PERKINS LOAN (FORMERLY NATIONAL DIRECT STUDENT LOAN), COLLEGE WORK-STUDY, SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANT PROGRAMS (RECORDKEEPING/DISCLOSURE)

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
134367	PERKINS LOAN (FORMERLY NATIONAL DIRECT STUDENT LOAN), COLLEGE WORK-STUDY, SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANT PROGRAMS (RECORDKEEPING/DISCLOSURE)	Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1840-0535	ICR Reference No: 199011-1840-005
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 199005-1840-002
Agency/Subagency: ED/OPE	Agency Tracking No:
Title: PERKINS LOAN (FORMERLY NATIONAL DIRECT STUDENT LOAN), COLLEGE WORK-STUDY, SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANT PROGRAMS (RECORDKEEPING/DISCLOSURE)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 01/15/1991
	Date Received in OIRA: 11/16/1990
Terms of Clearance: OMB approves this information collection request, under the condition that ED responds sufficiently to public comments received by OMB (attached) regarding paperwork provisions in the underlying propos rule. This response should be made in the analysis of comments sectio of the preamble to the campus-based final rule. ED should also seek n OMB clearance for any revised paperwork provisions. Specifically, ED should address the following public comments: o In 674.33(c)(2), ED should justify or revise the requirement that institutions may extend a borrower's repayment period only if that borrower meets the "low-income individual" definition. This requireme reduces the flexibility of institutions to use their discretion in extending repayment on a case-by-case basis. In addition, ED should state clearly, or justify otherwise, that once a borrower no longer qualifies for extended repayment due to low-income status, the origina length and monthly repayment schedule should be used (674.33(c)(2)(iv) o In 676.14, ED should justify or revise the level at which institutions must report overawards, proposed to change from $200 to $25, measuring expected budgetary savings against increased administrative complexity that could be introduced at the $25 level. should also consider whether the Federal share that triggers SEOG referrals must be determined by the institution, and whether S Pell Grant referrals may be made on the same form to re

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	12/31/1993	12/31/1993	07/31/1993
Responses	2,240	0	2,240
Time Burden (Hours)	11,026	0	11,026
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: UNDER TH THREE CAMPUS-BASED PROGRAMS INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY RECEI FEDERAL FUNDS TO ASSIST STUDENTS WHO NEED THE MONEY TO PAY FOR THEIR EDUCATIONAL COST. THE REGULATIONS ESTABLISH PROPER ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARDS. INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR AWARDING THE FUNDS.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
PERKINS LOAN (FORMERLY NATIONAL DIRECT STUDENT LOAN), COLLEGE WORK-STUDY, SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANT PROGRAMS (RECORDKEEPING/DISCLOSURE)

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	2,240	2,240	0	0	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	11,026	11,026	0	0	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/16/1990

---