10 CFR Part 52, Early Site Permits; Standard Design Certifications; and Combined Licenses for Nuclear Plants

ICR 200802-3150-001

OMB: 3150-0151

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2008-04-01
ICR Details
3150-0151 200802-3150-001
Historical Inactive 200708-3150-020
NRC
10 CFR Part 52, Early Site Permits; Standard Design Certifications; and Combined Licenses for Nuclear Plants
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue 06/26/2008
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 04/11/2008
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval at this time. Prior to publication of the final rule, the agency must submit to OMB a summary of all comments related to the information collection contained in the proposed rule and the agency response. The agency should clearly indicate any changes made to the information collection as a result of these comments.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
07/31/2010 07/31/2010 11/30/2010
37 0 37
456,039 0 456,039
0 0 0

Proposed Rule entitled: "Consideration of Aircraft Impacts for New Nuclear Power Designs." The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend its regulations to require applicants for new standard design certifications that do not reference a standard design approval; new standard design approvals; combined licenses that do not reference a standard design certification, standard design approval, or manufactured reactor; and new manufacturing licenses that do not reference a standard design certification or standard design approval to assess the effects of the impact of a large, commercial aircraft on the nuclear power plant. Based on the insights gained from this assessment, the applicant shall include in its application a description and evaluation of design features, functional capabilities, and strategies to avoid or mitigate the effects of the aircraft impact. The evaluation of such design features, functional capabilities and strategies must include core cooling capability, containment integrity, and spent fuel pool integrity. The impact of a large, commercial aircraft is a beyond-design-basis event, and the NRC’s requirements applicable to the design, construction, testing, operation, and maintenance of design features, functional capabilities, and strategies for design basis events would not be applicable to design features, functional capabilities, or strategies selected by the applicant solely to meet the requirements of this rule. The objective of this rule is to require nuclear power plant designers to perform a rigorous assessment of design features that could provide additional inherent protection to avoid or mitigate, to the extent practicable, the effects of an aircraft impact, with reduced reliance on operator actions.

PL: Pub.L. 83 - 703 68 Stat. 919 Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act of 1954
  
PL: Pub.L. 109 - 58 119 Stat 594 Name of Law: Energy Policy Act of 2005

3150-AI19 Proposed rulemaking 72 FR 56287 10/03/2007

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
10 CFR Part 52, Early Site Permits; Standard Design Certifications; and Combined Licenses for Nuclear Plants

Yes
Changing Regulations
No
The NRC is proposing to amend its regulations in 10 CFR part 52, “Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants,” to add 10 CFR 52.500, “Aircraft Impact Assessment,” which will require applicants for new reactor designs to perform a design-specific assessment of the effects on the designed facility of the impact of a large, commercial aircraft (impact assessment). The Commission has determined that the impact of a large, commercial aircraft is a beyond-design-basis event. Requiring applicants for new reactor designs to perform a rigorous aircraft impact assessment and describe design features to address the effects of a beyond-design- basis aircraft impact is consistent with the NRC's historic approach to beyond-design-basis events. The proposed rule will require applicants for new standard design certifications that do not reference a standard design approval; new standard design approvals; combined licenses that do not reference a standard design certification, standard design approval, or manufactured reactor; and new manufacturing licenses that do not reference a standard design certification or standard design approval to assess the effects of the impact of a large, commercial aircraft on the nuclear power plant. Based on the insights gained from this assessment, applicants would include in their application a description and evaluation of the design features, the plant’s functional capabilities, strategies for avoiding or mitigating the effects of an aircraft impact, and addressing of the plant’ score cooling capability, containment integrity and spent fuel pool integrity. The applicant would also be required to describe how such design and other features avoid or mitigate, to the extent practicable, the aircraft impact effects with reduced reliance on operator actions. This rule would result in newly designed power reactor facilities being more inherently robust with regard to a potential aircraft impact than if they were designed in the absence of this rule. It will also provide an enhanced level of protection beyond that which is provided by the existing adequate protection requirements, which all operating power reactors are required to meet, and which would be provided by the proposed adequate protection requirements that the facilities will be required to meet when finalized.

$41,280
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Stewart Schneider 301 415-4123 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
04/11/2008


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy