In the Third Report and Order and
Second Order on Reconsideration in CC Docket No. 99-200, the
Commission continues efforts to maximize the efficiency with which
numbering resources in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) are
utilized. In order for price cap LECs to qualify for exogenous
adjustment to access charges established under the federal cost
recovery mechanism, they must demonstrate that pooling results in a
net cost increase rather than a cost reduction. Applications to
state commission from carriers must demonstrate that certain
requirements are met before states.....
The previous information
collection requirements associated with the "Reporting Requirements
for Federal Cost Recovery" have expired. Because the extraordinary
federal recovery mechanism was intended to recover only the initial
implementation costs of thousands block number pooling, we
concluded that recovery should be spread over a two-year period.
This was appropriate given the two-year national rollout period
that the Commission proposed. After that implementation period,
thousands-block number pooling became a normal network function and
recovery of ongoing costs is through existing means.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.