"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

Combined Lead -2007

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

OMB: 2535-0114

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

HUD Master Models (2007) Combined Lead


Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control, Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration, and Operation Lead Elimination Action Program (LEAP)


The goal of these programs is to develop and deliver comprehensive programs to identify and control lead-based paint hazards in eligible privately owned housing.

Need Statement


There is a need to mitigate residential lead-based paint hazards that threaten the long-term health of children less than six years of age in single-and multifamily housing by 2010.


Activities and Outputs


Business opportunities- Other-Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities-Other-Dollars

Dollars

Business opportunities-Section 3-Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities-Section 3-Dollars

Dollars

Clearance

Units cleared

Community outreach to targeted population-Events

Events

Community outreach to targeted population-Persons

Persons

Employment opportunities- Other-Available jobs

Available jobs

Employment opportunities- Other-Persons

Persons

Employment opportunities-Section 3-Available jobs

Available jobs

Employment opportunities-Section 3-Persons

Persons

Historic preservation

Units

Housing enrollment

Units

Intake

Units

Lead hazard costs

Average $$/unit

Lead safe certified employees

Persons

Lead screening-blood lead levels

Children

Outreach materials disseminated-English

Materials

Outreach materials disseminated-LEP

LEP Materials

Referrals to medical follow-up

Children

Resources leveraged

$$/materials labor

Risk assessment/LBP Inspection

Units

Training Opportunities-Other-Persons

Persons

Training Opportunities-Other-Sessions

Sessions

Training Opportunities-Section-Persons

Persons

Training Opportunities-Section-Sessions

Sessions

Other

Other



Outcomes and Indicators

Business opportunities- Other-Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities-Other-Dollars

Dollars

Business opportunities-Section 3-Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities-Section 3-Dollars

Dollars

Decreased blood lead levels

Children

Employment opportunities-Other-Available jobs

Available jobs

Employment opportunities-Other-Persons

Persons

Employment opportunities-Section 3-Persons

Available jobs

Increase in lead safe certified employees

Persons

Increased lead safe affordable housing

Units

Increased training-lead safe certification

Persons

Leveraged funds to awarded funds

Percent

Program waiting lists

Units

Sustainable community lead control programs

Programs

Training Opportunities-Other

Persons

Training Opportunities-Section 3

Persons

Other

Other



Evaluation Process – These are standard requirements that HUD will expect every program manager receiving a grant to do as part of their project management.

  • An evaluation process will be part of the on-going management of the program.

  • Comparisons will be made between projected and actual numbers for both outputs and outcomes.

  • Deviations from projected outputs and outcomes will be documented and explained.

  • Analysis of data to determine the relationship of outputs to outcomes; what outputs produce which outcomes.


HUD Will Use The Following Questions To Evaluate Your Program


  1. How many children were screened?

  2. How many children were identified with unsafe blood lead levels?

  3. How many children with unsafe blood lead levels were referred for medical follow-up?

  4. How many children experienced a decrease in their blood lead levels?

  5. How many housing units were assessed?

  6. How many housing units were identified with lead-based paint hazards?

  7. How many housing units were cleared/remediated free of lead-based paint hazards?

  8. How many homes were in historic preservation districts?

  9. How many additional dollars from other sources were leveraged to support your lead program?

  10. What percentage of leveraged funds to all funds was used for your lead program?

  11. What in-kind or donated labor or materials were contributed to support your community lead control program(s)? If yes, please assign a dollar value to the in-kind or donated labor or materials.

  12. Did the leveraging of funds and contribution of in-kind and donated materials and services yield a sustainable community lead control program(s)? If not, why?

  13. How many persons were trained to perform lead hazard control, reduction and elimination work?

  14. How many persons are certified to perform lead hazard control, reduction and elimination work?

  15. How many Section 3 persons are certified to perform lead hazard control, reduction and elimination work?

  16. How many certified persons are employed to perform lead hazard control, reduction and elimination work?

  17. How many Section 3 certified persons are employed to perform lead hazard control, reduction and elimination work?

  18. Was there an increase in the number of certified persons employed to perform lead hazard control, reduction and elimination work?

  19. Was there an increase in the number of Section 3 certified persons employed to perform lead hazard control, reduction and elimination work?


Carter-Richmond Methodology


The above Management Questions developed for your program are based on the Carter-Richmond Methodology1. A description of the Carter-Richmond Methodology appears in the General Section of the NOFA.


1© The Accountable Agency – How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Public and Private Programs,” Reginald Carter, ISBN Number 9780978724924.


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleHUD Master Model
AuthorHUD
Last Modified ByLoyd LaMois
File Modified2007-01-19
File Created2006-09-12

© 2025 OMB.report | Privacy Policy