Feedback Survey for Annual Tsunami Warning Communications Test

Forms and Documents

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Feedback Survey for Annual Tsunami Warning Communications Test (conducted by NWS Western Region and West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center)	Form and Instruction	Modified	Available
0539 ss 120308 Part Brev.pdf	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2009-02-02	Available
0539 ss 120308 Part Arev.pdf	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2009-02-02	Available

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
4653	Feedback Survey for Annual Tsunami Warning Communications Test (conducted by NWS Western Region and West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center)	Form and Instruction	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0648-0539	ICR Reference No: 200812-0648-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200603-0648-003
Agency/Subagency: DOC/NOAA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Feedback Survey for Annual Tsunami Warning Communications Test
Type of Information Collection: Extension without change of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 08/20/2009
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/03/2009
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	08/31/2012	36 Months From Approved	08/31/2009
Responses	375	0	460
Time Burden (Hours)	31	0	45
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: To assess the effectiveness of NOAA/National Weather Service's (NWS) Tsunami Warning System, this survey is needed to gather specific feedback following testing of the associated NWS communications systems. Tests are planned annually March/April and September. Post-test feedback will be requested from emergency managers, the media, law enforcement officials, local government agencies/officials, and the general public. This is a web-based survey. Responses will be solicited for a limited period immediately following completion of this test, not to exceed seven days. This web-based survey will allow for efficient collection of information regarding the effectiveness of the Tsunami Warning System.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 109 - 424 3 (1) Name of Law: Tsunami Warning and Education Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	73 FR 55045	09/24/2008
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 5915	02/03/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Feedback Survey for Annual Tsunami Warning Communications Test (conducted by NWS Western Region and West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center)	NA	Tsunami Warning and Communications Test

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	375	460	0	0	-85	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	31	45	0	0	-14	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The original request for approval of this survey was based on NWS’s conducting one Tsunami Warning Communications Test per year. Changes are as follows: • This request for renewal now assumes that NWS (Western Region) will be conducting two such tests per year. • Based on recent test response numbers, the estimated test respondent total has been adjusted downward to 250 from 340, with approximately 125 expected to respond to the first survey and all 250 expected to respond to the second. Thus, a net increase of 35 responses (up from 340 responses expected for one survey per year in the previous request) results in a small increase of 2 hours’ burden for survey responses. • One hundred twenty additional responses and 16 hours originally estimated for follow-up regarding communications/technical problems are now considered not to be needed. Summary: There is an overall decrease in respondents (250, down from 400), responses (375, down from 460) and hours (31, down from 45).

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/03/2009

---