10 CFR Part 52 Crosswalk Table

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

10 CFR Part 52 Final Rulemaking

OMB Clearance Number 3150-0151

Burden Change Explanation Table

Revised June 27, 2007

Prepared By Christopher Colburn

Section	Burden Change Due to Adjustment	Burden Change Due to Program Change	Total Burden Change	Explanation
52.7	360		360	This is an Adjustment because the rule did not change exemptions, but it is anticipated that at least one per year will be requested during this clearance period. Exemptions would have been captured under Part 50 until now.
52.17(a)(1)	3,297		3,297	This is an Adjustment, because the number of respondents for Early Site Permits changed, due to a re-estimation. The number of respondents referencing an ESP will decrease by 1 over the period, while the number of respondents applying for an ESP will increase by 1 over the period. This will affect Sections 52.17 and 52.39.
52.17(b)(1)	7		7	Adjustment. See explanation in 52.17(a)(1).
52.17(b)(2)(ii) & (b)(3)	666		666	Adjustment. See explanation in 52.17(a)(1).
52.17(b)(4)	13		13	Adjustment. See explanation in 52.17(a)(1).
52.17(c)	-632		-632	Adjustment. See explanation in 52.17(a)(1). (Primarily due to drop in number expected respondents from 2 every 3 years to 1 every 3 years.)
52.39(b)	40		40	Adjustment. See explanation in 52.17(a)(1).
52.47	667		667	Adjustment. The requirement to maintain records materialized as a result of this rulemaking. The introductory paragraph to Section 52.47 requires that information normally contained in certain procurement specifications and construction and installation specifications be completed and available for audit if the information is necessary for the Commission to make its safety determination. It was already in Part 52 previously under Section 52.63(c), and has been moved to Section 52.47.
52.47(a)(1)(iv-vii)	-127,968		-127,968	Adjustment. The reduction in burden is a result of a shift of burden from this section to the next two sections (52.47(a) except (a)(6) & (a)(27 and 42.47(a)(27).
52.47(a) except (a)(6) & (a)(27)	55,986		55,986	Adjustment. See explanation in Section 52.47(a)(1)(iv-vii).
52.47(a)(27)	71,982		71,982	Adjustment. See explanation in Section 52.47(a)(1)(iv-vii).
52.47(b)(1)	39,990		39,990	Adjustment. This was shifted from Section 52.47(a)(1) to this section as a result of this rulemaking. It is neither a new requirement nor a policy change.
52.47(a)(1)(ii), (iv), & (v)	-43956		-43,956	Adjustment. This is a result of a reduction of the number of annual responses from 2 every 3 years to zero every 3 years, and also is a result of a failure to count burden for ITAAC under the former 52.79(c).
52.51	-5,332		-5,332	Adjustment. The burden in this section is covered in 52.47(a) (a shift of burden from one section to another.)
52.79(c)	-6,660		-6,660	Adjustment. For all of Section 52.79 and 52.80(a) revisions, there was in increase in the number of annual responses from 2 every 3 years to 4 every 3 years, and an increase in the burden per response from 10,000 to 36,550 hours, partly due to the movement of burden from Part 50.
52.79(d)	182,300		182,300	Adjustment. See explanation in Section 52.79(c)
52.79(b) & (d)	35,404		35,404	Adjustment. See explanation in Section 52.79(c)
52.80(a)	63,330		63,330	Adjustment. See explanation in Section 52.79(c)
52.80(c)	5,700		5,700	Adjustment. This is a movement of a section under a new section number (52.80(c)), which requires a COL application that wishes to be able to perform the activities at the site allowed under 10 CFR 50.10(e) before issuance of the combined license to identify and describe the activities that are requested and propose a plan of redress if the activities are performed and construction is later abandoned. This was covered under Section 52.91 under the current rule, and is now being covered under this section in the revised rulemaking.
App A X.B.1	8		8	Adjustment. There was an increase in the number of annual responses from 0 per year to 1 per year because licensees are finding it easier to reference a design certification. This results from the ease and timeliness of the application, not as a result of a policy or program change.
App A X.B.2	500		500	Adjustment. See explanation in Appendix A, Section X.B.1.
App D X.B.1	21		21	Adjustment. This is a result of the use of the new Appendix D. However, when this burden was determined in the 10 CFR Part 52 rule for AP1000, it was considered a program change. Since we now are estimating that licensees will use it, it is an adjustment (i.e., the change is now occurring because of a change in estimate, not due to a policy, program, or rulemaking change.)
App D X.B.2	1334		1334	Adjustment. This is a result of the use of the new Appendix D. However, when this burden was determined in the 10 CFR Part 52 rule for AP1000, it was considered a program change. Since we now are estimating that licensees will use it, it is an adjustment (i.e., the change is now occurring because of a change in estimate, not due to a policy, program, or rulemaking change.)
App D X.B.3.c	-39		-39	Adjustment. The original burden amount in the 10 CFR Part 52 AP1000 rulemaking is now corrected by adjusting the burden into the correct section.
App N Para 2		27	27	Program Change. This is an existing section which was not accounted for in the previous clearance package.
App N Para 3		107	107	Program Change. This is a new section added to the rulemaking, and results in an increase in burden, which is a program change.
Total Burden Change	277,018	134	277,152