Download:
pdf |
pdfSUPPORTING STATEMENT
Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to
Customer Information and Customer Notice
(OMB Control No. 1550-0110)
A.
JUSTIFICATION
1.
Circumstances and Need
On March 29, 2005, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System (Board), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and
Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) (collectively, the Agencies) published the Interagency
Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to Customer Information and
Customer Notice (70 FR 15736) (Guidance). The Guidance interprets the requirements of
section 501(b) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), 15 U.S.C. 6801, and the Interagency
Guidelines Establishing Information Security Standards (Security Guidelines)1 to include the
development and implementation of a response program to address unauthorized access to or use
of customer information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to a customer.
The Guidance states that every financial institution should develop and implement a response
program designed to address incidents of unauthorized access to customer information
maintained by the institution or its service provider, and describes the appropriate elements of a
financial institution’s response program, including customer notification procedures. OTS is
now seeking OMB’s approval to renew this collection of information.
2.
Use of the Information Collected
The collection helps to establish standards for financial institutions relating to administrative,
technical, and physical safeguards to: (1) insure the security and confidentiality of customer
records and information; (2) protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or
integrity of such records; and (3) protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or
information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.
A response program, of which this collection is a critical part, contains policies and procedures
that enable the financial institution to: (a) assess the situation to determine the nature and scope
of the incident, and identify the information systems and types of customer information affected;
(b) notify the institution’s primary Federal regulator and, in accordance with applicable
regulations and guidance, file a Suspicious Activity Report and notify appropriate law
enforcement agencies; (c) take measures to contain and control the incident to prevent further
unauthorized access to or misuse of customer information, including shutting down particular
applications or third party connections, reconfiguring firewalls, changing computer access codes,
and modifying physical access controls; and (d) address and mitigate harm to individual
customers.
1
12 CFR part 570, app. B (OTS).
1
3.
Use of Technology to Reduce Burden
OTS permits and encourages savings associations to use advanced technology in the preparation
of the required information.
4.
Effort to Identify Duplication
The information collection is not duplicative within the meaning of the PRA and OMB
regulations. The collection is unique and covers each institution’s particular circumstances.
5.
Minimizing the Burden on Small Entities
The collection applies to all institutions, regardless of size.
6.
Consequences of Less Frequent Collections
OTS believes that less frequent collection (a less stringent disclosure standard) would result in
unacceptable harm to customers of financial institutions.
7.
Special Circumstances
These information collections are conducted in a manner consistent with the requirements of
5 CFR 1320.
8.
Consultation with Persons Outside the Agency
Notice of intent to renew this information collection was published in the Federal Register on
December 18, 2006 (71 FR 75812). OTS received no comments.
9.
Payment or Gift to Respondents
No payments or gifts are made in connection with this information collection.
10.
Confidentiality
Financial institutions would treat these disclosure requirements with the same degree of
confidentiality as other disclosures of sensitive customer information.
11.
Information of a Sensitive Nature
The disclosure of this information would be limited to account holders.
2
12.
Estimate of Annual Burden
It is estimated that it will initially take institutions 24 hours (three business days) to develop and
produce the notices described in the Guidance and 29 hours per incident to determine which
customers should receive the notice and notify the customers. For the purposes of this analysis,
113 was used as the number of incidents of unauthorized access requiring customer notice under
the Guidance. This is the actual number experienced by covered institutions in 2006.
Thus, the burden associated for this collection of information may be summarized as follows:
Developing Notices: 24 hours x 840 = 20,160 hours
Notifying Customers: 29 hours x 113 = 3,277 hours
Total Estimated Annual Burden = 23,437 hours
Estimate of annualized cost: 23,437 hours x $50/hour = $1,171,850.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden
Not applicable.
14. Annualized Cost to the Federal Government
Negligible.
15. Reason for Program Changes or Adjustments
There is an overall increase of 1,882 hours of total burden. This occurred because, although
there is a decrease in the number of respondents (from 880 to 840), where OTS initially
estimated the number of covered institutions that experienced an incident of unauthorized access
to customer information resulting in customer notification by using two percent of the total
number of covered institutions, OTS is now using the actual number of such institutions for
2006, thus reflecting a net increase in the burden for notifying customers.
16. Publication
Not applicable.
17. Display of Expiration Date
Not applicable.
3
18. Exceptions to Certification
None.
B.
STATISTICAL METHODS
Not applicable.
4
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION |
Author | FDIC |
File Modified | 2007-03-14 |
File Created | 2007-03-14 |