0350 ss ren 031908

SUPPORTING STATEMENT
NORTHEAST REGION VESSEL IDENTIFICATION
OMB CONTROL NO.: 0648-0350

A.

JUSTIFICATION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.
Regulations at 50 CFR § 648.8 and § 697.8 require that vessels over 25 ft in registered length,
with Federal permits to fish in the Northeast, display the vessel’s name and official number. The
success of fisheries management programs depends upon regulatory compliance. The vessel
identification requirement, which is required of all Federally permitted fishing vessels in the
Northeast region, is essential to facilitate enforcement. The ability to link fishing or other
activity to a vessel owner or operator is crucial to the enforcement of regulations issued under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson
Act) as amended in 2006. By being able to identify vessels, enforcement personnel can easily
identify Federal permit holders that are fishing in restricted areas and/or during restricted times.
2. Explain how, by whom, how frequently, and for what purpose the information will be
used. If the information collected will be disseminated to the public or used to support
information that will be disseminated to the public, then explain how the collection
complies with all applicable Information Quality Guidelines.
No information is directly submitted to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) as a result of this collection. The vessel
name must be affixed to the port and starboard sides of the deckhouse or hull, and on an
appropriate weather deck so as to be visible from enforcement vessels and aircraft. This
identification allows law enforcement personnel, including U.S. Coast Guard, NOAA Office of
Law Enforcement, and state marine patrols, to ascertain whether the vessel’s observed activities
are in accordance with those authorized for that vessel. Concerned fishermen also use the
number to report suspicious activities that they observe. Fishermen ultimately benefit as
unauthorized and illegal fishing is deterred, which reduces the need for more restrictive fishing
regulations.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological techniques or other forms of
information technology.
This identification requirement facilitates the visual identification of fishing vessels. Although
technologies have been developed to electronically identify and monitor vessels, this form of
vessel identification is indispensable. The visual collection of the vessel identification characters
by law enforcement personnel may involve binoculars or other sight enhancement technology.
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication.
There is no duplication of this requirement with other collections by NOAA Fisheries. However,
the U.S. Coast Guard and many states require the same identification of vessel name and official
1

number. These requirements are complementary and do not create additional nor duplicative
requirements.
5. If the collection of information involves small businesses or other small entities, describe
the methods used to minimize burden.
Nearly all the commercial fishing vessels subject to this information collection are categorized as
small businesses. It is not anticipated that the information collection will have any significant
impact on the operations of small businesses.
6. Describe the consequences to the Federal program or policy activities if the collection is
not conducted or is conducted less frequently.
If commercial fishing vessels were not identifiable by the National Marine Fisheries Service,
U.S. Coast Guard, or any other cooperating enforcement agency the ability to enforce fishery
regulations would be significantly impaired. The requirements of this collection are only
repeated once the identification markings become illegible.
7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a
manner inconsistent with OMB guidelines.
No special circumstances require the collections to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with
the OMB guidelines.
8. Provide information on the PRA Federal Register notice that solicited public comments
on the information collection prior to this submission. Summarize the public comments
received in response to that notice and describe the actions taken by the agency in response
to those comments. Describe the efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to
obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of
instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data
elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.
A Federal Register Notice published on October 17, 2007 (72 FR 58812) solicited public
comments. No comments were received.
9. Explain any decisions to provide payments or gifts to respondents, other than
remuneration of contractors or grantees.
No payments or gifts are provided to respondents as part of this collection.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for
assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
Vessel identification is not considered confidential information and thus no confidentiality is
provided.

2

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual
behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered
private.
No sensitive questions are asked as a part of this collection.
12. Provide an estimate in hours of the burden of the collection of information.
The commercial fishing vessel’s official number must be displayed at a specified size on the port
and starboard sides of the deckhouse or hull and on a weather deck. It is estimated that each
vessel will require a total of 45 minutes to paint the number in all three required locations. Each
number is expected to need to be touched up or repainted on an annual basis. Table 1 provides a
summary of annual burden for vessel identification. This comes to approximately 4,500 hours
(45 min x 6,000 vessels).
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to the respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection (excluding the value of the burden hours in #12
above).
The cost to the respondents is minimal. Materials needed are paint and paintbrush, and possibly
a stencil. The cost of materials each year for painting/repainting can be estimated to be $10 per
respondent, totaling $60,000. It is anticipated that repainting or repairs would occur annually
due to natural weathering of the paint. Table 1 provides a summary of annual costs for vessel
identification.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government.
There are no costs attributed to the Federal government resulting from this collection.
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or
14 of the OMB 83-I.
The number of respondents, federally permitted commercial fishing vessels, has been adjusted
upward by 500 respondents due to the number of permitted vessels greater than or equal to 25
feet in overall length, currently listed in the permit database. The total number of respondents
and responses is now estimated to be 6,000 per year, with a corresponding increase of 375 hours
(from 4,125 to 4,500) and an increase of $5,000 (from $50,500 to $60,000).
16. For collections whose results will be published, outline the plans for tabulation and
publication.
This collection will not produce any results that will be published.

3

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the
information collection, explain the reasons why display would be inappropriate.
This information collection does not utilize any forms to display the OMB approval expiration
date.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 of the
OMB 83-I.
There are no exceptions to the certification statement requested.

B. COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS
This collection will not employ statistical methods.

Table 1. Cost Table
Collection

Vessel
Identification
requirements

Number
of
Entities

Items
per
Entity

Total
Number
of Items

Cost ($)
of
Materials
per vessel

6,000

1

6,000

10

4

Response
Time
(Hours)

Total
Burden
(Hours)

Cost ($) to
Government

Cost
($) to
Public

0.75 (45
minutes)

4,500

0

60,000