Party Preference for InterLATA 0+ Calls, CC Docket No. 92-77d

ICR 199606-3060-002

OMB: 3060-0717

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
3060-0717 199606-3060-002
Historical Active
FCC
Party Preference for InterLATA 0+ Calls, CC Docket No. 92-77d
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved without change 09/08/1996
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 06/12/1996
The FCC should consider combining this collection with 3060-0666 as well as 3060-0478. There are some fundamental questions that the FCC must answer with this proposed rule and collection. First, how will consumers be informed what the benchmark is? Would the consumer be better served by requiring the OSP to inform the caller of the cost of the call, regardless of any benchmark? The FCC should also calculate and include, as a cost burden, the cost of installing the systems that will inform the consumer of the cost of call (or if the cost exceeds the benchmark.) It should not be assumed by the FCC that members of the public will know what a benchmark cost is. Their knowledge will, in general, be limited to the cost of services provided by their interlata carrier of choice. Finally, 3060-0666 now requires both the caller and receiver of direct billing calls to be informed of costs. One member of the public commented that the process for billing calls using a calling card should be made simpler. These comments were forwarded to the FCC for review. This collection is approved for 18 months pending resolution of these and other issues covered in the rulemaking.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
05/31/1998 05/31/1998
210 0 0
551 0 0
0 0 0

The Commission proposes this information to further the goal of 47 U.S.C. 226(1) to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive practices relating to their use of operator services for interstate calls and (2) to ensure that consumers have opportunity to make informed choices in making such calls.

None
None


No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Party Preference for InterLATA 0+ Calls, CC Docket No. 92-77d

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 210 0 0 210 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 551 0 0 551 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
No

$0
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/12/1996


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy