Alternative Schools Random Assignment Evaluation

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
13116	Alternative Schools Random Assignment Evaluation	Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1205-0331	ICR Reference No: 199608-1205-002
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 199307-1205-013
Agency/Subagency: DOL/ETA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Alternative Schools Random Assignment Evaluation
Type of Information Collection: Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 10/09/1996
	Date Received in OIRA: 08/15/1996
Terms of Clearance: This collection is approved provided that DOL revise question 1.3a in section I to comply with OMB Directive 15. DOL agrees to send a revised page to add to the file. In addition, as stated in the previous terms of clearance for the initial two sites, DOL shall indicate the significance of empirical estimates published or reported based on these data, through an asterisk showing level of significance and publication of standard errors with the estimates where appropriate.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	10/31/1999	10/31/1999
Responses	1,600	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	1,600	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	13,620,000	0	0

---

Abstract: The Department of Labor provided grants to seven cities to start alternative schools for at-risk youth based on the model of High School Redirection in Brooklyn. DOL has implemented a random assignment evaluation in three of the schools in the demonstration. DOL has previously obtained OMB approval to conduct follow-up interviews for two of the schools in the evaluation, with the idea that it would subsequently come back to request approval for surveys for other sites in the evaluation. DOL is now seeking to do just that--to obtain approval for a follow-up survey and school records data....

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Alternative Schools Random Assignment Evaluation

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	1,600	0	0	1,600	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	1,600	0	0	1,600	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	13,620,000	0	0	13,620,000	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 08/15/1996

---