Rule 237 Support

Rule 237 Support.DOC

Rule 237 (17 CFR 230.237) under the Securities Act of 1933, Exemption for offers and sales to certain Canadian tax-deferred retirement savings accounts

OMB: 3235-0528

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

8



SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Rule 237


A. JUSTIFICATION


1. Necessity for the Information Collection

In Canada, as in the United States, individuals can invest a portion of their earnings in tax-deferred retirement savings accounts (“Canadian retirement accounts”). These accounts, which operate in a manner similar to Individual Retirement Accounts in the United States, encourage retirement savings by permitting savings on a tax-deferred basis. Individuals who establish Canadian retirement accounts while living and working in Canada and who later move to the United States often continue to hold their retirement assets in their Canadian retirement accounts rather than prematurely withdrawing (or “cashing out”) those assets, which would result in immediate taxation in Canada.

Once in the United States, however, these participants (“Canadian/U.S. Participants” or “participants”) may not be able to manage their Canadian retirement account investments. Most securities and most investment companies (“funds”) that are “qualified investments” for Canadian retirement accounts are not registered under the U.S. securities laws. Those securities, therefore, generally cannot be publicly offered and sold in the United States without violating the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”).1 As a result of these registration requirements of the U.S. securities laws, Canadian/U.S. Participants, in the past, had not been able to purchase or exchange securities for their Canadian retirement accounts as needed to meet their changing investment goals or income needs.

The Commission issued two rules in 2000 that enabled Canadian/U.S. Participants to manage the assets in their Canadian retirement accounts by providing relief from the U.S. registration requirements for offers of securities of foreign issuers to Canadian/U.S. Participants and sales to their accounts.2 Rule 237 under the Securities Act3 permits securities of foreign issuers, including securities of foreign funds, to be offered to Canadian/U.S. Participants and sold to their Canadian retirement accounts without being registered under the Securities Act. Rule 7d-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”)4 permits foreign funds to offer securities to Canadian/U.S. Participants and sell securities to their Canadian retirement accounts without registering as investment companies under the Investment Company Act.

The provisions of rules 237 and 7d-2 are substantially identical, and they contain “collection of information” requirements within the meaning of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (“PRA”).5 Rule 237 requires written offering materials for securities that are offered and sold in reliance on the rule to disclose prominently that those securities are not registered with the Commission and may not be offered or sold in the United States unless they are registered or exempt from registration under the U.S. securities laws. Rule 237 does not require any documents to be filed with the Commission.

2. Purpose of the Information Collection


Rule 237 has provided relief from the U.S. registration requirements for the offer of a foreign issuer’s securities to a Canadian/U.S. Participant and the sale of those securities to his or her Canadian retirement account. The requirement that written offering materials concerning securities offered or sold in reliance on the rule disclose prominently that those securities and, if they are issued by a foreign fund, the fund, are not registered with the Commission is designed to ensure that Canadian/U.S. Participants are aware that those securities are not subject to the protections afforded by registration under the U.S. securities laws.

3. Role of Improved Information Technology


There are no requirements in rule 237 that any documents be filed with the Commission. There is no “collection of information” that involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical or other forms of information technology.

4. Efforts to Identify Duplication

No other rule duplicates the requirement that written offering materials concerning securities offered or sold in reliance on rule 237 disclose that those securities are not registered with the Commission. Rule 7d-2 requires that fund provide similar, but not identical, disclosures.6 This information likely would not be readily available to Canadian/U.S. Participants without this disclosure requirement.

5. Effect on Small Entities

Rule 237 enables Canadian/U.S. participants to manage assets in their Canadian retirement accounts by providing relief from U.S. registration requirements. The burden under the rule consists of adding certain disclosure information to written offering materials. This is a minimal and non-recurring burden that applies equally to both small and large entities. The Commission believes that it would not be feasible to adjust the rule to lessen this minor burden on small entities because the disclosure requirements ensure that participants are aware that securities covered by the rules are not subject to protections afforded under the U.S. securities laws.

6. Consequences of Less Frequent Collection

The rule requires each written offering document for securities offered or sold in reliance on the rule to disclose prominently that those securities are not registered with the Commission. Less frequent disclosure of this information would not fulfill the objective of ensuring that Canadian/U.S. Participants are aware that the investments that they make for their Canadian retirement accounts are not subject to the protections afforded by registration under the U.S. securities laws.

7. Inconsistencies With Guidelines in 5 CFR 1230.5(d)(2)

Not applicable.

