Download:
pdf |
pdfSUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR
THE INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS OF
MATERIAL HOISTS, PERSONNEL HOISTS,
AND ELEVATORS (29 CFR 1926.552) 1
(OMB CONTROL NO. 1218-0231) (November 2007))
JUSTIFICATION
1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or
administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each
statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.
The main objective of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (i.e., the Act) is to
“assure as far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful
working conditions and to preserve our human resources” (29 U.S.C. 651). To achieve this
objective, the Act authorizes “the development and promulgation of occupational safety and
health standards” (29 U.S.C. 651).
With regard to recordkeeping, the Act specifies that “[e]ach employer shall make, keep and
preserve, and make available to the Secretary such records as the Secretary may prescribe by
regulation as necessary or appropriate for the enforcement of this Act” (29 U.S.C. 657). The
Act states further that “[t]he Secretary shall prescribe such rule and regulations as [he/she] may
deem necessary to carry out [he/she] responsibilities under this Act, including rule and
regulations dealing with the inspection of an employer’s establishment” (29 U.S.C. 657).
Under the Authority granted by the OSH Act, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA or the “Agency”) published the Material Hoists, Personnel Hoists, and
Elevators Standard (29 CFR 1926.552) (the “Standard”) to protect employees who operate and
work around personnel hoists. Items 2 and 12 below list and describe the specific information
collection requirement of this Standard.
2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection,
indicate the actual use the Agency has made of the information received from the current collection.
Posting Requirements
Paragraph (a)(2) requires that the rated load capacities, recommended operating speeds, and
special hazard warnings or instructions be posted on cars and platforms.
Paragraph (b)(1)(i) requires that operating rules for material hoists be established and posted at
the operator’s station of the hoist. These rules shall include signal system and allowable line
speed for various loads.
1
The purpose of this supporting statement is to analyze and describe the burden hour and cost associated with
provisions of this standard that contain paperwork requirements; this Supporting Statement does not provide
information or guidance on how to comply with, or how to enforce, these provisions.
Paragraph (c)(10) requires that cars be provided with a capacity and data plate secured in a
conspicuous place on the car or crosshead.
These posting requirements are used by the operator and crew of the material and personnel
hoists to determine how to use the specific machine and how much it will be able to lift as
assembled in one or a number of particular configurations. If not properly used, the machine
would be subject to failures, endangering the employees in the immediate vicinity.
Test and Inspection and Certification Records
Paragraph (c)(15) requires that a test and inspection of all functions and safety devices be made
following assembly and erection of hoists. The test and inspection are to be conducted under
the supervision of a competent person. A similar inspection and test is required following major
alteration of an existing installation. All hoists shall be inspected and tested at three month
intervals. A certification record (the most recent) of the test and inspection is required to be
kept on file, including the date the test and inspection was completed, the identification of the
equipment and the signature of the person who performed the test and inspection. This
certification ensures that the equipment has been tested and is in safe operating condition.
Disclosure of Test and Inspection Certification Records
The most recent certification record will be disclosed to a CSHO during an OSHA inspection.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting
this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.
Employers may use automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological informationcollection techniques, or other forms of information technology (e.g., electronic submission of
responses) when establishing and maintaining the required records. The agency wrote
paperwork requirements of the Standard in performance-oriented language (i.e., in terms of
what data to collect, not how to record the data).
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available
cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.
The requirements to collect and maintain information are specific to each employer and
employee involved, and no other source or agency duplicates these requirements or can make
the required information available to OSHA (i.e., the required information is available only
from employers).
5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.
−2−
The information collection requirements specified by the Standard do not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of entities.
6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is
conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
The Agency believes that the information-collection frequencies required by the Standard are the
minimum frequencies necessary to fulfill its mandate “to assure so far as possible every working
man and woman in the nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human
resources” as specified in the OSH Act at 29 U.S.C. 651. Accordingly, if employers do not
perform the information-collection required by §1926.552 or delay in providing this information,
employees are at risk of serious injuries or death.
7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a
manner:
·
Requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
·
Requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30
days after receipt of it;
·
Requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
·
Requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-inaid, or tax records for more than three years;
·
In connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that
can be generalized to the universe of study;
·
Requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by
OMB;
·
That includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or
regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the
pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible
confidential use; or
·
Requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless
the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's
confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
No special circumstances exist that require employers to collect information using the procedures
specified by this Item. The requirements are within the guidelines set forth in 5 CFR 1320.5.
8.
If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal
Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information
collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that
notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address
comments received on cost and hour burden.
−3−
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), OSHA
published a notice in the Federal Register on July 2, 2007 (72 FR 36066, Docket No. OSHA2007-0054) requesting public comment on its proposed extension of the information collection
requirements specified in the Material Hoists, Personnel Hoists, and Elevators Standard (29 CFR
1926.552). This notice was part of a preclearance consultation program intended to provide
those interested parties the opportunity to comment on OSHA’s request for an extension by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of a previous approval of the information collection
requirements found in the above Standard. The Agency received no comments in response to its
notice to comment on this request.
9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than reenumeration of
contractors or grantees.
The Agency will not provide payments or gifts to the respondents.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in
statute, regulation, or agency policy.
The paperwork requirements specified by the Standard do not involve confidential information.
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature such as sexual behavior and
attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should
include the reason why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the
information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to
be taken to obtain their consent.
None of the provisions in the standard require sensitive information.
12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:
·
Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation
of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special
surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample
(fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected
to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated
hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include
burden hours for customary and usual business practices.
If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for
each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.
·
Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of
information, identifying and using appropriate wage-rate categories.
−4−
Estimated Burden Hours and Costs
(A) Posting Requirements—1926.552(a)(2), (b)(1)(i), (c)(10)
In the Crane and Derrick Supporting Statement (1218-0232), OSHA estimated that there were
132,737 cranes and derricks in the construction industry, and that 80% (106,190) of those are
crawler, truck or locomotive. It is further estimated that the remaining 20% (26,547) are
construction personnel and material hoists. It has been determined that half of these hoists are
factory-built and half are site-built.
All factory manufactured equipment has the required documentation attached or included when
the equipment is delivered. If, for some reason, the manufacturer’s specifications are
unavailable, or if they have been lost or damaged, the employer must obtain a replacement set of
specifications from the manufacturer. In the event the equipment manufacturer is not available
or cannot provide the information, the equipment must be evaluated and tested by a qualified
engineer to obtain the required information.
The Agency uses average hourly earnings, including benefits, to represent the cost of employee
time. For the relevant occupational categories, mean hourly earnings from June 2005 National
Compensation Survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics have been adjusted to reflect the fact that
fringe benefits comprise about 29.5% of total compensation in the private sector. Since wages
are the remaining 70.5% of employee compensation wages are multiplied by 1.42 (1/0.705)
estimate full employee hourly compensation. The costs of labor used in this analysis are
therefore estimates of total hourly compensation. These hourly wages are:
$31.60 Construction supervisor
$24.94 Non-supervisory construction worker
Factory-Built Hoists and Elevators
In a factory-built hoist, manufacturers establish the rated load capacity, recommended operating
speeds, special hazards warning, allowable line speed for various loads and other required
information stated in these provisions. This information is permanently affixed to the hoist when
delivered. The only time an employer would incur a burden for this information collection
activity would be when, and if, the information would need to be re-posted due to damage caused
by wear and tear. The Agency estimates that .1% of factory-built hoists will need the
information re-posted each year due to damage. OSHA estimates that it would take a nonsupervisory construction worker 30 minutes (.5 hr.) to obtain and post the necessary information.
Burden hours: 13,274 hoists/elevators x .001 reposted/yr x .5 hr. = 7 hours
Costs: 7 hours x $24.94 = $175
−5−
Site-Built Hoists
When a hoist is built on site, it is necessary to determine the weight and rated-load capacity of
the hoist along with recommended operating speeds, special hazards warnings, and allowable
line speed for various loads. The hoists would typically be designed by an engineer. The
information needed to comply with this requirement is readily known from engineering plans.
For hoists that are site-built, posting this information would be required in all instances. Since
these hoists are required to be designed by a qualified engineer or a qualified person competent
in structural design, the only burden is the time to post the information developed by the
engineer on a plate or to permanently mark the hoist. OSHA estimates it takes a qualified person
5 minutes (.08 hour.) to post the necessary information. The Agency uses the wage rate for a
construction supervisor to estimate costs.
Burden hours: 13,274 hoists x.08 hour to post information = 1,062 hours.
Costs: 1,062 hours x $31.60 = $33,559
(B) Test and Inspection and Certification Records—1926.552(c)(15)
The frequency of the inspection is quarterly (4 times a year). Additionally, OSHA estimates that
10% of the personnel hoists will require a second inspection each quarter due to repair work.
The Agency estimates that it takes a construction worker approximately 15 minutes (.25 hour) to
conduct the test and inspection, and to generate and maintain the certification record of the most
recent test and inspection.
Burden hours: 26,547 hoists x 4 inspections annually x .25 hour = 26,547
hours
26,547 hoists x 10% requiring 2nd inspection x 4 inspections
annually x .25 hour = 2,655 hours
Costs: (26,547 hours + 2,655 hours) = 29,202 hours x $24.94 =
$728,298
(C) Disclosure of Test and Inspection Certification Records--1926.552(c)(15)
OSHA estimates that approximately 372 hoists covered by the Standard will be subject to an
OSHA inspection where the employer will be required to disclose certification records annually
(see Item 14 below). This is estimated to take a supervisor 2 minutes (.03 hour).
Burden hours:
Cost:
372 inspections x .03 hour = 11 hours
11 burden hours x $31.60 = $348
−6−
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the
collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)
·
The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost
component annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance
and purchase of service component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with
generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of
methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition,
expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which
costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for
collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling
and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.
·
If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and
explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information
collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden
estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondent (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day
pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact
analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.
·
Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof,
made:
(1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not
associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information
or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private
practices.
Item 12 above provides the total cost of the information-collection requirements specified by the
Standard.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the
method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as
equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred
without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14
in a single table.
OSHA estimates that a compliance officer (GS-12, step 5), with an hourly wage rate of $36.26
spends about 5 minutes (.08 hour) during an inspection reviewing the document required by the
Standard. The Agency determines that its compliance will inspect 372 personnel hoists which
are regulated by this Standard during each year covered by this ICR 2 . OSHA considers other
expenses, such as equipment, overhead and support staff salaries, to be normal operating
expenses that would occur without the paperwork requirements specified by the Standard.
Therefore, the total cost of this paperwork requirement to the Federal government is:
Cost: 372 inspections x .08 hour x $36.26 = $1,079
2
OSHA estimated the number of inspections by multiplying OSHA’s inspection rate (1.4%) by the number of
hoists covered by this ICR (i.e., 26,547 hoists x 1.4% = 372).
−7−
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reporting in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB
Form 83-I.
There are no program changes or adjustments being reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB 83-I.
16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and
publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the
entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection information, completion of report,
publication dates, and other actions.
OSHA will not publish the information collected under the Standard.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection,
explain the reasons that display would be appropriate.
No forms are available for the Agency to display the expiration date.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 per "Certification for
Paperwork Reduction Act Submission," of OMB Form 83-I.
OSHA is not seeking an exception to the certification statement specified by Item 19 of OMB
83-I.
−8−
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR |
Author | OSHA_User |
File Modified | 2007-11-09 |
File Created | 2007-11-09 |