report increased usage if the question refer specifically to the state law.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	03/31/1986	03/31/1986
Responses	3,000	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	750	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: EVALUATE THE EFFECT OF THE RECENTLY ENACTED MANDATORY OCCUPANT RESTRAINT LAW IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. THESE SURVEYS WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE PUBLIC'S KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR REGARDING RESTRAINT USE IN LIGHT OF THE MANDATORY OCCUPANT RESTRAINT LAW. THERE WILL BE THREE SURVEYS CONDUCTED, ONE BEFORE THE LAW GOES INTO EFFECT (OCTOBER 1984) AND TWO AFTER ITS IMPLEMENTATION (MARCH 1985 AND SEPT. 1985).

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
ASSESSMENT OF THE PERCEPTIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF THE CITIZENS OF NEW YORK STATE TOWARD THE MANDATORY SEAT BELT USE LAW

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	3,000	0	0	3,000	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	750	0	0	750	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 09/21/1984

---