Sponsor Survey

Burden Statement for Sponsor Survey

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0584-XXXX. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 20 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

SURVEY INSTRUMENT

S URVEY 1: SPONSOR SURVEY

[The following information will be collected from the Pennsylvania State database, PEARS]:

THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LISTS ADDRESS AS:

Sponsor name: __________________________________________________________________

Address 1:______________________________________________________________________

City: ______________________________________ Zip code: ___________________________

1. IS THIS THE EXACT LOCATION WHERE YOU SERVE MEALS?

___ Yes [If yes, GO TO Q2]

___ No (If no, provide the correct information below).

If you do not have a street address, please describe your location. For example: “we serve meals at the Briarwood Community Park,” or “we serve meals at the northwest corner of Thompson Park and Main Street.”

No street address: Description of location: ________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

If you provide meals at a park or playground, provide details including the names of at least 2 cross-streets for the location, e.g., “Creek Park near Hampshire Avenue and Center Street.”

Site name: ________________________________________________________________

Address 1:_________________________________________________________________

City: ____________________________________ Zip code: ________________________

[To be collected from PEARS: When did organization join SFSP and years active?] ___ 2004 ___ 2005 ___ 2006

2. WHAT TYPE OF ORGANIZATION ARE YOU?

___ School district

___ Non-profit

___ Religious-based

___ Community action program

___ Other non-profit (Specify____________________)

___ Government agency

___ State

___ County

___ City

___ Other (Specify ____________)

___ Private (Specify ____________).

3. HOW DID YOU ESTABLISH SFSP SITES? [Check all that apply.]

___ We approached existing programs that served children.

___ Existing programs contacted us.

___ We set up new sites.

___ Other (Specify_____________________)

[Sponsors that did not establish new sites skip to Q5.]

• DID YOU KNOW WHERE CHILDREN WERE CONGREGATING IN YOUR AREA BEFORE YOU ESTABLISHED NEW SITES?

___ Yes If yes, (4b) Did you locate new sites in those areas? ___ Yes ___ No

___ No If no, (4a) Where did you locate your sites? _________________________

5. FOLLOWING ARE SOME MARKETING TECHNIQUES USED BY SPONSORS TO RECRUIT SITES. PLEASE SPECIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOUR EFFORTS TO RECRUIT SITES ON A SCALE OF 1-5, WITH 1 BEING MOST EFFECTIVE AND 5 BEING LEAST EFFECTIVE. [Check NA, if you did not use a specific technique to recruit sites.]

Site Recruitment Techniques	Effectiveness					NA
	1	2	3	4	5
Direct mailings
Local newspaper
Newsletters
Outreach by others in the community
Presentations to local non-profits
Posting flyers throughout community
Word of mouth
Other (Specify_________________________)
Other (Specify_________________________)

(5A) WHERE DO YOU SEND YOUR DIRECT MAILINGS?

___ To churches

___ To families

___ To schools

___ To daycare centers

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Local Newspaper, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(5B) HOW DID YOU USE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS?

___ Article in newspaper

___ Advertisement

___ Press releases

___ Other (Specify__________________________)

___ Other (Specify__________________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Newsletters, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(5C) WHAT TYPES OF NEWSLETTERS DID YOU USE?

___ School district

___ Churches

___ Food bank

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Outreach by others in the community, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(5D) WHO TOOK PART IN THESE OUTREACH EFFORTS?

___ Churches

___ Private partners

___ Public partners

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

6. PLEASE DESCRIBE ANY OBSTACLES TO OPENING MORE SITES? __________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

ANSWER QUESTION 7 ONLY IF: (1) ACTIVE IN 2005, AND (2) ADDED 40% SITES IN 2005. ELSE RESPONDENT WILL GO TO Q8.

ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION IN THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DATABASE, YOU ADDED _________ 40% SITES IN 2005 AND USED THE FOLLOWING ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: (NOTE: ALL 40% SITES IN 2005 WERE OPEN.]

Site Name	Criterion (1)	Criterion (2)	Criterion (3)
Site name 1	Open	School Data	46%
Site name 2	Open	Census track/block	42%

7. WOULD ANY OF THESE SITES THAT QUALIFIED UNDER THE NEW 40% CRITERION HAVE QUALIFIED UNDER THE 50% CRITERION HAD YOU USED ANOTHER METHOD TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY?

___ No [If yes, GO TO Q8.]

___ Yes [If no, GO TO Q7a.]

___ Don’t know [If don’t know, GO TO Q8.]

(7A) WHICH OF THESE SITES WOULD HAVE QUALIFIED UNDER THE 50% ELIGIBILITY CRITERION? WHAT CRITERION COULD YOU HAVE USED?

Site Name	Qualified Under 50%
	Yes	No
Site name 1
Site name 2
Site name 3
Site name 4

[If all of Q7a= “no,” go to Q8. For each “yes,” ask Q7b.]

(7B) WOULD YOU HAVE APPLIED FOR ELIGIBILITY HAD THE 50% CRITERION BEEN THE REQUIREMENT?

___ No (7c) Why not? ______________________________________ GO TO Q8.

___ Yes GO TO 7d

___ Don’t know GO TO Q8.

(7C) WHAT ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY COULD YOU HAVE USED?

___ Open GO TO 7e

___ Enrolled-income applications collected GO TO Q8

___ Enrolled – eligibility provided by school or other child nutrition program GO TO Q8

___ Residential camp GO TO Q8

___ National Youth Sports Program GO TO Q8

___ Migrant site GO TO Q8

(If “open” selected in Q7d)

(7D) WHAT KIND OF DATA DID YOU USE TO CALCULATE ELIGIBILITY?

___ School data

___ Housing data

___ Census track/block

___ Children’s eligibility area

ANSWER QUESTION 8ONLY: IF (1) ACTIVE IN 2006 AND (2) ADDED 40% SITES IN 2006. ELSE, GO TO Q9. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION IN THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DATABASE, YOU ADDED _________ 40% SITES IN 2006 AND USED THE FOLLOWING ELIGIBILITY CRITERION: [IN 2006, 40% SITES MAY BE ENROLLED OR OPEN.]

Site Name	Criteria (1)	Criteria (2)	Criteria (3)
Site name 1	Open	School Data	46%
Site name 2	Open	Census track/block	42%
Site name 3	Enrolled	Income applications collected

8. WOULD ANY OF THESE SITES THAT QUALIFIED UNDER THE NEW 40% CRITERION HAVE QUALIFIED UNDER THE 50% CRITERION HAD YOU USED ANOTHER METHOD TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY?

___ No GO TO Q9.

___ Yes GO TO Q8a

___ Don’t know GO TO Q9.

(8A) WHICH OF THESE SITES WOULD HAVE QUALIFIED UNDER THE 50% ELIGIBILITY CRITERION? WHAT CRITERION COULD YOU HAVE USED?

Site Name	Qualified Under 50%
	Yes	No
Site name 1
Site name 2
Site name 3
Site name 4

If all of Q8a= “no,” go to Q9. For each “yes,” ask Q8b.

(8B) WOULD YOU HAVE APPLIED FOR ELIGIBILITY HAD THE 50% CRITERION BEEN THE REQUIREMENT?

___ No (8c) Why not? ______________________________________ GO TO Q9.

___ Yes GO TO 8d

___ Don’t know GO TO Q9.

(8C) WHAT ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY COULD YOU HAVE USED?

___ Open GO TO 8e

___ Enrolled-income applications collected GO TO Q9

___ Enrolled – eligibility provided by school or other child nutrition program GO TO Q9

___ Residential camp GO TO Q9

___ National Youth Sports Program GO TO Q9

___ Migrant site GO TO Q9

(If “open” selected in Q8d)

(8D) WHAT KIND OF DATA DID YOU USE TO CALCULATE ELIGIBILITY?

___ School data

___ Housing data

___ Census track/block

___ Children’s eligibility area

QUESTIONS IN THIS SECTION PRESENTED ONLY IF NEW IN 2005 OR 2006.

9. DID YOU BECOME A SPONSOR BECAUSE OF THE NEW ELIGIBILITY CRITERION (40% OF THE CHILDREN ARE LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS WITH 185% OF THE POVERTY LEVEL)?

___ No

___ Yes

10. HOW DID YOU LEARN OF THE NEW ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS?

___ Sponsor meeting in Harrisburg

___ Notification by the Pennsylvania State Department of Education

___ Notification by USDA

___ SFSP training

___ Other (Specify_____________)

___ Did not know of the new eligibility requirements

ATTENDANCE

11. WHAT IS/WAS THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN SERVED AT YOUR SITES ?

___ 2004

___ 2005

___ 2006

12. SOME SPONSORS REPORT THAT CHILDREN OF CERTAIN AGES ARE LESS LIKELY TO ATTEND THE SFSP THAN CHILDREN OF OTHER AGES. DO YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY EITHER “GETTING THE WORD OUT” OR GETTING CHILDREN OF DIFFERENT AGES TO ATTEND THE SFSP?

