Sections 1.774, 61.49, 61.55, 61.58, 69.4, 69.707, 69.713, and 69.729, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, FCC 99-206 (New Services)
ICR 200810-3060-012 · OMB 3060-0770 · Historical Active
⚠️ Notice: This information collection may be outdated. More recent filings for OMB 3060-0770 can be found here:
Sections 1.774, 61.49, 61.55, 61.58, 69.4, 69.707, 69.713, and 69.729, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, FCC 99-206 (New Services)
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
The Commission permits price cap LECs to introduce new services on a streamlined basis, without prior approval. The Commission modified the rules to eliminate the public interest showing required by 69.4(g) and to eliminate the new services test (except in the case of loop-based new services) required under sections 61.49(f) and (g). The information is needed by the Commission to carry out its mandate.
The Commission is reporting an adjustment to the burden estimates. The +40 hours in total annual burden is due to increase in the number of respondents (from 17 in 2005 to 21 respondents now being reported); the increase in the annual cost burden is due to a filing fee of $775 which was mistakenly omitted from the previous submission in 2005.
$6,720
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Geneva Butler 202 418-1559
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.