30-day FRN

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Specifically, I take official notice that
following a hearing on September 20–
21, 2005, the Tennessee Board of
Medical Examiners concluded that
Respondent had violated multiple
provisions of Tennessee law, including
Tenn. Code Ann. § 63–6–214(b)(12),
which prohibits, inter alia, ‘‘dispensing,
prescribing or otherwise distributing
any controlled substance or any other
drug not in the course of professional
practice.’’ In re Yeates, Order at 3 (Tenn.
Bd. of Med. Examiners 2005). On
October 12, 2005, the State Board thus
permanently revoked Respondent’s
medical license.2 Id. at 4. Subsequent to
the State Board’s order, DEA has
received no information indicating that
that the order has been set aside on
appeal. Accordingly, I find that
Respondent is not authorized to handle
controlled substances in Tennessee.
DEA does not have statutory authority
under the Controlled Substances Act to
maintain a registration if the registrant
is without state authority to handle
controlled substances in the state in
which he practices. See 21 U.S.C. 823(f),
824(a)(3). DEA has consistently applied
this rule. See James Marvin Goodrich,
M.D., 70 FR 24619 (2005); Dominick A.
Ricci, M.D., 58 FR. 51104 (1993); Bobby
Watts, M.D., 53 FR. 11919 (1988).
Therefore, Respondent is not entitled to
maintain his DEA registration.

Dated: June 13, 2006.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–10780 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
Public Announcement; Pursuant to the
Government in the Sunshine Act
(Public Law 94–409) (5 U.S.C. 552b)
Department of
Justice, United States Parole
Commission.
TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Friday, July 14,
2006.
PLACE: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth
Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The meeting
is being held to discuss the agency’s
budget for Fiscal Year 2008.
AGENCY CONTACT: Thomas W.
Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States
Parole Commission. (301) 492–5959.
AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

Dated: July 6, 2006.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–6154 Filed 7–7–06; 11:17 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–31–M

Order

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 823
and 824, and 28 CFR 0.100(b) & 0.104,
I hereby order that DEA Certificate of
Registration, BY5532076, issued to
Sheran Arden Yeates, M.D., be, and it
hereby is revoked. I further order that
any pending applications for renewal or
modification of such registration be, and
they hereby are, denied. This order is
effective August 10, 2006.

Office of the Secretary

reconsideration of a final order. See Robert A.
Leslie, M.D., 60 FR 14004, 14005 (1995). To allow
Respondent the opportunity to refute the facts of
which I am taking official notice, publication of this
final order shall be withheld for a fifteen-day
period, which shall begin on the date of service.
2 Among the findings of the State Board were that
‘‘Respondent permitted his patients to return
unused prescription medication to his offices,’’ and
that ‘‘Respondent instructed his office staff to place
any returned prescription medication in a storage
chest’’ for ‘‘future use.’’ Id. at 2. The State Board
also found that ‘‘Respondent and his office staff
routinely administered ‘cocktail’ injections to
patients without medical justification[,]’’ and that
‘‘[o]n occasion, * * * Respondent and his office
staff denied patients their maintenance medication
until the patients agreed to receive ‘cocktail’
injections.’’ Id.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:49 Jul 10, 2006

Jkt 208001

Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
July 3, 2006.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of this
ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained by
contacting Darrin King on 202–693–
4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or
e-mail: [email protected].
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Department of Labor, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, 202–395–7316
(this is not a toll-free number), within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:

PO 00000

Frm 00083

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

39131

• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Departmental Management.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Title: Customer Satisfaction Surveys
and Conference Evaluations Generic
Clearance.
OMB Number: 1225–0059.
Frequency: On occasion.
Affected Public: Business and other
for-profit; Individuals or households;
Not-for-profit institutions; Farms;
Federal Government; and State, local, or
tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 200,000.
Estimated Annual Responses:
200,000.
Average Response Time: 6 minutes.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 20,000.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $0.
Description: The Department of Labor
(DOL) conducts a variety of voluntary
Customer Satisfaction Surveys of
regulated/non-regulated entities, which
are specifically designed to gather
information from a customer’s
perspective as prescribed by E.O. 12862,
Setting Customer Service Standards,
September 11, 1993. These Customer
Satisfaction Surveys provide
information on customer attitudes about
the delivery and quality of agency
products/services and are used as part
of an ongoing process to improve DOL
programs. This generic clearance allows
agencies to gather information from both
Federal and non-Federal users.
In addition to conducting Customer
Satisfaction Surveys, the Department
also includes the use of evaluation
forms for those DOL agencies
conducting conferences. These
evaluations are helpful in determining

E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM

11JYN1

39132

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices

the success of the current conference, in
developing future conferences, and in
meeting the needs of the Department’s
product/service users.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–10766 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Information Security Oversight Office;
Public Interest Declassification Board
(PIDB); Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to Section 1102 of the
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 which extended
and modified the Public Interest
Declassification Board (PIDB) as
established by the Public Interest
Declassification Act of 2000 (Pub. L.
106–567, title VII, December 27, 2000,
114 Stat. 2856), announcement is made
for the following committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Public Interest
Declassification Board (PIDB).
Date of Meeting: Friday, July 14, 2006.
Time of Meeting: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Place of Meeting: National Archives and
Records Administration, 700 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Archivist’s Reception Room
(Room 105), Washington, DC 20408.
Purpose: To discuss declassification
program issues.
This meeting will be open to the public.
However, due to space limitations and access
procedures, the name and telephone number
of individuals planning to attend must be
submitted to the Information Security
Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than
Monday, July 10, 2006. ISOO will provide
additional instructions for gaining access to
the location of the meeting.
For Further Information Contact: J. William
Leonard, Director, Information Security
Oversight Office, National Archives Building,
700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20408, telephone number (202) 357–5250.
Dated: July 6, 2006.
William Bosanko,
Acting Director, Information Security
Oversight Office.
[FR Doc. E6–10783 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:49 Jul 10, 2006

Jkt 208001

following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. This is the second notice for public
comment; the first was published in the
Federal Register at 71 FR 4382, and no
comments were received. NSF is
forwarding the proposed renewal
submission to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance
simultaneously with the publication of
this second notice. Comments regarding
(a) whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; or (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collected;
or (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collect techniques or other
forms of information technology should
be addressed to: Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs of OMB,
Attention: Desk Officer for National
Science Foundation, 725–17th Street,
NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503, and to Suzanne Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 295, Arlington,
Virginia 22230 or send e-mail to
[email protected]. Comments regarding
these information collections are best
assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of this
notification. Copies of the submission(s)
may be obtained by calling 703–292–
7556.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton at (703) 292–7556 or
send e-mail to [email protected].
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number
and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the
collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.

PO 00000

Frm 00084

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title of Collection: Evaluation of the
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities Undergraduate Program.
OMB Control No.: 3145-New.
Abstract: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) funded a program,
called Historically Black Colleges and
Universities Undergraduate Program
(HBCU–UP), designed to help
institutions strengthen the quality of
their undergraduate STEM programs.
The Urban Institute is conducting an
evaluation of the HBCU–UP program.
Using a mixed-methods approach, UI
researchers will conduct an evaluation
over three years to study the
effectiveness of the program. The
evaluation will include both process
and summative components. The
process component will document how
different models within the Program are
being implemented, thus helping
evaluators to link strategies to outcomes,
identify crucial components of different
models, and contribute to the
construction of general theories to guide
future initiatives to increase the
diversity of the STEM workforce. The
summative component of the evaluation
will focus on the extent to which the
Program has produced outcomes that
meet stated goals for students, faculty
and institutions. The process evaluation
will rely mainly on qualitative data
collected during case study site visits
and interviews; the summative
evaluation will rely primarily on data
collected through a survey of graduates.
Respondents: Graduates of
undergraduate programs to STEM at
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities awarded an HBCU–UP
grant from NSF.
Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 5,000 (total).
Burden on the Public: 1,250 hours.
Dated: July 6, 2006.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 06–6129 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
National Science Board; Committee on
Strategy and Budget; Sunshine Act
Meeting
July 13, 2006 3 p.m.–4
p.m. (ET).
PLACE: National Science Foundation,
Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Robert Webber, (703) 292–7000. http://
www.nsf.gov/nsb.
DATE AND TIME:

E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM

11JYN1