we received a
letter dated 1/29/86 from NIRMA asserting that the reporting
requirements in this proposed rule would result in "an annua cost
to a utility in excess of $313,000 per nuclear power unit." Within
the next 145 days, please explain how you plan to resolve the
concerns expressed in that letter. Specifically, please explain--in
practical, operational terms, for what purpose the reporting burden
is needed to be imposed in order to accomplish the proper
performance the functions of this program--for each reporting or
recordkeeping requirement included in the proposed rule. Also,
please reassess the burden estimate in light of these
concerns.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
10/31/1988
10/31/1988
01/31/1986
19,200
0
19,200
115,210
0
115,210
0
0
0
NUCLEAR RADIATION MONITORING,
RADIATION SAFETY, PACKAGE, THEFT, LOSS, NUCLEAR MATERIAL' THE NRC
IS PROPOSING A MAJOR REVISION OF 10 CFR 20 WHICH PROVIDES THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE EXPOSED,
BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE WORKPLACE, THE IONIZING RADIATION
FROM ROUTINE ACTIVITIES WHICH ARE LICENSED BY THE NRC.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.