Revisions to Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, and NESHAP, and NESHAP for Source Categories (Direct Final Rule for Revisions to Consolidated Federal Air Rule)

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
44541	Revisions to Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and NESHAP for for Source Categories		Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2060-0599	ICR Reference No: 200708-2060-002
Status: Historical Inactive	Previous ICR Reference No: 200707-2060-001
Agency/Subagency: EPA/OAR	Agency Tracking No: 2226.03
Title: Revisions to Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, and NESHAP, and NESHAP for Source Categories (Direct Final Rule for Revisions to Consolidated Federal Air Rule)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Preapproved	Conclusion Date: 01/28/2008
	Date Received in OIRA: 08/09/2007
Terms of Clearance: Before this ICR is renewed, the burden hours should be incorporated into ICR 2060-0443, and a nonsubstantive change filed to indicate that the two ICRs (2060-0599 and 2060-0443) are being consolidated into one ICR.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	01/31/2011	06/30/2010	06/30/2010
Responses	6	0	6
Time Burden (Hours)	6	0	6
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The final rule allows source owners and operators to petition the Administrator for an extension of the regulatory deadline to conduct performance tests during force majeure events. A force majeure event is an event caused by circumstances beyond the control of the affected facility, its contractors, or any entity controlled by the affected facility that prevents the owner or operator from complying with the regulatory requirement to conduct performance tests within the specified timeframe despite the affected faciltiy's best efforts to fulfill the obligation. Examples of such events are acts of nature, acts of war or terrorism, or equipment failure or safety hazard beyond the control of the affected facility. Source owners and operators must provide a written description of the event and measures taken to minimize the delay to the EPA for approval. Potential respondents are owners or operators who are required to conduct stack testing to demonstrate compliance with applicable standards under the Consolidated Federal Air Rule (40 CFR Part 65). The potential respondents under the final rule included only owners or operators who are required to conduct stack testing to demonstrate compliance with applicable standards under the Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (40 CFR Part 60), National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR Part 61), and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories (40 CFR Part 63). There is no change in the currently approved burden because these requirements serve as an alternative to those included under the previous ICR.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 42 USC 7401 et seq Name of Law: Clean Air Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
2060-AN84	Final or interim final rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Revisions to Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and NESHAP for for Source Categories

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Request	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	6	6	0	0	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	6	6	0	0	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $435

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 08/09/2007

---