If there was no difference, check here: ___ GO TO Q13

Age	Getting the word out	Getting children to Attend	Why?
Less than 5 years
5-8 years
9-12 years
13-15 years
16-18 years

13. WHAT ABOUT BY GENDER? IS IT HARDER TO GET THE WORD OUT EITHER TO BOYS OR GIRLS TO ATTEND THE SFSP?

If there was no difference, check here: ___ GO TO Q14

Age	Getting the word out	Getting children to Attend	Why?
Girls
Boys

14. SOME SPONSORS REPORT THAT THE FOLLOWING CHILDREN ARE ALSO DIFFICULT TO REACH. DO YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY EITHER “GETTING THE WORD OUT” OR GETTING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CHILDREN TO ATTEND THE SFSP? WHAT ABOUT ANY OTHER CHILDREN?

If there was no difference, check here: ___ GO TO Q15

Hard-to-reach children	Getting the word out	Getting children to Attend	Why?
Home-schooled
Special needs
Children with disabilities
Migrant children
Other (Specify___________)
Other (Specify___________)

15. DO YOU HAVE ANY MIGRANT SITES?

___ No

___ Yes (If yes) (15a) Which sites are migrant sites? ________________

16. DID ANY MIGRANT CHILDREN ATTEND SFSP IN ANY OF YOUR NON-MIGRANT SITES?

___ No

___ Yes (If yes) (16a) How many of your non-migrant sites have migrant children attending the SFSP each year? ___

17. FOLLOWING ARE SOME MARKETING TECHNIQUES SITES USED TO RECRUIT CHILDREN TO THE SFSP. PLEASE SPECIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANY OF THESE EFFORTS IN RECRUITING CHILDREN ON A SCALE OF 1-5, WITH 1 BEING THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND 5 BEING THE LEAST EFFECTIVE METHOD. CHECK NA, IF YOUR SITE DID NOT USE A SPECIFIC TECHNIQUE.

Site Recruitment Techniques	Effectiveness					NA
	1	2	3	4	5
Direct mailings
Local newspaper
Newsletters
Outreach by others in the community
Presentations to local non-profits
Posting flyers throughout community
Word of mouth
Other (Specify_________________________)
Other (Specify_________________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Direct Mailings, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(17A) WHERE DO YOU SEND YOUR DIRECT MAILINGS?

___ To churches

___ To families

___ To schools

___ To daycare centers

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Local Newspaper, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(17B) HOW DID YOU USE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS?

___ Article in newspaper

___ Advertisement

___ Press releases

___ Other (Specify__________________________)

___ Other (Specify__________________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Newsletters, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(17C) WHAT TYPES OF NEWSLETTERS DID YOU USE?

___ School district

___ Churches

___ Food bank

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Outreach by others in the community, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(17D) WHO TOOK PART IN THESE OUTREACH EFFORTS?

___ Churches

___ Private partners

___ Public partners

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

SFSP ENHANCEMENTS

18. FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF SOME OF THE THINGS THAT SPONSORS AND SITES HAVE USED TO ENHANCE THEIR SFSP AND THEREBY LOWER COST, AND ATTRACT AND RETAIN CHILDREN TO THE PROGRAM. PLEASE CHECK OFF THOSE THAT YOU HAVE USED AND NOTE WHICH HAVE BEEN THE MOST USEFUL.

	Used by Sites	Most Useful
Federal transportation grant
State-provided marketing materials
Incentives from local produce purveyors
WIC marketing
Free commodities from the USDA
Reaching out to federal title programs early in summer at elementary school
Large banners announcing the program
Money for special events to draw out the children
State grant money to sponsors/sites to experiment with new techniques to reach children
State campaign to introduce the program
Other (Specify_______________________)
Other (Specify_______________________)
Other (Specify_______________________)

19. ARE THERE ANY OTHER THINGS THAT YOU HAVE NOT TRIED, BUT THAT YOU THINK MIGHT HELP?

____________________________________________________________________________________

20. HOW IMPORTANT DO YOU THINK THE ACTUAL MEAL IS IN GETTING THE CHILDREN TO TAKE PART IN THE SFSP?

___ Very important

___ Somewhat important

___ Not very important

___ Very unimportant

21. HOW IMPORTANT DO YOU THINK THE DISTANCE FROM HOME TO SITE IS IN GETTING CHILDREN TO TAKE PART IN THE SFSP?

___ Very important

___ Somewhat important

___ Not very important

___ Very unimportant

22. HOW IMPORTANT DO YOU THINK ACTIVITIES ARE IN GETTING CHILDREN TO TAKE PART IN THE SFSP?

___ Very important

___ Somewhat important

___ Not very important

___ Very unimportant

23. HOW OFTEN DO YOU COMMUNICATE WITH OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE SFSP DURING THE SUMMER SEASON? DO YOU THINK THAT ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATION WITH ANY OF THE FOLLOWING DURING THE SUMMER SEASON WOULD MAKE YOUR SFSP STRONGER?