8. Consultations Outside of the Agency

The Commission requested public comment on the collection of information requirements in rule 237 before it submitted this request for extension and approval to the Office of Management and Budget. The Commission received no comments in response to its request.

The Commission and the staff of the Division of Investment Management participate in an ongoing dialogue with representatives of the fund industry through public conferences, meetings, and informal exchanges. These forums provide the Commission and the staff means of ascertaining and acting upon paperwork burdens confronting the industry.

9. Payment or Gift to Respondents

Not applicable.

10. Assurance of Confidentiality

Not applicable.

11. Sensitive Questions

Not applicable.

12. Estimates of Hour Burden

Rule 237 requires written offering documents for securities offered and sold in reliance on the rule to disclose prominently that the securities are not registered with the Commission and may not be offered or sold in the United States unless registered or exempt from registration under the U.S. securities laws. The burden under the rule associated with adding this disclosure to written offering documents is minimal and is non-recurring. The foreign issuer, underwriter or broker-dealer can redraft an existing prospectus or other written offering material to add this disclosure statement, or may draft a sticker or supplement containing this disclosure to be added to existing offering materials. In either case, based on discussions with representatives of the Canadian fund industry, the staff estimates that it would take an average of 10 minutes per document to draft the requisite disclosure statement.

The Commission understands that there are approximately 3,500 Canadian issuers other than funds that may rely on rule 237 to make an initial public offering of their securities to Canadian/U.S. Participants. The staff estimates that in any given year approximately 35 (or 1 percent) of those issuers are likely to rely on rule 237 to make a public offering of their securities to participants, and that each of those 35 issuers, on average, distributes 3 different written offering documents concerning those securities, for a total of 105 offering documents.

The staff therefore estimates that during each year that rule 237 is in effect, approximately 35 respondents7 would be required to make 105 responses by adding the new disclosure statements to approximately 105 written offering documents. Thus, the staff estimates that the total annual burden associated with the rule 237 disclosure requirement would be approximately 17.5 hours (105 offering documents x 10 minutes per document). The total annual cost of burden hours is estimated to be $5,110.00 (17.5 hours x $2928 per hour of attorney time).9

In addition, issuers from foreign countries other than Canada could rely on rule 237 to offer securities to Canadian/U.S. Participants and sell securities to their accounts without becoming subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Because Canadian law strictly limits the amount of foreign investments that may be held in a Canadian retirement account, however, the staff believes that the number of issuers from other countries that relies on rule 237, and that therefore is required to comply with the offering document disclosure requirements, is negligible.

13. Estimate of Total Annual Cost Burden

The disclosure requirements do not entail any annual cost burden in addition to the cost of the hourly burden discussed above.

14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government

The disclosure requirements would not entail any cost to the Federal Government.

15. Explanation of Changes in Burden

The burden hours for Rule 237 did not change.

16. Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes

Not applicable.

17. Approval to not Display Expiration Date

Not applicable.

18. Exceptions to Certification Statement

Not applicable.

B. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS


Not applicable.

1 15 U.S.C. 77.

2 See Offer and Sale of Securities to Canadian Tax-Deferred Retirement Savings Accounts, Release Nos. 33-7860, 34-42905, IC-24491 (June 7, 2000) [65 FR 37672 (June 15, 2000)].

3 17 CFR 230.237.

4 17 CFR 270.7d-2.

5 44 U.S.C. 3501 - 3502. The collection of information burden of rule 7d-2 is discussed in a separate submission under OMB control number 3235-0528.

6 Canadian funds can rely on both rule 7d-2 and rule 237 to offer securities to participants and sell securities to their Canadian retirement accounts. Rule 237, however, does not require any disclosure in addition to that required by rule 7d-2. Thus, the disclosure requirements of rule 237 do not impose any burden on Canadian funds in addition to the burden imposed by the disclosure requirements of rule 7d-2. To avoid double- counting this burden, the staff has excluded Canadian funds from the estimate of the hourly burden associated with rule 237.

7 This estimate of respondents also assumes that all respondents are foreign issuers. The number of respondents may be greater if foreign underwriters or broker-dealers draft a sticker or supplement to add the required disclosure to an existing offering document.

8 The Commission’s estimate concerning the wage rate for attorney time is based on salary information for the securities industry compiled by the Securities Industry Association. $292 per hour figure for an attorney is from the SIA Report on Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2006, modified to account for an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.

9 See supra note 5.

File Typeapplication/msword
File Title_Supporting Statement
AuthorU.S.
Last Modified Bymartinsons
File Modified2007-10-31
File Created2007-10-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy