0213 IERS ss 112508

SUPPORTING STATEMENT
ALASKA REGION LOGBOOK FAMILY OF FORMS
OMB CONTROL NO. 0648-0213

INTRODUCTION
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act)
16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. authorizes the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) to
prepare and amend fishery management plans for any fishery in waters under its jurisdiction.
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) manages the crab fisheries in the waters off the coast
of Alaska under the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab
and groundfish under the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands and the FMP for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska. Regulations
implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 679.
The NMFS system of logbooks and forms allows tracking of fish and shellfish from harvest,
through processing, to transfer of fish product.
This action is a revision of this collection to incorporate the increased use of an electronic
reporting system, eLandings, and the decreased use of paper logbooks and forms.
A.

JUSTIFICATION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.
The data obtained from logbooks are used during boardings and site visits by NMFS Office for
Law Enforcement (OLE) and United States Coast Guard to ensure conservation of groundfish,
compliance to regulations, and reporting accuracy by industry. The data are used by the Council
and NMFS Alaska Fisheries Science Center for biological and economic evaluation of
management measures and stock assessment. The data are used by the NMFS Observer Program
for vessel position coordinates and observer coverage information. The data are used by the
NMFS Inseason Branch to monitor and manage the fisheries through openings and closures of
fishery species and Federal reporting area, as well as through reallocation of quotas. Quotas and
allotments are designated by species, reporting area, gear type, season, inshore/offshore
component, by the Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program, and by the
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program. The NMFS Inseason Branch and NMFS Restricted
Access Program respond to public inquiries, agency requests, and media requests for groundfish
data, IFQ halibut data, and IFQ sablefish data. In addition, the NMFS Inseason Branch submits
these data to national data archives, including the NMFS Statistics Division, for preparation of
the Fisheries of the United States.

1

2. Explain how, by whom, how frequently, and for what purpose the information will be
used. If the information collected will be disseminated to the public or used to support
information that will be disseminated to the public, then explain how the collection
complies with all applicable Information Quality Guidelines.
The use of logbooks and certain forms in the Alaska Region for collection of fisheries data from
participating fishermen is decreasing due to the use of other methods of data transmittal.
eLandings (see Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control No.: 0648-0515) is becoming
the major method of fisheries data transmittal from processors. The daily cumulative production
logbooks (DCPL) will be used in conjunction with eLandings by motherships and
catcher/processors, because the DCPL request information about position coordinates, details
concerning gear, and gear and ocean depth that currently are not requested in eLandings but still
have value.
a. Shoreside processor DCPL [REMOVED]
The shoreside processor DCPL is removed from this collection. The use of eLandings (see OMB
Control No.: 0648-0515) is required for managers of shoreside processors and SFPs instead of
the shoreside processor DCPL. In addition, eLandings replaced the former electronic system,
Shoreside Processor Electronic Logbook report (SPELR), OMB Control No.: 0648-0401.
Changes have been made to the following information collections, based on the use of
eLandings.
b. Mothership DCPL or Electronic Logbook (ELB)
The operator of a mothership required to have a Federal fishery permit must daily complete the
top section of a mothership DCPL – the identification information and delivery information -and write “eLandings” across the sections for product, discard, and disposition information. The
operator must use eLandings to submit production, discard, and disposition information to
NMFS. Even though using eLandings as the primary data entry operation, the operator is
required to submit the yellow logsheets to OLE in Juneau, Alaska, each quarter.
Mothership DCPL or ELB
Identification (record in both eLandings and DCPL)
Page number
Date
Mothership name and Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) processor code
Name and signature of operator
Federal fisheries permit number
If inactive, enter start and end dates and reason for inactivity
Crew size
Gear type of harvester
Federal reporting area of catch
If harvest with trawl gear, indicate whether in C. Opilio Bycatch Limitation Zone (COBLZ) or Red King
Crab Savings Area (RKCSA)
Number of observers onboard
Name and cruise number of each observer aboard
If fishing under a separate management program, indicate appropriate program and identifying number
Delivery information (record in DCPL only)
Whether records are in pounds or metric tons
Whether catcher vessel or buying station delivery

2

Whether received discard report
Catcher vessel or buying station name and ADF&G vessel registration number
Receipt time
Receipt position in latitude and longitude
Total haul weight of catch
Species code and round catch weight of Improved Retention/Improved Utilization (IR/IU) species
Fish ticket number issued to catcher vessel
Discard/disposition information (record in DCPL only as backup)
Whether records in pounds or metric tons
Daily total, balance forward, and weekly cumulative total
Species and product codes
Production information (record in DCPL only as backup)
Whether records in pounds or metric tons
Daily total, balance forward, and weekly cumulative total of products
Species and product codes.

The operator partially completes the mothership DCPL each day as well as completes eLandings
data entry each day. The number of motherships has not changed since the last Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) analysis. Because this dual recordkeeping will require some extra effort
to coordinate, the estimated time to record information in the DCPL also is unchanged.
Corrections are necessary, however, to the number of annual responses. Regulatory
requirements state that each logbook must be completed every day, except when inactive. When
inactive, only one page is completed for each quarter. If we presume that 200 days are active
and 164 days are inactive, then
1 month = 30 days x 3 = 90 (quarter) x 4 = 360 (year)
364 – 200 = 164 inactive days = 164/90 = ~2 quarters
200 active day reports + 2 inactive quarterly reports.
Mothership DCPL, Respondent
Estimated number of respondents
Total annual responses (34 x 202)
Frequency of response
200 receiving or processing days
2 inactive quarters
Total Burden Hours (3571.36)
Time per response (31 min = .52 hr)
Total personnel cost ($25 x 3571)
Total miscellaneous cost
Mail DCPL logsheets quarterly ($2.50 x 4 qtr x 34)
Mothership DCPL, Federal Government
Total annual responses
Total Burden Hours (14 + 34)
Time to review and file quarterly submittal (6 min = .1 hr)
Time to process (34 x 4 x .1=13.6)
Time to prepare and mail one DCPL (30 min = .5 hr)
Time to mail all DCPLs twice (34 x .5 x 2 = 34)
Total Personnel cost ($25 x 48)
Total Miscellaneous Cost
Cost to print DCPLs ($12 x 34= $408)
Cost to mail DCPLs ($5 x 34 = $170)

3

34
6,868

3,571
89,284
340

6,868
48

1,200
578

c. Catcher/processor trawl gear DCPL or ELB
The operator of a catcher/processor using trawl gear and required to have a Federal fisheries
permit must daily complete the top section of a catcher/processor trawl gear DCPL – the
identification information and catch-by-haul information -- and write “eLandings” across the
sections for product, discard, and disposition information. The operator must use eLandings to
submit production, discard, and disposition information to NMFS. Even though using eLandings
as the primary data entry operation, the operator is required to submit the yellow logsheets to the
OLE in Juneau, Alaska, each quarter.
Catcher/processor trawl gear DCPL or ELB
Identification (record in both eLandings and DCPL)
Page number
Date
Vessel name and ADF&G processor code
Federal fisheries permit number
Name and signature of operator
If inactive, enter start and end dates and reason not active
Gear type
Federal reporting area and whether harvest occurred in COBLZ or RKCSA
Number of observers onboard
Name and cruise number of each observer aboard
Crew size
If under a separate management program, indicate appropriate program and identifying number
Catch-by-haul information (record only in DCPL)
Haul number
Time and begin position of gear deployment
Date, time, and end position of gear retrieval
Average sea depth and average gear depth
Target species code
Haul weight of catch (lb or mt)
Species code and estimated round catch weight of Improved Retention/Improved Utilization (IR/IU) species
Discard/disposition species information (record in DCPL only as backup)
Whether records in pounds or metric tons
Enter daily total, balance forward, and weekly cumulative total by species and product codes
Production information (record in DCPL only as backup)
Whether records in pounds or metric tons
Enter daily total, balance forward;
Weekly cumulative total by species and product codes.

The operator partially completes the catcher/processor trawl gear DCPL each day as well as
completes eLandings data entry each day. The number of trawl catcher/processors has not
changed since the last PRA analysis. Because this dual recordkeeping will require some extra
effort to coordinate, the estimated time to record information in the DCPL also is unchanged.
Corrections are necessary, however, to the number of annual responses. Regulatory
requirements state that each logbook must be completed every day, except when inactive. When
inactive, only one page is completed for each quarter. If we presume that 200 days are active
and 164 days are inactive or 2 logsheets per quarter = 202 logsheets submitted.

4

Catcher/processor trawl gear DCPL or ELB, Respondent
Estimated total respondents
Total annual responses (52 x 202)
Frequency of response
200 active (receiving or processing) days
2 inactive quarters
Total Burden Hours (.50 x 10504)
Time per response (30 min = .50 hr)
Total personnel cost ($25 x 5252)
Total miscellaneous cost
Cost to mail DCPL logsheets ($2.50 x 4 qtr x 52)
Catcher/processor trawl gear DCPL or ELB, Federal Government
Total annual responses
Total Burden Hours (10.4 + 26=36.4)
Time to review, data entry, and file each quarterly submittal (3 min = .05
hr)
Time to process all responses (52 x 4 x .05=10.4)
Time to prepare and mail one DCPL (30 min = .5 hr)
Time to mail all DCPLs (52 x .5 = 26)
Total Personnel cost ($25 x 36)
Total Miscellaneous Cost
Cost to print DCPL ($12 x 52 = $624)
Cost to mail DCPL ($5 x 52 = $260)

52
10,504

5,252
131,300
520

10,504
36 hr

900
884

d. Catcher/processor longline and pot gear DCPL or ELB
The operator of a catcher/processor using longline or pot gear to harvest groundfish, that retains
any groundfish from the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) or Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management
area (BSAI), and is required to have a Federal fisheries permit must maintain a longline and pot
gear DCPL. The operator of a catcher/processor using longline or pot gear to harvest IFQ
sablefish, IFQ halibut, or CDQ halibut from the GOA or BSAI must maintain a longline and pot
gear DCPL. The operator of a catcher/processor using pot gear to harvest BSAI Crab
Rationalization Program (CR) crab must maintain a longline and pot gear DCPL.
The operator must daily complete the top section of a catcher/processor longline or pot gear
DCPL – the identification information and catch-by-set information -- and write “eLandings”
across the sections for product, discard, and disposition information. The operator must use
eLandings to submit production, discard, and disposition information to NMFS. Even though
using eLandings as the primary data entry operation, the operator is required to submit the
yellow logsheets to the OLE in Juneau, Alaska, each quarter.
Catcher/processor, longline, or pot gear DCPL or ELB
Identification (record in both eLandings and DCPL)
Page number
Date
Name and ADF&G processor code of catcher/processor
Federal crab vessel permit number or Federal fisheries permit number
Operator name and signature
If inactive, enter start and end dates and reason not active
Federal reporting area of catch
Number of observers onboard
Name and cruise number of each observer aboard

5

Crew size
Operator IFQ permit number
Crew IFQ permit number(s)
CDQ group number
Halibut CDQ permit number
If under a separate management program, indicate appropriate program and identifying number
Indicate gear type
Catch by set (record in DCPL only)
Set number
Date and time gear set
Date and time gear hauled
Location of set
buoy or bag number (optional)
begin position of set; end position of haul
Begin and end depth
If gear type is hook and line
Whether fixed hook (conventional or tub), autoline, or snap gear
Length of skate (ft)
Hook size, spacing (ft), and number of hooks per skate
Bird avoidance gear code
Gear ID (transfer alpha letter from gear type box)
Number of skates or pots set
Number of skates or pots lost (if applicable)
Species code and estimated round catch weight of IR/IU species
Target species code
Weight of CDQ or IFQ halibut (pounds)
Number and weight of IFQ sablefish in round weight, western cut, or eastern cut
Number and weight of CR crab
Haul weight of catch
Production information (record in DCPL only as backup)
Whether records in pounds or numbers
Enter daily total, balance forward, and weekly cumulative total of products by species and product codes
Discard/disposition information (record in DCPL only as backup)
Date of discard
Whether records in pounds or numbers
Daily total, balance forward and weekly cumulative total
Species and product codes.

The operator partially completes the catcher/processor longline or pot gear DCPL each day as
well as completes eLandings data entry each day. The number of longline or pot gear
catcher/processors has not changed since the last PRA analysis. Because this dual
recordkeeping will require some extra effort to coordinate, the estimated time to record
information in the DCPL also is unchanged. Corrections are necessary, however, to the number
of annual responses. Regulatory requirements state that each logbook must be completed every
day, except when inactive. When inactive, only one page is completed for each quarter. If we
presume that 200 days are active and 164 days are inactive or 2 logsheets per quarter = 202
logsheets submitted.

6

Catcher/processor longline and pot gear DCPL or ELB, Respondent
Estimated number of respondents
Total annual responses (202 x 118)
Frequency of response
200 active (receiving or processing) days
2 inactive quarters
Total Burden Hours (16208.48)
Time per response (41 min = .68 hr)
Total personnel cost ($25 x 16208)
Total miscellaneous cost
Cost to mail DCPL logsheets ($2.50 x 4 qtr x 118)

118
23,836

16,208 hr

Catcher/processor longline and pot gear DCPL or ELB, Federal Government
Total annual responses
Total Burden Hours (106.2)
Time to review, data entry, and file (6 min = .1 hr)
Time to process all responses (118 x 4 x .1 = 47.20)
Time to prepare and mail one DCPL (30 min = .5 hr)
Time requirement for mailing all DCPLs (118 x .5 = 59)
Total Personnel cost ($25 x 106)
Total Miscellaneous Cost
Cost to print DCPL ($12 x 118 = $1416)
Cost to mail DCPL ($5 x 118 = $590)

405,200
1,180

23,836
106 hr

2,650
2,006

The following forms are removed from this collection-of-information because the information
previously contained in these reports is now submitted through eLandings (see OMB Control
No.: 0648-0515).
g. Mothership or catcher/processor weekly production report (WPR) [Removed]
h. Shoreside processor WPR [Removed]
i. Cumulative Mothership ADF&G Fish Tickets ) [Removed]
All other information collections under OMB Control No. 0648-0213 are unchanged.
It is anticipated that the information collected will be disseminated to the public or used to
support publicly disseminated information. As explained in the preceding paragraphs, the
information gathered has utility. NMFS will retain control over the information and safeguard it
from improper access, modification, and destruction, consistent with National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) standards for confidentiality, privacy, and electronic
information. See response to Question 10 of this Supporting Statement for more information on
confidentiality and privacy. The information collection is designed to yield data that meet all
applicable information quality guidelines. Prior to dissemination, the information will be
subjected to quality control measures and a pre-dissemination review pursuant to Section 515 of
Public Law 106-554.

7

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological techniques or other forms of
information technology.
All forms and logsheets are available on the NMFS Alaska Region Home Page at
http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/. The forms are fillable for completion on screen, printing, and
submitting to NMFS. The logsheets of the DFLs and DCPLs also may be reviewed on screen
along with individual instructions for completion of each but may not be used for recordkeeping.
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication.
This action describes the integration of existing logbook requirements with the electronic
reporting system, eLandings. Some of the information recorded in the logbooks is also entered
into eLandings. However, the information is not really the same.
For example, a processor enters identification information in the logbook each day. The
processor using eLandings enters identification information only once at registration. Before a
User can use the eLandings system to report landings, production, discard or disposition data, he
or she must request authorization to use the system, reserve a unique UserID, and obtain a
password by using the Internet to complete the eLandings processor registration at
https://[email protected]/elandings/Register. Upon registration acceptance, the User must
print, sign, and submit the User Agreement Form to NMFS/ Restricted Access Management
Program (RAM) eLandings Registration. Confirmation will be e-mailed to indicate that the User
is registered, authorized to use eLandings, and that the UserID and User’s account are enabled.
eLandings autofills the following fields from processor registration records: UserID, processor
company name, business telephone number, e-mail address, port of landing, ADF&G processor
code, and Federal permit number. This is the “identification information” that is recorded daily
on each logbook. Because eLandings identifies the processor, this information is entered only
once in eLandings.
Certain information is recorded only in the logbooks. Certain other information is recorded only
in eLandings.
5. If the collection of information involves small businesses or other small entities, describe
the methods used to minimize burden.
The collection-of-information does not impose a significant impact on small entities.
6. Describe the consequences to the Federal program or policy activities if the collection is
not conducted or is conducted less frequently.
Without this information collection, Federal management of the Alaskan groundfish fisheries
would be severely hampered, resulting in adverse impacts on: (1) the long-term biological
stability and economic yield of the groundfish resource; (2) the efficiency and economic viability
of the domestic groundfish industry; and (3) the credibility of the fishery management process
itself.

8

7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a
manner inconsistent with OMB guidelines.
No inconsistencies occur in this collection.
8. Provide information on the PRA Federal Register Notice that solicited public comments
on the information collection prior to this submission. Summarize the public comments
received in response to that notice and describe the actions taken by the agency in response
to those comments. Describe the efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to
obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of
instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data
elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.
A proposed rule, RIN 0648-AT91, was published on June 29, 2007 (72 FR 35748), requesting
comments from the public. A supplementary proposed rule was published on September 24,
2008 (55368), requesting additional comments from the public. A final rule will be published in
December, 2008.
The comments received and actions taken are listed below:
1. The data entry time limits for trawl and longline catcher/processors, the provision that requires
submission “by noon each day to record the previous day’s discard and disposition information,”
is unworkable. An example of how this reporting deadline is a problem is when a tow or set is
retrieved just before midnight. An observer cannot start monitoring and sampling a tow until it is
being processed, and in some cases an observer’s work shift may end in the morning. This means
that the vessel crew may not know about discard and bycatch estimates until the afternoon of the
day after the previous day’s tow has been retrieved. We request the time limit for when data is
entered in eLandings or the DCPL be changed from “by noon each day to record the previous
day’s discard and disposition information” to “by midnight each day to record the previous day’s
discard and disposition information.”
Response: NMFS revised § 679.5(c)(3) and (c)(4) for trawl, longline, or pot catcher/processors to
change the time limit for data entry in eLandings or the DCPL from “by noon each day to record
the previous day’s discard and disposition information” to “by midnight each day to record the
previous day’s discard and disposition information.”
2. No East or West component is requested in regulations and logbooks when describing position
coordinates in latitude and longitude. The East or West component is necessary to describe both
the beginning position and the end position of gear.
Response: NMFS revised § 679.5(c) to include an East or West component when recording
position.
3. In the logbooks, the space allocated for the date and time of gear retrieval is only big enough
for either the date or the time, but not both, and we request that the logbooks be redesigned to
provide more space to record this information.

9

Response: NMFS will adjust the format of the logbooks at the next printing. No change to the
regulatory text in the proposed rule is needed to respond to this comment.
4. In the daily fishing logbook, clarify what to record for Target Species Code and Estimated
Total Round Catch Weight.
Response: NMFS revised § 679.5(c) to require only a single target species code of the desired
target, to replace ‘estimated total round catch weight’’ with ‘‘total hail weight,’’ and to clarify
that “total hail weight” means the estimated quantity of the entire catch without regard to
individual species.
5. In the daily cumulative production logbook, clarify what to record for the improved
retention/improved utilization (IR/IU) Species Codes and IR/IU Species Weight.
Response: NMFS revised § 679.5(c) to require that a separate line in the logbook be used to
record each and every IR/IU species and that species associated weight.
6. In the daily cumulative production logbook, clarify relationship between Total Haul Weight
and IR/IU weight.
Response: NMFS explained that the transition between older and new NMFS logbooks caused
this confusion. No change to the regulatory text in the proposed rule is needed.
7. Cut all quotas allowed by 50 percent this year and by 10 percent each subsequent year.
Response: NMFS stated that this rule would implement revisions to electronic recordkeeping and
reporting and several miscellaneous adjustments to the regulations at 50 CFR part 679; and that
these revisions have no relationship to the establishment of harvest specifications or the
assignment of quotas or allocations in the North Pacific groundfish fisheries. This comment is
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
8. Establish marine sanctuaries where no ships can go to fish and do it now [sic].
Response: NMFS stated that the proposed rule did not address the establishment of marine
sanctuaries, so this comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking.
9. Get satellite inspections of what these commercial fishing profiteers are actually doing out
there instead of what they tell you they do [sic].
Response: NMFS stated that in 1988, the NOAA Fisheries Office for Law Enforcement (OLE)
embarked on a satellite-based vessel monitoring program using vessel monitoring systems
(VMS). VMS allows the OLE to monitor and survey vessels over vast expanses of open water
while maintaining the confidentiality of fishing positions. NMFS stated that changes to VMS
requirements are outside the scope of the proposed rule, and no changes were made in response
to this comment.

10

10. Commercial fishing is doing damage to the seas and asks NMFS to take remedial action.
Response: NMFS stated that this comment is outside the scope of the proposed rule, and no
changes were made in response to this comment.
9. Explain any decisions to provide payments or gifts to respondents, other than
remuneration of contractors or grantees.
No payment or gift will be provided under this program.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for
assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
The information collected is confidential under section 402(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
also under NOAA Administrative Order (AO) 216-100, which sets forth procedures to protect
confidentiality of fishery statistics.
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual
behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered
private.
This information collection does not involve information of a sensitive nature.
12. Provide an estimate in hours of the burden of the collection of information.
Estimated total unique respondents: 899. Estimated total responses: 89,265, down from 98,441.
Estimated total burden: 39,871 down from 43,332. Estimated total personnel costs (average
wage equivalent to a GS-7 employee in Alaska, including COLA, at $25/hour): $992,034, down
from $1,078,525.
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to the respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection (excluding the value of the burden hours in Question
12 above).
Total estimated miscellaneous costs: $134,701, down from $145,483.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government.
Total estimated burden: 6,287, down from 8,928 hours. Total estimated personnel cost:
$157,193, down from $224,528. Total estimated miscellaneous cost: $10,455, down from
$12,138.
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.
This action revises use of some of the logbooks and forms due to regulatory effectiveness of an
electronic data system, eLandings (see OMB Control No.: 0648-0515). The shoreside processor
DCPL is removed. The mothership and catcher/processor DCPLs are now partially completed in
conjunction with eLandings, but time per response remains the same, based on partial
11

duplication of information with eLandings. Mothership cumulative fish tickets are removed
from this collection, because eLandings creates fish tickets as part of the normal procedure. The
daily production report and weekly production report are removed, because eLandings also
creates daily production reports as part of the normal procedure.
In addition, frequency of responses for DCPLs is corrected based on current regulatory
requirements.
Remove shoreside processor DCPL: decrease of 2,600 responses, 1,352 hours and $130
miscellaneous costs.
Remove mothership or catcher/processor WPR: decrease of 5,184 responses, 1,452 hours, and
$9,504 miscellaneous costs.
Remove shoreside processor WPR: decrease of 468 responses, 131 hours and $1,008
miscellaneous costs.
Remove cumulative mothership ADF&G fish tickets: decrease of 1,332 responses, 773 hours,
and $444 miscellaneous costs.
Mothership DCPL: increase of 68 responses, 35 hours, and no increase in miscellaneous costs.
Catcher/processor trawl gear DCP: increase of 104 responses, 52 hours, and no increase in
miscellaneous costs.
Catcher/processor longline or pot gear DCPL: increase of 236 responses, 160 hours, and no
increase in miscellaneous costs.
Net total decreases: in responses: 9,176; in hours: 3,461; in miscellaneous costs: $11,086.
16. For collections whose results will be published, outline the plans for tabulation and
publication.
The information collected will not be published.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the
information collection, explain the reasons why display would be inappropriate.
In accordance with OMB requirements, the control number and the expiration date of OMB
approval are shown on the forms and logbooks.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 of the
OMB 83-I.
N/A.

12

B.

COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS

This collection does not employ statistical methods.

13