NSPS for Portland Cement Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart F) (Proposed Rule)

ICR 200806-2060-006

OMB: 2060-0614

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2008-06-16
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
2060-0614 200806-2060-006
Historical Inactive
EPA/OAR 2307.01
NSPS for Portland Cement Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart F) (Proposed Rule)
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Comment filed on proposed rule 07/03/2008
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 06/16/2008
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval of this information collection. Prior to the publication of the final rule, the agency must provide to OMB a summary of all comments pertaining to the information collection burden imposed by this rule and any changes made in response to these comments.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

Respondents are owners/operators of facilities in portland cement plants: kilns, clinker coolers, raw mill systems, raw mill dryers, raw material storage, clinker storage, finished product storage, conveyor transfer points, bagging and bulk loading and unloading systems. All respondents are required to submit initial notifications, performance tests, monitoring, and periodic reports. Owners/Operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative and submit semi-annual manfunction reports. Owners/Operators that use continuous emission monitors must submit semi-annual excess emission reports. Owners/Operators that install a bag leak detection system must submit a site-specific monitoring plan.

US Code: 42 USC 7401 et seq Name of Law: Clean Air Act
  
None

2060-AO42 Proposed rulemaking 73 FR 34072 06/16/2008

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
NSPS for Portland Cement Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart F)

Yes
Changing Regulations
No
The change in burden cost is due to these four reasons. First, it is estimated that 20 new kilns are projected to become subject to subpart F in the next 5 years. Second, new standards in subpart F require additional monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements. Third, the analysis for this ICR includes current rates for management, technical, and clerical staff. And fourth, Method 5 and initial CEMS performance testing were calculated as a capital cost because it is likely to be conducted by a contractor. Overall, these changes result in an increase in hourly burden and in increase in capital costs.

$10,887
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Keith Barnett 919 541-5605 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/16/2008


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy