Pre-approved, pending publication of the final rule. Submit another ICR within seven days of that final rule's publication noting whether or not the collection is changed from that proposed and, if so, how.
1. Although the proposed rule was published 8/29/2006, this ICR was not submitted until a half year afterward. That was not only inconsistent with the published statement of an ICR being submitted to OMB, but prevented review of the information collection shortly after the comment period.
2. Moreover, the published request comment excluded the statorily required mention of the four aspects of the collection for which comment was being sought: (1) need for information, (2) its practical utility, (3) accuracy of burden estimate, and (4) ways to minimize burden.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
04/30/2010
36 Months From Approved
384
0
0
576
0
0
0
0
0
The proposed rule addresses the potential for increased congestion and delay at LaGuardia Airport when the HDR expires.
US Code:
49 USC 40103
Name of Law: Sovereignty and use of airspace
This is a new collection, therefore it is a program change.
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
John Chescavage 202 267-9783
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.