	Amount of Communication					Would more communication help? (yes or no)
	Every Day	Once a week	Once or Twice a Month	Once a Sum-mer	Never
With other sponsors
With your site directors
With other site directors
With site monitors
With state program staff
With USDA

(23A) ABOUT HOW OFTEN DO YOU COMMUNICATE WITH OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE SFSP PRIOR TO THE SUMMER SEASON? DO YOU THINK THAT ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATION WITH ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PRIOR TO THE SUMMER SEASON WOULD MAKE YOUR SFSP STRONGER?

	Amount of Communication since Last Summer			Would more communication help? (yes or no)
	Never	Occasionally (Less than 5 times)	Often (5 times or more)
With other sponsors
With your site directors
With other site directors
With site monitors
With state program staff
With USDA

CONCERNS

24. FOLLOWING ARE SOME OF THE CONCERNS SPONSORS REPORT ABOUT THE SFSP. PLEASE SPECIFY HOW PROBLEMATIC EACH OF THE FOLLOWING WAS FOR YOU. USE A 1-5 SCALE, WITH 1 BEING THE MOST PROBLEMATIC, 5 THE LEAST PROBLEMATIC. SELECT NA IF THIS WAS NOT A CONCERN FOR YOU.

Concerns/Problems	1	2	3	4	5	NA
Reimbursement/administrative fees
SFSP application requirements
SFSP reporting requirements
Lack of vehicles to move food.
Lack of equipment to move food.
Little freedom in terms of what we serve at meals
SFSP monitoring requirements
40% requirement only lasts for 2 years
Lack of staff
Staff turnover
Staff training
Food preparation
Extensive administrative or operational regulations
Requirement for summer-long menus

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for reimbursement/ administrative fees, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(24A) IN WHAT WAYS WERE REIMBURSEMENT/ADMINISTRATIVE RATES A PROBLEM?

___ Are too low and do not cover actual expenses

___ Only reimburse 2% for second servings

___ Do not cover transportation costs needed to reach distant areas

___ Do not provide enough reimbursement for paperwork

___ Do not provide enough money to pay staff wages

___ Other (specify_____________________)

Only for those sponsors who had sites that dropped out.

25. FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF SITES THAT DROPPED OUT OF SFSP DURING THE PAST 5 YEARS. PLEASE SPECIFY THE MAIN REASON(S) THEY DID SO. [SITE NAMES WILL BE EXTRACTED FROM THE PEARS DATABASE AND PRESENTED TO THE RESPONDENT].

Site Name (PEARS)	Year Dropped Out (PEARS)	Reason Dropped Out
Site Name 1	2003
Site Name 2	2003
Site Name 3	2004
Site Name 4	2005

PARTNERS

26. DO YOU NOW/DID YOU EVER HAVE ANY LOCAL PARTNERS?

___ No

___ Yes

27. DO YOU NOW/DID YOU EVER HAVE ANY NON-LOCAL PARTNERS?

___ No

___ Yes

Sponsors who answer “No” to Q26 and Q27 will skip to Q30.

28. ARE THERE ANY PARTNERS (LOCAL OR NON-LOCAL) THAT YOU COLLABORATED WITH PRIOR TO 2005, BUT WHOM YOU DO NOT COLLABORATE WITH NOW?

___ No GO TO Q29

___ Yes (f yes)

(28A) WHO ARE THEY? ______________________________

(28B) WHY DO YOU NO LONGER COLLABORATE WITH THEM?

_______________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

The following questions will only be shown if the sponsor was active during the relevant time periods. Sponsors active only in 2002 or 2003 will skip directly to Q30.

Sponsors active in 2005 and 2006 will be shown both parts of Q29; sponsors active in 2006, but not 2005, will only see “Importance in 2006.”

29. SPECIFY THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH PARTNER’S CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR SFSP IN 2006, ADDING ANY ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS THAT ARE NOT LISTED. ENTER “1” FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THAT PARTNER, “2” FOR THE 2^ND MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION, ETC. NOTE WHETHER PARTNER ACTIVITIES/SUPPORT INCREASED OR DECREASED FROM 2005 TO 2006. ENTER NA IF YOUR PARTNERS WERE NOT INVOLVED IN SOME OF THESE ACTIVITIES.

