Site Survey

Burden Statement for Site Supervisor Survey

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0584-XXXX. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

SURVEY INSTRUMENTS

SURVEY 2: SITE SUPERVISOR SURVEY

The following information will be extracted from PEARS and presented:

The Pennsylvania Department of Education lists your address as:

Site name: __________________________________________________________________

Address 1:___________________________________________________________________

Address 2:___________________________________________________________________

City: _____________________________________ Zip code: _________________________

1. IS THIS THE EXACT LOCATION WHERE YOU SERVE MEALS?

___ Yes GO TO Q2

___ No (If no, Provide the correct information below.)

If you do not have a street address, please describe your location. For example, “we serve meals at the Briarwood Community Park,” or we serve meals at the northwest corner of Thompson Park and Main Street.”

If you provide meals at a park or playground, provide as much detail as possible, including the names of at least 2 cross-streets for the park: “Creek Park near Hampshire Avenue and Center Street.”

Site name: _________________________________________

Address 1:_________________________________________

Address 2:_________________________________________

City: ____________________________ Zip code: _________

No street address:

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

Information on whether active sites were “new” in 2005 or 2006 will be extracted and used to determine skip patterns.

___ 2005, new site ___ 2006, new site ___ 2006, not a new site

Information on when a site joined the SFSP and the years it was active will be extracted from the PEARS database and used to determine skip patterns.

___ 2004 or earlier ___ 2005 ___ 2006

2. WHAT TYPE OF ORGANIZATION ARE YOU?

___ School district

___ Non-profit

___ Religious-based

___ Community action program

___ Other non-profit (Specify____________________)

___ Government agency

___ State

___ County

___ City

___ Other (Specify ____________)

___ Private (Specify ____________).

Extract information from PEARS as to how the site determined its SFSP eligibility.

3. ACCORDING TO OUR RECORDS, THE BASIS OF YOUR SFSP DETERMI-NATION IN 2006 WAS PEARS METHOD. WHY DID YOU SELECT THIS METHOD?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Present the following question only for those sites that used one eligibility determination method in 2005 and another in 2006.

(3A) ACCORDING TO OUR RECORDS, THE BASIS OF YOUR SFSP DETERMINATION IN 2005 WAS PEARS METHOD FOR 2005, WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN THE BASIS OF YOUR SFSP DETERMINATION IN 2006. WHY DID YOU MAKE THIS CHANGE IN ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION METHODS? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Present the following question only for those sites that used one eligibility determination method in 2005 (or 2006 if it was not active in 2005) and another in 2004 if site was active in both years.

(3B) ACCORDING TO OUR RECORDS, THE BASIS OF YOUR SFSP DETERMINATION IN 2005 WAS PEARS METHOD FOR 2005 AND THE BASIS OF YOUR SFSP DETERMINATION IN 2004 WAS PEARS METHOD FOR 2004. WHY DID YOU MAKE THIS CHANGE IN ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION METHODS?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. IF SITE QUALIFIED UNDER THE NEW 40% CRITERION, DID YOU BECOME A SITE BECAUSE OF THE NEW ELIGIBILITY CRITERION (40% OF THE CHILDREN ARE LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS WITH 185% OF THE POVERTY LEVEL)?

___ No GO TO Q6

___ Yes

5. WOULD YOUR SITE HAVE QUALIFIED UNDER THE 50% CRITERION HAD YOU USED ANOTHER METHOD TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY?

___ No GO TO Q6.

___ Yes GO TO Q5a

___ Don’t know GO TO Q6.

(5A) WOULD YOU HAVE APPLIED FOR ELIGIBILITY HAD THE 50% CRITERION BEEN THE REQUIREMENT?

___ No (If no) (5b) Why not? _______________________________ GO TO Q6

___ Yes GO TO OQ5c

___ Don’t know GO TO Q6

(5C) WHAT ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY COULD YOU HAVE USED?

___ Open GO TO 5d

___ Enrolled-income applications collected GO TO6

___ Enrolled, eligibility provided by school or other child nutrition program GO TO 6

___ Residential camp GO TO 6

___ National Youth Sports Program GO TO 6

___ Migrant site GO TO 6

(5D) WHAT TYPE OF “OPEN” CRITERION WOULD YOU HAVE USED?

___ School data

___ Housing data

___ Census track/block

___ Children’s eligibility area

6. HOW DID YOU LEARN ABOUT THE SFSP?

	Way learned about SFSP
Direct mailings from sponsors
Local newspaper
Newsletters
Outreach by others in the community
Presentations by sponsors
Flyers posted in the community
Word of mouth
Other (Specify_________________________)
Other (Specify_________________________)

7. HOW DID YOU GO ABOUT ESTABLISHING YOUR SFSP SITES?

___ We had an existing program that served children and our sponsor approached us about becoming an SFSP site.

___ We had an existing program that served children and we approached our sponsor about becoming an SFSP site.

___ This was a new site instituted because of the SFSP.

___ Other (Specify_____________________)

8. PLEASE DESCRIBE ANY OBSTACLES TO OPENING YOUR SITE? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ATTENDANCE

9. WHAT IS/WAS THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN YOU SERVED EACH DAY?

___ 2004

___ 2005

___ 2006

10. WHAT IS THE LOWEST NUMBER OF CHILDREN YOU SERVED ON ANY ONE DAY IN 2006? _______

11. WHAT IS THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF CHILDREN YOU SERVED ON ANY ONE DAY IN 2006? _______

(11A) WHAT DO YOU DO IF MORE CHILDREN THAN YOU PLAN FOR SHOW UP? __________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

12. DID THE SAME CHILDREN COME EVERYDAY? OR DID DIFFERENT CHILDREN COME EVERY DAY?

	2006	2005	2004
Mostly the same children
Mostly different children

13. HOW MANY CHILDREN OF DIFFERENT AGES ATTENDED YOUR SFSP IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING YEARS?

Age	2006	2005	2004
Less than 5 years
5-8 years
9-12 years
13-15 years
16-18 years

14. HOW MANY GIRLS AND BOYS ATTENDED THE SFSP? [NOTE: in the pilot test, half of those responding will be offered the option of entering percents, and half the option of entering numbers and make our decision regarding which should be used in the surveys based on their completion rates and feedback.]

Gender	2006	2005	2004
Girls
Boys

15. HOW MANY CHILDREN OF DIFFERENT RACES/ETHNICITIES ATTENDED THE SFSP?

Race/Ethnicity	2006	2005	2004
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Hispanic or Latino
DK

16. HOW MANY MIGRANT CHILDREN ATTEND YOUR SFSP?

	2006	2005	2004
Migrant children

Ask only if migrants attended the SFSP.

(16A) WHAT TYPE OF MIGRANTS DO YOU SERVE? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY.)

___ Traditional migrants who move from place to place, following the crops

___ Migrants that work year-round, e.g., chicken and fish processing plant migrants

___ Seasonal farm workers who stay for a full season, e.g., summer, but return to a home base in winter (e.g., Texas)

17. DO YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY EITHER “GETTING THE WORD OUT” OR GETTING CHILDREN OF DIFFERENT AGES TO ATTEND THE SFSP?

Age	Getting the word out	Getting children to Attend	Why?
Less than 5 years
5-8 years
9-12 years
13-15 years
16-18 years

(17A) WHAT ABOUT BY GENDER? IS IT HARDER TO GET THE WORD OUT TO BOYS OR GIRLS TO ATTEND THE SFSP?

Age	Getting the word out	Getting children to Attend	Why?
Girls
Boys

(17B) WHAT ABOUT BY RACE/ETHNICITY? IS IT HARDER TO GET THE WORD OUT TO CHILDREN OF SOME RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUPS?

Race/Ethnicity	Getting the word out	Getting children to Attend	Why?
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African American
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Hispanic or Latino

(17C) SOME SITES REPORT THAT THE FOLLOWING CHILDREN ARE ALSO DIFFICULT TO REACH. DO YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY EITHER “GETTING THE WORD OUT” OR GETTING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CHILDREN TO ATTEND THE SFSP? WHAT ABOUT ANY OTHER CHILDREN?

Hard-to-reach children	Getting the word out	Getting children to Attend	Why?
Home-schooled
Special needs
Children with disabilities
Migrant children
Other (Specify_________)
Other (Specify_________)

18. FOLLOWING ARE SOME MARKETING TECHNIQUES USED BY SITES TO RECRUIT CHILDREN TO THE SFSP. PLEASE SPECIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANY OF THESE EFFORTS IN RECRUITING CHILDREN ON A SCALE OF 1-5, WITH 1 BEING THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND 5 BEING THE LEAST EFFECTIVE METHOD. CHECK NA, IF YOU DID NOT USE A SPECIFIC TECHNIQUE.

Children Recruitment Techniques	Effectiveness					NA
	1	2	3	4	5
Direct mailings
Local newspaper
Newsletters
Outreach by others in the community
Presentations to local non-profits
Posting flyers throughout community
Word of mouth
Other (Specify_______________________)
Other (Specify_______________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Direct Mailings, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(18A) WHERE DO YOU SEND YOUR DIRECT MAILINGS?

___ To churches

___ To families

___ To schools

___ To daycare centers

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

___ To other groups (Specify _________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Local Newspaper, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(18B) HOW DID YOU USE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS?

___ Article in newspaper

___ Advertisement

___ Press releases

___ Other (Specify__________________________)

___ Other (Specify__________________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Newsletters, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(18C) WHAT TYPES OF NEWSLETTERS DID YOU USE?

___ School district

___ Churches

___ Food bank

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for Outreach by others in the community, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”

(18D) WHO TOOK PART IN THESE OUTREACH EFFORTS?

___ Churches

___ Private partners

___ Public partners

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

___ Other (Specify _____________________)

SFSP ENHANCEMENTS

19. FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF SOME THINGS THAT SITES HAVE USED TO ENHANCE THEIR SFSP AND THEREBY LOWER COST AND/OR ATTRACT AND RETAIN CHILDREN TO THE PROGRAM. PLEASE CHECK THOSE THAT YOUR SITE HAS USED AND NOTE WHICH HAVE BEEN THE MOST USEFUL.

	Used by Sites	Most Useful
Federal transportation grant
State-provided marketing materials
Incentives from local produce purveyors
WIC marketing
Free commodities from the USDA
Reaching out to federal title programs early in summer at elementary school
Large banners announcing the program
Money for special events to draw out the children
State grant money to sponsors/sites to experiment with new techniques to reach children
State campaign to introduce the program
Other (Specify_______________________)
Other (Specify_______________________)
Other (Specify_______________________)

(19A) ARE THERE ANY OTHER THINGS THAT YOU HAVE NOT TRIED, BUT THAT YOU THINK MIGHT HELP? ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

OTHER ACTIVITIES

20. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES WERE AVAILABLE AT YOUR SFSP SITE, AND HOW IMPORTANT WERE THEY?

	Year			Importance for Getting Children to Take Part in SFSP
Activities	2006	2005	2004	Very Impor-tant	Some-what Impor-tant	Not Very Impor-tant	Very Unim-portant
Unstructured playground
Structured playground
Swimming pool
Playing fields (e.g., baseball)
Day camp
Music
Arts and crafts
Academics
Sports
Other (Specify______________)
Other (Specify______________)
Other (Specify______________)
Other (Specify______________)

(20A) FOR EACH ACTIVITY NOT CHECKED IN 2006, BUT CHECKED IN EITHER 2005 OR 2005 (20A) WHY DID YOU DROP THIS ACTIVITY?