Partner Activities/Support	Importance in 2006	Change in Activities/Support between 2005 and 2006
		Increased in 2006	No change in 2006	Decreased in 2006
Volunteer time
Raise funds
Recruit sites
Take part in general marketing
Outreach to sites
Outreach to children and families
Other (specify______________)
Other (specify______________)
Other (specify______________)

Sponsors active in 2004 and 2005 will be shown both parts of Q29a; sponsors active in 2005, but not 2004, will only see “Importance in 2005.”

(29A) SPECIFY THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH PARTNER’S CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR SFSP IN 2005, ADDING ANY ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS THAT ARE NOT LISTED. ENTER “1” FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THAT PARTNER, “2” FOR THE 2^ND MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION, ETC. NOTE WHETHER PARTNER ACTIVITIES/SUPPORT INCREASED OR DECREASED FROM 2004 TO 2005. ENTER NA IF YOUR PARTNERS WERE NOT INVOLVED IN SOME OF THESE ACTIVITIES.

Partner Activities/Support	Importance in 2005	Change in Activities between 2004 and 2005
		Increased in 2005	No change in 2005	Decreased 2005
Volunteer time
Raise funds
Recruit sites
SFSP Marketing
Outreach to sites
Outreach to children and families
Other (specify______________)
Other (specify______________)
Other (specify______________)

Sponsors active in 2004 will see Q29b.

(29B) SPECIFY THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH PARTNER’S CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR SFSP IN 2004, ADDING ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS IF THEY ARE NOT LISTED. ENTER “1” FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THAT PARTNER, “2” FOR THE 2^ND MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION, ETC.

Partner Activities/Support	Importance in 2004
Volunteer time
Raise funds
Recruit sites
SFSP Marketing
Outreach to sites
Outreach to children and families
Other (specify______________)
Other (specify______________)

30. DO YOU MAKE ANY SPECIAL EFFORTS TO RECRUIT PARTNERS?

___ No

___ Yes (If yes) (30a) What do you do? ____________________

31. PLEASE PROVIDE SUGGESTIONS FOR GETTING COMMUNITY MEMBERS INVOLVED IN THE SFSP?

_________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

BUDGET AND FUNDING SOURCES

32. HOW MUCH OF THE COST OF ADMINISTERING AND MANAGING THE SFSP (INCLUDING SPONSOR AND ALL SITE COSTS) WAS NOT COVERED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SFSP FUNDING?

___ 2004

___ 2005

___ 2006

Pilot test: half to provide $ amount; half to provide %

33. DO YOU HAVE A BUDGET FOR MARKETING THE SFSP?

___ No

___ Yes (If yes) (33a) How much money did you allocate to marketing SFSP?

___ 2004

___ 2005

___ 2006

34. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF THESE MARKETING EFFORTS? CHECK ALL THAT PROVIDED ANY FUNDING.

Funding Sources for Marketing Costs	2006	2005	2004
My organization
Partners (Specify __________)
Partners (Specify __________)
Individuals
Other (specify_______________)

35. (IF MORE THAN ONE FUNDING SOURCE WAS SELECTED IN ANY TIME PERIOD, SHOW THIS SOURCE.) WHICH OF THESE PROVIDED THE MOST FUNDS FOR YOUR MARKETING EFFORTS? ___

36. HAVE YOU ATTEMPTED TO ATTRACT FUNDING FROM PRIVATE COMPANIES?

___ No

___ Yes

STAFF

37. THINKING ABOUT ALL OF THE PEOPLE, INCLUDING YOURSELF, WORKING TO ADMINISTER THE SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM (SFSP), NOT INCLUDING THE OPERATION OF THE FOOD SITES, HOW MUCH TIME IS SPENT ON SFSP ACTIVITIES. IS THIS PAID TIME OR VOLUNTEER? USE THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLE AS A GUIDE.

Staff Position	Amount of time		Paid	Volunteer
	During Summer	Rest of Year
Director	3/4 time	1 /4 time	
Assistant	Full time	10 % time	
Driver (to deliver food to sites)	1/2 time	No time		

38. ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY OTHER PROGRAMS THAT OFFER SUMMER FOOD PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN IN YOUR AREA, OTHER THAN THE SFSP?

___ No

___ Yes

(38A) APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY CHILDREN ATTEND THESE OTHER PROGRAMS EACH SUMMER?_______

(38B) WHO DO THESE PROGRAMS TARGET? (E.G., ARE THEY ELEMENTARY AGE? MIGRANTS? DO THEY PROVIDE SPECIAL ARTS PROGRAMS? SPORTS PROGRAMS? RELIGIOUS PROGRAMS?) _______________________________________________________________

(38C) WHY DO YOU THINK THESE CHILDREN ATTEND THOSE PROGRAMS RATHER THAN THE SFSP?

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Position: ________________________________________________________

Date: ______/______/2006