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

MEALS

21. ABOUT HOW MANY CHILDREN, ON AVERAGE, RECEIVED THESE MEALS EACH DAY?

Type Meal	2006	2005	2004
Breakfast
Lunch
Dinner
Morning snack
Afternoon snack

22. WHAT TYPE OF MEALS DID YOU SERVE?

Type Meal	2006	2005	2004
Hot
Cold
Both hot and cold

23. DID YOU MAKE ANY SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES TO YOUR MENUS IN THESE YEARS?

Menu Changes	2006	2005	2004
Yes
No

(23A) IF “YES” TO ANY YEAR, SHOW THE YEAR THAT CHANGES WERE MADE, AND IN WHAT WAYS CHANGES WERE MADE

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

24. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHETHER YOUR LUNCHES AND DINNERS WERE MOSTLY “LIGHT” OR MOSTLY “FULL” BY PLACING AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE CATEGORY. IF YOU DID NOT SERVE LUNCH OR DINNER FOR ANY OF THESE YEARS, SELECT NA.

[An example of a “light meal” might be a ham sandwich, an apple, juice or milk.]

[An example of a “full meal” might be turkey with gravy, mashed potatoes, peas, juice or milk, desert.]

	2006			2005			2004
	Light Meals	Full Meals	NA	Light Meals	Full Meals	NA	Light Meals	Full Meals	NA
Breakfast
Lunch
Dinner

(24A) IF THERE WERE ANY CHANGES FROM EITHER 2005 TO 2006 OR FROM 2004 TO 2005 WHY DID YOU MAKE THE CHANGES? ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

25. HOW IMPORTANT DO YOU THINK THE ACTUAL MEAL WAS IN GETTING CHILDREN TO TAKE PART IN THE SFSP?

___ Very important

___ Somewhat important

___ Not very important

___ Very unimportant

TRANSPORTATION

26. HOW DO THE CHILDREN WHO ATTEND YOUR PROGRAM GET TO THE SITE?

___ % are driven by a parent or relative

___ % are driven by a non-related person

___ % walk to the site on their own

___ % walk to the site with someone older

___ % ride a bicycle

___ % ride a bus

___ % don’t know

(26A) IF ANYTHING OTHER THAN 0% IS ENTERED FOR “RIDE A BUS” (26A) WHO OPERATES THE BUS?

___ The site

___ A partner organization

___ Public transportation

27. PLEASE ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN WHO LIVE

___ Within 1 mile of the SFSP

___ 1-5 miles

___ 5-10 miles

___ More than 5 miles

___ DK

28. HOW IMPORTANT DO YOU THINK THE DISTANCE FROM HOME TO THE SITE WAS IN GETTING CHILDREN TO TAKE PART IN THE SFSP?

___ Very important

___ Somewhat important

___ Not very important

___ Very unimportant

29. HOW OFTEN DO YOU COMMUNICATE WITH OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE SFSP DURING THE SUMMER SEASON? DO YOU THINK THAT ADDITIONAL WITH ANY OF THE FOLLOWING DURING THE SUMMER SEASON WOULD MAKE YOUR SFSP STRONGER?

	Amount of Communication					Would more communication help? (yes or no)
	Every Day	Once a week	Once or Twice a Month	Once a summer	Never
With your sponsor
With other sponsors
With other site directors
With site monitors
With state program staff
With USDA

(29A) HOW OFTEN DO YOU COMMUNICATE WITH OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE SFSP PRIOR TO THE SUMMER SEASON? DO YOU THINK THAT ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATION WITH ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PRIOR TO THE SUMMER SEASON WOULD MAKE YOUR SFSP STRONGER?

	Amount of Communication
	Never	Occasionally (Less than 5 times)	Often (5 times or more)	Would more communication help? (yes or no)
With your sponsor
With other sponsors
With site directors
With site monitors
With state program staff
With USDA

30. FOLLOWING ARE SOME CONCERNS SITES REPORT ABOUT THE SFSP. PLEASE SPECIFY HOW PROBLEMATIC EACH OF THE FOLLOWING WAS FOR YOU. USE A 1-5 SCALE, WITH 1 BEING THE MOST PROBLEMATIC, 5 THE LEAST PROBLEMATIC. SELECT NA IF THIS WAS NOT A CONCERN FOR YOU.

Concerns/Problems	1	2	3	4	5	NA
Reimbursement/administrative fees
SFSP application requirements
SFSP reporting requirements
Lack of vehicles to move food.
Lack of equipment to move food.
Little freedom in terms of what we serve at meals
SFSP monitoring requirements
40% requirement only lasts for 2 years
Lack of staff
Staff turnover
Staff training
Food preparation
Extensive administrative or operational regulations
Requirement for summer-long menus

(The following will be displayed only if respondent checks off 1-5 for reimbursement/ administrative fees, i.e., it will not be displayed if respondent selects “NA.”)

(30A) IN WHAT WAYS WERE REIMBURSEMENT/ADMINISTRATIVE FEES A PROBLEM?

___ Are too low and do not cover actual expenses

___ Only reimburse 2% for second servings

___ Does not cover transportation costs needed to reach distant areas

___ Does not provide enough reimbursement for paperwork

___ Does not provide enough money to pay staff wages

___ Other (specify_____________________)

PARTNERS

31. DO YOU NOW/DID YOU EVER HAVE ANY LOCAL PARTNERS?

___ No

___ Yes

32. DO YOU NOW/DID YOU EVER HAVE ANY NON-LOCAL PARTNERS?

___ No

___ Yes

(Sponsors who answer “No” to Q30 and Q31 will skip to Q35.)

33. ARE THERE ANY PARTNERS (LOCAL OR NON-LOCAL) THAT YOU COLLABORATED WITH PRIOR TO 2005, BUT WHOM YOU DO NOT COLLABORATE WITH NOW?

___ No

___ Yes (f yes)

(33A) WHO ARE THEY? __________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

(33B) WHY DO YOU NO LONGER COLLABORATE WITH THEM? ____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

(The following questions will only be shown if the site was active during the relevant time periods. Sites active in 2005 and 2006 will see both parts of Q34. Sites active in 2006, but not in 2005, will only see “Importance in 2006.”)

34. SPECIFY THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH PARTNER’S CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR SFSP IN 2006, ADDING ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS IF THEY ARE NOT LISTED. ENTER “1” FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THAT PARTNER, “2” FOR THE 2^ND MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION, ETC. NOTE WHETHER PARTNER ACTIVITIES/SUPPORT INCREASED OR DECREASED FROM 2005 TO 2006. ENTER NA IF YOUR PARTNERS WERE NOT INVOLVED IN SOME OF THESE ACTIVITIES.

Partner Activities/Support	Importance in 2006	Change in Activities/Support between 2005 and 2006
		Increased in 2006	No change in 2006	Decreased in 2006
Volunteer time
Raise funds
Recruit sites
Take part in general marketing
Outreach to sites
Outreach to children and families
Other (specify______________)
Other (specify______________)
Other (specify______________)

(Sites active in 2004 and 2005 will see both parts of Q34a. Sites active in 2005, but not 2004, will only see “Importance in 2005.”)

(34A) SPECIFY THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH PARTNER’S CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR SFSP IN 2005, ADDING ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS IF THEY ARE NOT LISTED. ENTER “1” FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THAT PARTNER, “2” FOR THE 2^ND MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION, ETC. NOTE WHETHER PARTNER ACTIVITIES/SUPPORT INCREASED OR DECREASED FROM 2004 TO 2005. ENTER NA IF YOUR PARTNERS WERE NOT INVOLVED IN SOME OF THESE ACTIVITIES.

Partner Activities/Support	Importance in 2005	Change in Activities/Support between 2005 and 2006
		Increased in 2005	No change in 2005	Decreased in 2005
Volunteer time
Raise funds
Recruit sites
Take part in general marketing
Outreach to sites
Outreach to children and families
Other (specify_________)
Other (specify_________)
Other (specify_________)

(Sites active in 2004 will see Q34b.)

(34B) SPECIFY THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH PARTNER’S CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR SFSP IN 2004, ADDING ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS IF THEY ARE NOT LISTED. ENTER “1” FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THAT PARTNER, “2” FOR THE 2^ND MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION, ETC.

Partner Activities/Support	Importance in 2004
Volunteer time
Raise funds
Recruit sites
SFSP Marketing
Outreach to sites
Outreach to children and families
Other (specify_______________)
Other (specify_______________)

35. DO YOU MAKE ANY SPECIAL EFFORTS TO RECRUIT PARTNERS?

___ No

___ Yes (If yes) (35a) What do you do? ____________________

36. PLEASE PROVIDE SUGGESTIONS FOR GETTING COMMUNITY MEMBERS INVOLVED IN THE SFSP? ___________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

37. HOW MUCH OF THE COST OF ADMINISTERING AND MANAGING THE SFSP WAS NOT COVERED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SFSP FUNDING? IN THE PILOT, HALF WILL BE ASKED TO PROVIDE PERCENTS AND HALF WILL BE ASKED TO PROVIDE DOLLAR AMOUNTS.

___ 2004

___ 2005

___ 2006

38. DO YOU HAVE A BUDGET FOR MARKETING THE SFSP TO FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN IN YOUR AREA?

___ No

___ Yes (If yes, GO TO Q38A)

(38A) HOW MUCH DID YOU ALLOCATE FOR MARKETING SFSP? IN THE PILOT, HALF WILL BE ASKED TO PROVIDE PERCENTS AND HALF WILL BE ASKED TO PROVIDE DOLLAR AMOUNTS.

___ 2004

___ 2005

___ 2006

39. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF THESE MARKETING EFFORTS? CHECK ALL THAT PROVIDED ANY FUNDING.

Funding Sources for Marketing Costs	2006	2005	2004
My organization
Partners (Specify __________)
Partners (Specify __________)
Individuals
Other (specify_______________)

*(39a) (If more than one funding source was selected in any time period, show this source.) Which of the funding sources provided the most funds for your marketing efforts? ___________________________________________

40. HAVE YOU ATTEMPTED TO ATTRACT FUNDING FROM PRIVATE COMPANIES?

___ No

___ Yes

STAFF

41. THINKING ABOUT ALL OF THE PEOPLE, INCLUDING YOURSELF, WORKING TO ADMINISTER THE SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM (SFSP), HOW MUCH TIME IS SPENT ON SFSP ACTIVITIES. IS THIS PAID TIME OR VOLUNTEER? USE THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLE AS A GUIDE.

Staff Position	Amount of time		Paid	Volunteer
	During Summer	Rest of Year
Director	3/4 time	1 /4 time	
Assistant	Full time	10 % time	
Driver (to deliver food to sites)	1/2 time	No time		

42. ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY OTHER PROGRAMS THAT OFFER SUMMER FOOD PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN IN YOUR AREA, OTHER THAN THE SFSP?

___ No

___ Yes (If yes)

(42A) APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY CHILDREN ATTEND THESE OTHER PROGRAMS EACH SUMMER?___

(42B) WHO DO THESE PROGRAMS TARGET? (E.G., ARE THEY ELEMENTARY AGE? MIGRANTS? DO THEY PROVIDE SPECIAL ARTS PROGRAMS? SPORTS PROGRAMS? RELIGIOUS PROGRAMS?) ______________________________

(42C) WHY DO YOU THINK THESE CHILDREN ATTEND THOSE PROGRAMS RATHER THAN THE SFSP? __________________________________________________________________

Position: _________________________________________________________

Date: ______/______/2006

1